Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Oh, you on mobile? It's probably not displaying correctly.
The Bluening never ended.I guess the Bluening never ends.
Ah, I remember that scene, where pop Ortiz gets 200% mad.
I guess the Bluening never ends.
Oh my god, are we talking about a Undertale X Higurashi crossover?Something like WHERE ARE THE KNIVES would fit very well in Higurashi.
Here, have someDoes anyone have unicorn meat?
I'm feeling cannibal today
Yummy!Here, have some
You have some questionable... tastes.Yummy!
Hey! What doesn't kill me makes me stronger, right?You have some questionable... tastes.
You know what they say: Boys will be boys.You have some questionable... tastes.
.gif)
.gif)
I was gonna say something about that earlier, actually. I stopped taking Game Theory seriously after the "Sans is Ness" theory. Like, really...I just watched Matpat Ace Attorney Game Theory and....
I really didn't like it.
Like, I am normally OK with Matpat video, even if the theory don't make sense or have alot of holes. I still manage to be entertain by the editing and the humor.
But here? God, there is so many error that it's just suck pretty much the rest of the video.
And that's coming from a guy who never played a AA games (Yeah I know, I should be ashame, but that's not the point).
Does he know that the prosecutor does the same **** about evidence? That Gumshoe finded the evidence for Phoenix on Maya case? (Heck, the freaking video SHOW that passage!) That only playing the first game make that he only know very little about the actual universe of AA?
And most important of all:
No point in the video he actually talk about Rise From The Ashes.
This shouldn't be tolerate.
Especially when this freaking case have basically everything that prove that his theory his wronf. (Or atleast alot of them)
This is just...
...Just, dissapointing, did he actually played the whole game before making this video?
Brief, it's just a bad Game Theory to me. I disliked the video and I won't get back on it. Sorry Mat', but this time, you made a mistake.
Don't worry bro, I love Undertale.I was gonna say something about that earlier, actually. I stopped taking Game Theory seriously after the "Sans is Ness" theory. Like, really...
(Pls don't hate me for using an Undertale pic, it fit the situation D: )
Ah, good to see we should be on good terms.Don't worry bro, I love Undertale.
But yeah, his "Sans in Ness" Theory was already a pretty bad one. But I still managed to get some good times with it.
His latest video tough?
Disgusting.
Someone eating his own kind is questionable, no matter how real or imaginary.Proceeds to write angry internet text, rambling over how heartless human beings are, that how they can kill such an innocent and rare creature as that unicorn, completely ignoring the fact that unicorns don't exist.
This is related.
...I'm not fully sure what you're trying to imply here.
It's not even that, it's just that his own logic doesn't work in the AA universe because it's just, well, wrong. Alot of his point are wrong because the game shut his point. (The Maya Case being the most notable of the bunch)Ah, good to see we should be on good terms.
Yeah, some pretty good memes and jokes were made out of that one, at least. I haven't watched the new Game Theory video myself (I'm still playing through Ace Attorney 1 and I'd prefer to avoid spoilers if possible) but I might get the gist of what it's about and...yeah. Sure, Ace Attorney might not be an accurate representation of an actual case in an actual courtroom, but it's a video game. It doesn't need to be 100% accurate.
Said everyone upon seeing Flyer's post?...I'm not fully sure what you're trying to imply here.
At least choose targets that require remote effort to make fun of.
Not to blow your cover... but this news has been floating around for a while. Still shocking though.
I remember hearing that news when I was visiting my relatives in San Francisco.
What do you have to be so rude for?
I said "Boys will be boys," did I not?
But jokes aside, what was this post about?
Well, I wouldn't say it takes much effort to make fun of me, if at all, but I'd welcome it. I'd embrace the title of village idiot.At least choose targets that require remote effort to make fun of.
I was honestly joking. That said, I can't think of anything you're known for, so therefore I cannot make fun of you. Albeit, it'd always be in jest.Well, I wouldn't say it takes much effort to make fun of me, if at all, but I'd welcome it. I'd embrace the title of village idiot.
What I'm saying is, more people should make fun of me, I guess.
I realize you were joking, yes. And about the second thing...you do make a good point there, actually. I'm not really known for anything on these forums.
And yeah. 