Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Said character being a last minute clone of Mario and generally being stuck in limbo since.If Sakurai wanted to keep the Mario series at solely the main four he wouldn't have planned to include a fifth Mario character twice...
Roster contest?This is decidedly different than the roster I have in the roster contest.
Regardless, if Sakurai thought the Mario series should be limited to the four most prominent characters and no others, he wouldn't have even included him in the first place, clone or not. And he certainly wouldn't have attempted to add him again. It's possible we don't get another Mario character this time, but it wouldn't be because Sakurai thought the series to be limited to what it had in Brawl.Said character being a last minute clone of Mario and generally being stuck in limbo since.
This and Isaac over Shulk.@Louie G
Good roster! I'd only advocate for cutting Ghirahim. I'd also consider keeping Lucario, and adding another FE character (Ike being the best choice).
Didn't he also say he felt that making a Dr. Mario costume wouldn't be enough?If Sakurai wanted to keep the Mario series at solely the main four he wouldn't have planned to include a fifth Mario character twice...
I find it odd why he wanted to bring back Dr. Mario, but not Pichu or Young Link, though.Regardless, if Sakurai thought the Mario series should be limited to the four most prominent characters and no others, he wouldn't have even included him in the first place, clone or not. And he certainly wouldn't have attempted to add him again. It's possible we don't get another Mario character this time, but it wouldn't be because Sakurai thought the series to be limited to what it had in Brawl.
Well who else is going to patch up the wounds after each fight?I find it odd why he wanted to bring back Dr. Mario, but not Pichu or Young Link, though.
I believe his reasoning was it would be strange that Dr. Mario was shooting fireballs instead of Megavitamins.Didn't he also say he felt that making a Dr. Mario costume wouldn't be enough?
Young Link is pretty understandable with the addition of Toon Link, that's really the only case of one character actually replacing another, and considering he wanted to include Pokemon Trainer, Lucario, Jigglypuff, Mewtwo, and possibly Plusle and Minun (and obv Pikachu) over Pichu, it's not that surprising he didn't even bother with him. He was very poorly received in Melee anyway.I find it odd why he wanted to bring back Dr. Mario, but not Pichu or Young Link, though.
----
I find it odd that this was the thing that Sakurai considered strange; not a man of medicine beating the snot out of people. Guess Doc went to the same school of medicine as Team Fortress's Medic.I believe his reasoning was it would be strange that Dr. Mario was shooting fireballs instead of Megavitamins.
No, Bowser Jr. is going to be a full-fledged clone of Bowser.Guys, guys.
We all know Doc Mario isn't happening since Paper Mario is taking the spot of Mario semi-clone.
Unless he has the Shadow Mario transform and then he can be both.No, Bowser Jr. is going to be a full-fledged clone of Bowser.
A MARIO AND A BOWSER CLONE. JUST WHAT WE NEED.Unless he has the Shadow Mario transform and then he can be both.
Kirby is a semi-clone of every character including transformations .Unless he has the Shadow Mario transform and then he can be both.
Da best!A MARIO AND A BOWSER CLONE. JUST WHAT WE NEED.
It'd be funny if he actually were instead of just one move.Kirby is a semi-clone of every character including transformations .
What if he copied items .It'd be funny if he actually were instead of just one move.
Maybe using more of an mechanic inspired by Kirby Superstar where instead of copying one move there would be more of a move set to utilize.It'd be funny if he actually were instead of just one move.
Who says this?So...
Am I the only one who is getting a bit sick and tired of people bemoaning the fact that it's unfair that Super Smash Bros. doesn't allow third parties to have an equal representation?
No.So...
Am I the only one who is getting a bit sick and tired of people bemoaning the fact that it's unfair that Super Smash Bros. doesn't allow third parties to have an equal representation?
Today: Supporter in the Shadow the Hedgehog thread. I'm not my nicest in that thread, but feel free to read it. There's a few suggestions that he'd be a great addition and they should let more sonic characters in.Who says this?
That's another thing. If we get two third-parties and keep the originals even up to Smash 5 most companies are represented.I think one 3rd party character per company is a good principle to go by.
I hate to say it but you're going to be frowned upon a good majority of the users here for that post.I think: rob, snake, lucas, ike, wolf, lucario and pkm trainer, will be out but Zoroark, Krystal and another Fire Emblem character will be in, maybe another pkm trainer generation...
Oh god. Third parties should be 1 per company, no exceptions. Sonic is the most deserving franchise in Smash to have multiple characters? coughmarioandpokemoncough.Today: Supporter in the Shadow the Hedgehog thread. I'm not my nicest in that thread, but feel free to read it. There's a few suggestions that he'd be a great addition and they should let more sonic characters in.
I've seen it in a few places; usually third party support threads, Sonic character threads tend to be worse, but once or twice in other threads around this section of the forum.
I would think it's very very strange, but I guess I wouldn't be upset. I don't really have an attachment to either character. I get more excited for new Nintendo characters in SSB more than any 3rd party.New question, What would be your reaction if Bayonetta gets in over Sonic?
I agree. I didn't really care for Sonic, and I don't really care for Bayonetta, but I would be shocked if that happened. Sonic is legendary. He shouldn't be replaced by someone lesser than him.I would think it's very very strange, but I guess I wouldn't be upset. I don't really have an attachment to either character. I get more excited for new Nintendo characters in SSB more than any 3rd party.
Sakurai said he wont just let any 3rd party in his game, having included Sonic, snake, and now Megaman, all three legends and icons of video games. Although never directly stated, I feel it's implied that third parties have to be a VERY BIG DEAL if they are to be considered.It does not always have to be about Legendary status.