But don't you have the belief to immediately lynch the protective claim due to the many options Mafia has tomorrow, marshy?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
i omgus'd kevin because i thought his voting me out of nowhere was a joke. do you think it's scummy for me to not fully elaborate on my thought process regarding mcfox? are you against the riddle lynch because you're distrusting of the people who were on his wagon (me steel and kevin) or because you think he's town? or some kind of combination?FoS Marshy for randomly throwing out "XY dead yet?" nonsense and his OMGUS vote. Can't see this being any helpful for town.
it really bothers me that people are trusting of mcfox. i think you and cacti have both said that you guys believe mcfox to be town. maybe gheb has too. why?The only people I have town reads on at the moment are Frozenflame and Mcfox. I still need to see more from everyone else.
i take it you mean wifom by "many options"?But don't you have the belief to immediately lynch the protective claim due to the many options Mafia has tomorrow, marshy?
what do you mean by avoiding discussion?However, I'm still not sure why not Marshy...he's been unhelpful the whole time and now seems to avoid discussion after being mentioned by mentos and somebody else as potential scum.
The reasons I'm not trusting the people on the Riddle wagon is mostly due to their weak reasons for their votes. As for Riddle himself ... him pushing the Cacti lynch is a bit too much in my book and as you said post 556 show why he's not clear at all. What I really dislike about Riddle are his REASONS to push the Cacti lynch. Why not just go by Kevin/mentos' simple and effective logic? Instead he tries to pressure him when he has already a lot of votes and nobody is against a Cacti lynch except frozen ... that really seems over-the-topish by Riddle.i omgus'd kevin because i thought his voting me out of nowhere was a joke. do you think it's scummy for me to not fully elaborate on my thought process regarding mcfox? are you against the riddle lynch because you're distrusting of the people who were on his wagon (me steel and kevin) or because you think he's town? or some kind of combination?
If I ever said that I trust McFox then I officially take it back. I don't see why people see him clear either.it really bothers me that people are trusting of mcfox. i think you and cacti have both said that you guys believe mcfox to be town. maybe gheb has too. why?
The fact that you need to be called suspicious by AT LEAST 3 people before you even attempt to post something as substantial as this post. Is it really necessary that 3 people or more agree that lynching you isn't bad to have you post something of substance?what do you mean by avoiding discussion?
That too but up to now he didn't respond to my points either. I still want this point answered though.Marshy, I believe he's referring to the comments me and Kevin have made that it strikes a strange chord that you've said in other games that protective roles should be lynched as soon as they claim, but have yet to suggest Cacti being lynched, or explain why it is a different situation which makes you stay off.
Specific examples? Your behaviour in its entirety is an example of how to push a scumtell beyond any limit. You keep on pushing for a Cacti lynch? Newsflash: Cacti WILL be lynched toDay there's no need to pressure him, when he's @ L-2 (now L-1) and nobody except one person disagrees with the Cacti lynch (and maybe frozen even changed his mind by now). Your pushing for the Cacti lynch has no purpose.In response to my "over-the-topish-ness" and my bad reasoning, I would like specific examples (Gheb).
Fair enough.Actually, I probably won't come up with a "scumlist" before deadline. I don't really see the point. The lynch for today is basically set, and tomorrow we'll have brand-new information to go off of anyway. I don't see the advantage of me throwing out a scumlist that would be tenuous-at-best right now anyway.
Well Okay then. Why is this scummy? Wouldn't scum want to avoid attention? I redally just can't help but push for lynches I feel strongly enough. It doesn't feel okay with me to just sit and watch it happen. If Cacti flips town I realize that wll put suspicion on me but I'm not ever going to sit and let someone who I find scummy get lynched while I sit back.Specific examples? Your behaviour in its entirety is an example of how to push a scumtell beyond any limit. You keep on pushing for a Cacti lynch? Newsflash: Cacti WILL be lynched toDay there's no need to pressure him, when he's @ L-2 (now L-1) and nobody except one person disagrees with the Cacti lynch (and maybe frozen even changed his mind by now). Your pushing for the Cacti lynch has no purpose.
That's over the top in my book.
Fair enough.
Marshy for sure if he flips scum and if he flips town too I guess. Either way scum-marshy would be more hesitant to push Cacti's lynch even after he claimed a protective role. Honestly the fact that MArshy didn't vote Cacti immediately makes me very suspicious. And yes I know this has been brought up by several people.Gheb said:I'd like to know from EVERYBODY:
Who are your suspects depending on Cacti's flip? Who's suspicious if Cacti flips town/scum?
I bet at least one scum is throwing people under the bus. However, the people I think we need to look at are people that joined the wagon late (scum realizing lynch was inevitable) and people not on it all.Gheb said:Do you think that scum was throwing Cacti under the bus or should we focus on people, who didn't vote him or didn't push for his lynch?
Marshy for reasons both others and me have pointed out.Gheb said:]Is there anybody else scummy to you regardless of Cacti's flip?
Yeah, just answer the questions.Gheb said:If you think it's better for you to not answer these questions I can understand that because it could give scum a good idea on whom they should kill N1 but I think it would be helpful for all players to know your position and stuff. At least Cacti can answer those questions without having to worry about the NK so at least he should answer those questions...
Not too sure at the moment in terms of specific alignement.Who are your suspects depending on Cacti's flip? Who's suspicious if Cacti flips town/scum?
Ehh...possibly to a no. I'm really unsure, since I don't think mafia would claim two roles at the same time. For all we know, Cacti could be an indie.Do you think that scum was throwing Cacti under the bus or should we focus on people, who didn't vote him or didn't push for his lynch?
All the people that's on Marshy's grill for not aggressivly voting Cacti cause he claimed protect role. It's basically stupid reasoning. If Mentosman didn't unvote a person that claimed doctor or vig, does this mean he's scum? If KevinM doesn't agressivly/pressure votes someone (which he actually havn't as far as I seen), does this mean KevinM is scummy? These things hold little weight by themselves. For all I know, Marshy COULD be maf, but to use these arguments against him is pretty much fluff.Is there anybody else scummy to you regardless of Cacti's flip?
Contridict much?Scum: Anybody not on his bandwagon, especially you because there have been some connections drawn between you two today.
I bet at least one scum is throwing people under the bus. However, the people I think we need to look at are people that joined the wagon late (scum realizing lynch was inevitable) and people not on it all.
No. my point is this the first place to look for scum is the people not on the bandwagon. I really doubt that all of the maf threw Nick under the bus if he's scum. However, since this is a small game I might be over-estimating the number of scum. Either way, I think late bandwagoners with weak reasoning are quite possibly scum.Contridict much?
Wouldn't town want to avoid arguing with WIFOM like you do just now? Do you realize that this is EXACTLY why Cacti is going to die toDay?Well Okay then. Why is this scummy? Wouldn't scum want to avoid attention?
That's not what you said. This is what you said:No. my point is this the first place to look for scum is the people not on the bandwagon. I really doubt that all of the maf threw Nick under the bus if he's scum. However, since this is a small game I might be over-estimating the number of scum. Either way, I think late bandwagoners with weak reasoning are quite possibly scum.
You're sure that at least one scumbag is on the Cacti wagon but you still insist on looking at the people who didn't vote him. You need to elaborate on that because your response @ Rockin isn't sufficient. You just confirmed the thoughts you posted the previous post but didn't actually show how you didn't contradict yourself.I bet at least one scum is throwing people under the bus. However, the people I think we need to look at are people that joined the wagon late (scum realizing lynch was inevitable) and people not on it all.
We are getting ahead of ourselves anyways. Let's wait to see Cacti's flip before we have this argument.Wouldn't town want to avoid arguing with WIFOM like you do just now? Do you realize that this is EXACTLY why Cacti is going to die toDay?
That's not what you said. This is what you said:
You're sure that at least one scumbag is on the Cacti wagon but you still insist on looking at the people who didn't vote him. You need to elaborate on that because your response @ Rockin isn't sufficient. You just confirmed the thoughts you posted the previous post but didn't actually show how you didn't contradict yourself.