Roys amazing
Smash Cadet
yeah i think so! But Ikes on there.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Roy.. Was in to promote his game in japan, If it werent for Roy, Marth (would have had less of a chance, but still would have a chance) wouldnt have been in. FE Would never have been brought to America, we wouldent have Marth in brawl. Roy may not have been a good character, but he set the way for alot of things.Roy sucks horribly. He's a bad character and never should have been playable in Smash.
No seriously, he's a terrible character in FE6 (from Japan on the GBA). There is nothing really remarkable about him that really is deserving of a place in Smash. The reason Marth is in, he's the first FE lord. Win. Reason Ike can be in? He made internationally TWICE, and he's an excellent character in both FE9 and FE10, which are on the GCN and Wii respectively.
That's not true at all. If it weren't for Roy we would've had Sigurd! Roy's game was never brought to America in the first place and was only advertised in Japan. And it was largely Marth's popularity that brought them over, not Roy's. If Sigurd had gotten in instead, we may have had Marth's remake sooner, instead of getting a prequel to Roy's game. Don't ever try to bundle Roy and Marth together, be it in terms of popularity, series importance, ect. Marth is leagues above Roy in the Fire Emblem world.Roy.. Was in to promote his game in japan, If it werent for Roy, Marth (would have had less of a chance, but still would have a chance) wouldnt have been in. FE Would never have been brought to America, we wouldent have Marth in brawl. Roy may not have been a good character, but he set the way for alot of things.
Ike is better IMO more of a diffrence. less of a clone. way cooler.
dude, youre just here to spam and ***** about roy's exclusion. go send your hate to sakurai. gtfo and let the marth forums keep its reputation for having intelligent members, unlike yourself.Blah Blah Blah
Im Not Bundleing Roy and Marth's popularity together at all. Roy helped bring FE to America.That's not true at all. If it weren't for Roy we would've had Sigurd! Roy's game was never brought to America in the first place and was only advertised in Japan. And it was largely Marth's popularity that brought them over, not Roy's. If Sigurd had gotten in instead, we may have had Marth's remake sooner, instead of getting a prequel to Roy's game. Don't ever try to bundle Roy and Marth together, be it in terms of popularity, series importance, ect. Marth is leagues above Roy in the Fire Emblem world.
P.S. Stop making these threads everywhere.
If theres a SSB4. ofcourse, the disapointment with the roster may lead Sakurai (or somebody else? Like a right hand man?) To make a SSB4. they already know it'd sellI don't think they should have kept Roy as he was. Then again, there are fun times to play as Roy, and there are components that make him pretty cool, such as the final effect of his Flare Blade. However, I think it was mainly due to the fact that his game wasn't too popular, and nor was he. But if they really go all out with characters in SSB4, I won't throw a tantrum if I see Roy again.
Well actually it goes more like this.Im Not Bundleing Roy and Marth's popularity together at all. Roy helped bring FE to America.
I explained above. and I'll do a shorter version now.
Roy = In for promotion (In Japan, out of Japan, who cares he was in to promote)
Marth = In with Roy.
Marth and Roy in SSBM = SSBM was released in america, with *** only FE Characters.
These Characters were really popular (The Truth is, Roy is/was popular among the casuals. smashboards isnt the entire world y'know) = FE Games in America.
Roy = Helped FE come to Amercia (So did marth)
That = Had Marth in Brawl, because FE was more popular.
You said it. Amen.Roy sucks horribly. He's a bad character and never should have been playable in Smash.
No seriously, he's a terrible character in FE6 (from Japan on the GBA). There is nothing really remarkable about him that really is deserving of a place in Smash. The reason Marth is in, he's the first FE lord. Win. Reason Ike can be in? He made internationally TWICE, and he's an excellent character in both FE9 and FE10, which are on the GCN and Wii respectively.
Because you touch yourself at night.Why not?
Roys pretty good?
Um, no. You unlocked Roy by beating Classic with Marth, so Marth came first. Marth was the original Fire Emblem lord, and Roy wasn't even in a game before Melee. And why would Marth return then instead of Roy?wasnt Roy the main character and Marth the clone. I remember it was sorta like that in the FE series in japan too
actualy roy was very popular among the 'noobs' and his game was 3rd most selling fe game with about 500k. What if sigurd was the clone? would u hate sigurd just like u hate roy? i dont see why u hate roy that much cuz he did look pretty cool although it was a mistake to release his game after melee came out. it was a big risk that they shouldnt have taken.Because you touch yourself at night.
Seriously, Roy was an unpopular clone that nobody really knew beforehand anyway. He wasn't important to his series either. You should feel very lucky he was even in Melee. And this isn't a Roy forum.
may God/Nintendo hear you, may they heayou (hell whit, bow users, swordsmans, thiefs, sages, shamans, axes, mankamutes, lagus, pegasus/wirens, holy weapons... in the FE saga, it should be easy (not to mention, i would have the chance to kick *** whit sigurd)).....
I woulnt mind a FE smash bros.
3 words for you:
IKE IS ROY!