BluePikmin11
Akko is my dear daughter!
If any of you guys played both S&P games in full (I only played the sequel, looked and played quite much better than it's predecessor from the S&P64 videos I saw), Which S&P was better?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
If I remember correctly, who every is in the main role is a silent protagonist in the GS series. Isaac, Felix, and Matthew. I don't remember if you switch back to him from Felix by the end TLA, but yeah, I guess he did speak.Actually Isaac spoke several times....
Now we get to the insulting, yipee. Plus that argument of yours doesn't support your theory of Roy being added in later. For all you could know they planned to have Roy and planned to have him as a clone. And on top of that you are treating your theory as a fact when it isn't, theory =/= fact. You have no way of knowing for sure or not they added Roy as a last minuete thing he could have just as easily been planned from the get-go as a clone, or had been added as an advertisment for the next FE game to be released and due to that become a clone. Until you can actually prove with a link where Sakurai said so himself, I'm not conviced that was the full reason of Roy getting added. And don't bring the BS common sense argument you did earlier with the President as it can actually be proved that the current President of the USA is Obama, and to prove that point http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama http://www.biography.com/people/barack-obama-12782369 http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/president-obama/Has it ever occurred to you that Roy WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN IN MELEE IF SAKURAI DIDN'T DECIDE TO ADD CLONES?!?
No seriously, do you even think before you make an argument?
If there weren't any clones, Marth would be the only Fire Emblem character in Melee. Rendering the "latest character" argument completely null and void.
There have been several interviews dude.Now we get to the insulting, yipee. Plus that argument of yours doesn't support your theory of Roy being added in later. For all you could know they planned to have Roy and planned to have him as a clone. And on top of that you are treating your theory as a fact when it isn't, theory =/= fact. You have no way of knowing for sure or not they added Roy as a last minuete thing he could have just as easily been planned from the get-go as a clone, or had been added as an advertisment for the next FE game to be released and due to that become a clone. Until you can actually prove with a link where Sakurai said so himself, I'm not conviced that was the full reason of Roy getting added. And don't bring the BS common sense argument you did earlier with the President as it can actually be proved that the current President of the USA is Obama, and to prove that point http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama http://www.biography.com/people/bar...hitehouse.gov/administration/president-obama/
and all of that is proof of him being the President of the USA thus making it more common sense then your theory which cannot be proven. However if you continue with the insults I probably won't end up replying to your post next time, so please keep that in mind.
I really liked the gameplay S&P2, maybe it was because I played too much KI:U.Isaac also speaks a lot in Golden Sun: The Lost Age since he isn't the lead character anymore.
As for S&P, obviously S&P2 is gameplay wise a lot better. (But I didn't quite like the fact that you were constantly in the air as the S&P2 cast, I preferred Saki/Airan's jumping). Plus S&P2 has a lot better villains.
S&P2 is to me superior in every way...except leading role. :D I like Kachi and Airan almost equally, Kachi is a bit more "moe" while Airan was... I guess supposed to be on the slightly sexy side (dem trianglez)
If he wants to prove me wrong then he needs to provide the actual link the will prove me wrong. I have no qualms with being wrong, as long as there is actual proof that I am wrong. And from the way he worded his arguments he made it sound like there weren't interviews of it anyway. But again it's his job to prove me wrong that Roy was added in last minuete by providing the link the proves it. I'm not going to go looking for it my self when I have no reason to. ._.There have been several interviews dude.
Check the resources thread.
http://www.smashboards.com/threads/new-smash-bros-for-wiiu.304894/page-2675#post-14462546If he wants to prove me wrong then he needs to provide the actual link the will prove me wrong. I have no qualms with being wrong, as long as there is actual proof that I am wrong. And from the way he worded his arguments he made it sound like there weren't interviews of it anyway. But again it's his job to prove me wrong that Roy was added in last minuete by providing the link the proves it. I'm not going to go looking for it my self when I have no reason to. ._.
I don't either it's just an endless game of tennis, just shooting two equally good reasons back in forth. The only problem I'm facing that ISN'T agreeable is the reasons NOT to have Matthew/Issac.I don't want to get TOO (emotionally) involved in the MatthewXisaac debate, but if it were all about advertising... Shouldn't we have gotten the 4th gen Pokemon Trainer instead of the 1st gen one?
And notice Sakurai himself said that to inclide new pokemon character he goes over to the Pokemon company to ask "what's hot". If someting as generic as the Pokemon Trainer had plenty of "icon power" left, I don't see why Isaac wouldn't. (Despite of course the fact that Isaac and Matthew are pretty much the same, except name and fashion sense).
Yeah, not ALL clones were late additions. I can't stand Clone Nazis discrediting the major importance of these characters JUST because they are clones. They even make up lies about them. (Not saying you are clone nazi.)http://www.smashboards.com/threads/new-smash-bros-for-wiiu.304894/page-2675#post-14462546
Roy was a late addition like all clones.
He was one of the latest actually.
Well, potentially. I remain unconvinced that popularity among Smash fans will do anything for Roy this time around, as it certainly didn't save him in Brawl.And smash fans.
Smash fans have a say as well.
That's why Roy has a decent chance as far as the west in concerned.
I'm still fairly new here. So what common knowledge for everyone here probably isn't for me.He's not providing a link because it's common knowledge, atleast here.
And that was all he had to do, he didn't have to insult me or anything, just provide a link for me. Nonetheless, thank you for proving me wrong and allowing me to learn something new.http://www.smashboards.com/threads/new-smash-bros-for-wiiu.304894/page-2675#post-14462546
Roy was a late addition like all clones.
He was one of the latest actually.
In Melee, they kinda were. They only clone that wasn't added late was Luig and calling him a clone is kinda iffy.Yeah, not ALL clones were late additions.
When he and Mewtwo are the most wanted characters in Japan, then Sakurai will probably AT LEAST consider Roy. Besides, in Japan, Roy is an incredibly popular lord in FE as well.Well, potentially. I remain unconvinced that popularity among Smash fans will do anything for Roy this time around, as it certainly didn't save him in Brawl.
Eh. That's just Golden. He's kinda grouchy at times, but he's a good guy when it comes down to it.And that was all he had to do, he didn't have to insult me or anything, just provide a link for me. Nonetheless, thank you for proving me wrong and allowing me to learn something new.
Really it's just a Roy vs Chrom debate when it comes to a third FE spot.Oh, Roy will be considered for inclusion for sure. I've never doubted that for a second.
Marth is in for sure. Ike won't be cut for Roy, and certainly is not a likely candidate for replacement even if Sakurai considers an Awakening rep. He could be cut, but I don't think that he'd go easily.Really it's just a Roy vs Chrom debate when it comes to a third FE spot.
Both stand on equal ground. I just personally think that Roy should be prioritized because of his veteran status and fan demand.
That's all assuming Marth and Ike stay, which I think they will.
This. Some recent users, (not all. Most are honestly acceptable) are coming up with these dumb reasons, either because they already know that the bigger reasons (such as the "too big" argument) have been shot down.Eh. That's just Golden. He's kinda grouchy at times, but he's a good guy when it comes down to it.
He's just a bit cranky because we have a LOT of stupid people with stupid reasoning around right now. It's frustrating a lot of members here. Myself included.
but then they just start being stubborn and create more nonsense
I wasn't trying to actually create a dumb reason, I honestly didn't know about that stuff with Melee. And I admitted I was wrongwhen I was provided with that link. I didn't mean to create trouble. D:This. Some recent users, (not all. Most are honestly acceptable) are coming up with these dumb reasons, either because they already know that the bigger reasons (such as the "too big" argument) have been shot down.
It's incredibly annoying when somebody gives reasons that are absolutely garbage and can be immediately shot down, but then they just start being stubborn and create more nonsense
Don't worry. I wasn't referring to you .I wasn't trying to actually create a dumb reason, I honestly didn't know about that stuff with Melee. And I admitted I was wrongwhen I was provided with that link. I didn't mean to create trouble. D:
Oh no. We weren't talking about you.I wasn't trying to actually create a dumb reason, I honestly didn't know about that stuff with Melee. And I admitted I was wrongwhen I was provided with that link. I didn't mean to create trouble. D:
Like the Skyward Zelda discussion. That was just ***.This. Some recent users, (not all. Most are honestly acceptable) are coming up with these dumb reasons, either because they already know that the bigger reasons (such as the "too big" argument) have been shot down.
It's incredibly annoying when somebody gives reasons that are absolutely garbage and can be immediately shot down, but then they just start being stubborn and create more nonsense
Awakening DLC isn't so much a reboot as it is a spin off. I say if you're going to add Roy, at least be loyal to FE6. That design is half credited to the awakening mercenary concept.Ganondorf is WAY cooler fighting with his fists. See here is the thing I LIKE clones. I think they are cool.
Also the whole Mewtwo & Roy coming back. Mewtwo is DEFINITELY coming back. Sakurai has hinted at it quite an awful lot. Plus Mewtwo isn't just a Pok'emon. He is a CHARACTER in the series, like Prof. Oak or Giovanna. He is probably the most requested character of all time.
As for Roy, not having THIS:
as a playable character would be INCREDIBLY dissapointing. This new reboot of Roy only makes him 100 times more wanted than ever before.
Moreso the Ike clone BS. That is a perfect example of ignorance or flat out trolling. It doesn't take a genius to realize that they aren't clones.Like the Skyward Zelda discussion. That was just ***.
Or Dr. Mario being his own series.
and Ike being a F***ing clone of Marth?????????
I cannot agree to using the design of the original Binding Blade game than that bad*** design. That design of Roy....................may be the coolest looking person I have EVER seen.Awakening DLC isn't so much a reboot as it is a spin off. I say if you're going to add Roy, at least be loyal to FE6. That design is half credited to the awakening mercenary concept.
I would have liked that post if it honestly wasn't for that first statement.Ganondorf is WAY cooler fighting with his fists. See here is the thing I LIKE clones. I think they are cool.
Woah dude.I would have liked that post if it honestly wasn't for that first statement.
I mean, you like clones? The idea of having two extremely similar characters is more favorable to you than two different ones? The sign of a lack of effort to make a character unique is more interesting to you than an individual moveset? Of all the things I've heard people say about Smash Bros., liking it when a character is a clone is by far the most bizarre.
I bet you lay there at night wishing Jigglypuff was more like Kirby.
You win. Not just for the reference but your avatar is awesome and Baccano! is an awesome anime/show.Game of Clones?
I feel that way with most of the characters claimed to be clones. Like the Starfox trio in Brawl. so many people claim Falco and wolf to be clones of Fox, moreso with Wolf but still even calling Falco a semi-clone is being a bit generous. First of all they all play differently, Fox is most about combos, Falco seems to be chain grabs and getting people off the stage to spike them, and Wolf is all about spacing. Not to mention all their differences in attacks. While for Specials the only thing Wolf has in common is the reflector and names of the specials, but the rest have different animantions, work differently, or both. for Falco he has a bit more in common but his blaster and reflector still work differently making it to where even calling him a semi-clone is being considerably generous. At least to me.Moreso the Ike clone BS. That is a perfect example of ignorance or flat out trolling. It doesn't take a genius to realize that they aren't clones.
That's why I included that reference to the fact that if a character shares ONE move with another character, they're a clone? Nonsense.
That would mean more than half the roster is a clone of another character.
In Melee, if I wanted to play with Pikachu's moveset, I would play as Pikachu, not Pichu. Same with Dr. Mario. Same with Falco.What is the problem with clones anyway????
I think I can vouch for the both of us when I say those people just want to watch the world burn.People INSIST Sakurai will remove Falco, Ganondorf, and Lucas/Ness because they are "Clones"
He wants to add a character, but there isn't enough time to develop and balance a unique moveset. Because of time constraints, the only choices left become either dropping them entirely or making them a slight tweak from someone else's moveset. Hence, clones are born out as a lesser-evil, not greater-good.Okay, if Sakurai doesn't want clones/semi-clones, WHY DOES HE ALWAYS MAKE SEMI-CLONES.
Ah, tradition. One of the most popular buzzwords used by those that refuse to give up nostalgia. The antithesis of change and the unwillingness to experiment. Primarily said to justify having more of the same of something despite it not adding to the core of a game, regardless of how little it actually serves purpose in a game. This isn't much of an argument if "tradition" is seriously what you're going to rely on as a legitimate point now.For those of you Clone Nazis with no intelligence left, Clones/Semi-Clones are a TRADITION
Oh, definitely.Yeah, Falco is DEFINITELY going to be replaced with Krystal because he is a clone.
Clone Nazi talk.In Melee, if I wanted to play with Pikachu's moveset, I would play as Pikachu, not Pichu. Same with Dr. Mario. Same with Falco.
Yes, Robert. I'm sure that's a totally understandable reason. Once again you deny any GOOD reason for there to be clone characters. DO YOU HAVE A SOURCE FOR THIS!?!?!?He wants to add a character, but there isn't enough time to develop and balance a unique moveset. Because of time constraints, the only choices left become either dropping them entirely or making them a slight tweak from someone else's moveset. Hence, clones are born out as a lesser-evil, not greater-good.
So now you're implying Sakurai has no intention to add semi-clones in the next game. Yep having Semi-clones isn't sakurai thought was a good idea. He just ALWAYS has semi-clones because he lacks creativity. You see he-............................I'm sorry I have to stop a moment and laugh before I continue thisAh, tradition. One of the most popular buzzwords used by those that refuse to give up nostalgia. The antithesis of change and the unwillingness to experiment. Primarily said to justify having more of the same of something despite it not adding to the core of a game, regardless of how little it actually serves purpose in a game. This isn't much of an argument if "tradition" is seriously what you're going to rely on as a legitimate point now.
Yes, Falco (one of the most famous and loved Star Fox characters and Smash characters of all time.) will be replaced by KRYSTAL! Because Falco's Forward 'B' move is the same. Guess Luigi will be replaced with Toad as well because He shares some of Mario's moves. Yeah, if Falco was to be replaced because of similar moves, the time he took to program Wolf would have been used to replace Falco with Krystal instead had it been that important (Which it's not.)Oh, definitely.
That's my sarcastic way of saying I completely agree with your point that he won't be.
What talk about total douche bag. I guess you are a new level of Clone-Nazi. Instead of insisting clones not be in SSB you go around trolling people because they like semi-clones. I don't follow you around b****ing that you want Ridley to be in SSB, why? Because I don't care what you LIKE or WANT. A person can't like a character having similar moves, but with a unique twist? What is your problem.I would have liked that post if it honestly wasn't for that first statement.
I mean, you like clones? The idea of having two extremely similar characters is more favorable to you than two different ones? The sign of a lack of effort to make a character unique is more interesting to you than an individual moveset? Of all the things I've heard people say about Smash Bros., liking it when a character is a clone is by far the most bizarre.
I bet you lay there at night wishing Jigglypuff was more like Kirby.