• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Racism

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eor

Banned via Warnings
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
9,963
Location
Bed
This is an interesting subject, I think, since there are so many different ways to view it, and it's a problem a lot of people don't want to think about.

For starting, Obama. This is a cartoon that the New York Post had



A lot of people are claiming it's racist for showing Obama as a monkey.

Personally, I don't see it. It's a dead chimp (if you haven't been following the news, a woman's pet chimp recently went on a rampage and had to be shot dead by the police, like above). The chimp doesn't have Obama's features, it's not even suppose to be Obama. If the person had said "They'll have to find a new president" then I'd find it racist, but linking a rampaging animal with what they view as out of control spending is in line.

At the same time, I think all of the "obama is muslim/anti-christ" is racist, as is a lot of the seething hatred some people had for Obama during the election.
 

Amide

Smash Lord
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
1,217
Location
Maine
I think I'll have to agree with you on that controversial cartoon, but I can see where people are coming from thinking it's racist. African Americans have infamously been portrayed as monkeys, so many would draw that conclusion from this. Especially since the woman's crazy chimp and the stimulus bill have no logical connection whatsoever.
 

Jam Stunna

Writer of Fortune
BRoomer
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
6,450
Location
Hartford, CT
3DS FC
0447-6552-1484
I think I'll have to agree with you on that controversial cartoon, but I can see where people are coming from thinking it's racist. African Americans have infamously been portrayed as monkeys, so many would draw that conclusion from this. Especially since the woman's crazy chimp and the stimulus bill have no logical connection whatsoever.
The connection is that monkeys wrote the stimulus package because it's so stupid (or at least that's the point that the cartoon is trying to make).

And how is this representative of Obama in any way? Presidents don't write legislation in the first place. I like what the editor of the Post wrote in response to the controversy:

"Again, Al Sharpton reveals himself as nothing more than a publicity opportunist."
I 100% agree. Aren't there any real instances of racism and bigotry that Sharpton could be fighting instead of making them up?
 

Crimson King

I am become death
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
28,982
Is it weird I thought "****ing tyrannical cops..."

Nah, I just took it as the Stimulus was stupid, like Jam. I never even thought of a racist idea.
 

AltF4

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Dec 13, 2005
Messages
5,042
Location
2.412 – 2.462 GHz
I hadn't heard of the whole "chimp being shot" thing, so my initial reaction was to think it was in reference to Obama. Then I thought "They didn't even TRY to make that monkey look like Obama". At which point I was just confused.

It's one of those touchy subjects. The writer probably didn't mean it to be racist, but it can easily come across like that.

Is the media making a big deal of this? I don't watch TV, really. Especially not TV news.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Suppose the writer did intend for the comic to be racist. Who the hell cares? There are some seriously racist jokes that comedians make all the time. On national television! I don't understand the double standard. Both are meant to be in jest.

Why would we care about the cartoon and not Mind of Mencia?
 

Jam Stunna

Writer of Fortune
BRoomer
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
6,450
Location
Hartford, CT
3DS FC
0447-6552-1484
Suppose the writer did intend for the comic to be racist. Who the hell cares? There are some seriously racist jokes that comedians make all the time. On national television! I don't understand the double standard. Both are meant to be in jest.

Why would we care about the cartoon and not Mind of Mencia?
Because Mind of Mencia sucks?
 

Pr0phetic

Dodge the bullets!
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
3,322
Location
Syracuse, NY
Because Mind of Mencia sucks?
Not only that, most people assume it's not meant to offend people, because they share a view that if your offended, then your insecure, and its all in fun.

For me, I don't mind a few jokes, because all in all racism has declined, and tolerance has increased, it's in this present time, However, hate crimes, now that's the core of racism.
 

Dash_Fox

Smash Ace
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Messages
557
Location
California, Sacramento
Race is just an idea. It's a tool used to specify someone from someone else personally. The people who see that comic to target Obama's skin color are the racists them selves. It looks more like a play on "intelligence" than "race" to me. You know... poo flinging monkeys?

When will people realize that we're nearly the same genetically (very very close in percentage, you can hardly pinpoint the differences) and throw this "racism" idea out of the equation? I don't think people need tolerance of other people, but tolerance of them selves. Why should the word "******" or "beaner" or "chink" offend you so much? As long as YOU are offended by these words, they will be offensive words and this race superiority/differences will never die down.

It's hard to explain how I feel about it and my opinions about it since I can't word it right on paper.
 

Darxmarth23

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
2,976
Location
Dead. *****es.
I think this cartoon was very cleverly written. Tying recent events at a more public an neighborly level to something so high in politics, and pulling it off so that the reader interprets the message as to what ever pops in their mind first.

Those who analyze the cartoon to what appears to be the fullest will most likely find it not racist, but what i have said above - cleverly written.

Those who take it as a racist cartoon will simply take it as what it seems to them - a racist cartoon.
 

Pr0phetic

Dodge the bullets!
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
3,322
Location
Syracuse, NY
Race is just an idea. It's a tool used to specify someone from someone else personally.
This. There's only one race, and that's the HUMAN race. However, not everyone caters to this diea, so we have to debate accordingly, while including this opinion (hell, should be a KNOWN fact).
 

LordoftheMorning

Smash Champion
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
2,153
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
It does come off as racist to me, but then again, why would I assume that that monkey is Obama when it doesn't even look like him? The actual existence of a raging monkey also makes it look a bit better (what an odd sentence O_o)

Maybe I can brew a little controversy here...

Personally, I think racial jokes reduce actual racist feelings (if that comic were a racist joke, however, I'd have to say it's a bit savage). I really despise these celebrations of "diversity" that school tries to force on me. What? By drawing more attention to racial and cultural differences, they hope to ease tension? But by making a mockery of it and being insensitive to race, you would be contributing to the ultimate downfall of real
racism, a feeling that is generally not outwardly spoken, but felt.

So I would say that diversity is not something to celebrate, but something to accept. Instead celebrate unity. I would also say that race is not something that should be hushed up or given politically correct terms such as "_____-American"; rather, one should acknowledge it in it's fullest and treat as something little different from hair or eye color. I agree with the above: there is one human race. This is pretty idealistic, I know, because some people in this world can't help but to get butt-hurt at something silly.
 

Amide

Smash Lord
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
1,217
Location
Maine
I never thought I'd actually say this, but I actually kind of agree with you. I think it's healthy to make fun of other social groups, and ourselves every once in a while. Also, when people refer to themselves as say part of "the black community," it creates an image that blacks and whites have different social circles. How does that encourage diversity at all? In fact, I'd say the best way to encourage diversity is to not acknowledge it at all!

Nonetheless, the comic sucks.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Because Mind of Mencia sucks?
Well yeah, but it still exemplifies my point. We could just focus on Chappelle's Show and it would be the same deal.

It's simply a freedom of speech debate. People should be allowed to mock subtle differences and stereotypes if they **** well want to. Everybody stereotypes. If you say you don't, you're a liar.

However, my advocacy of freedom of speech doesn't make this comic any less stupid. I didn't find it racist; I just found it unfunny. But if it was racist, I couldn't give a ****.
 

Darxmarth23

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
2,976
Location
Dead. *****es.
It does come off as racist to me, but then again, why would I assume that that monkey is Obama when it doesn't even look like him? The actual existence of a raging monkey also makes it look a bit better (what an odd sentence O_o)

This.

The cartoon is cleverly written, as simple as it may seem.
 

Proverbs

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 21, 2008
Messages
1,698
Location
Seattle, WA
Is this thread about racism in general or just the cartoon? I feel like we could widen the discussion a little, I'm not sure how much debate can be had over that cartoon.

But, let me throw out a question: Whatever your race, do you think of yourself as 'white' or 'black' or 'hispanic' or whatever?

When I look at myself in the mirror, I don't think about my skin color (I'm technically 50% middle-eastern, but I look white) at all. But I've heard that some black people look at themselves in the mirror and think "I'm black." Likewise, when I see someone posting on here, I never think that person might be black. If I see a picture of them and see they're black, I'm surprised. But if I see they're white, I don't think about their skin color at all.

It seems that the view in our culture is that if you only have a 'skin color' if you're not white. White seems to be 'normal' and everyone else is not the norm. It's sort of like assuming that someone can walk perfectly fine and isn't handicapped. That's the norm. If you see a picture of them in a wheelchair, you're surprised. You don't judge them, but it still catches you off guard. Or that's the way it is for me.

How about everyone else? Do you think about your race or your color on a daily basis? And do you think that things like 'Black History Month' are encouraging there to be a bigger separation between whites and blacks? I personally feel that if there was no 'Black History Month' or ebony groups at my college (I see Asian groups too), I wouldn't think about race at all. It'd be like meeting a person and seeing they're blond instead of having brown hair.

Thoughts?
 

Eor

Banned via Warnings
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
9,963
Location
Bed
As said in the first post the cartoon was just to start discussion

I have a friend from Japan, who said that when he came to America he was surprised that other Asian people didn't speak Japanese, and of the diversity. I think it's common to assume that people are like you, or to just base off what you see. I agree that I never think "i'm white". In fact, when describing a person I'm more likely to mention their skin color if they're not white then if they are. But at the same time, most people where I live are white. I'm more likely to say someone has Blonde or red hair then if they have brunette, because most people where I live have brown hair. I wouldn't call that really racist, just basic nature.

The thing is though, Race doesn't really exist. There is just ethnicity. If I moved to Africa with a community of white people, lived without a lot of modern technologies, and we stayed there for thousands of years, then by the end of it we'd probably be almost indistinguishable from black people. Which isn't really running contrary to anyone's views, but it does help to reconnect people with everyone else. People need to stop seeing themselves as "black/white/ethnicity", or seeing someone else as "oh he's a black/white/ethnicity guy". It's ridiculous.
 

LordoftheMorning

Smash Champion
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
2,153
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
I totally agree. If I'm describing someone, I shouldn't feel guilty about saying what race they are. I also don't think I should have to call anyone "African-American" or "Hispanic American". It really gets on my nerves. The world today gives way too much thought about race. It's a little disturbing actually, when I see people talking about a skin color in a way that excludes others. Honestly, I don't give a crap what race anyone is, and I've been called racist for saying that we shouldn't care (WTF). If we were all insensitive in this regard, no one would get butthurt over stupid things like race.

And I do oppose Black History month because I feel it is an inequality. I don't want a "white history month", but I DO want "history year", in which we learn history as it comes, and not race specific. I have yet to find a good explanation for exactly how drawing special attention to a race and pointing out things that are different about them is a supposed to reduce racism. Things like Black Student Union and Black History Month are completely obsolete. They can only exist under the pretense that blacks are still discriminated against (and unless you're part of a super small portion of the country, you're not someone who does that). Quite honestly, it is racist to assume that I am racist because I'm a white guy. But, of course, no one cares about that. The BSU at my school even does performances at assemblies. I'm always wondering: "Exactly what is it that we're celebrating?" It seems really dumb.

So I say: Celebrate Unity, not Diversity. Advocate thick skins instead of sensitivity.

This one time, at band camp at lunch during my freshman year of highschool, I was with my fellow football players, most of which are black or mexican (I don't even know why I was eating with them. They didn't really like me that much anyways.) and this guy was eating salad. He asks "Where the crackers at?". Someone points at me and says "right here." I thought that was hilarious, but everyone else at the table thought a line had been crossed, and were uncomfortable. Then I was kind of annoyed. They'd let a racial difference kill a perfectly good joke? Tsk. I think the world would be a whole lot happier if we just forgot about it, but some people think the answer is to draw more attention to it. I think racism was dead a decade ago, but the politics of the day brought it back with their "Diversity".
 

blazedaces

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
1,150
Location
philly, PA, aim: blazedaces, msg me and we'll play
Before I respond to some of you I'm going to give my simple response to the comic. It could be viewed as racist (this is what matters guys). Let me explain. Let's say, hypothetically speaking, one day there's a news report talking about all the robberies in the past week. It coincidentally happens to be that a lot of puerto ricans were involved (like if it was discussing a puerto rican neighborhood) and someone makes a comment that says something like "it's a bad week to be puerto rican". Now, the person who wrote this could argue they never intended to be racist, but it would easily be considered a racist comment by most.

This cartoon was posted in The New York Post people. Whether or not the person intended it to be a racist statement is irrelevant. Regardless of whether the president wrote the stimulus bill himself, he's a representative of the current administration, not to mention most people are unaware of this detail. Therefore it can be viewed as racism, and because it can be viewed that way, perhaps the newspaper showing it should have thought twice about its content.

In the world today things that we used to considered in a "black and white" sense racist or not are disappearing and are being replaced with a subtle racism that can often be even more destructive. While you and I know that many people are still racist and proud of it, many people would deny this viewpoint. Yet at the same time racism is very prevalent. People often don't notice their own biases.

Suppose the writer did intend for the comic to be racist. Who the hell cares? There are some seriously racist jokes that comedians make all the time. On national television! I don't understand the double standard. Both are meant to be in jest.

Why would we care about the cartoon and not Mind of Mencia?
Expectation my friend. I don't care about all the comedians because we expect racist jokes out of them, and when questioned, they admit fully that their jokes are racist. On the other hand a newspaper is supposed to be objective and furthermore, hold some integrity.

Not only that, most people assume it's not meant to offend people, because they share a view that if your offended, then your insecure, and its all in fun.

For me, I don't mind a few jokes, because all in all racism has declined, and tolerance has increased, it's in this present time, However, hate crimes, now that's the core of racism.
I'm not trying to overreact in the following statement. I want you to think about what I'm saying. I know you're not suggesting that anything below hate crimes that's racist should be tolerated flat out, but wouldn't you agree that in order to reduce the acceptance of radical racism we need to put a stop to the small, subtle, and often ignored racism that we can put a stop to? I'm not even talking about this cartoon. Think about it.

Race is just an idea. It's a tool used to specify someone from someone else personally. The people who see that comic to target Obama's skin color are the racists them selves. It looks more like a play on "intelligence" than "race" to me. You know... poo flinging monkeys?

When will people realize that we're nearly the same genetically (very very close in percentage, you can hardly pinpoint the differences) and throw this "racism" idea out of the equation? I don't think people need tolerance of other people, but tolerance of them selves. Why should the word "******" or "beaner" or "chink" offend you so much? As long as YOU are offended by these words, they will be offensive words and this race superiority/differences will never die down.

It's hard to explain how I feel about it and my opinions about it since I can't word it right on paper.
I agree with you about something, but I'm going to be a bit more blatant about it: Race is a social construct. That means it's made up guys. There is absolutely NO genetic link that shows someone's "race". The grouping might as well be arbitrary. I'm going to go on even further in explaining this: statistics show that when we consider race, and factor out other causal links, and look at something like, for example, test scores, we find race is NOT a factor. Asking you for your race is like asking you what your hair color is. If in the end a few more blondes do better in a classroom on one test, than some people would say being blonde makes you smarter. Think about how stupid that sounds? It is the same thing when it comes to race.

But when it comes to why someone is offended that's fairly obvious man. Many people use the word in an offensive manner, so it's understandable people feel they're being offended when it's said. The person who said it could have chosen to offend any trait of said person, but instead they chose to pick on their "race". Have you never been offended by a word?

It does come off as racist to me, but then again, why would I assume that that monkey is Obama when it doesn't even look like him? The actual existence of a raging monkey also makes it look a bit better (what an odd sentence O_o)

Maybe I can brew a little controversy here...

Personally, I think racial jokes reduce actual racist feelings (if that comic were a racist joke, however, I'd have to say it's a bit savage). I really despise these celebrations of "diversity" that school tries to force on me. What? By drawing more attention to racial and cultural differences, they hope to ease tension? But by making a mockery of it and being insensitive to race, you would be contributing to the ultimate downfall of real
racism, a feeling that is generally not outwardly spoken, but felt.

So I would say that diversity is not something to celebrate, but something to accept. Instead celebrate unity. I would also say that race is not something that should be hushed up or given politically correct terms such as "_____-American"; rather, one should acknowledge it in it's fullest and treat as something little different from hair or eye color. I agree with the above: there is one human race. This is pretty idealistic, I know, because some people in this world can't help but to get butt-hurt at something silly.
Guys, and this is something I'm going to repeat to a few people, there was a lot of racism BEFORE we celebrated diversity, had black history month, and were educated about blatant examples of racism throughout history (and the long struggle to fight oppression). So what makes you think their is a causal relationship between celebrating diversity and racism? It's actually the opposite. By constantly reminding ourselves that racism is wrong, and that we should be tolerant of people's cultural differences, we avoid having racist ideas.

Have you ever heard the statement "think before you talk"? Initially, many people make blatantly racial judgments without thinking about it. We are human and we create patterns. Not only that, but we often make up reasons to explain/justify patterns. A black man robs a white woman. The woman has never been robbed before in her entire life. She feels scared when she sees black men walk by her. It's understandable that she makes this initial connection perhaps, but then after some time has passed, she can tell herself she's educated, and knows this has nothing to do with someone's skin color. Do you agree that without any knowledge about race throughout her life this could easily brew racist feelings?

I never thought I'd actually say this, but I actually kind of agree with you. I think it's healthy to make fun of other social groups, and ourselves every once in a while. Also, when people refer to themselves as say part of "the black community," it creates an image that blacks and whites have different social circles. How does that encourage diversity at all? In fact, I'd say the best way to encourage diversity is to not acknowledge it at all!

Nonetheless, the comic sucks.
Refer to my above comment in response to yours about acknowledging diversity.

I agree that referring to a "black community" or any racial community creates an image of separation, which encourages racism. Still, you say it's healthy to make fun of social groups. Why? It depends on how you define "make fun" I guess. I think that if we decided it's perfectly acceptable to make racist comments, than a consequence is that some people feel it's acceptable to take it a step further. What about pulling pranks? What about "jokingly" forcing the black kid to sit in the back of the bus? It's just "making fun" isn't it? What if it happens every day? Day after day? Things like this happen man, and a lot. I'm not talking about buses necessarily. Restaurants, for example, do this often. If it happens only once in a while, you would say the person is overreacting and needs to be less sensitive. But if it happens just about every time he goes there... do you see my point?

Well yeah, but it still exemplifies my point. We could just focus on Chappelle's Show and it would be the same deal.

It's simply a freedom of speech debate. People should be allowed to mock subtle differences and stereotypes if they **** well want to. Everybody stereotypes. If you say you don't, you're a liar.

However, my advocacy of freedom of speech doesn't make this comic any less stupid. I didn't find it racist; I just found it unfunny. But if it was racist, I couldn't give a ****.
Do you not care because it doesn't affect you negatively? That's the only reason I can imagine. I hate to say it like that man, but it's how it sounds to me. This freedom of speech argument is nonsense. When that speech has negative consequences that threaten OTHERS that overrides the freedom to say it (yelling "fire" in a theater for example would not be allowed).

If you're a well-known newspaper that's supposed to be objective, fair, and is seen by millions, you need to avoid racist remarks. Period. If we tolerate them, then we're tolerating all consequences that arise due to this tolerance. Towards the time of the Holocaust (and it still occurs before and after it) there were a lot of pictures in the newspapers showing Jews in a mocking manner (like with big noses for example). Perhaps if we didn't tolerate newspaper's racial drawings we could have avoided the deaths of millions. Explain to me how this is an incorrect assumption.

As said in the first post the cartoon was just to start discussion

I have a friend from Japan, who said that when he came to America he was surprised that other Asian people didn't speak Japanese, and of the diversity. I think it's common to assume that people are like you, or to just base off what you see. I agree that I never think "i'm white". In fact, when describing a person I'm more likely to mention their skin color if they're not white then if they are. But at the same time, most people where I live are white. I'm more likely to say someone has Blonde or red hair then if they have brunette, because most people where I live have brown hair. I wouldn't call that really racist, just basic nature.

The thing is though, Race doesn't really exist. There is just ethnicity. If I moved to Africa with a community of white people, lived without a lot of modern technologies, and we stayed there for thousands of years, then by the end of it we'd probably be almost indistinguishable from black people. Which isn't really running contrary to anyone's views, but it does help to reconnect people with everyone else. People need to stop seeing themselves as "black/white/ethnicity", or seeing someone else as "oh he's a black/white/ethnicity guy". It's ridiculous.
I agree with you. But we have to be aware that these things occur all too often. Because of that awareness we can try our best to minimize this response by constantly reminding others of how/why it's wrong.

We have to try and see the big picture people. We have to understand the consequences of trying to ignore race. Because you as an individual is not the only person in the United States or in the world. Even if you claim you would never be racist (which obviously for most people is just not true) we all know that many would. Only by understanding and agreeing that it's unethical can we hope to purge as much of it from our society today.

-blazed
 

SuperBowser

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
1,331
Location
jolly old england. hohoho.
Lordofthemorning, I'd disagree with you about black history month. I don't think sweeping the differences between cultural groups under a rug is useful (or failing to adddress them). In fact, this can be just as damaging. We are all different and in the society we live in cultural awareness and acceptance is so important. Days that educate the general population about different cultures, their history, their beliefs and tolerance can only be a good thing. I'm going to guess that outside of black history month the vast majority of people you learn about in history are white - very much a white history year!

I was at a restaurant the other day. I ordered a chicken sandwich and after one bite I found pork in it (I choose not to eat pork). When I asked the waiter about it he simply agreed that the menu never specified, but there wasn't much he could do now. Though he apologized, it wasn't particularly heartfelt and he didn't seem to care. I figured what's done is done, so didn't make a fuss about it and finished the sandwich. However, I'm brown and the waiter never knew I'm not muslim (muslims don't eat pork). I could have been very upset about being given that meat (moreso his reaction to my complaint), yet he never even realized this potential problem.

There are so many situations like this where cultural awareness can aid a sensitive topic (aside from making menus that aren't dumb >.>). This doesn't mean to stereotype and apply a broad brush to every foreign looking person you see. It's just important to be aware. More people than you'd think are ignorant of other's cultures and backgrounds. I've heard some pretty shocking things from some people at uni...................


Personally, though, I enjoy racist jokes too :p. Always the funniest.
 

RDK

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
6,390
As for the comic, I couldn't help laughing at people who took offense to it. Firstly, Obama is part of the executive branch, so the mental leap people take to try and connect this comic, which is clearly bashing the legislative branch, is ridiculous. I mean at this point, people are just looking for things to whine and complain about.

Someone I know (a white person, at that) thought it was terrible to portray Obama as a monkey; everyone here probably knows that one of the most notorious jabs at blacks is comparing them to apes. The reason I found this so funny is because we're pretty much all related to apes, seeing as how we share a common ancestor and all. But oh well.

At least Obama supporters aren't threatening to bomb the New York Post unless they recall the comic strip, kind of like radical Muslims. OH WAIT--Obama is a Muslim! Tee hee!


Expectation my friend. I don't care about all the comedians because we expect racist jokes out of them, and when questioned, they admit fully that their jokes are racist. On the other hand a newspaper is supposed to be objective and furthermore, hold some integrity.
Lol, newspaper comics are supposed to be objective and have integrity? I can understand the journalism aspect by itself, but newspaper comics?

On the rare occasions I actually read newspaper comics, it's not to get a fair and balanced view of something; it's usually to get a cheap laugh at some group or organization.


How about everyone else? Do you think about your race or your color on a daily basis? And do you think that things like 'Black History Month' are encouraging there to be a bigger separation between whites and blacks? I personally feel that if there was no 'Black History Month' or ebony groups at my college (I see Asian groups too), I wouldn't think about race at all. It'd be like meeting a person and seeing they're blond instead of having brown hair.
When it comes to Black History Month, I think it's biased and racist in itself to have a whole stinking month dedicated to one ethnicity. IMO, that's just overkill. I can understand having just regular old History Month, but do we really need something that only reminds us of our ethnic differences?

The old adage about ignoring our differences to encourage diversity is true.


Blazedaces said:
We have to try and see the big picture people. We have to understand the consequences of trying to ignore race. Because you as an individual is not the only person in the United States or in the world. Even if you claim you would never be racist (which obviously for most people is just not true) we all know that many would. Only by understanding and agreeing that it's unethical can we hope to purge as much of it from our society today.
This really has nothing to do with the topic, but whenever anyone says something pertaining to individuals and collectives, I have to say something.

This nonsense about "the community" or "the group" is exactly that--nonsense (especially when pertaining to things like "group rights", which do not exist; you can't confer rights onto a group; only individuals). The same is true about America--as individual citizens, we have certain rights. I.E., the group or collective is nothing more than several individuals. In fact, that's the dictionary definition:


2: a number of individuals assembled together or having some unifying relationship
This is partly why people get into unnecessary arguments about race, and it does nothing but tangle up the discussion. As it's been stated before, human "races" are a social myth.
 

Pr0phetic

Dodge the bullets!
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
3,322
Location
Syracuse, NY
blazedaces said:
I'm not trying to overreact in the following statement. I want you to think about what I'm saying. I know you're not suggesting that anything below hate crimes that's racist should be tolerated flat out, but wouldn't you agree that in order to reduce the acceptance of radical racism we need to put a stop to the small, subtle, and often ignored racism that we can put a stop to? I'm not even talking about this cartoon. Think about it.
No I agree with you, but you know aswell as I do with so many personalities on this Earth it won't happen that way. There's a lot of racial ignorance, so for now you have to know when enough's enough.

RDK said:
This is partly why people get into unnecessary arguments about race, and it does nothing but tangle up the discussion. As it's been stated before, human "races" are a social myth.
too true man, as I've said.
 

blazedaces

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
1,150
Location
philly, PA, aim: blazedaces, msg me and we'll play
As for the comic, I couldn't help laughing at people who took offense to it. Firstly, Obama is part of the executive branch, so the mental leap people take to try and connect this comic, which is clearly bashing the legislative branch, is ridiculous. I mean at this point, people are just looking for things to whine and complain about.

Someone I know (a white person, at that) thought it was terrible to portray Obama as a monkey; everyone here probably knows that one of the most notorious jabs at blacks is comparing them to apes. The reason I found this so funny is because we're pretty much all related to apes, seeing as how we share a common ancestor and all. But oh well.
And yet in the past this is always how they were portrayed, therefore it's a common derogatory technique. Since it was used often throughout history it makes sense that it can be considered offensive today. It's not quite that large of a leap...

At least Obama supporters aren't threatening to bomb the New York Post unless they recall the comic strip, kind of like radical Muslims. OH WAIT--Obama is a Muslim! Tee hee!
I can't tell how much of this is a joke. I'm just going to assume the entire thing is, including the part referring to Obama as a muslim...

Lol, newspaper comics are supposed to be objective and have integrity? I can understand the journalism aspect by itself, but newspaper comics?

On the rare occasions I actually read newspaper comics, it's not to get a fair and balanced view of something; it's usually to get a cheap laugh at some group or organization.
And yet I'm 100% sure if you ask the owner of the New York Post in a public interview the question of whether or not his comic strip tolerates blatantly racial jokes he would say absolutely not. I'm sure he thinks his comic strips are of a higher caliber. I don't really care what you look for in them.

Comedians who use racial jokes on the other hand would openly admit they do...

When it comes to Black History Month, I think it's biased and racist in itself to have a whole stinking month dedicated to one ethnicity. IMO, that's just overkill. I can understand having just regular old History Month, but do we really need something that only reminds us of our ethnic differences?
Did you completely ignore my comments? When we didn't have black history month there was a lot more racism present in our country. Not to mention most people are extremely uneducated and actually believe a statement like "no black person has ever contributed to our country's history".

If we ignore our ethnic history then we pull attention away from the truth.


This really has nothing to do with the topic, but whenever anyone says something pertaining to individuals and collectives, I have to say something.

This nonsense about "the community" or "the group" is exactly that--nonsense (especially when pertaining to things like "group rights", which do not exist; you can't confer rights onto a group; only individuals). The same is true about America--as individual citizens, we have certain rights. I.E., the group or collective is nothing more than several individuals. In fact, that's the dictionary definition:
You're completely missing the point I'm trying to make. Without all the constant reminders to avoid being racist many would openly find themselves being just that. I said that you're not the only individual because I really don't care if YOU claim to me you "don't see race". It's a BS statement. Everyone sees race... and without something to remind you that you shouldn't judge based on it many would make judgments (and many still do). This has nothing to do with "community". How did you even get here?

No I agree with you, but you know aswell as I do with so many personalities on this Earth it won't happen that way. There's a lot of racial ignorance, so for now you have to know when enough's enough.
Look, I really don't think you mean this, but it's what your writing is telling me: are you actually suggesting that because it's really hard to stop racism we shouldn't even try?

-blazed
 

~Peachy~

Creator of delicious desserts
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Messages
1,423
Location
<3
♡These days, you can see all sorts of racist and controversial things all over the media. MadTV, Family Guy, The Simpsons, WhattheBuck, etc. It's a fact, people are known to laugh at the expense of others.....even if it does border criminal. That's why there is the "Viewer Discretion is Advised" warning before a lot of television shows. I still wonder why some people have that sense of humor....

♡Hmmmmm....and it may just be me, but I don't really see anything racist about the cartoon. I see a "probably" or a maybe" here and there... but nothing that won't seem like a stretch or something that a person who is somewhat inclined to thinking "that's racist" would see.

♡As for the whole "racial separation" subject, I blame it on some of the people these days. For example, there are many immature people who make up some random excuses such as:

"It's just because I'm Hispanic/Black/Asian/White/etc, right?"

Not even considering the real factors that may or may not have contributed to the situation.

♡Another thing I don't understand is the use of the word "N*****". I see black people (maybe not only, but it is the most prominent) use it all the time to each other. When someone else of a different race calls them that word, they get offended. Honestly, if you don't want to be called a name, especially if it deteriorates the background history of millions of people, please don't use it. That's what I have to say on the matter. ;)
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
blazedaces said:
Expectation my friend. I don't care about all the comedians because we expect racist jokes out of them, and when questioned, they admit fully that their jokes are racist. On the other hand a newspaper is supposed to be objective and furthermore, hold some integrity.
I see what you're saying, but I don't buy it. The context in which the joke is made (newspaper, comedy club) is pretty much irrelevant - it's what is being said. It's a double standard. I don't care if the owner of the New York Post says it isn't racist, it's up to the cartoonist to do so. If he doesn't think it is, (the monkey looks nothing like Obama, and caricatures are incredibly important to make the joke somewhat obvious) then it isn't racist. But, if it is racist, it still doesn't mean ****, which I'll explain in regards to your other half:

blazedaces said:
Do you not care because it doesn't affect you negatively? That's the only reason I can imagine. I hate to say it like that man, but it's how it sounds to me. This freedom of speech argument is nonsense. When that speech has negative consequences that threaten OTHERS that overrides the freedom to say it (yelling "fire" in a theater for example would not be allowed).
The only reason I don't care is because I believe in freedom of speech. Yeah, Holocaust deniers are ********, but that doesn't mean they can't spew that **** if they want to. There's a difference between hate speech and freedom of speech, and that's where the "reasonable limits" on freedom of speech end. I will admit, though, it is hard to define the line. If I say, "I hate the blacks and they should all be burned," I SHOULD be silenced. However, if I say, "Haha, asian people can't drive," I SHOULD NOT be silenced. No matter the consequences, it's freedom of speech, regardless if it's racist or not. However, hate speech is completely different. Hate speech has no place in any public form, as it is designed to inspire hatred (obviously) and violence.

blazedaces said:
If you're a well-known newspaper that's supposed to be objective, fair, and is seen by millions, you need to avoid racist remarks. Period. If we tolerate them, then we're tolerating all consequences that arise due to this tolerance. Towards the time of the Holocaust (and it still occurs before and after it) there were a lot of pictures in the newspapers showing Jews in a mocking manner (like with big noses for example). Perhaps if we didn't tolerate newspaper's racial drawings we could have avoided the deaths of millions. Explain to me how this is an incorrect assumption.
It's the New York Post. That rag doesn't hold much integrity in the first place, so it's not surprising they'd print something that is a) unfunny and b) potentially holds racial implications.

We're past the time of a second Holocaust being possible. Anyway, it's entirely possible that the NYP decided to run the thing anyway for a variety of reasons:

a) Viral publicity - there's no such thing as bad press
b) Taking a stand on freedom of speech - my school newspaper published a cartoon that pictured Jesus and Mohammed making out in the "Tunnel of Tolerance." The newspaper received tons of flak, but eventually the dean of students slammed those offended and defended our right to free speech.
c) Maybe the thing just wasn't racist - perhaps no one at the NYP had the foresight to see a bunch of minorities become butt hurt. (which is so frustratingly common, holycraphowcouldtheynotseeit) Seriously, don't these people have jobs? Where do they get the time to be offended about something so god**** trivial
 

illinialex24

Smash Hero
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
7,489
Location
Discovered: Sending Napalm
♡Another thing I don't understand is the use of the word "N*****". I see black people (maybe not only, but it is the most prominent) use it all the time to each other. When someone else of a different race calls them that word, they get offended. Honestly, if you don't want to be called a name, especially if it deteriorates the background history of millions of people, please don't use it. That's what I have to say on the matter. ;)
You see rappers using it very commonly but many prominent black people view it as offensive whoever says it. So it is not very well viewed among higher members of society either way.
 

LordoftheMorning

Smash Champion
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
2,153
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
I'm a bit depressed that there is a word that I will get jumped for saying because I'm white. That's all I'm going to say about that.

blazedaces said:
When we didn't have black history month there was a lot more racism present in our country. Not to mention most people are extremely uneducated and actually believe a statement like "no black person has ever contributed to our country's history".
This is pretty unfounded. I'm not sure who these "most people" are that would believe anything like that. In fact, I can't think of a single person I know that would believe that. Furthermore, unless you have the date of the foundation of BHM (I'm getting tired of typing that out), and you also have some sort of fancy "racism meter", you can't make that claim and expect it to hold up. Even if you were able to match these things up, you cannot simply assume that BHM is the cause and not the billions of other social influences we experience over the years.

So what makes you think their is a causal relationship between celebrating diversity and racism? It's actually the opposite. By constantly reminding ourselves that racism is wrong, and that we should be tolerant of people's cultural differences, we avoid having racist ideas.
Any "diversity" celebrations I have ever had the misfortune to be in have always ended in "this one time I remember these ____ people/person said/did something nasty to this ____ guy." and it degenerates into throwing around ideas like this. What does this do? It promotes indignation. These "celebrations" merely create a self-fulfilling prophecy (or perhaps a solution that creates a problem it solves) and feel people with a sense of injustice, which can lead to irritation, if not anger, at the offending race (which is generally those terrible white people).

IMO, when you actually know someone who is a different race than you, being racist is like playing The Game. You don't really think about it, but if you do, you lose The Game. By that I mean that it doesn't really become a serious consideration until someone makes you think that way and makes you lose the game by reminding you with their diversity celebrations. Suddenly, you feel like you don't have anything in common with your friend, and you feel excluded. The solution to racism is life experience, and that's a naturally occurring solution.


SuperBowser said:
Lordofthemorning, I'd disagree with you about black history month. I don't think sweeping the differences between cultural groups under a rug is useful (or failing to adddress them). In fact, this can be just as damaging. We are all different and in the society we live in cultural awareness and acceptance is so important. Days that educate the general population about different cultures, their history, their beliefs and tolerance can only be a good thing. I'm going to guess that outside of black history month the vast majority of people you learn about in history are white - very much a white history year!

Well first off, we're not "sweeping" anything "under the rug". We'd merely be choosing to ignore it until it actually becomes an issue. By ignore, I don't mean "I'm going to pretend I didn't hear that", I mean "I really don't care about your race, and I don't expect you to care about mine." The sort of hush hush is actually what the diversity celebrators want you to do. They would not allow you to comment, object, disagree, or inquire about/with anyone's culture. Whereas if race were just a casual thing, this would all happen on a daily basis, and we'd learn more and become a helluvalot more mature in the process.

On the second half of your comment: Let us step back and consider why it is that we learn about white people in U.S. history... is it because every teacher you will ever find is a racist jerk? Maybe not... It's because our founding fathers were old, rich, white guys, and they had the most say in the development of our country. Why were there few black individuals who changed the course of older U.S. history? (NO I SHOULDN'T SAY THAT IT'S RACIST) It's because they were in a state of oppression and were not in a position to make a lot of difference. This isn't their fault, of course, we all understand that. Racism isn't the problem. In order to fix the "problem" that BHM is directed at, you'd need a freakin' time machine.

I don't care about the black dude who invented ****ing water guns! We learn about MLK and Harriet Tubman in normal history because they did have a significant effect on the United States! This is unbiased, efficient, significant history and that is the
ONLY history I want to learn about! No one would talk about the inventor of the super-soaker if he was white. The whole idea fills me with indignation, a type dissimilar to the aforementioned indignation, but it can have the same effect. Psychologically, the more one has foreign culture shoved down his throat, the more sick of it he's going to get. And that is NOT the way to destroy racism.

I'd like to reiterate that things like BSU and BHM can only exist under the pretense that blacks are still discriminated against, and it is racist to assume that I am racist because I'm a white guy. People have pulled this crap on me before and it really throws a monkey-wrench into my brain.
 

SuperBowser

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
1,331
Location
jolly old england. hohoho.
Well first off, we're not "sweeping" anything "under the rug". We'd merely be choosing to ignore it until it actually becomes an issue. By ignore, I don't mean "I'm going to pretend I didn't hear that", I mean "I really don't care about your race, and I don't expect you to care about mine." The sort of hush hush is actually what the diversity celebrators want you to do. They would not allow you to comment, object, disagree, or inquire about/with anyone's culture. Whereas if race were just a casual thing, this would all happen on a daily basis, and we'd learn more and become a helluvalot more mature in the process.
Uhh, since when?! That's just a silly assertion and goes against just about every cultural awareness event I've had at school and university.

The problem with your attitude is that people from other cultures are very different and if you aren't made aware of these differences, it leads to problems somewhere down the line. Ignorance of other cultures is a massive problem and one of the major breeding grounds for hate. Part of school is to prepare you for meeting and working with people in the outside world. Cultural awareness is totally relevant. You can learn some of it on your own. But not everyone will and you can use a similar argument for most things in school.

I don't care about the black dude who invented ****ing water guns!
Well last I checked there's actually a lot of american black history to learn about. Like the whole slavery thing and getting equal rights. But I don't live in america and if they waste time teaching you who invents a watergun... ok that probably is useless.

I'd like to reiterate that things like BSU and BHM can only exist under the pretense that blacks are still discriminated against, and it is racist to assume that I am racist because I'm a white guy. People have pulled this crap on me before and it really throws a monkey-wrench into my brain.
I have no idea where you jump to this conclusion =/.
 

RDK

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
6,390
I can't tell how much of this is a joke. I'm just going to assume the entire thing is, including the part referring to Obama as a muslim...
All of it was a joke. I was making a jab at right-wing morons that actually believe Obama is a Muslim terrorist.

And yet I'm 100% sure if you ask the owner of the New York Post in a public interview the question of whether or not his comic strip tolerates blatantly racial jokes he would say absolutely not. I'm sure he thinks his comic strips are of a higher caliber. I don't really care what you look for in them.
Obviously the owner of the New York Post is not going to admit to blatant racism in his paper--not even if there was an actual photo of Obama used, let alone a cartoon monkey that could, if you're an incredibly sensitive person, be construed as bearing extremely vague resemblance to the President.

Comedians who use racial jokes on the other hand would openly admit they do...
As far as the New York Post goes, I pretty much take anything they say with the same amount of seriousness that I do when I listen to comedians. Which, if you were wondering, is none.

Did you completely ignore my comments? When we didn't have black history month there was a lot more racism present in our country. Not to mention most people are extremely uneducated and actually believe a statement like "no black person has ever contributed to our country's history".
And in response, I suggested just regular old History Month instead of targeting one group in particular, which in turn elevates it above every other group out there. While it's not even debatable that African Americans are still extremely persecuted against, they're not the only group in the world that is.

If we ignore our ethnic history then we pull attention away from the truth.
I never said "Hey, we should ignore our ethnic history!" I merely suggested not putting one ethnic group on a pedestal above all else. That's called being a Nazi.

You're completely missing the point I'm trying to make. Without all the constant reminders to avoid being racist many would openly find themselves being just that. I said that you're not the only individual because I really don't care if YOU claim to me you "don't see race". It's a BS statement. Everyone sees race... and without something to remind you that you shouldn't judge based on it many would make judgments (and many still do). This has nothing to do with "community". How did you even get here?
I even said that it had nothing to do with the whole race discussion; I just had to address your use of terms like "group" and "community".
 

LordoftheMorning

Smash Champion
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
2,153
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
SuperBowser said:
Uhh, since when?! That's just a silly assertion and goes against just about every cultural awareness event I've had at school and university.

The problem with your attitude is that people from other cultures are very different and if you aren't made aware of these differences, it leads to problems somewhere down the line. Ignorance of other cultures is a massive problem and one of the major breeding grounds for hate. Part of school is to prepare you for meeting and working with people in the outside world. Cultural awareness is totally relevant. You can learn some of it on your own. But not everyone will and you can use a similar argument for most things in school.
Perhaps I got a little overzealous with my accusations, but it's not as if I would never learn anything about other cultures without diversity celebrations. Heck, I learn about Mexican and black culture just by being around them all the time. It's much better to have this sort of education on a casual scale. I don't attend a class that teaches me how to talk to girls, do I? Nope. I don't go to rallies about making friends either. Social know-how is learned through life experience, and when you try to can it, it's not going to be effective, accurate, enjoyable, and it won't discourage racism.

SuperBowser said:
Well last I checked there's actually a lot of american black history to learn about. Like the whole slavery thing and getting equal rights. But I don't live in america and if they waste time teaching you who invents a watergun... ok that probably is useless.
Of course there is. I merely wished to point out that the lower levels of black historical characters we learn about in U.S. history is created by an unfortunate circumstance in the past (black oppression from 1700s-early 1900s), and not current-day racism. Why can't we just learn black history in history class? -.- Oh wait. I do. Like RDK said, we don't need to put any race on a pedestal (good analogy thar).

SuperBowser said:
I have no idea where you jump to this conclusion =/.
Again you're correct in correcting me. I didn't really provide enough grounds for that. I am speaking from life experience when I say what you bolded. Many people of other ethnicities think that white people are racist. This is racist in itself. It's kind of like the stuff I said in the Affirmative Action thread a while ago:

me said:
I had an interesting experience yesterday. There is a kid on my bus who is autistic. Apparently he was causing a problem, because I woke up (I sleep on the bus) and the bus had stopped. The bus driver was trying to get this kid to sit down, and he repeatedly refused to do so. Finally, after a sort of struggle, they got him to move seats and sit.

I sit close to the back, and there are 4 black girls sitting in the same area. I know them quite well. They were all loudly complaining about the kid's behavior and how they would have been beaten, or something, had they done the same sort of thing. The autistic kid could definitely hear them, and it was obvious that they were making things worse. So I asked them to be more quiet and change the subject of their conversation. One of them said something along the lines of
"Just because you don't agree with my culture and don't understand it doesn't mean I have to be quiet." (this was a pretty WTF moment for me) They scoffed at me and proceeded there discussion of the boy with the "mental issues" loud enough for everyone to hear, and they were the only ones speaking on the whole bus.

I don't attribute their obnoxious and insensitive behavior to their race, but it made me wonder how far this brand of racism had become ingrained into America's culture. I really didn't like the idea of being called racist because of the color of my skin. I wonder if this is the same sort of thought involved with AA.
me said:
What shocked me about those people on the bus was that I knew them. Then they just pull that sort of stuff out of their hats? It's the same thing I get when I talk about AA or the Black Student Union irl. There seems to be an assumption that whites are inherently racist. It's not specific to a race, but this sort of idea is becoming more and more common among the general populace, and this idea is racist to whites (yes, that's possible). Why should I be held accountable for the actions of my ancestors? If there's going to be some equality, then it **** well should be equal equality.
Does that make a bit more sense?
 

Mewter

Smash Master
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
3,609
Why should I be held accountable for the actions of my ancestors? If there's going to be some equality, then it **** well should be equal equality.
Well said.
I hate it when people call you racist because of your skin color. Then again, who doesn't?
The government is going to far with reverse discrimination, though. Back in most of elementary school, I was held in an English Language-Learner class because of half my ethnicity, even though I was doing perfectly well in our Language class....
Does this make sense? People make such a big deal of race.
 

The 5th Horseman

Smash Ace
Joined
Mar 11, 2008
Messages
626
Location
Tampa, Florida
I think the Government is going a little too far with its reversal of racism. Now of days, businesses and colleges have to meet a quota of students or workers of every race. I just think it's unfair for the people who really work hard and are not accepted because the college or businesses are forced to pick a minority instead of the person who worked really hard to get there. (Not saying the minority didn't work hard, but you get the jift)
 

Darxmarth23

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
2,976
Location
Dead. *****es.
I think the Government is going a little too far with its reversal of racism. Now of days, businesses and colleges have to meet a quota of students or workers of every race. I just think it's unfair for the people who really work hard and are not accepted because the college or businesses are forced to pick a minority instead of the person who worked really hard to get there. (Not saying the minority didn't work hard, but you get the jift)
This i agree with.

I think that now is a good time for everything to be evened out.
 

aeghrur

Smash Champion
Joined
Jun 7, 2008
Messages
2,513
Location
Minnesota
I think the Government is going a little too far with its reversal of racism. Now of days, businesses and colleges have to meet a quota of students or workers of every race. I just think it's unfair for the people who really work hard and are not accepted because the college or businesses are forced to pick a minority instead of the person who worked really hard to get there. (Not saying the minority didn't work hard, but you get the jift)
Oh, oh, Affirmative Action topic again.
God, where is that link? >_<
And yes, I completely agree with this. There's absolutely no point in AA, and it ruins the ideal of work hard to get rewarded. =/

:093:
 

Jam Stunna

Writer of Fortune
BRoomer
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
6,450
Location
Hartford, CT
3DS FC
0447-6552-1484
I've been thinking alot about race. Bear with me, this is going to be somewhat long-winded and rambling. I'm not trying to change the subject with my introduction, but it's necessary to explain how I came to my thoughts.

Recently, gay marriage became legal in my home state, Connecticut. A bill is being proposed now that will protect clergy from being sued if they choose not to perform gay marriage ceremonies, as it would be against their religious beliefs. Other people want the bill to be extended to include justices of the peace, florists, caterers and other vendors who have moral objections to gay marriage.

I started thinking about it, and at first I was against the idea of extending that protection beyond clergy. If the law says that gay people can be married, then you have to support that. But then as I thought about it more, I realized, "Wait, do I? Do I have to support gay marriage?" Of course I don't. I don't have to support gay people if I think that homosexuality is wrong.

But the law is trying to make it so that you DO have to support them, no matter what you feel. If you don't like gays, too bad, you still have to serve them and cater to their lifestyle. That's not right. If I'm a florist, it's my store. I decide who I serve and who I don't, not someone who wants to force their idea of morality on me through statute.

Of course, when I came to that conclusion, it wasn't long before I realized that the same thing is true about race. If a racist doesn't want black people in his store, well, it's his store. He doesn't have to serve me if he doesn't want to. This is something that PockyD was getting at in the Affirmative Action thread, and I didn't understand his reasoning at the time. But now I definitely do. If a racist can have a successful business without my money, then more power to him.

You can't legislate people's feelings, and in the long run you're really not doing minorities any favors with those laws. My brother put it to me this way: in the 1960's, blacks marched and protested and fought for the right to force a bunch of racists to take our money. And as soon as we could, we did, and drained all of our money out of our communities to give it to a bunch of people who hate us because "the white man's ice is colder". Did that really help us?

If you don't want me in your schools, or your stores, or your neighborhoods, that's fine. I can't make you like me, no matter how many laws are passed. The law should only go so far that it prevents the government from discriminating, because equal protection under the law pertains only to government. It does NOT give you the right to buy flowers or eat lunch wherever you want.

That's how I see race relations now. If we get along, great. If we don't, great. Integration, segregation, whatever. As long as we're not killing each other.
 

RDK

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
6,390
I can see your point about florists and vendors having a choice because, ulitmately, it's a business, and they should be allowed to make their own decision, but when it comes to things like Justices of the Peace or members of the clergy refusing to marry a gay couple, isn't that wrong, considering it's not a business per se--you're basically providing a civil service?

If anything, I think the whole tradition of using a church and a priest to get married should be abolished. I don't want religion to have any part in my marriage ceremony.
 

pockyD

Smash Legend
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
11,926
Location
San Francisco, CA
this is rather off topic, but if you don't want to get married in a church and/or in a religious setting, there are plenty of other ways/places to do it

you can even do it on a boat

marriage is dumb anyway... as is the idea that you can stop racism by "forcing" acceptance
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
I can see your point about florists and vendors having a choice because, ulitmately, it's a business, and they should be allowed to make their own decision, but when it comes to things like Justices of the Peace or members of the clergy refusing to marry a gay couple, isn't that wrong, considering it's not a business per se--you're basically providing a civil service?
Again, the understanding here is that we are not a pure capitalist system comes into play.

Just like pollution output regulations, there are certain regulations which can be imposed because of overall societal effects of the practice which is prohibited in the regulation.

Without legal prevention of this practice, it's very easy for the group to be left without anyone willing to perform the service.


A social service is not a government service. There's a little something called the free exercise clause which stops that line of thought right in it's tracks.

If anything, I think the whole tradition of using a church and a priest to get married should be abolished. I don't want religion to have any part in my marriage ceremony.
The state has n right to remove the religious element, only the couple has that right. Otherwise free extercise says, "hi".

If anything the state should be pushed out of what is fundamentally a private contract, and the couple can legally choose to celebrate it in any manner they choose.
 

Pluvia's other account

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
3,174
Location
No Internet?!?
Of course, when I came to that conclusion, it wasn't long before I realized that the same thing is true about race. If a racist doesn't want black people in his store, well, it's his store. He doesn't have to serve me if he doesn't want to. This is something that PockyD was getting at in the Affirmative Action thread, and I didn't understand his reasoning at the time. But now I definitely do. If a racist can have a successful business without my money, then more power to him.

You can't legislate people's feelings, and in the long run you're really not doing minorities any favors with those laws. My brother put it to me this way: in the 1960's, blacks marched and protested and fought for the right to force a bunch of racists to take our money. And as soon as we could, we did, and drained all of our money out of our communities to give it to a bunch of people who hate us because "the white man's ice is colder". Did that really help us?

If you don't want me in your schools, or your stores, or your neighborhoods, that's fine. I can't make you like me, no matter how many laws are passed. The law should only go so far that it prevents the government from discriminating, because equal protection under the law pertains only to government. It does NOT give you the right to buy flowers or eat lunch wherever you want.

That's how I see race relations now. If we get along, great. If we don't, great. Integration, segregation, whatever. As long as we're not killing each other.
********, if people were allowed to pick and choose who they wanted to take into their stores or schools, then there would be full blown riots everywhere.

Say, for example, I went with all my friends to Starbucks or something one afternoon, but only I (seeing as I live in a predominately white community, all my friends are white) wasn't allowed in, then how'd you think I'd feel? We could go somewhere else, but what if almost everywhere doesn't allow me in? I'd have to walk home, seeing as though the bus company might not let me on their buses, and sit at home alone whilst all my friends enjoy a nice day out.

If this was happening on a mass scale to a load of people, then their would just be chaos. If a shop didn't allow me in because I was kinda black, I'd go by later that night with a hoodie and a few bricks and smash every window. When they replaced the windows, I'd come back with a few more bricks and do it again.

Basically my point is, more good comes from forcing racists to do things, than letting them choose what they want to do, or who they want to serve. I'm a person, not some half-human who doesn't deserve things just because of my skin colour.
 

LordoftheMorning

Smash Champion
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
2,153
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Wait... a clergy member can be sued for not marrying two gay people? I... did not know that.... That is directly forcing down Christian beliefs, and by extension, an infringement on our freedom of speech! Supposedly, church and state are separate things >_>. The government has absolutely no right to dictate to the church what it will and will not do, so long as no one else's rights are infringed >_>. The government can't tell me what's moral >_>. They'll have to get married somewhere else >_>. I'm starting to wonder if it's the Christians who are being discriminated against nowadays. >_> RDK is probably foaming at the mouth right now, so I'll get back on subject.

I completely agree with Jam. Technically, he is right. A business owner should have the right to not serve his products (which were made by him with his money) to someone for whatever reason. The reason this doesn't get out of hand is because if a company is seen a discriminatory in the eyes of the public, they lose customers. Using this reasoning, AA is another instance of the government over-stepping its authority (and is a bad idea anyway).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom