xianfeng
Smash Hero
Yes and some serious.Isn't Roy popular among non-serious players?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yes and some serious.Isn't Roy popular among non-serious players?
Same here.Yeah i \want roy to stta , hell he is the reason i start playing FE
Actually, Marth's sword is more the Rapier-like of the two. Roy's Sword of Seals is a two handed sword, which could easly make a whole diffrent moveset. But I agree with you nonetheless.How is his popularity the only thing allowing him to come back? Roy is very significant to the FE series. He is also better than the vast majority of other FE characters. Most people just look at him and see that he has a sword and that he is a clone. But guess what. You can't use a broadsword the same way you would use a rapier. There was no reason for Roy and Marth to attack the same. They seem to have gotten that message with Link.
He popular among non-serious players, which far outnumbers serious Smashers.Actually, Marth's sword is more the Rapier-like of the two. Roy's Sword of Seals is a two handed sword, which could easly make a whole diffrent moveset. But I agree with you nonetheless.
Well, Roy isn't actually very populair by serious players. His counterpart Marth is just way better than him. Which is a waste, because Roy actally is a fun character to play as.
I know that the Sword of Seals is a broad sword. The Falchion is the rapier. I never said it was the other way around.Actually, Marth's sword is more the Rapier-like of the two. Roy's Sword of Seals is a two handed sword, which could easly make a whole diffrent moveset. But I agree with you nonetheless.
Well, Roy isn't actually very populair by serious players. His counterpart Marth is just way better than him. Which is a waste, because Roy actally is a fun character to play as.
Yeah true. But the majorty of serious players main Marth, and even many of the non-serious do. Just search for a thread called: "Who do you primarly use?" in the Melee discussion. There's a poll in there, and almost 50% of the votes go to Marth.He popular among non-serious players, which far outnumbers serious Smashers.
Or FE 1, and 3.Nobody grew up playing FE 6 when they were a kid.
Lol, well of course not in America. The Japanese gamers will be pretty pissed if they get rid of Marth in SSBB. Marth is actually ALOT more popular in Japan than he is here, and not because of his apearance in SSBM. I'm sure Marth will return, not really because of the american popularity but the Japanese, and it really would'nt make any sense for them to get rid of Marth in the American version of Smash... that would be very stupid on nintendos part.Or FE 1, and 3.
Considering that FE6 was released only 4 years ago (2002), I think it's FAR too soon for that anyway - and that goes double for every FE title since. And since when were Doctor Mario, Falco, Sheik, and the Ice Climbers LEGENDARY? It's all a matter of opinion... Also, I happen to play Roy and I am a "serious" Smash player.I know a bunch of "non serious" smash players and they aaaall like Roy, but I'm sure if they put a another FE character thats better than Roy they will forget aaaall about him. You have to understand, most of these casual gamers that play smash don't look at Roy as a "Fire Emblem 6 Roy" to them Roy is just a cool looking kid with a fire sword. Nobody grew up playing FE 6 when they were a kid. every other Nintendo character in SSBM is legendary, exept Roy...... and Pichu.
But he's unpopular by serious and japanese FE players which outnumbers other FE players, FE fans are more important than smash fans in terms of FE characters one would assume..He popular among non-serious players, which far outnumbers serious Smashers.
I agree with all of that especially the fire partAs for Roy, while I'd hate to see him leave as he was one of my favourite characters in melee (I don't care if Marth is superior in every way, Roy has fire), his chances of returning are slim.
Falco WAS in Starfox on nes and on the 64 verision and although he was not playable, he still played a very memorable role in the Starfox games. Shiek is not a legend, Zelda is(Legend of ZeldaConsidering that FE6 was released only 4 years ago (2002), I think it's FAR too soon for that anyway - and that goes double for every FE title since. And since when were Doctor Mario, Falco, Sheik, and the Ice Climbers LEGENDARY? It's all a matter of opinion... Also, I happen to play Roy and I am a "serious" Smash player.
That's because Lyn is from the most important FE game released outside of Japan and is more unique than Roy, she better represents FE to the western world.It would seem judging by the other threads aswell that people want Lynn to replace Roy. I personally would like to see them both.
You mean SNESFalco WAS in Starfox on nes
Yes Falco was on Starfox since the beginning (on the SNES, not the NES BTW), but so were Slippy and Peppy - niether of which seem get any credit even though Falco's equally worthless (yes, in the actual Starfox games, he sucks...). At any rate, despite his rabid fanbase, the fact remains that Falco is nothing more than a support character who doesn't quite merit the title of "Legend." And I was referring to the Sheik alter-ego, not Zelda herself. At any rate, I will admit that Roy is fairly likely to leave, but I still get annoyed how people keep lumping him together with Pichu, Doc, and Y. Link - unlike those 3 he's NOT a filler character - no more than Falco or Ganondorf (from a mechanics standpoint, not character significance). Oh well. I would like Roy to return, but I suppose we'll just have to wait and see...Falco WAS in Starfox on nes and on the 64 verision and although he was not playable, he still played a very memorable role in the Starfox games. Shiek is not a legend, Zelda is(Legend of Zelda). Doc & ICs aren't legends though, ya got me on those 2. I play Roy also, but I wouldn't care to much if he was gone. I guess it is a matter of opinion like you say.
Woah, woah, woah there xianfeng... The Japanese FE fanbase would take that statement as a declaration of war, considering that's probably the LEAST liked FE title over there... I'll admit it is important in the fact that it was the first international release, but pretty much EVERY FE title with the possible exceptions of FE5, FE6, and FE8. And the only factors that Lyn has as far as "uniqueness" over Roy is that she is a female Lord and that she just so happens to fire a bow from time to time...That's because Lyn is from the 2nd most important FE game and is more unique than Roy, she better represents FE to the western world.
Maybe in your little world Xianfeng. You're gonna need some links to prove that one.That's because Lyn is from the 2nd most important FE game and is more unique than Roy, she better represents FE to the western world.
I see it like this.Maybe in your little world Xianfeng. You're gonna need some links to prove that one.
And Lyn would just be a fancy Link...becuase she uses a bow and sword. Not very unique there.![]()
Dont mean to be rude but.I see it like this.
1. FE1 - First game
2. FE7 - First worldwide game
3. FE4 - "Best" game
4. FE9 - First 3D game
Eh blame Nintendo, it's just another thing they stuffed up.FE7 is overrated. No seriously, it may be the first world wide Fire Emlbem, but comparing to FE6... I find the story to be rather medicore. It's pretty confusing actually, Roy got his hands on the Divine weapons to, but they never mentioned that Eliwood used the Durandal... Nor you'd ever heard of the Black Fang, Nergal and various other things in FE6. FE7 is a good game, but it's story is pretty confusing... I don't think you can see it as a "real" prequel to FE6 story wise.
That's the way of the true swordman. I don't think in the Middle Age swordmans swapped between sword and bow. They used just a sword. And since Fire Emblem is mostly based on European medieval stories, Marth's moves are simply great. 100% sword moves with a stylish manga twist.I think Marth and Roy are really really boring I mean all they do is slash with their swords, nothing special.
How could you say that's boring they actually spiced up melee come on think about it if it wasnt for those secret characters and there looks then we would be talking about whos gonna leave from fire emblem think about it for awhile. any way they need to give roy his sheath, they could get rid of him for a cool axe person from fire emblem and i didnt know that Roys game came out in america can someone tell me where i could buy it?Eh blame Nintendo, it's just another thing they stuffed up.
I think Marth and Roy are really really boring I mean all they do is slash with their swords, nothing special.
Roy's game never came to America. However, there is a translated ROM out there that you can play.How could you say that's boring they actually spiced up melee come on think about it if it wasnt for those secret characters and there looks then we would be talking about whos gonna leave from fire emblem think about it for awhile. any way they need to give roy his sheath, they could get rid of him for a cool axe person from fire emblem and i didnt know that Roys game came out in america can someone tell me where i could buy it?
There you go blaming Nintendo again... And it was developed by Intelligent Systems, a second party company of Nintendo, but NOT Nintendo itself.Eh blame Nintendo, it's just another thing they stuffed up.
I think Marth and Roy are really really boring I mean all they do is slash with their swords, nothing special.
I suppose he would be, if he used it how Marth and Roy use their swords, it's just not quirky, SSB is a quirky game. Hector's fighting style is supposed to be self taught and wild so I don't think it would be as boring as Marth and Roy's were. I mean their moves wereAnd now you're dissing Marth AS WELL as Roy?! Just because they only use swords?! Jeez... Hector only uses an axe, does that make him boring? You and you're bloody double standards...
I thought they were first party, that's why I blamed Nintendo.There you go blaming Nintendo again... And it was developed by Intelligent Systems, a second party company of Nintendo, but NOT Nintendo itself.
I know I just like quirky characters.GenG said:That's the way of the true swordman. I don't think in the Middle Age swordmans swapped between sword and bow. They used just a sword. And since Fire Emblem is mostly based on European medieval stories, Marth's moves are simply great. 100% sword moves with a stylish manga twist.
That's a terrible oversimplification of thier movesets... and their B > is the best in the game with all the different combinations you could utilize... Though I will admit that self-taught styles are always interesting.I suppose he would be, if he used it how Marth and Roy use their swords, it's just not quirky, SSB is a quirky game. Hector's fighting style is supposed to be self taught and wild so I don't think it would be as boring as Marth and Roy's were. I mean their moves were
B - Hold Sword over head then smash it down
B > - thrust sword foward repeatidly
B ^ - Thrust sword upwards
B v - Hold sword downwards
Hector would swing more and be more rough and choppy sorta more interesting than that, so would Ike...
Just lighten up on Nintendo a bit, at least they're getting back on the right track...I thought they were first party, that's why I blamed Nintendo.
Nothing wrong with that.I know I just like quirky characters.
Kid Icarus is awesome. Therefore, Pit is as well altough his captain N version was meh. I only watched the show for Eggplant Wizard(also from Kid Icarus ^_^) and King HippoUGGHH... i don't like pit... he reminds me of missonaries...
ooookkay, your kinda creepn' me out there... :nerd:Pit and Roy BOTH rock!! *drools* But I like Roy more!! =O *huggles Roy plushie* Oh, and Hail-Nekoyasha rocks too xD Yay for Marth abuse!!!