btw @
Litt
I don't think @
Mervis
is even being that critical ("I think all this really has going for it is the mixup, which is really inline with what most Samus players do.") You don't have to be so defensive all the time ^^
That looks sort of useful.... not useful, applicable or viable, just sort of, trying to demarcate a tech before he even explored it just from looking at it
It's a mixup and and extension of ftilt pressure... there are mutilple uses for this other than just one mix up option or solely for ftilt pressure... something he shouldnt be stating as fact, which is what he wants everyone to read it as.
although I don't think it extends as long as you would think.... "I dont think"... ok well you are wrong and you should think more... another negative part of his post instead of asking if it would by requesting frame data of its speed...
"as long as you would think"... I was the one who put this tech forward... I know how long it extends, and he again is just trying to downplay the application just so people "think" he knows what he is talking about by talking in declarations.
"How many frames is the turnaround, because I feel like a fox or falcon could punish pretty easily".... oh please tell me how punishable this tech is Mr. Unnecessarily Critical... wait so the turn around is further than a wavedash away and you and jump/wavedash during it to evade punishment during the turn around so its completely noncommittal...
"The distance seems nice but I feel like 2 wavedashes comes out just as fast if not faster. I can't really say for certain though because I don't know frame data." ... The distance seems nice... thats another way of saying... well you tried but im pretty sure 2 wavedashes are just as good... but i dunno the data so dont quote me on it... How about asking if 2 wavedashes would compensate for the distance... Since you already admit to not knowing the data or being an expert on this...
"I think all this really has going for it is the mixup"... Oh thank you for your elementary critque of a tech you already stated you don't completely understand or can compare the data you claim is comparable to the tech ....
So no 343 I think Mervis was unnecessarily critical and spoke about this coming from a place in which he actually knew what he was talking about, despite not even testing it himself just watching the video and threw up what he thought about it... so my post was to give him a heads up, to actually think about what you say before you say it, and watch what you critique, especially when you don't know your ****.... which is not defensiveness its just asking for legitimate critiques from players that have valid options after research and experience of testing said tech, I could give a crap about a 2 second look at the video and them tossing up their negative opinion of it just so they can talk about something and feel they contributed