You don't need to rate how much you want a character as that is optional, but if you are going to discuss a character and have time to do so, make sure you discuss and vote for how likely he/she/it is during the discussion and voting phase for the character up (or if failing that, giving out a vote in likelihood and explaining it during the voting phase, although do be aware that the character during the voting phase is not the main character being discussed, so debates must cease during the voting phase). Also make sure to explain why you gave the likelihood rating you did (explaining how much you want a character is optional and not required, if you want to use the want system, just put in a letter grade). You did that with King K. Rool this phase, so all you have to do tomorrow along with others who did explain their thoughts for King K. Rool's likeliness is use the letter grade system to vote for K. Rool's likelihood from your interpretation of his chances.
Also, we are using the letter grade system for wants and likelihood. Number votes for wants and likelihood will not be counted, no exceptions.
Ok, so If I am understanding this correctly, now that everyone has had a chance to say their fill about K. Rool, it's time to re-vote him with newly opened eyes?
If that's the case, yesterday, I would have voted him a B, but today, after seeing a lot of convincing arguments, I would probably raise that to a B+.
Do I put in 5 more votes because it is a new day?
if so,
Ray 01 (Custom Robo)
Ridley
Shy Guy
Original Pokemon Trainer
Funky Kong
Sorry, I thought I was clear on the rules when I read the first page, but it seems I am bad at this @.@ I will get the hang of it.
EDIT
oh you edited that post right above me, good, I am even clearer now
I think I will rate how much I want to see Ridley in the next Smash an S
Samus is the only character from the original 12 to not get a second representative from her series yet, and captain falcon has been a secret character. (although I do hope we get more from F zero) Zamus does not count as a second representative, it is still samus, afterall
I posit that there is no more central villain to the Metroid series than Ridley. This enemy almost appeared in more metroid games than metroids themselves, only absent in Prime 2 and hunters. He has been in the most recent Metroid game, and has seen countless forms, from normal old purple, to metal, to omega (phaazon corruption)
People sometimes think his size/shape would cause him to not fit in the game, however, this is a ridiculous argument. re-sizing characters is incredibly common in games, Ridley has gone from slightly taller than samus to rather large. However, Bowser has gone from Godzilla size to how we see him in smash today. for some trivia, Ridley has actually appeared in every smash game so far (even 64 o_0 )
In the games, Ridley is center to the plot. He killed Samus's parents, is the leader of the space pirates, and is highly intelligent. He may seem large, but he is actually quite skinny, thus rendering him much lighter than he looks, and flight ready. Think of how wolf was hunched over in brawl.
And Ridley has no end to where you could pull his moveset from. From fireballs to wing attacks to aerial maneuvers, Ridley's done it all. Which better character to represent the metroid-verse than the prime (GET IT) antagonist?
also, he's a space pirate dragon. that's really the only argument you need. For more, head over to the
RIDLEY FOR SM4SH THREAD
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=324284
There's always room for more supporters =D