• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official Pac-Man's Amazing Full Colour Fan Club! - Pac-Man General Thread

APC99

Smash Master
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
4,244
Location
Appleton, WI
NNID
APC-99
3DS FC
3840-8265-8211
It's not just about the requirements, it's also that Sakurai said in an interview that he is not considering PacMan.
"Of particular interest is whether Namco Bandai characters are proritized. Sakurai said no."

By this, it means that a Namco-Bandai character will not be in over, say, another third-party or a Nintendo character. This does not say Pac-Man's 100% not in-game, it simply means that Pac-Man will not get in if there's higher priority. Has Sakurai specifically stated that Pac-Man is not in the game? No.

"Smash Bros. can still be considered as an all-star collection of Nintendo characters. Just like Mega Man or any other third-party character, it must be a special situation."

Tell me that Pac-Man is not a special situation. He's well-requested, isn't too hard to get rights to (they're working with each other, if Sakurai deems Pac-Man worthy, he literally can ask the team), has plenty of moveset potential, is as recognizable as Mario, maybe even more than Sonic and Mega Man, and is one of the most predicted characters for this game.
 

Jason the Yoshi

Watching Me, Wanting Me
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
18,791
Location
Waiting for Jesus
Oh god yeah, I'll agree there. The Cross Tekken Pac-Man was creepy and I didn't like it. He always had that same smile on his face, never blinking, never moving his eyes. And then at the end he grew huge and ate the world or something? What the heck was up with that? xD



Unless you can provide proof of that, no, you're wrong. Sakurai never said those words. He said Namco wasn't getting any special consideration for a character simply because they were developing the game, but he never flat out said Pac-Man wasn't getting in.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but you're reading things out of context. Also, IGN is biased as hell against Pac-Man, so they're not a reliable source. I remember they did a poll where they asked people what new character should be in Smash. They didn't have an option for Pac-Man. They had a "please god anybody but Pac-Man" option. I mean, seriously? That's how you run a professional business? By slamming a massive game company's mascot? Stay classy, IGN.
That's what Sakurai meant though. And not having an option for PacMan? That obviously means that even they find him uncharismatic.
 

Jason the Yoshi

Watching Me, Wanting Me
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
18,791
Location
Waiting for Jesus
"Of particular interest is whether Namco Bandai characters are proritized. Sakurai said no."

By this, it means that a Namco-Bandai character will not be in over, say, another third-party or a Nintendo character. This does not say Pac-Man's 100% not in-game, it simply means that Pac-Man will not get in if there's higher priority. Has Sakurai specifically stated that Pac-Man is not in the game? No.

"Smash Bros. can still be considered as an all-star collection of Nintendo characters. Just like Mega Man or any other third-party character, it must be a special situation."

Tell me that Pac-Man is not a special situation. He's well-requested, isn't too hard to get rights to (they're working with each other, if Sakurai deems Pac-Man worthy, he literally can ask the team), has plenty of moveset potential, is as recognizable as Mario, maybe even more than Sonic and Mega Man, and is one of the most predicted characters for this game.
I see that you have learned nothing. The article also says that Sakurai is considering how expensive it was to get MegaMan into the game. There is no Special Situation just because Namco Bandai is assisting with the development of the game, that means absolutely nothing.
 

greenluigiman2

Smash Ace
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
809
Okay, I just want to ask a question here to everyone, and please don't take offense to it. I understand opinions are opinions, and that's okay! :D But my question is, why do people prefer the Party design to his new Ghostly Adventures design?

Here's a comparison:


Now don't get me wrong, his Party design is cute, and I don't dislike it at all. Back before the TV show came out, I thought that that was the new look Namco was taking with Pac-Man, and I was okay with it. But once I saw the actual TV show and how good their 3D model was, looking back on the Party model made it look cheap. Comparing the two, for me, the one on the left looks like someone was trying to imitate the model on the right. In the GA model, his mouth actually has a rim and has depth. So do his eyes. Hi shoes look more fleshed out and realized, including a tiny modeled Pac-Man on the front. He has fingers instead of just mittens, and his eyebrows look much better in comparison to the Party model's.

Just my two cents, but I hear a lot of hate on the GA model (not just from here, from other places too) and I honestly don't understand it. It's a much better designed and detailed model in almost every regard. Maybe it makes him look too plasticky and real rather than looking like a cartoon? I dunno. I wanna hear what you guys think. :D
The reason I prefer the Party design is because it's a lot more subdued. His hands, arms, legs and feet are all look perfect, proportionally speaking. His limbs are short and complement the size of his body. The mittens are also a lot more aesthetically pleasing than the fingered gloves. Also, check out the location of his arms, they sit nicely below the eyes and nose rather than above the nose and in line with the eyes like in the GA version. The eyes are closer to the top of his head and closer to his eyebrows. His eyes also don't have that unnecessary GA depth (since when is eye depth good design for a cartoony character? Mario, Sonic, Mega Man, Rayman, none of them have that.) Another thing is that his pupils/irises are not too big like in GA, which don't have enough white space. Lastly, the colors of the gloves and shoes are better in the Party design.

The only things better about the GA version IMO is the mouth depth, the eye triangles and maybe the shoes, which aren't that much different.
 

Bauske

Pac-Maniac
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
1,175
Location
Pac-Maze
NNID
Bauske
3DS FC
2878-9584-0314
That's what Sakurai meant though. And not having an option for PacMan? That obviously means that even they find him uncharismatic.
You have no idea what he meant. He was making that statement because people were assuming that, because they were helping develop the game, Namco would receive special treatment for character consideration. He made the statement to imply that NO ONE is getting special treatment for a character, regardless of whether they're helping with the game or not.

Look, we're not stating Pac-Man is definitely getting into the game. We've seen no evidence to support that he IS in the game, but the fact remains he's one of the biggest and most iconic characters in video game history, and with Namco helping to develop the game, I can't imagine they wouldn't put forth the effort to try to get their beloved mascot into the fray.

Regardless of what happens, you can deny it all you want. It may not happen, but it also may, and your tears will taste that much better if it does. ;)
 

Jason the Yoshi

Watching Me, Wanting Me
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
18,791
Location
Waiting for Jesus
You have no idea what he meant. He was making that statement because people were assuming that, because they were helping develop the game, Namco would receive special treatment for character consideration. He made the statement to imply that NO ONE is getting special treatment for a character, regardless of whether they're helping with the game or not.

Look, we're not stating Pac-Man is definitely getting into the game. We've seen no evidence to support that he IS in the game, but the fact remains he's one of the biggest and most iconic characters in video game history, and with Namco helping to develop the game, I can't imagine they wouldn't put forth the effort to try to get their beloved mascot into the fray.

Regardless of what happens, you can deny it all you want. It may not happen, but it also may, and your tears will taste that much better if it does. ;)
I know, but I've seen some pretty fake leaks on the internet, ridiculous Pacman leaks being among them. No offense.
 

Bauske

Pac-Maniac
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
1,175
Location
Pac-Maze
NNID
Bauske
3DS FC
2878-9584-0314
The reason I prefer the Party design is because it's a lot more subdued. His hands, arms, legs and feet are all look perfect, proportionally speaking. His limbs are short and complement the size of his body. The mittens are also a lot more aesthetically pleasing than the fingered gloves. Also, check out the location of his arms, they sit nicely below the eyes and nose rather than above the nose and in line with the eyes like in the GA version. The eyes are closer to the top of his head and closer to his eyebrows. His eyes also don't have that unnecessary GA depth (since when is eye depth good design for a cartoony character? Mario, Sonic, Mega Man, Rayman, none of them have that.) Another thing is that his pupils/irises are not too big like in GA, which don't have enough white space. Lastly, the colors of the gloves and shoes are better in the Party design.

The only things better about the GA version IMO is the mouth depth, the eye triangles and maybe the shoes, which aren't that much different.
Very good points. I like those a lot, and it makes a lot of sense.

Again, I will admit I'm not fond of the GA promotional art they do for him. A lot of the pictures don't seem to do him justice and do come off as creepy. Like this picture. It's one of the main pictures they use everywhere for the new show, but in my opinion does not do the actual show's character justice. He's far more animated and well done there than those pictures portray.
 

greenluigiman2

Smash Ace
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
809
I see that you have learned nothing. The article also says that Sakurai is considering how expensive it was to get MegaMan into the game. There is no Special Situation just because Namco Bandai is assisting with the development of the game, that means absolutely nothing.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
 

Bauske

Pac-Maniac
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
1,175
Location
Pac-Maze
NNID
Bauske
3DS FC
2878-9584-0314
I know, but I've seen some pretty fake leaks on the internet, ridiculous Pacman leaks being among them. No offense.
None taken. I've seen ridiculous leaks too, like ones that say Goku or Sora from Kingdom Hearts would be in it. Stuff like that is just wishful thinking by fanboys.

And while Pac-Man fans wanting Pac-Man to be in Smash Bros. may sound like wishful thinking or us just being fanboys, we actually have reason behind it rather than "he's just cool." Namco and Nintendo have a history, they've made games together, Pac-Man has been in Mario games, Mario has been in Pac-Man games, and he's one of the most iconic characters in history. His chances are actually pretty good, if you take the time to do the research and not let your bias cloud your vision.
 
Last edited:

APC99

Smash Master
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
4,244
Location
Appleton, WI
NNID
APC-99
3DS FC
3840-8265-8211
That's what Sakurai meant though. And not having an option for PacMan? That obviously means that even they find him uncharismatic.
How exactly do you know what Sakurai meant when you were not present? And because they think someone's uncharismatic means he won't be in? Well then, I guess I'll go back to Wii Fit Traienr and marvel at the amount of story and development put into her totally not bland appearance.

I see that you have learned nothing. The article also says that Sakurai is considering how expensive it was to get MegaMan into the game. There is no Special Situation just because Namco Bandai is assisting with the development of the game, that means absolutely nothing.
Expensive?

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06...ters-receive-no-priority-for-super-smash-bros

Here's the article. Point out the word "expensive" to me. It's more trying to ensure all parties are happy, the characters are special arrangements. I never said Pac-Man would get in, but if Sakurai deems him worthy and WANTS him in, he's able to access him more easily than, say, Sonic, Snake or Mega Man. If Pac-Man was chosen already, it had nothing to do with Namco's inclusion. It had to do with his large fanbase, his moveset potential and his status as the ICON of video gaming in the 80's and 90's. Sonic and Mega Man got in because of popularity. Snake as a request. Who's to say Pac-Man's popularity has no effect on it? Nope. He's disconfirmed because Sakurai said no characters will get in solely for the fact that they're Namco. Ignore movesets, ignore popularity, if Sakurai said that a Capcom character was not the most important addition to Smash Bros. at the time, would that mean that Mega Man was disconfirmed? Or that Nintendo characters have priority over third-parties?

Pac-Man still has a chance. Namco's not getting special treatment solely for working on the game. They'd get him in BECAUSE Pac-Man's an icon, it has nothing to do with Namco's involvement. Besides, the roster's already decided. We don't know. You can't come in to the support thread and bash us because you don't like the idea of a character.

Lemme guess, Ridley's too big for you?
 

Jason the Yoshi

Watching Me, Wanting Me
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
18,791
Location
Waiting for Jesus
How exactly do you know what Sakurai meant when you were not present? And because they think someone's uncharismatic means he won't be in? Well then, I guess I'll go back to Wii Fit Traienr and marvel at the amount of story and development put into her totally not bland appearance.



Expensive?

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06...ters-receive-no-priority-for-super-smash-bros

Here's the article. Point out the word "expensive" to me. It's more trying to ensure all parties are happy, the characters are special arrangements. I never said Pac-Man would get in, but if Sakurai deems him worthy and WANTS him in, he's able to access him more easily than, say, Sonic, Snake or Mega Man. If Pac-Man was chosen already, it had nothing to do with Namco's inclusion. It had to do with his large fanbase, his moveset potential and his status as the ICON of video gaming in the 80's and 90's. Sonic and Mega Man got in because of popularity. Snake as a request. Who's to say Pac-Man's popularity has no effect on it? Nope. He's disconfirmed because Sakurai said no characters will get in solely for the fact that they're Namco. Ignore movesets, ignore popularity, if Sakurai said that a Capcom character was not the most important addition to Smash Bros. at the time, would that mean that Mega Man was disconfirmed? Or that Nintendo characters have priority over third-parties?

Pac-Man still has a chance. Namco's not getting special treatment solely for working on the game. They'd get him in BECAUSE Pac-Man's an icon, it has nothing to do with Namco's involvement. Besides, the roster's already decided. We don't know. You can't come in to the support thread and bash us because you don't like the idea of a character.

Lemme guess, Ridley's too big for you?
That's not what I meant, just saying that his chances are pretty low.
 

APC99

Smash Master
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
4,244
Location
Appleton, WI
NNID
APC-99
3DS FC
3840-8265-8211
That's not what I meant, just saying that his chances are pretty low.
Sorry for starting this whole argument thing, but I do agree that any third-party has lower chances. I'm just hopeful to see the 4 icons of gaming face off.
 

CyberWolfBia

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
1,685
Location
Brazil, São Paulo
NNID
CyberWolfJV
3DS FC
0130-2511-6417
Switch FC
SW-6209-5056-9218
and here we go again...always there is one to spoil the pac-party :upsidedown: (and talking things that don't know, unsurprisingly; low chances?... :smash:)

... uncharismatic? ... so, personal point of view, IMO... I find Sonic, and many others in Smash, very boring characters... (the blue hedgehog, means only nostalgia for me, seriously.. his Modern incarnation is nothing to me).

anyway... if we pay attention, and argue against every guy that comes here to talk whatever he wants, this thread will be more a battlefield than a peaceful support place, I guess. :\/
 
Last edited:

Bauske

Pac-Maniac
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
1,175
Location
Pac-Maze
NNID
Bauske
3DS FC
2878-9584-0314
and here we go again...always there is one to spoil the pac-party :upsidedown: (and talking things that don't know, unsurprisingly)

... uncharismatic? ... so, personal point of view, IMO... I find Sonic, and many others in Smash, very boring characters... (the blue hedgehog, means only nostalgia for me, seriously.. his Modern incarnation is nothing to me).

anyway... if we pay attention, and argue against every guy that comes here to talk whatever he wants, this thread will be more a battlefield than a peaceful support place, I guess. :\/
Eh, I like to look at the naysayers as an opportunity to show them why Pac-Man would be a great potential candidate rather than spewing lopsided arguments at them. I know Pac-Man's not as popular as other characters out there, but he definitely has his place in gaming history. You're never going to convince someone who hates Pac-Man to suddenly like him, but you may be able to show them why he's not an impossible choice.
 

CyberWolfBia

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
1,685
Location
Brazil, São Paulo
NNID
CyberWolfJV
3DS FC
0130-2511-6417
Switch FC
SW-6209-5056-9218
Eh, I like to look at the naysayers as an opportunity to show them why Pac-Man would be a great potential candidate rather than spewing lopsided arguments at them. I know Pac-Man's not as popular as other characters out there, but he definitely has his place in gaming history. You're never going to convince someone who hates Pac-Man to suddenly like him, but you may be able to show them why he's not an impossible choice.
nah, their bias is so huge, that make them blind, I just gave up of this... I just want to wait at Pac's (not a bit low chances to really happen) reveal. And I can bet that, will still have some Pac-Haters.. and for them, I just will say this (at 0:09)
 
Last edited:

BridgesWithTurtles

Smash Champion
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
2,175
Location
The long road to nowhere
3DS FC
3523-2059-7939
Okay, I just want to ask a question here to everyone, and please don't take offense to it. I understand opinions are opinions, and that's okay! :D But my question is, why do people prefer the Party design to his new Ghostly Adventures design?

Here's a comparison:


Now don't get me wrong, his Party design is cute, and I don't dislike it at all. Back before the TV show came out, I thought that that was the new look Namco was taking with Pac-Man, and I was okay with it. But once I saw the actual TV show and how good their 3D model was, looking back on the Party model made it look cheap. Comparing the two, for me, the one on the left looks like someone was trying to imitate the model on the right. In the GA model, his mouth actually has a rim and has depth. So do his eyes. Hi shoes look more fleshed out and realized, including a tiny modeled Pac-Man on the front. He has fingers instead of just mittens, and his eyebrows look much better in comparison to the Party model's.

Just my two cents, but I hear a lot of hate on the GA model (not just from here, from other places too) and I honestly don't understand it. It's a much better designed and detailed model in almost every regard. Maybe it makes him look too plasticky and real rather than looking like a cartoon? I dunno. I wanna hear what you guys think. :D
While they appear almost identical at face value, something that also made me ponder why I prefer one to the other so strongly, there are actually a few subtle differences that, as a whole, drastically contribute to why I prefer the Party design. The depressed eyes in the GA design are a little offputting on a round body, and the way that Pac is rendered overall makes him too shiny and dense, like a hard plastic figure or robot rather than an organic lifeform. The eyebrows are also a problem, as they're angled more acutely than in the Party design, making them shaped like "kitty ears". The Party design also has this "solid eyebrows" problem, but it's much more pronounced in GA. Add the mouth rim into the equation, and all of these attributes make it look like he's wearing some sort of shell over his body, which comes off as unnaturally inorganic. I think it's the same sort of problem that a lot of people had with the character models in Sonic Heroes. The designs were unnecessarily shiny and rigid looking, making everyone look like plastic toys.



Everything else mentioned by greenluigiman2 is also pretty much spot-on in my point of view as well. I like the proportionality of the Party design more. The shorter limbs contribute to a more compact, "round" appearance overall, while the spindly arms of the GA design detract from that. The placement of the arms is notable as well. GA's Pac-Man has his arms directly in the middle of his body, while the Party design places them below the mouth, which I feel is a bit more natural, if you look at Pac-Man as more of a bodiless head and less like a headless body. I much prefer the gloved mittens to the fingered hands, the latter of which are the same size but are too large overall in proportion to the body thanks to the addition of digits. This isn't a dislike I have in solely the GA design. I dislike the fingered gloves in prior games' artwork as well. The teeth have never done it for me, and I think Pac-Man is just too abstract to have such a human-like set of teeth. It just looks really weird. Imagine if Kirby had teeth (he actually did, in older promotional material). It'd look awkward.

Finally, I prefer the coloring on the Party design. The shade of yellow used is more akin with how I tend to imagine the character, the deep orange gloves look better in contrast to his overall color scheme than the borderline red ones in the GA design, and his shoes are more vibrant and are a burnt orange sort of color, which clashes less with Pac-Man's palette than the straight red shoes in GA, which make him look like a McDonalds mascot.
 

CyberWolfBia

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
1,685
Location
Brazil, São Paulo
NNID
CyberWolfJV
3DS FC
0130-2511-6417
Switch FC
SW-6209-5056-9218
Well, answering the question of @ Bauske Bauske ;.. again, I have nothing against the G.A. design,. .. as I said, I got used very quick, and the Show kinda captivates me, and I do like a lot the new game, and how NAMCO is doing his new marketing, I approve.. when we talk about design, I have my personal tastes, and, kinda for not a big reason I prefere the Pac-Man Party design, or even the hibrid between Party and G.A., which is the SFxTK one.
-- but I have no problem with the new one, ... I hope that NAMCO do better and better with him this way, for this Pac's design remind people to legendary things, rather just than a kids show.

EDIT: oh,.. I don't get all the thing about his teeth, why he can't have teeths? lolz,... in any case, Pacster just show his teeths for some facial expressions, not all the time.. is just like any other character, even Donald Duck show some tooth some few times (which is insane, he's a duck! XD).

but a design that I'm already hating is this for Pac-Man Monsters, ugh. =P

... AND, I promise to not bring back anymore this design debate; ...=P we all love/like Pac-Man, whatever how he looks, whatever how he appears in Smash (as a playable character, obviously), right? :3
 
Last edited:

Pacack

Super Pac-Fan
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
8,066
Location
US (Mountain Time, -7 Hours)
NNID
Pacack
3DS FC
0688-5284-6845
The reason I prefer the Party design is because it's a lot more subdued. His hands, arms, legs and feet are all look perfect, proportionally speaking. His limbs are short and complement the size of his body. The mittens are also a lot more aesthetically pleasing than the fingered gloves. Also, check out the location of his arms, they sit nicely below the eyes and nose rather than above the nose and in line with the eyes like in the GA version. The eyes are closer to the top of his head and closer to his eyebrows. His eyes also don't have that unnecessary GA depth (since when is eye depth good design for a cartoony character? Mario, Sonic, Mega Man, Rayman, none of them have that.) Another thing is that his pupils/irises are not too big like in GA, which don't have enough white space. Lastly, the colors of the gloves and shoes are better in the Party design.

While they appear almost identical at face value, something that also made me ponder why I prefer one to the other so strongly, there are actually a few subtle differences that, as a whole, drastically contribute to why I prefer the Party design. The depressed eyes in the GA design are a little offputting on a round body, and the way that Pac is rendered overall makes him too shiny and dense, like a hard plastic figure or robot rather than an organic lifeform. The eyebrows are also a problem, as they're angled more acutely than in the Party design, making them shaped like "kitty ears". The Party design also has this "solid eyebrows" problem, but it's much more pronounced in GA. Add the mouth rim into the equation, and all of these attributes make it look like he's wearing some sort of shell over his body, which comes off as unnaturally inorganic. I think it's the same sort of problem that a lot of people had with the character models in Sonic Heroes. The designs were unnecessarily shiny and rigid looking, making everyone look like plastic toys.



Everything else mentioned by greenluigiman2 is also pretty much spot-on in my point of view as well. I like the proportionality of the Party design more. The shorter limbs contribute to a more compact, "round" appearance overall, while the spindly arms of the GA design detract from that. The placement of the arms is notable as well. GA's Pac-Man has his arms directly in the middle of his body, while the Party design places them below the mouth, which I feel is a bit more natural, if you look at Pac-Man as more of a bodiless head and less like a headless body. I much prefer the gloved mittens to the fingered hands, the latter of which are the same size but are too large overall in proportion to the body thanks to the addition of digits. This isn't a dislike I have in solely the GA design. I dislike the fingered gloves in prior games' artwork as well. The teeth have never done it for me, and I think Pac-Man is just too abstract to have such a human-like set of teeth. It just looks really weird. Imagine if Kirby had teeth (he actually did, in older promotional material). It'd look awkward.

Finally, I prefer the coloring on the Party design. The shade of yellow used is more akin with how I tend to imagine the character, the deep orange gloves look better in contrast to his overall color scheme than the borderline red ones in the GA design, and his shoes are more vibrant and are a burnt orange sort of color, which clashes less with Pac-Man's palette than the straight red shoes in GA, which make him look like a McDonalds mascot.
The only things better about the GA version IMO is the mouth depth, the eye triangles and maybe the shoes, which aren't that much different.
Don't forget how much better the party design shows emotion (doesn't use eyelids, instead uses eyebrows). Fits him better, imo.
 

Bauske

Pac-Maniac
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
1,175
Location
Pac-Maze
NNID
Bauske
3DS FC
2878-9584-0314
Don't forget how much better the party design shows emotion (doesn't use eyelids, instead uses eyebrows). Fits him better, imo.
In the show, they use a mix of eyelids and eyebrows to do emotion. It's quite frequent, if not all the time. Since Pac is a very, very animated character, they need all they can to make it work, since he's kinda just a ball with arms, legs, eyes and a mouth. :p

Here are some pics I took from the first five or so minutes from an episode of the show. You can see what I mean.



I think, since a lot of people don't watch the cartoon, many just see the new clip art Namco has made for Pac (like the stuff I used in my fake Smash Bros. pictures), and as I said, it's not very convincing. He looks so much better in action. You can watch all the episodes online here if you want.
 

BridgesWithTurtles

Smash Champion
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
2,175
Location
The long road to nowhere
3DS FC
3523-2059-7939
I dunno Bauske. I've seen most of the episodes in Season 1 (including some rewatches), and the design still has no appeal to me. I really just don't like the way Pac-Man looks, moves, and acts in Ghostly Adventures. Part of it is the design itself, and part of it is the sheer fact that I dislike the way the show itself is animated.
 

Bauske

Pac-Maniac
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
1,175
Location
Pac-Maze
NNID
Bauske
3DS FC
2878-9584-0314
I dunno Bauske. I've seen most of the episodes in Season 1 (including some rewatches), and the design still has no appeal to me. I really just don't like the way Pac-Man looks, moves, and acts in Ghostly Adventures. Part of it is the design itself, and part of it is the sheer fact that I dislike the way the show itself is animated.
Well there's nothing I can say about that. :D Nor would I try to change your opinion, especially if you've watched it. I'm still watching the episodes, and for the most part I really enjoy the show and am glad to hear they're making a season two. I still really appreciate your input on the matter, though! Thanks! :D
 

Pacack

Super Pac-Fan
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
8,066
Location
US (Mountain Time, -7 Hours)
NNID
Pacack
3DS FC
0688-5284-6845
In the show, they use a mix of eyelids and eyebrows to do emotion. It's quite frequent, if not all the time. Since Pac is a very, very animated character, they need all they can to make it work, since he's kinda just a ball with arms, legs, eyes and a mouth. :p

Here are some pics I took from the first five or so minutes from an episode of the show. You can see what I mean.



I think, since a lot of people don't watch the cartoon, many just see the new clip art Namco has made for Pac (like the stuff I used in my fake Smash Bros. pictures), and as I said, it's not very convincing. He looks so much better in action. You can watch all the episodes online here if you want.
Oh, I've watched it. What I'm talking about is this:


In the Party design, there are no eyelids used for emotion at all. Instead, they made the eyebrows form the outlines of the eyes when they're showing emotions other than happiness (or when he has a lack of emotion). (The eyes even close without any discernible eyelids, like in the first picture.) Basically, it's just a more cartoony approach than the one that they went for in Ghostly Adventures, and I think it fits better for Pac-Man. It all comes down to personal preference in the end, of course, but I think that the added details on the Ghostly Adventures design just don't work as well as the simplistic approach that the Party design uses.

(For the record, this design is about tied with the classic design as my favorite Pac-Man design. I really love it. It's all the little details. The eyes gradually blend from blue to black instead of having a dramatic layering, the yellow is more vibrant, the shoes are absolutely perfect and make Pac-Man look brighter without changing too much, the gloves being mittens works with the rest of the design's simplistic approach, the proportions are better done by a long shot, the eyebrows are slightly less prominent, the arms are in a lower position, and his nose isn't ridiculously long. I mean, really, it's a very nice design. I wish they kept this for Ghostly Adventures. Might've been received better that way.)
 

Bauske

Pac-Maniac
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
1,175
Location
Pac-Maze
NNID
Bauske
3DS FC
2878-9584-0314
Oh, I've watched it. What I'm talking about is this:


In the Party design, there are no eyelids used for emotion at all. Instead, they made the eyebrows form the outlines of the eyes when they're showing emotions other than happiness (or when he has a lack of emotion). (The eyes even close without any discernible eyelids, like in the first picture.) Basically, it's just a more cartoony approach than the one that they went for in Ghostly Adventures, and I think it fits better for Pac-Man. It all comes down to personal preference in the end, of course, but I think that the added details on the Ghostly Adventures design just don't work as well as the simplistic approach that the Party design uses.

(For the record, this design is about tied with the classic design as my favorite Pac-Man design. I really love it. It's all the little details. The eyes gradually blend from blue to black instead of having a dramatic layering, the yellow is more vibrant, the shoes are absolutely perfect and make Pac-Man look brighter without changing too much, the gloves being mittens works with the rest of the design's simplistic approach, the proportions are better done by a long shot, the eyebrows are slightly less prominent, the arms are in a lower position, and his nose isn't ridiculously long. I mean, really, it's a very nice design. I wish they kept this for Ghostly Adventures. Might've been received better that way.)
You know, I never got to play the Wii version of Pac-Man Party, so I never got to see those in action. I had the 3DS version, but they completely took out all emotion on his face for it. Kind of annoying.
 

Pacack

Super Pac-Fan
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
8,066
Location
US (Mountain Time, -7 Hours)
NNID
Pacack
3DS FC
0688-5284-6845
You know, I never got to play the Wii version of Pac-Man Party, so I never got to see those in action. I had the 3DS version, but they completely took out all emotion on his face for it. Kind of annoying.
That explains why you didn't know what I was talking about. I have the game for Wii (though I have yet to actually beat the story mode...heh.) and I got to see the animations myself. I also like the way he runs and whatnot in-game.
 

JamesDNaux

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 14, 2013
Messages
7,760
Location
Studio Naux
NNID
JamesDNaux
I'm working on my own Pac-Man moveset, with a few Namco inspired twists. I'm trying to make this at least a bit different from the usual Pac-Man moveset, so I'm pulling out all the stops on it. One thing I'll mention, is that chomp is not his neutral special in this one. Would any of the more post-arcade fans be able to share some insight into his newer abilities? I've only ever played the original game, Pac-Man 2, and a small bit of Pac-Man World, which I can barely remember.
 

Pacack

Super Pac-Fan
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
8,066
Location
US (Mountain Time, -7 Hours)
NNID
Pacack
3DS FC
0688-5284-6845
I'm working on my own Pac-Man moveset, with a few Namco inspired twists. I'm trying to make this at least a bit different from the usual Pac-Man moveset, so I'm pulling out all the stops on it. One thing I'll mention, is that chomp is not his neutral special in this one. Would any of the more post-arcade fans be able to share some insight into his newer abilities? I've only ever played the original game, Pac-Man 2, and a small bit of Pac-Man World, which I can barely remember.
Hes done a little bit of everything, honestly. I recommend you look at some gameplay footage of the World games first, since those have his signature butt-bounce and whatnot.
 

CyberWolfBia

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
1,685
Location
Brazil, São Paulo
NNID
CyberWolfJV
3DS FC
0130-2511-6417
Switch FC
SW-6209-5056-9218
I hope that until the weekend, I can finish my moveset for Pacster with all the details that I want; :3 ... but I'll warn you guys already, that I'm using those horrible sketches that I do at work; as poster I had posted here the other day. =P
 

Freduardo

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
2,389
This thread already found out Pac Man's best design was in the 16 bit era.

He was in a baseball game launch title on the SNES too with that design. Super Batter Up? Bases Loaded? Don't remember, but if you hit a home run you'd see pac man fly over the bleachers either surfing on a rocket, piloting a bi plane, or in his superhero mask and cape from Pac Man 2.

So mask and cape super pac man for the win!
 

Pacack

Super Pac-Fan
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
8,066
Location
US (Mountain Time, -7 Hours)
NNID
Pacack
3DS FC
0688-5284-6845
Remember the merchandise pictures that I promised forever ago?

They're here :D

First up, these!






They're tokens from a Namco event. I have a bunch of them now! Pretty cheap if you wanna look at buying some. Found them on ebay. Just search for Pac-Man tokens.

And the one that I was waiting for for WAAAAY longer than I expected.



ISN'T HE ADORABLE?!? He's seven inches tall and he's made of really soft plush-y material. I found him online for way cheaper than others like him were going for :D

I have no idea what to name him, though. Got any ideas?
 

Popo Nana Power

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Messages
96
If Pac-Man's in the game, I hope he has his Ghostly Adventures look instead of his retro look. The big blue eyes look so much better than the little black dots.
 

Pacack

Super Pac-Fan
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
8,066
Location
US (Mountain Time, -7 Hours)
NNID
Pacack
3DS FC
0688-5284-6845
If Pac-Man's in the game, I hope he has his Ghostly Adventures look instead of his retro look. The big blue eyes look so much better than the little black dots.
I never thought I'd hear anyone say that. I much prefer his classic design. Or his Party design.



What do you think of his Party design? It's basically the in-between of the classic and GA designs. One of my personal favorite designs of Pac-Man.
His eyes are a little bland. How bout those eyes from the arcade design?
Eh. Not a fan.
 

FlareHabanero

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
16,443
Location
New Jersey


ISN'T HE ADORABLE?!? He's seven inches tall and he's made of really soft plush-y material. I found him online for way cheaper than others like him were going for :D

I have no idea what to name him, though. Got any ideas?
Reminds me of one of the crane games in the movie theater next door that had the ghosts from Pac-Man, designed similar to that plush. I believe they were Blinky and Pinky ones. Pac-Man, Inky, and Clyde weren't there though.

Anyway, name is Spunky or Sneaky or something along those lines.

Or Debbie.
 

Pacack

Super Pac-Fan
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
8,066
Location
US (Mountain Time, -7 Hours)
NNID
Pacack
3DS FC
0688-5284-6845
Reminds me of one of the crane games in the movie theater next door that had the ghosts from Pac-Man, designed similar to that plush. I believe they were Blinky and Pinky ones. Pac-Man, Inky, and Clyde weren't there though.

Anyway, name is Spunky or Sneaky or something along those lines.

Or Debbie.
No lie, I'd legitimately pay you to get one of those.

And those two are nice, but I'd go for something that doesn't sound so...strong. He is a blue ghost, after all.
 
Last edited:

Popo Nana Power

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Messages
96
I never thought I'd hear anyone say that. I much prefer his classic design. Or his Party design.



What do you think of his Party design? It's basically the in-between of the classic and GA designs. One of my personal favorite designs of Pac-Man.
Hmm. Well, I guess I don't mind it? I'm having a difficult time figuring out what the difference is with his Ghostly Adventures design...Are the proportions slightly different? I can't tell.

I can see that his new design colouring is slightly less saturated in colour, and his model has more detail to it, though. But I think that's an improvement.

Oh, are you talking about the gloves? They changed his boxing gloves into fingered gloves, huh. Well, I don't really mind, though I slightly prefer the boxling gloves.

EDIT: Oh, you're probably talking about the addition of teeth. Didn't notice that. :V Yeah, I prefer his old mouth. Though whether they show him with teeth in Ghostly Adventures varies.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member

Guest
Remember the merchandise pictures that I promised forever ago?

They're here :D

First up, these!






They're tokens from a Namco event. I have a bunch of them now! Pretty cheap if you wanna look at buying some. Found them on ebay. Just search for Pac-Man tokens.

And the one that I was waiting for for WAAAAY longer than I expected.



ISN'T HE ADORABLE?!? He's seven inches tall and he's made of really soft plush-y material. I found him online for way cheaper than others like him were going for :D

I have no idea what to name him, though. Got any ideas?
That is some awesome merch. The most I have of any video game at all is a Wario plushie I got from New York's Nintendo shop.

My opinion on the design is basically the World one is best, making it a bit more fluid. Pac-Man should be fairly expressive. (I always found the World design's lack of animation creepy). He was from the Arcade game a cowardly and comical protagonist, his reactions to getting damaged should be similar to Dedede's or Diddy Kong's. Basically a less try hard version of Sonic. And yeah, I like the design having shorter arms/legs and no teeth.
 

Yomi's Biggest Fan

See You Next Year, Baby
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
26,203
Location
Chicago, Illinois
NNID
Takamaru64
3DS FC
1375-7346-9605
Switch FC
SW-8277-6509-2593
This is probably what that trollish Namco dev that tarnished Sega of Europe's HQ building with Pacster was thinking: "The Pac is Baaaaaaaaaac.." *shot* :troll:
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom