Curious Villager
Puzzles...
Wow, I missed a lot since I went off for that interview today.....
Granted its Young Link we are talking about but still....
Granted its Young Link we are talking about but still....
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Everyone loves that guy!Wow, I missed a lot since I went off for that interview today.....
Granted its Young Link we are talking about but still....
Well he is the Hero of Time!Everyone loves that guy!
Considering the amount of time developing a character takes, I doubt he has many pre-planned characters (and we already have four confirmed). He will probably start developing ballot characters in October, possibly even earlier. He doesn't have time to bring back all veterans (and we still have more popular ones like Wolf and Snake left).He probably has a load of characters pre-planned, and given that Sakurai wants to make veteran fans happy with Lucas and Mewtwo, he might do the same with other veterans, like Young Link, given the many ways he could get considered.
This is the only good idea I read today about getting Young Link...Would be interesting if they could implement young link as a skin for toon link? Like all the different bowser junior skins.
You're only further proving my point.- Just because people like a game does not necessarily translate into character popularity. WFT sold millions, yet nobody supported her. Chrom ended up with a split fan base despite selling well too.
Still a veteran that people want to come back, and you know Sakurai knows the pain of cutting characters that people mained.2 - True, he's a veterain, but one of the least supported ones, second only to Pichu. Check out this thread, and you see where veteran status is held highly he's struggling to get a 5% approval to disproval rating. Compared to many characters, that's not very good.
I will agree on this, but it's also possible that he can revamp his moveset a little so that he can least give Young Link a not-so-similar playstyle to Toon Link and give him a new appeal.3 - While I don't have a counter to that popularity, it is entirety possible Sakurai thinks that Toon Link is a good enough successor to Young Link.
I'm just pointing out that there are existing fanbases that would buy his inclusion, not necessarily saying that the demand is high.4 - The Zelda fan base seems to want many other characters. Many are sick of having two clones, one of which comes from a different franchisee. Tetra, Vaati, Ganon, Impa, Tingle, etc. are typically more supported among Zelda fans than him.
He's already an established character in Smash already, he doesn't have to go through criteria in which Chrom had to be in.My question is if Sakurai will even attempt to bring him back. Remember what he said about Chrom. He considered him, but felt that he added to little and chose Robin instead. He has a president of skipping over characters he has no interest in, even after considering them. With Toon Link acting as a replacement, he might not want to work again.
Didn't the guys who made Mario Kart 8 wanted make the game more balanced though, I'm sure they are comparable to a somewhat good extent, but not fully.Responding to FalKoopa's points, unlike in Maro Kart, a Smash Brother character is significantly more work. They require little balancing and not nearly as many animations. The two are not nearly comparable.
He does have one legiitmate reason to come back for some people, and that reason is him being a veteran that people want to come back so they can main him again. He's not completely redundant in reality.It's pointless because Young Link and toon Link might as well be the same person for all the difference it makes. They both were in for the purpose of representing an important aspect of the LoZ franchise- Child Links. As Toon Link is here, ergo Young Link has no reason to be in and thus is redundant.
Of course he does have all the time in the world to bring back all veterans though, he's no longer in a state where he has a limited amount of characters to bring back or add and create a load of features for two versions of the game. This is the time where he can make said characters who people mained before and make them satisfied again.He doesn't have time to bring back all veterans (and we still have more popular ones like Wolf and Snake left).
He's currently working on at least three characters, three months are remaing until the ballot ends, after which he probably starts working on ballot characters, do you seriously think that he has time to bring back ICs, Wolf, Snake, Squirtle, Ivysaur, Pichu and Young Link? That's seven characters, five of which are unique, and ICs have the 3DS issue.Of course he does have all the time in the world to bring back all veterans though, he's no longer in a state where he has a limited amount of characters to bring back or add and create a load of features for two versions of the game. This is the time where he can make said characters who people mained before and make them satisfied again.
Yes, he doesn't have a whole game and roster to make, which is a big layoff of time. He doesn't have to worry about it anymore and he can focus on character that have been cut in other Smash games. I'm very certain that is enough time. Really the only iffy veterans are IC themselves with 3DS limitations, but that's another topic.He's currently working on at least three characters, three months are remaing until the ballot ends, after which he probably starts working on ballot characters, do you seriously think that he has time to bring back ICs, Wolf, Snake, Squirtle, Ivysaur, Pichu and Young Link? That's seven characters, five of which are unique, and ICs have the 3DS issue.
We don't know if he is focusing on cut veterans. We are getting a non-veteran pre-ballot character (Ryu), he might not be the only one, and my edited post mentions the possiblity of DLC stages, modes and more costumes.Yes, he doesn't have a whole game and roster to make, which is a big layoff of time. He doesn't have to worry about it anymore and he can focus on character that have been cut in other Smash games. I'm very certain that is enough time. Really the only iffy veterans are IC themselves with 3DS limitations, but that's another topic.
But him mentioning how cutting veterans can be painful is a sign towards this, moreso than the ballot contenders themselves because he's specifically talks about veterans.We don't know if he is focusing on cut veterans. We are getting a non-veteran pre-ballot character (Ryu), he might not be the only one, and my edited post mentions the possiblity of DLC stages, modes and more costumes.
I did not say it's a wall against YL's inclusion, I meant it's a wall against including all veterans. And yes, Sakurai's statement could be sign towards that, but it's not certain.But him mentioning how cutting veterans can be painful is a sign towards this, moreso than the ballot contenders themselves because he's specifically talks about veterans.
And yeah other content is possible, but I could say the same thing with all other characters too, that's not a wall to YL's inclusion.
If time constraints is what you're referring to, I already told you that it's not much of a case with DLC.I did not say it's a wall against YL's inclusion, I meant it's a wall against including all veterans. And yes, Sakurai's statement could be sign towards that, but it's not certain.
Having a ballot asking fans which character would they like to see in Smash and then concentrating on bringing all veterans back over popular ballot newcomers would make the whole ballot redundant.If time constraints is what you're referring to, I already told you that it's not much of a case with DLC.
And it certainly feels a lot more certain than expecting the majority of the characters to be popular choices, at least he's talking about a specific type of character when it came to interviewing Sakurai. If Sakurai said he would be adding specifically popular characters for DLC, then I would be expecting more of that to happen, but it's not the specific case.
He's probably going to at least answer a few of the ballot suggestions to consider, but I see the rest of the choices being made by Sakurai himself.Having a ballot asking fans which character would they like to see in Smash and then concentrating on bringing all veterans back over popular ballot newcomers would make the whole ballot redundant.
And your evidence to support this assumption?He's probably going to at least answer a few of the ballot suggestions to consider, but I see the rest of the choices being made by Sakurai himself.
He can't really prove it its just an assumption, but knowing what Sakurai is going to do is up to SakuraiAnd your evidence to support this assumption?
None as of yet, other than him saying he hasn't picked a unique newcomer strictly based on popularity in one interview I read and his variety on newcomer choices most of them being not the most popular suggestions.And your evidence to support this assumption?
But that was for the main roster, was it not?None as of yet, other than him saying he hasn't picked a unique newcomer strictly based on popularity in one interview I read and his variety on newcomer choices most of them being not the most popular suggestions.
The veterans are popular choices even though Young Link doesn't have the highest ratio he'll sellBut that was for the main roster, was it not?
DLC is fundamentally different from the main game. Each individual piece of content created must have enough appeal to sell on its own, without the backup of an entire game. That's why popularity is arguably more important than ever, because popular characters can sell. Characters that won't sell as well are weaker choices for DLC.
Popularity's a factor when it comes to optional content, though. Why take a massive risk on a character with lukewarm reception whose moveset potential is limited when there are so many other compelling options?None as of yet, other than him saying he hasn't picked a unique newcomer strictly based on popularity in one interview I read and his variety on newcomer choices most of them being not the most popular suggestions.
If you're saying that he's guarenteed sales just for being a Smash DLC character and he'll be recognized for his veteran status, then there really isn't much going for him that'll give him a bigger impact than the two characters we already got and are getting.The veterans are popular choices even though Young Link doesn't have the highest ratio he'll sell
Just because a character is a veteran doesn't guarantee them popularity. It's true that almost all the veterans are popular choices, but Young Link is not.The veterans are popular choices even though Young Link doesn't have the highest ratio he'll sell
He might be biased towards Young Link. What makes me think that?If you're saying that he's guarenteed sales just for being a Smash DLC character and he'll be recognized for his veteran status, then there really isn't much going for him that'll give him a bigger impact than the two characters we already got and are getting.
Young Link
Chance: 95%
I was going to leave this alone, but this particular line grabbed my attention.If done right it certainly can, even Mario Kart 8 does it with Dry Bowser, Tanooki Mario, and Cat Peach.
Sakurai is known to make unpopular characters look like attracting choices to play as, and that also can be a selling point into buying a character.
Well no, just going by vet status is not really valid but, he had TWO very popular games sell (Ocarina of Time & Majora's Mask 3D)If you're saying that he's guarenteed sales just for being a Smash DLC character and he'll be recognized for his veteran status, then there really isn't much going for him that'll give him a bigger impact than the two characters we already got and are getting.
Two words: muh relevancy.Well no, just going by vet status is not really valid but, he had TWO very popular games sell (Ocarina of Time & Majora's Mask 3D)
Wha?Two words: muh relevancy.
I'm gonna ask this.Well no, just going by vet status is not really valid but, he had TWO very popular games sell (Ocarina of Time & Majora's Mask 3D)
Uuuuh,.....My mind has drawn a blank l:lI'm gonna ask this.
For anyone who HASN'T played melee and saw .
The kids who got into Zelda BY OoT & MM 3D over the past 5 years, or even got in around the time of Twilight Princess and fairly recently fell in love by the remakes.
Who of them aren't going to see & and think that the character that they really liked from that game is already in... twice?
Quite frankly Young Link being a veteran from the Zelda is enough appeal to sell really. You just don't see it.But that was for the main roster, was it not?
DLC is fundamentally different from the main game. Each individual piece of content created must have enough appeal to sell on its own, without the backup of an entire game. That's why popularity is arguably more important than ever, because popular characters can sell. Characters that won't sell as well are weaker choices for DLC.
Because he's the only character who currently has no standout-characteristics from his clone.But why would Young Link get special treatment? The DLC characters that have been confirmed so far were both heavily requested, whereas Young Link is barely a blip on the radar. Mewtwo and Lucas also had the benefit of not being full clones originally, and therefore not feeling redundant next to anyone we currently have. And so why would the developers get invested enough in a character with low popularity that they'd have to spend as much time revamping as a newcomer in order to justify adding him, and still risk there being a lack of interest in him?
I'm not saying it couldn't happen...but it doesn't seem all that likely.
It's not a risk as long as it's a Smash Bros. character, it's going to sell well, likely not as well as the others, but still a pretty notable amount.Popularity's a factor when it comes to optional content, though. Why take a massive risk on a character with lukewarm reception whose moveset potential is limited when there are so many other compelling options?
Again, no reason to be a villain again. :YHe might be biased towards Young Link. What makes me think that?
This:
Yeah I know already, but it's an example of how you can make less hype things sell well. If it was sold separately it would not have sold as well.I was going to leave this alone, but this particular line grabbed my attention.
Nobody bought MK8's DLC for Dry Bowser or the his and her furry cosplay set. They weren't even the marketed characters. The DLC sold because it's Link and Animal Crossing characters and that said characters came with four whole new cups.
Far less people would of thrown money at it if Dry Bowser, Cat Peach and Tanooki Mario had come in their own set, especially without any courses. These characters were only welcomed because they came with frankly 'better' characters. Given the choice between Cat Peach and Tanooki Mario in a pack with Link or Diddy Kong and Bowser Jr in a pack with Link, most people would pick the latter option.
With that said; Young Link would be marketed alone, because Smash characters take a lot of time to make in comparison to Mario Kart models.
The two can't really be compared since they're working on different sales types.
It's a logic fallacy coined by the Smash speculation community. But it can extend to many other things too. By pointing out that Young Link would sell just because OoT3D & MM3D were really popular, you're saying that a character's appearance in recent games discounts them from a wide margin over satisfying other factors along with that (uniqueness, iconicity, etc.)Wha?
Let's calm down here, I know he probably isn't really logical of Nintendo and Smash, but you shouldn't give him a hard time here.It's a logic fallacy coined by the Smash speculation community. But it can extend to many other things too. By pointing out that Young Link would sell just because OoT3D & MM3D were really popular, you're saying that a character's appearance in recent games discounts them from a wide margin over satisfying other factors along with that (uniqueness, iconicity, etc.)
You Young Link supporters are really giving me a tough sale here.
but we havent had any bundles for just characters announced. Now you're adding to ANOTHER variable into the mix :/It would highly logical to bundle Young Link with another character so the sales go well for him. I honestly don't get why people say it's a bad option, even the DLC costumes in Smash Bros do it too, why shouldn't characters too?
you're guilty of it as well. this is very snarky. even if you dont intend it, anyone you are calling a villain doesnt intend it either.Quite frankly Young Link being a veteran from the Zelda is enough appeal to sell really. You just don't see it.
You're contradicting yourself. You say that Young Link has enough appeal to sell, while also acknowledging that Young Link would need a revamp or a bundle to sell best.Quite frankly Young Link being a veteran from the Zelda is enough appeal to sell really. You just don't see it.
Yeah I know already, but it's an example of how you can make less hype things sell well. If it was sold separately it would not have sold as well.
It would highly logical to bundle Young Link with another character so the sales go well for him. I honestly don't get why people say it's a bad option, even the DLC costumes in Smash Bros do it too, why shouldn't characters too?
Well at the end of the day its really up to the mastermind to decide what DLC characters would be added while there are factors you have to look for most of the time it wouldn't even matterYou're contradicting yourself. You say that Young Link has enough appeal to sell, while also acknowledging that Young Link would need a revamp or a bundle to sell best.
And honestly, all this talk of bundles and revamps... These are just excuses to add Young Link, a way of justifying his inclusion while dancing around the fundamental problems.
You say it's highly logical to bundle Young Link for him to sell well. But it's highly illogical to add a DLC character that won't sell well to begin with.