The **** is your point? I have Dr. Mario so what? I don't have Dr. Mario and Nurse Peach. So how is just Dr. Mario too much?
...what about Wind Waker HD???????????
Because she isn't a SECOND INCARNATION FROM THE SAME SERIES. Reading is a good thing to do before replying.
I wanted clarification for the first point. Toon Zelda is too much...what? It's a run-on sentence, at least the way I'm reading it. Like...She's too much to add to the game, or she's too much of a *****. Not just "too much."
Do you think Toon Link would have gotten the same courtesy if there WASN'T Wind Waker HD? Maybe so, but I
do think that big releases play a part in characters.
Why are you suddenly putting a limit on the number of incarnations a series can have? This is an unwritten rule that you just made up because you don't like the way it looks.
Toon Zelda: Why that ***** isn't getting in Smash.
1. At that point, a second incarnation of Ganondorf is obligatory (most likely Toon).
2. Zelda already has a second incarnation, 2 more would be unnecessary.
3. This character is difficult to develop as she is actually 2 characters (as opposed to one).
4. This character might require Sakurai to design a fanfiction-esque character (Toon Sheik) if his ideals haven't changed.
5. Zelda already has 5 representatives; at this point, many believe that number to be saturating.
6. If Toon Zelda is implemented, Zelda would have a staggering 7 representatives despite many proclaiming that 5 was too much.
7. Toon Link's return wasn't well-received.
Just some circumstantial notions.
Dr. Mario actually has Smash relevance and he is easy to develop, so the point is moot.
Dixie is a VERY important character in Donkey Kong, Toon Zelda doesn't compare to that importance (mostly pertaining to playable status). He does love incarnations, trust me, he isn't being hypocritical.
1. I don't believe so. At least Toon Link and Toon Zelda have a height difference and are of different eras; Toon Ganondorf is
literally just Ganondorf of a different art style.
2. It's not about necessity. I want to play as Tetra because I like her and I think she's a cool, and EASILY imporant enough Zelda character.
3. You could say the same about whether or not Pokemon Trainer returns. It's not a character specific argument.
4. That's possible. But it would be as dumb as Baby Daisy.
5. Sheik isn't a representative. It's a part of Zelda herself. It's "representing" the same idea.
6. I don't think people will ever complain about having "too many" characters in SSB.
7. It was half and half. I was happy. And even if others weren't, who cares? He's still an important Nintendo character, incarnation or not. That's what matters.
Pichu also has Smash relevance and easy to develop, as does possibly Roy. I'm not arguing about how easy the character is to be made, just the possible priority of the character themselves.
Dixie is, I think, most definitely a more important Nintendo character than Toon Zelda or Tetra. But all I'm talking about is Zelda getting new characters at all. I think Tetra/Toon Zelda is at the top of that.
Argue with me on these basis: I think Tetra/Toon Zelda has the best shot of any Zelda newcomer, if there is one. I myself think she's the BEST new Zelda newcomer we could have. The fact that she is an incarnation of another character doesn't matter.