Social Smash 4 Social 6.0 - 『ONE YEAR OF SOCIAL 6.0!』

[Morbi]

I wouldn't call myself adhering to any ideology, but I'm more of an agnostic-atheist rather than an outright atheist.

My belief is that there's no way to tell if God exists or not as we lack any kind of irrefutable evidence to back up any claim. We can't tell that God exists, but we can't tell that God doesn't exist either nor do we know if there's one god or multiple gods.

There's no evidence. There are no indicators that help any side of the question. Without evidence, there's no way to back up a premise.

However, I do defend that God, as described in Abrahamic religions (such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam), doesn't exist. Those religions describe God as omnipotent, omniscient, merciful and good. If God is exactly as described, wouldn't he have the power to make this world better? Wouldn't he be benevolent and good-nature to rid the world of its evils? Wouldn't he know the solution to all of this world's problems?

I fail to see why such an all-powerful, benevolent entity would ignore the problems of this world and wouldn't use his might to turn it into something good. Therefore, it stands to reason that God, as an omnipotent, omniscient and benevolent being is something that doesn't make sense from a purely logical point of view.

Therefore, I live my life and form my own opinions with atheism in mind. The God described in those religions doesn't and cannot exist in my own point of view.

Also, I don't intend to debate. You're free to believe in what you think is right. So, whether you agree or disagree with me, let's just leave it at that and respect each other.

I agree wholeheartedly; however, the defense to the issue of evil is that humans were granted free will. So I suppose God is like, "haters gonna hate."

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

I wouldn't call myself adhering to any ideology, but I'm more of an agnostic-atheist rather than an outright atheist.

My belief is that there's no way to tell if God exists or not as we lack any kind of irrefutable evidence to back up any claim. We can't tell that God exists, but we can't tell that God doesn't exist either nor do we know if there's one god or multiple gods.

There's no evidence. There are no indicators that help any side of the question. Without evidence, there's no way to back up a premise.

However, I do defend that God, as described in Abrahamic religions (such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam), doesn't exist. Those religions describe God as omnipotent, omniscient, merciful and good. If God is exactly as described, wouldn't he have the power to make this world better? Wouldn't he be benevolent and good-nature to rid the world of its evils? Wouldn't he know the solution to all of this world's problems?

I fail to see why such an all-powerful, benevolent entity would ignore the problems of this world and wouldn't use his might to turn it into something good. Therefore, it stands to reason that God, as an omnipotent, omniscient and benevolent being is something that doesn't make sense from a purely logical point of view.

Therefore, I live my life and form my own opinions with atheism in mind. The God described in those religions doesn't and cannot exist in my own point of view.

Also, I don't intend to debate. You're free to believe in what you think is right. So, whether you agree or disagree with me, let's just leave it at that and respect each other.

I can't really say I'm religious anymore

But most of the world's problems are caused by man

If man cause problems, it's man's job to fix them

 

[Trick or Treat]

I wouldn't call myself adhering to any ideology, but I'm more of an agnostic-atheist rather than an outright atheist.

My belief is that there's no way to tell if God exists or not as we lack any kind of irrefutable evidence to back up any claim. We can't tell that God exists, but we can't tell that God doesn't exist either nor do we know if there's one god or multiple gods.

There's no evidence. There are no indicators that help any side of the question. Without evidence, there's no way to back up a premise.

However, I do defend that God, as described in Abrahamic religions (such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam), doesn't exist. Those religions describe God as omnipotent, omniscient, merciful and good. If God is exactly as described, wouldn't he have the power to make this world better? Wouldn't he be benevolent and good-nature to rid the world of its evils? Wouldn't he know the solution to all of this world's problems?

I fail to see why such an all-powerful, benevolent entity would ignore the problems of this world and wouldn't use his might to turn it into something good. Therefore, it stands to reason that God, as an omnipotent, omniscient and benevolent being is something that doesn't make sense from a purely logical point of view.

Therefore, I live my life and form my own opinions with atheism in mind. The God described in those religions doesn't and cannot exist in my own point of view.

Also, I don't intend to debate. You're free to believe in what you think is right. So, whether you agree or disagree with me, let's just leave it at that and respect each other.

So, this, basically:

Spoiler

Sort of.

But as you said, not really here to debate. I lretty much agree with everything you said.

And I respect other peoples' beliefs as well.

 

[Morbi]

So, this, basically:

Spoiler

Sort of.

But as you said, not really here to debate. I lretty much agree with everything you said.

And I respect other peoples' beliefs as well.

To be fair, they misuse the definition of Malevolent.

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

How would humanity grow if all our problems were solved for us?

What would we want to achieve if we had everything we wanted?

 

[Blargg888]

Eh, probably not, if that would be a technical issue.

Basically just imagine Nana being "reduced" to the level Luma is.

That way she would work fine in both the 3DS version and 8-player Smash, while still keeping somewhat of a 2-in-1 couples character, of course not to the same extent as in Brawl or Melee, but still

But then what's the point?
Yeah, you have the character back in the game, but they're not the character you played as in Melee/Brawl, they're a knockoff of one of the Newcomers.

My view of this whole thing is that the ICs can come back, but not without being changed in some way. If they do come back, all they will bring is the character.
The experience will be left behind.

But that's just me though.
It's perfectly understandable that people would disagree, but this is just my personal reasoning.

They would not bring anything with them that they had before.
In fact, they would bring even less.

 

[TJ-Works]

Not sure why people confidently pick sides when it comes to religion.

If you're agnostic like me, you sit on the metaphorical bench. Then if a God comes down to declare rapture onto the non-believers, you just jump in with the Theist crowd and get a ticket to heaven.

It's foolproof!




Don't take me seriously.

 

[-crump-]

EDIT
Old news, never mind.
Turns out I'm just a slowpoke.

Mods, you can delete this, if you would.
Or don't. That's fine too.

 

[Deleted member]

From Ice Climbers to whether or not God exists? OK.

 

[Trick or Treat]

But then what's the point?
Yeah, you have the character back in the game, but they're not the character you played as in Melee/Brawl, they're a knockoff of one of the Newcomers.

My view of this whole thing is that the ICs can come back, but not without being changed in some way. If they do come back, all they will bring is the character.
The experience will be left behind.

But that's just me though.
It's perfectly understandable that people would disagree, but this is just my personal reasoning.

They would not bring anything with them that they had before.
In fact, they would bring even less.

I agree with you to an extent. That is why I probably wouldn't like a SoPo.

However, a Luma-fied Nana would still keep something similar to the duo aspect from previous games. I admit it isn't the same, and is undeniably less than a full Nana AI, however I would be much more okay with that than a SoPo or losing them altogether.

 

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

From Ice Climbers to whether or not God exists? OK.

#SocialMondays

That's all that needs to be said

 

[A10theHero]

Hi everyone! How's it going?

I just made a new wallpaper for my phone. It's based on the Smash 4 Album Cover. What do you think?

Spoiler

 

[praline]

Did it happen at work?

Yep.

 

[Morbi]

Not sure why people confidently pick sides when it comes to religion.

If you're agnostic like me, you sit on the metaphorical bench. Then if a God comes down to declare rapture onto the non-believers, you just jump in with the Theist crowd and get a ticket to heaven.

It's foolproof!




Don't take me seriously.

Honestly, that is how you should just approach every dilemma. That way, you can never be wrong. What is the worst that can happen? People call you out on being objective?

 

[Deleted member]

From Ice Climbers to whether or not God exists? OK.

I'd rather not get into the latter.

 

[praline]

What's up people.

 

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

But then what's the point?
Yeah, you have the character back in the game, but they're not the character you played as in Melee/Brawl, they're a knockoff of one of the Newcomers.

My view of this whole thing is that the ICs can come back, but not without being changed in some way. If they do come back, all they will bring is the character.
The experience will be left behind.

But that's just me though.
It's perfectly understandable that people would disagree, but this is just my personal reasoning.

They would not bring anything with them that they had before.
In fact, they would bring even less.

I completely agree. Luma-ing Nana or removing her entirely would completely ruin the Ice Climbers experience, because it just... it wouldn't be the same.

 

[PsychoIncarnate]

I see God as more like a "father" looking down on his creations

He wants them to grow and evolve

So, instead of instantly solving all their problems, which would cause them stagnation

He gives subtle pushes toward the right direction

That way humanity can grow, expand, gain enlightenment

 

[Morbi]

From Ice Climbers to whether or not God exists? OK.

Maybe Ice Climbers are God. We should just ask him wobble all of the evil out of the world!

 

[Deleted member]

I'd rather not get into the latter.

The Ice Climbers are evil though.

 

[TJ-Works]

Honestly, that is how you should just approach every dilemma. That way, you can never be wrong. What is the worst that can happen? People call you out on being objective?

How do you think I make it through life? Having opinions all the time? Pfffffffffft.

Just follow the herd! You can never go wrong if you stick with the majority.

 

[Blargg888]

I agree with you to an extent. That is why I probably wouldn't like a SoPo.

However, a Luma-fied Nana would still keep something similar to the duo aspect from previous games. I admit it isn't the same, and is undeniably less than a full Nana AI, however I would be much more okay with that than a SoPo or losing them altogether.

I SoPose that makes sense.


I'm just saying that I, personally, would like the ICs to be the ICs as they were.
Kinda like Mewtwo, Roy, and Lucas.
(Mewtwo is still floaty, Roy is still a Marthy clone, Lucas is still Lucas)

Even Ryu is made to be "Like he was" in SF.

 

[Benishigure]

tfw some random loser changes the topic out of nowhere

Anyways so I was playing that Agario game 2 nights ago and good lord it was pissing me off so much lmao but I managed to snag a spot on the leaderboard for a few minutes. :^)

also good morning sisters~

 

[EmceeEspio]

I'd rather not get into the latter.

This entirely.

You people DO NOT want to see me get defensive. Quite frankly neither do I.

I prefer to keep the conversation off my faith around those who I don't know the religious beliefs of, or know that they disagree and keep it at a level of respect.

 

[Knuckles the Knuckles]

I believe, so whatevs. As long as we can respect one anothers views and not be dinguses to each other, its cool.

 

[-crump-]

Oh, jeez. Are we seriously talking about religion..?

As a religious person, I think that's my cue to abandon thread and wait for someone to change the subject.

 

[TJ-Works]

I believe, so whatevs. As long as we can respect one anothers views and not be dinguses to each other, its cool.

We don't live in that world.

I really wish we do, believe me. But we're a minority in this world.

 

[praline]

Can we like... Not talk about religion?

 

[EmceeEspio]

Oh, jeez. Are we seriously talking about religion..?

As a religious person, I think that's my cue to abandon thread and wait for someone to change the subject.

This entirely.

Again.

 

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

Tag me back in when the religion subject is over.

As a non-believer, I'd feel like a target to you religious people

 

[RamOne]

Anyone read some good books recently?

 

[Trick or Treat]

I completely agree. Luma-ing Nana or removing her entirely would completely ruin the Ice Climbers experience, because it just... it wouldn't be the same.

I disagree.

It wouldn't be the same, you're right. But it wouldn't ruin it either. And I am someone who adored them in the previous games. I would be perfectly okay with Popo and Luma.

I SoPose that makes sense.


I'm just saying that I, personally, would like the ICs to be the ICs as they were.
Kinda like Mewtwo, Roy, and Lucas.
(Mewtwo is still floaty, Roy is still a Marthy clone, Lucas is still Lucas)

Even Ryu is made to be "Like he was" in SF.

I was kind of hoping they would have changed Roy a little more, but I do like how they changed a few things at least.

I see God as more like a "father" looking down on his creations

He wants them to grow and evolve

So, instead of instantly solving all their problems, which would cause them stagnation

He gives subtle pushes toward the right direction

That way humanity can grow, expand, gain enlightenment

At the cost of how many innocent lives, livelihoods, and disasters?

That's like a parent letting their pet die because it was their child's responsibility to feed or take care of it, to teach them the consequences. ;P

 

[praline]

Tag me too. I made my own religion so I don't care about religion talk.

 

[Still~Wolf]

religion and opinion talk?
thats quite a change from our usual circle of topics.
im... somewhat impressed, but these are kinda dangerous topics.

sup though guys.

Anyone read some good books recently?

sadly nah, but i should get back into reading.

 

[Deleted member]

This entirely.

You people DO NOT want to see me get defensive. Quite frankly neither do I.

I prefer to keep the conversation off my faith around those who I don't know the religious beliefs of, or know that they disagree and keep it at a level of respect.

Yeah, exactly. This is why I generally don't talk about religion.

I do respect other people's views though.

 

[Deleted member]

Anyone read some good books recently?

Seeing as how school started for me today, I'll be reading Hamlet soon. At present though, not really.

 

[TJ-Works]

Let's talk Pokemon.

Anyone read some good books recently?

I'm not much of a book reader. I'm a visual person, so graphic novels and manga is my choice of books.

 

[RamOne]

Currently reading through Stephen King's It. It's good, although the chapter I'm currently on is a huge ordeal.

 

[Trick or Treat]

Also if God does exist I have already secured my spot in hell. So that would be bad.

Again, to clarify, I respect everyone else's beliefs and I hope you all do the same.

 

[Benishigure]

Completely random question but if I were to set up a Cards Against Humanity game on Xyzzy this weekend, would anyone be interested?