Fire gets the first post with positive movement on Poisoner, which is meaningless, but only mentions Poisoner in the post, which is a little interesting. Anyway, he calls Poisoner useless.
Another read of Poisoner as useless.
Role Cop is a hard no over only Disguiser, Poisoner discussed as a coin-flip possibility.
"Easy to deal with." Maven prompts a follow-up on this from Z25, which didn't really clear up what Z25 meant here. Focus afterwards went towards Z25's Hider pick. I didn't quote it here, but I wonder who all was on him about Hiders, and I'm going to check after this post.
Fire thinks it's Day Vig, Tracker, and a coin-flip between Driver and Jailer (no explanation). I don't know how scum would use tracker to produce WIFOM, aside from by leaving Tracker out and claiming a track on someone, or hoping that the tracker hits them so they can claim a role?
Koops lumps Role Cop in the "least worst" category with Poisoner and Roleblocker. And while that's technically true from his POV, since he's discarded Hider and Disguiser at this point, I think it's odd to lump the remaining three as "least worst" when his previous post called Role Cop 'nononononono' and suggested that it had 'devastating combos.' (Which ones?)
Isn't RB + RC likely to be one of the 'devastating combos'? It's not clear how RC got away from being a hard 'no' so quickly. It's important to note, on a micro level, Maven was currently questioning the 'ease' of dealing with Poisoner, so it was unclear at this time if town thought that poisoner was worth doing.
Only quoting this because it's an example of Koops being on the fence, and that's important in a bit.
Here, Koops says that he's leaning towards Role Cop regardless of GLG's response about the bus driver, which is weird because, again, RC was a six-no pony less than two hours prior, and the logic hadn't changed in that time, but the air in the thread had clarified in a positive direction for Role Cop. Again, just thinking out loud.
Maven is willing to discuss the inclusion of jailer. I don't think that this necessarily suggests that he wants Poisoner, he may just want to hear more from potential scumspects who do want Poisoner.
Koops' direct response to Maven. While this is all true in the moment, it doesn't help to make sense of 'leaning towards Rolecop' in Koops' previous post. Given what he first said about RC being a no, RC should only be a lean if and when GLG confirms that Poisoner hits through Bus Driver.
Shish votes RC and Poisoner, saying that they don't synergize (true) while RB and RC would (true).
Having heard from GLG that Poisoner doesn't affect RC, Koops says 'this makes it a bit harder to choose.' Why? Koops said before that he was leaning RC, and before that he said RC was a hard no, so if either one of those is real, it should make the choice a straightforward one from his POV. And Koops doesn't provide an immediate opinion on the question here -- he asks it as an open question, and then asks Shish why he wants Role Cop over Roleblocker.
Shish weighs RB versus RC. Poisoner is assumed.
Koops wants to discuss Poisoner, as in, over RC. Not RC over Poisoner, when RC was a no. I'm probably nitpicking.
Shish expresses that Poisoner is a good pick that only counters one role, and he says that RB+RC is a bad combination, but he changes Poisoner to RB anyway, which leaves his votes as RB+RC. He may have meant to tag someone other than me here, but I don't know who he meant.
Responding to Maven, Z25 says that poisoner is easy to deal with "compared to the other ones", going on to say that RC and Disguiser can cause more problems.
Importantly, Seph's flip and the Jailer flip show that mafia was trying to get Poisoner through if possible. Seph also says RC over RB, and expresses the universally-liked point that Hider and Disguiser are pro-scum options, which strongly suggests a lack of info roles picked by scum.
Moydow says she could go either way on Poisoner or RC. She states the same point as Seph and a few others, that RB+RC is scary for scum to have as a combination. She then says that she's leaning RC, but "they're both equally dodgy", which coupled with the previous sentence talking about RB+RC is a lot of talk about RC being bad over Poisoner.
Seph trashes RB + RC, presumably wanting RC + Poisoner since a Jailer exists.
Koops says, if Poisoner, then RB, as RC gives scum information. Information isn't actually relevant to the Poisoner, since the Poison is meant to hit through the Jail, not to hit the Jailer itself. If Poisoner is a sure thing, then for scum, RB is better than RC. Seph actually voices this point as well. Koops says he's curious to hear more about Role Cop being weak. Again, RC was a hard no for him to begin with. At this point, after sleeping on it, Koops still doesn't have a definite idea.
Koops asking me if I think RC+RB is the optimal path.
Koops states that RB is settled, and directly asks Seph to clarify if he wants Poisoner over RC, because Seph has been saying Poisoner + RC.
Z25 makes clear that he hates RC as an option.
Fand countering the idea that RB+RC is too strong.
Seph reiterates how safe Poisoner is.
Koops finally places his second vote (Poisoner) saying he'll put his vote where his mouth is. He unnecessarily lists all three combinations of the three discussed roles, suggesting that any of the three would be fine if that's what people want.
This is an odd statement to make about Role Cop. Koops was opposed to Role Cop from the beginning. He makes it sound as if he was on Role Cop, but was convinced that it was the lesser of two evils.
k
Seph hadn't voted yet, and he did vote for Poisoner after this post.
Right for the wrong reasons, heh.
Z25 explains himself out of Hider with a preference for Poisoner. He was already off of Hider, though, and this was an unsolicited response to Maven; no one asked Z25 to back up his choices.
Not much to say about this, it's a vote for Poisoner with reasoning, 45 minutes before the deadline.
That's no votes from me, J, Vult, and .