BarDulL
Town Vampire
ok, i believe you
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Dost thou truly agree to such a notion?Very valid points here.
vote: Pawndidater2
In the context, yes, but no, I'm not actually serious.Dost thou truly agree to such a notion?
Nay, you spoke as surmised. But for what purpose doth thou agree with the un-Hetero when there is so much more to contemplate in the world?In the context, yes, but no, I'm not actually serious.
It's an RVS vote, and the reasoning is pertaining to RVS.
Why do you ask? And did I answer differently than you expected?
Like what, pray tell?Nay, you spoke as surmised. But for what purpose doth thou agree with the un-Hetero when there is so much more to contemplate in the world?
What do you take from Gorf and Bardull's cross vote then? Do you find it not worth examining?Like what, pray tell?
So far the only 'meaningful content' I'd identify is Bardull's crumb and Fandango pointing it out.
Just about everything else is RVS or relatively void of meaning.
On that note, what did you make of Fanny pointing it out?
I find myself agreeing with Bardull, moreso. Probably because I think Frito is all over the goddamn place.What do you take from Gorf and Bardull's cross vote then? Do you find it not worth examining?
I find his pointing it out null for now.
...the whole point of my "shut[ting] down avenues" thing, was that not clear?That reason being?
Thanks, I appreciate itok, i believe you
Like, how can you have an outlook on life if you can't look outwards man? You know what I'm saying dude? Cuz like, you have a blindfold on man.Dost thou truly agree to such a notion?
Dude it's cuz my partner was in trouble so I HAD to step in and chainsaw defend him, did people not understand that when Bardull caught me in the corner me and frito put ourselves in?I find myself agreeing with Bardull, moreso. Probably because I think Frito is all over the goddamn place.
Gorf did indeed provide Frito an out for what I can only describe as 'erratic' behaviour, whereas Gorf's vote on Bardull is based on shallow RVS stuff about how Joey's avatar makes him Townie.
So yeah, I suppose that is somewhat worth examining, actually, I had kinda glazed over it.
However, I want to point out that as Gorf voted first, Gorf's vote isn't gross. Gorf's looked like RVS.
What IS important is that I think Bardull's vote on there is legit, and I'm actually going to park my vote there as well.
Vote: Gorf
Gorf, why step in and defend Frito this early?
In the context, yes, but no, I'm not actually serious.
It's an RVS vote, and the reasoning is pertaining to RVS.
Why do you ask? And did I answer differently than you expected?
I can't disagree with this guy!
"Yeah! A HYPOCRITE! And he IGNORED me!"
Vote: Raziek
Well his "warning" post or whatever that was confused me a lot. I don't know what that means, and giving that almost no one has pointed it out yet it seems no one wants to discuss it right now. He made it obvious on that post that he didn't want to discuss it after that, so I am curious as to what it means at its intent.Hey @ Fandangox watchu make of bardull?
Vote: FandangoxYeah @ Raziek you said that those were very balid points, thus implying it was not a RVS vote, but when asked about it you said it was? So what is it? Why do you think his points are valid, or not depending on the context?
Dost thou also tarry true in this? Doth thy creative countryman fill your fancy, or are his words amusing and nothing more?I can't disagree with this guy!
Vote: Raziek
"Take a look at this question. He's asking it because he was prompted by someone else (us in this case) and is basically just rewording what we said in question format. This isn't scumhunting, this is just looking for an easy question to ask to look proactive!"Yeah @ Raziek you said that those were very balid points, thus implying it was not a RVS vote, but when asked about it you said it was? So what is it? Why do you think his points are valid, or not depending on the context?
"He's answering Gorf's questions, and doing so makes him ask Bardull a question that he should have asked when he first saw Bardull's post if he actually cared! Fanny isn't being very creative! It was Gorf's questioning that spurred Fanny to take action, not an interest in finding scum!"Well his "warning" post or whatever that was confused me a lot. I don't know what that means, and giving that almost no one has pointed it out yet it seems no one wants to discuss it right now. He made it obvious on that post that he didn't want to discuss it after that, so I am curious as to what it means at its intent.
On his vote on you, it looks to me like it could either be pressuring your slot, or jumping on a wagon giving that I really don't see what he is talking about about you and frito. So right now he is the player who has generated the most "content" so far to work on.
@ BarDulL Can you talk about what that post you said means?
Thy defense was white as Aristotle's bust gleaming in the morning sun.Wait I'm white knighting frito? This is actually news to me, I thought what I was doing was pointing out the (might I say, genius) approach that frito took to make himself the ****** that people would latch onto early game, and your response is the reason why I think it worked. Or at least that's what I think I thought. I must have just been white knighting frito too hard.
I am familiar with it. Played a few games in AiB stopped playing for a long time and started playing again here. I know the basics of roles, terms, plays, etc.how familiar are you with mafia? this is not a rhetorical question.
Okay not entirely sure what you are saying here, but I think similar to KWK's post below?Vote: Fandangox
Thine enthusiasm for pressure is built on a foundation of sand my friend. For it is not for his jest we look at our fellow scholar, but for his decision to look only at the stuff of jesters when the craft of thieves was much about. Why doth thou sling such arrows of falsehood?
Heh, valid criticism, but what else do you wanted me to say when Gorf asked me about it? Other's people posts mentioning other's plays are naturally gonna make me look at those posts again.
"I'd keep an eye on Fandango, guys."
"WHY?"
"Take a look at this question. He's asking it because he was prompted by someone else (us in this case) and is basically just rewording what we said in question format. This isn't scumhunting, this is just looking for an easy question to ask to look proactive!"
"I dunno guys, maybe he wants something from his question he couldn't get from us."
"I can't think of ANYTHING!"
"But wait! Take a look at this post:"
"He's answering Gorf's questions, and doing so makes him ask Bardull a question that he should have asked when he first saw Bardull's post if he actually cared! Fanny isn't being very creative! It was Gorf's questioning that spurred Fanny to take action, not an interest in finding scum!"
"I don't see what you MEAN!"
"It means Fandango is faking content and asking questions he doesn't care about the answer to!"
"M-my mom h-has... fanny!"
FoS: Fandango
I see a man who must look beyond his own blindfold if we are to take stock of him. We shall see what he does now that his eyes are open to more than what lay before. I blame him not for deflating pressure of his own creation, nary the same as stealing what belongs to another man if he be good and true.
"Hey Blindfolded Philosophers! I can see you're very creative! Take a look at Raziek, and tell me please, what do you see?"
the post isn't important for now, don't worry about it.I am familiar with it. Played a few games in AiB stopped playing for a long time and started playing again here. I know the basics of roles, terms, plays, etc.
Okay fine.the post isn't important for now, don't worry about it.
It was, was it? I knew it was! Geez I thought for a second that I was doing something much different like using frito's null play as a means of exploring content, but yea I must have been white knighting. Oh and call me stupid but I don't understand your question so reword plzThy defense was white as Aristotle's bust gleaming in the morning sun.
What didst thou think thy aim was?
(I'm concerned that you're slinging mud for things that never happened or seem self evident when there's valid things to question Raz about already on the table to turn to if you were to choose to further the questioning of Raz. We questioned Raz because we wondered why he wasn't commenting on other things we thought were more useful, choosing to follow joke RVS instead. Not because we thought the idea of him saying quips about Canadian bacon "were valid" were truly serious or scummy by nature, that seems like quite a reach at the moment to swing that far and I'm surprsied you made it.)Okay not entirely sure what you are saying here, but I think similar to KWK's post below?
(it means stop being sarcastically dramatic about being thought to be white-knighting and tell us in plain English what you hoped to accomplish instead of leaving it to the "it was so obvious I can leave it to your imagination" zone)It was, was it? I knew it was! Geez I thought for a second that I was doing something much different like using frito's null play as a means of exploring content, but yea I must have been white knighting. Oh and call me stupid but I don't understand your question so reword plz
So I am curious what he means with context.In the context, yes, but no, I'm not actually serious.