"I'm not even a big Roy supporter, but your reasoning is bias."
"I'm by no means a fanboy. That would be you Louie G. You are a Chrom fanboy. You're in denial"
Fixed.
What makes Chrom likely? Oh yeah MUH RECENCY. Roy's pretty recent too, you know. Roy is more important to Fire Emblem than Chrom, whether the past or present. Roy's been in at least 3 games, INCLUDING CHROMS!!! So yeah, Roy would have more merit as a potential return than Chomp would as a newcomer.
I also have everybody agreeing with me on this issue, including Habanero, Super Brawler, and others. The only one who is not... is you.
Now, I'm going to attempt to have a civil discussion with you on this.
As far as the first part of your statement goes, you are essentially claiming that, "all Chrom supporters are vicious to Roy supporters and claim he's the greatest thing since sliced bread, and act like Roy never existed," correct? If this is in fact what you're saying, and I'm going to come from a completely unbiased position here, but I believe that the reverse is equally (or even more) true. Around here at least, someone can barely even bring up including Chrom over Roy before being heckled by those saying "you only like him for Muh Recency" or other such things. If anything, the Roy "fanboys" are more...fiery, for lack of a better word, than the Chrom "fanboys." Just from my observations, though. Now, if we were to go to, let's say, Youtube or Gamefaqs, the reverse may be true, but then again, these places are usually cesspools when it comes to speculation, minus the occasional diamonds in the rough.
Now, as far as your claim goes that "Chrom would have no moveset potential/he'd have to be a clone," there's not much to base that on. Both Chrom and Roy can have perfectly fine and unique movesets if enough effort was put into them. Roy? Creating pillars of fire and slashy fire swordplay. Chrom? Possible stance-switching mechanic using the Falchion and the spear, shifting in playstyle as the fight goes on, as well as a healing factor. Both of those sound pretty cool, don't you think? Conversely, both can also be made into clones/semi-clones, where Roy plays like Marth, and Chrom plays like Ike. As you can see, depending on the creativity that Sakurai can offer, the tides can turn in multiple ways. And considering Sakurai's probably not going to go too overboard on semi-clones, I can definitely see whichever third Fire Emblem character as being unique. It just takes a little faith in Sakurai.
Now, one thing that I definitely think Chrom has over Roy is marketability. While getting in just through recency is not exactly good speculation, it goes a bit deeper. Sakurai actually goes to Intelligent Systems for Fire Emblem character suggestions, if Ike's inclusion story is anything to go by. Now, if he were to ask, I'd be pretty sure they'd want the poster boy of their newest successful game to be playable alongside Marth and Ike more so than they would Roy. Just my personal belief, though. I will say, though, that you knocking Chrom for only being in one game is a bit silly, considering he only appeared in the latest game, so logically he'd only be in one so far. Not that it means much, but the Arena Ferox stage on the 3DS is at least worth a mention, I think.
Plus, he's pretty popular to boot. Now admittedly, Roy has some more popularity when it comes to Smash, but if you look at the Top 10 character selection polls for Super Smash Bros. 4, Chrom is usually sitting in the Top 10 alongside Roy, showing that he does, indeed, have popularity. Even Fire Emblem fans like him, judging from the poll that ManlySpirit had going. Admittedly, he pales in comparison to Ike on that poll, but then again, every Fire Emblem character does.
That doesn't mean they can't coexist.
Basically, that's what I have to say on the matter. If you wish to reply, just please make it civil. I'm willing to accept that public apology you gave everyone, so long as you're civil. I await your reply.