Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
really thanks, I appreciate that you had liked ^-^.You made that? Wow, man, that was awesome! You made some really excellent points without sounding like a fanboy. It was precise and educated. Good job!
I really agree with this,.. you know, I'm in favor of Pac-Man be most based in the World series and his original arcade appearance; but when we talk about Final Smashes in general in SmashBros., I think we have already a lot of characters with transformations (principally changing drastically of appearence).. and giving him a touch of modernization in just this detail, wouldn't hurt... besides I consider Pac-Man World series still part of his "classic" incarnation, since his debut occurred only afater Pac-Man Party.Pac-Man doesn't have to become a 2D circle missing a piece...
Well, I was thinking in Pac's Final Smash.. I see a lot of people saying that he could turn in a giant 8-bit verion of himself, and walk around the stage biting the opponents.. while I think that would be cool throwback of Arcades, I think that wouldn't fit too much with his recents incarnations (and I'm not talking just about GA, but in general, Pac never did something before.. in Pac-Man World series, Pac-in-Time, Pac-Land, etc)...
So, for keep his main characteristic (eating) as his Final Smash, I thought that would be cool something like in Pac-Man World series fashion,.. he eats a Power Palette (that would appear from nowhere), the Power Pallet 8-Bit sound would be heard while he's by the effect, and with Pac-Man World 3 as reference, he would shine this way (always found this a nice effect)
the opponents at the stage would get a blue mask in all the body (while we don't know if the Power Pallet effect works in other people, not just ghosts.. it's a crossover, anything can happen. :\/), just like this:
the opponents would stay working normally with their A.I. (or the player commands), you can even stay fighting and hit Pac,... but, if Pac-Man can be able to perform his chomp attack (which obvisously would be part of his moveset, no doubts here, lol), the opponent would be eaten instantly (with the classic 8-Bit SFX, and with a pause in a second, just like in his game), ... the eyes of the character that was eaten, would fly around, and then be out of the stage (when the eyes touches a critical part of the limit of the stage, the standard K.O. effect of SmashBros would occur normally, together with the character scream).... everytime when Pac-Man could bite the characters, everytime they would be instantly KOned.. but as a disadvantage of this "OP" Final Smash, Pac would stay vulnerable to attacks and such..
of course, when the Final Smash/Power Pallet effect finishes, everybody would back to their normal colors.
I thought that would be cool... it's similar of Chaos Dimension of Shuma-Gorath in MvC series (in terms of opportunity to attack the opponent and timer).
what you think? =)
Awesome video man! I love the effects and music! You must like vistacity too!
If it makes you feel better, we Americans have very few arcades these days.I agree with this, although Pac-Man having his own universe (that, aesthetically, doesn't seem nothing alike Mario's universe.. be classic or modern), he fits very very well with Mario and friends together in the same place.. seems like a compatible universe, concept of characters and all, like Banjo and Conker were once with Donkey Kong (and DK, is related with Mario, so.. =P)..
Pac in Smash will fit like a glove, and he'll feel in home. :'D .
Oh, btw, Mario Kart Arcade GP DX is already in western countries... or at least in USA; check it out:
http://www.gonintendo.com/s/222527-mario-kart-gp-dx-more-footage-dave-and-busters-commercial
(PS: I'm jealous of you American guys,... we on Brazil have very few MKAGP machines, and it's very hard to find. :\/)
Aaaah! And we have a Dave & Buster's in town! Now I wanna go and see if they have it! D:I agree with this, although Pac-Man having his own universe (that, aesthetically, doesn't seem nothing alike Mario's universe.. be classic or modern), he fits very very well with Mario and friends together in the same place.. seems like a compatible universe, concept of characters and all, like Banjo and Conker were once with Donkey Kong (and DK, is related with Mario, so.. =P)..
Pac in Smash will fit like a glove, and he'll feel in home. :'D .
Oh, btw, Mario Kart Arcade GP DX is already in western countries... or at least in USA; check it out:
http://www.gonintendo.com/s/222527-mario-kart-gp-dx-more-footage-dave-and-busters-commercial
(PS: I'm jealous of you American guys,... we on Brazil have very few MKAGP machines, and it's very hard to find. :\/)
I would laugh, cry, and rejoice.changing a bit the subject.. seeing how "loved" Pac is, at least here on Smashboards; After the imminent Pac reveal, how many people you think that will come here and say "Hey, Pac-Man supporters! Congratulations! Glad Pac entered in Smash!"??... After seeing people on Little Mac thread, I wonder about that.. principally if Pac recieve a cool trailer, showing a lot of potential of unique gameplay; a instant Pac-Love would appear in their dark hearts. =P...
heh, in fact, wouldn't care too much of the ammount of people saying that, since we, Pac-Supporters stay together until we get our objective. =)
of course this would be (and hopefully will be!) awesome.. but you know, Pac-Man in Smash is a thing that I always wanted, be or not in the current circumstances (with Sonic, and Mega Man in the game too),.. but sure this point make the things still more memorable, not only for us, but for the gaming story... "the only game that reunited the four main mascots from gaming industry"... NAMCO and Nintendo hopefully know that, and won't waste the chance. =;DAnd I'll probably just have an unbelievable feeling that 3 of the most popular 3rd parties are in the same game with Mario. It's a real good, strong feeling for me.
Well, that alone can't possibly make the Wii U a success, but it would certainly help a lot.I venture to say that if Pac-Man join the game to complete this epic team of mascots, even the Wii U sales can increase... thing that, Smash alone (with the game appeal itself) couldn't do.. you know, everyone (I mean, literally everyone) would like to play the game that made this epic encounter! I know that I would. =P
Whelp, time to go to Dave & Busters downtown on Spring Break. It's been a while since my last visit and I'll go now that they have something new for once.Oh, btw, Mario Kart Arcade GP DX is already in western countries... or at least in USA; check it out:
http://www.gonintendo.com/s/222527-mario-kart-gp-dx-more-footage-dave-and-busters-commercial
I would be shocked if people like him admit they were wrong if it comes to that. Maybe we need a "I was wrong" thread in Pac-Man's board if he is confirmed.I'll just laugh real hard if people like Xenoblaze love Pac-Man's playstyle.
Actually I think Pac-Man is going off in a very particular direction trying to create an almost science-fiction background to the world. It's so unnecessary, but very funny at the same time. I can totally see Nancy Cartwright voice act him in this show. And I can't exactly bad mouth it that much, because how do you make Pac-Man into a cartoon? It's worth watching for laughs, anyway, at least the first couple episodes.well, I don't like of most of the cartoons nowadays,... those recents in CN and/or Nick; .. but I'm not the target, so, Pac-Man at least is doing anything wrong, just following as current trends. =P... and here's a trivia; here on Brazil he's voiced by the same voice actor of Bart Simpson. lolz... sounds like okay for him, at least.. and helps a bit in the charisma of the show. =P
If Little Mac deserves one, Pac-Man definitely does. But lets not get ahead of ourselves.I would be shocked if people like him admit they were wrong if it comes to that. Maybe we need a "I was wrong" thread in Pac-Man's board if he is confirmed.
the cartoon is not for me *(my age), probably not for you too.. but I watch sometimes, casually, without compromise; it's my favorite character, and I do like to see the references of NAMCO games in the scenarios.. but I wouldn't never say that it's my favorite cartoon just 'cause is Pac-Man. =P.. it's just nice for a free time;Actually I think Pac-Man is going off in a very particular direction trying to create an almost science-fiction background to the world. It's so unnecessary, but very funny at the same time. I can totally see Nancy Cartwright voice act him in this show. And I can't exactly bad mouth it that much, because how do you make Pac-Man into a cartoon? It's worth watching for laughs, anyway, at least the first couple episodes.
I can imagine it appeals to very young children, it's basically just an advertisement for Pac-Man's games. Does it stay as cheesy past the opening two epsiodes? I kind of want to watch to see where they go with the stupid storyline. Mostly the part where the villain Betrayus, based on David Petraeus' etymologically for some reason, and his entire army is turned into indestructible ghosts then locked away, but they don't guard the prison or note down where it is. If it stays that level of goofy and silly I may revisit it for more funnies.the cartoon is not for me *(my age), probably not for you too.. but I watch sometimes, casually, without compromise; it's my favorite character, and I do like to see the references of NAMCO games in the scenarios.. but I wouldn't never say that it's my favorite cartoon just 'cause is Pac-Man. =P.. it's just nice for a free time;
my sister, though, loves in passion, she likes Cylindria a lot, principally.
if you continue with such high demand and requirement for history and things like that, for sure you won't enjoy the episodes, not even casually. I don't believe that Ghostly Adventures is to be taken seriously .. as I didn't take with Adventures of Super Mario Bros. 3, Donkey Kong Country, Sonic SatAM and such ... it's just simple entertainment and focused in small children who are just waiting for colorful characters on the screen. In one way or another is great for the younger generations know the figure of Pac-Man, a character 30 years old, and still manages to captivate children in other ways.I can imagine it appeals to very young children, it's basically just an advertisement for Pac-Man's games. Does it stay as cheesy past the opening two epsiodes? I kind of want to watch to see where they go with the stupid storyline. Mostly the part where the villain Betrayus, based on David Petraeus' etymologically for some reason, and his entire army is turned into indestructible ghosts then locked away, but they don't guard the prison or note down where it is. If it stays that level of goofy and silly I may revisit it for more funnies.
I agree completely and get where you're coming from in all respects, BridgesWithTurtles.Smashy Daddy, it pretty much stays that bad. Trust me. I watched through most of Season 1 because I was just as curious as you are. In its defense, though, it'd probably make an excellent abridged series for this reason, and something like that really should exist if it doesn't already. I personally sort of enjoy it when there's nothing on late at night and I'm falling asleep anyway. It's just flashy enough to keep my attention while retaining enough terribly nonsensical writing that I can stimulate myself by picking out everything wrong with it. Yeah, I'm that kind of person. Honestly, as someone who doesn't really enjoy much of anything in the way of cartoons these days, GA could be worse than it is. It's not entertaining on its own merits, but it's not offensive, like most of the drivel on CN, Disney, and Nick. Force me to choose between 10 straight hours of GA and 10 hours of post-movie Spongebob episodes, and I'l easily pick the former.
On the subject for "retribution" for Pac-Man haters, I personally don't care. I'm happy for them if whoever they want gets into the game. Chances are the majority of sensible people will, in the case of Pac-Man being revealed, simply shrug it off and come to accept it, the same way most of us do when a character we don't want becomes playable. Besides, I'm not willing to laugh at others' expense, especially since Pac-Man still isn't guaranteed. If he's not in the game, anyone pointing fingers like now will look ever worse than those that they're pointing at. Just something to consider, for any supporter of any character.
As far as this cartoon goes I kinda want to watch on because it didn't feel completely devoid of soul like many modern cartoons do, and Turtles pointed out. Not to say it's a good cartoon, but it's accidentally funny at times. It tries to build a world, which shocked me, and that it does it badly makes it fascinating. I can appreciate the effort they put in and analyse the show to get some enjoyment out of the experience. However that kind of entertainment would probably get old pretty quickly, but eh, if I have time to burn I may watch it to get more of that bizarre Pac-Man meets Ghostbusters cheesefest.if you continue with such high demand and requirement for history and things like that, for sure you won't enjoy the episodes, not even casually. I don't believe that Ghostly Adventures is to be taken seriously .. as I didn't take with Adventures of Super Mario Bros. 3, Donkey Kong Country, Sonic SatAM and such ... it's just simple entertainment and focused in small children who are just waiting for colorful characters on the screen. In one way or another is great for the younger generations know the figure of Pac-Man, a character 30 years old, and still manages to captivate children in other ways.
but if you want a laugh from simple jokes, I recommend seeing once in a while. =)
The worldbuilding is actually really cool, in my opinion. They took a game that featured nothing but a maze, dots, and a couple characters, no background story, and they created a unique, interesting world that feels like somewhere Pac could live, plus gave a backstory as to why ghosts exist and why they don't like the citizens of Pac-World, rather than "they bad, we good, fight."I went and watched some of the new Pac-Man cartoon recently in a MST3000 sort of way with some friends, that show is remarkably bad. To the point I get why you'd enjoy it, the creators just didn't care at all about criticism, they went full cheeseball 90's style with the ridiculous world-building. And that theme song... that theme song...
There are a few episodes here and there that explain a bit more. One where Betrayus actually gets his hands on the repository and all four main ghosts, Inky, Pinky, Blinky, and Clyde, get shoved into one single body in an attempt to recover their own. That was entertaining. Then another episode where Pac-Man goes back in time and actually meets his parents, and you get to see the war in action, including a non-ghost-form Betrayus.I can imagine it appeals to very young children, it's basically just an advertisement for Pac-Man's games. Does it stay as cheesy past the opening two epsiodes? I kind of want to watch to see where they go with the stupid storyline. Mostly the part where the villain Betrayus, based on David Petraeus' etymologically for some reason, and his entire army is turned into indestructible ghosts then locked away, but they don't guard the prison or note down where it is. If it stays that level of goofy and silly I may revisit it for more funnies.
The guy who made this had a lot more insight to it. He also crushed every other argument.Or old enough to realize his modern 3D form is nothing but an obvious Capitalization on an iconic character's success, despite his iconic status being tied to his retro appeal and original game and not to him as a unique character.
TC, people don't hate PacMan. They hate the idea of him in Smash Bros.
It'd be as if Nintendo tried to Capitalize on Mr. G&W in modern games. His moves taken not from his old games, but simply random abilities that don't make much sense that just happen to be very similar to other popular games at the time. So, if such games were made and he were somehow stylized to be more modern and trendy, with 3D affects.... Then him and his games would be abominations. They would not be true to his original form, as is the Smash Bros version which takes his imagery and moves directly from his original games.
And while Mr. G&W is really cool in Smash Bros, as one of those interesting gimmicky characters... His appeal outside of Smash and his own retro games is non-existent. It would never work.
Now working in the other direction, let's say these Mr. G&W games came before Melee, and his inclusion in Melee was instead based on these abominable, horrible games and his trendy, cliche, and disfigured modern 3D incarnation.... Not just that, but let's say Nintendo never even owned this character, but instead a third-party owned him.
Would anyone EVER want him in Smash like that? The answer is an obvious 'No'.
This is the reason no one wants Pac-Man in Smash Bros.
1. His 3D form is a "trendy" abomination on the original character.
2. He has completely lost his iconic status.
3. He is not well designed in 3D form.
4. His games generally sucked horribly, and we also designed mostly for children, with basically no real backstory or anything at all.
5. He has no real moveset potential besides moves stolen from other platform game characters which never really even seemed to fit him in the first place.
People don't hate PacMan..... They hate what he has BECOME.
I agree people hate what he has become, but some of those resons are illogical. Pacman can very well have an arcade based moveset as suggested and made by many of us here. The point that his games suck today and are aimed at children is subjective. I love his world series, and of course its aimed toward kids. Its E for everyone. Most E rated games are aimed at kids. "His 3d form is designed badly" is also subjective and it depends on which 3d form. Ghostly adventures is too trendy and sucks and i'll admit it, but thats only my opinion. I also love his original 3d form that was on his japanese arcade box art, but again, that is also my opinion. He has not lost any iconic status though, he is still PACMAN. With that logic, i guess megaman has too. Capcom has literally abandoned him and tossed him away to focus on their more important series. At least Namco cares enough to try to revive their mascot. I really do appreciate you trying to show us supporters an objective view on why people don't want the pac in smash, but that person seems a bit too subjective in his argument points.Relevant to this thread.
On the topic of What's with all the hate on Pacman!?
The guy who made this had a lot more insight to it. He also crushed every other argument.
I don't think this is really relevant to this thread, since I believe everyone here already knows why people who don't want Pac-Man, well, don't want him. We've heard every reason a million times. Furthermore, all of these reasons listed are entirely subjective and based on individual perceptions. There is no truly objective cause for not wanting Pac-Man listed here.Relevant to this thread.
This is the reason no one wants Pac-Man in Smash Bros.
1. His 3D form is a "trendy" abomination on the original character.
2. He has completely lost his iconic status.
3. He is not well designed in 3D form.
4. His games generally sucked horribly, and we also designed mostly for children, with basically no real backstory or anything at all.
5. He has no real moveset potential besides moves stolen from other platform game characters which never really even seemed to fit him in the first place.
I'm not a Sonic fan, nor do I like 99% of his recent games, but that doesn't negate his important history in the video game industry. Pac-Man is an icon. Whether you play the classic Arcade game or spin-offs or watch the cheesy cartoons, you've been a part of that legacy. No one is saying that the classic, original game isn't the most successful or deserving of praise/recognition, but it's not irrelevant either, it was only remade a couple of years ago to overwhelmingly positive reviews on XBLA. Google had it playable from their search engine at one point. It's that ingrained into our culture. I personally see an inclusion as Smash as the best thing the character has done in decades, if anything those who like the Arcade game and nothing else should be happy because he'd obviously take all of his cues from that game. The fact he may take some inspiration from his later games is hardly cause for alarm or revulsion."He is an abomination"
Many people feel the same way about modern Sonic, especially with his recent face-lift for the Sonic Boom franchise (yes, I'm aware that Sonic Boom is gonna be a western made franchise running on the side while the regular Sonic's franchise from Sonic team continues)
But when it comes to modern Sonic, many people call him a "green eye'd lanky imposter" or a "green eye'd freak" or "Poochie-Sonic" or "Not-Sonic" and yes, I've even heard modern Sonic be called an "abomination" by those who prefer the classic Sonic design and games.
I honestly feel like it's 2007 again, only instead of Sonic, it's Pac-Man considering we had similar arguements:
Isn't what he used to be
his new design looks stupid
Isn't relevant anymore
all games after his classic games suck
no move set potential (with him being called a blue yoshi clone some times, not kidding)
Doesn't belong in/wouldn't fit in smash bros
would take away a spot from a more deserving character.
No one likes his crappy new tv show (Sonic X was the most recent incarnation he had at the time and was currently being shown in re-runs)
He'll ruin the game by being in it
ect
Perhaps there's no convincing other people to like Pac-Man just like how there's no convincing other people to like Sonic, in the very least people should be convinced that if hypothetically if Pac-Man did in fact make it in, they shouldn't allow that to ruin the game for them or let it damage their experience of the game as a whole.
and even if Pac-Man miraculously makes it in, doesn't mean people will accept him. If people are still raging today about Sonic's inclusion in Brawl claiming he took Geno's spot or some how ruined the enjoyment of the game, chances are they'll rage whining that Pac-Man took some one else's spot or ruined the game with his presence until Smash 5 comes out, and then continue raging over it despite it being old news.
People's likes and dislikes are generally subjective; however, it's the colmigation of those ideas that can get a characters in or not. Sakurai wants to add characters that will make people want to play the game. Pac-Man wont do that. A lot of people hate what Pac-Man has become and don't care for him as a character. The character only appeals to children who don't know any better. No surprise, most of the people in this thread are very young. The original games attempted to appeal to women. Since Mrs. Pac-Man, the series has gone down hill. Since then, Namco has used him as a cheap mascot and he's basically a weak substitute to Sonic and Mario. I expect Sonic Boom will give Pac-Man a run for it's money as children will find Sonic cooler.I agree people hate what he has become, but some of those resons are illogical. Pacman can very well have an arcade based moveset as suggested and made by many of us here. The point that his games suck today and are aimed at children is subjective. I love his world series, and of course its aimed toward kids. Its E for everyone. Most E rated games are aimed at kids. "His 3d form is designed badly" is also subjective and it depends on which 3d form. Ghostly adventures is too trendy and sucks and i'll admit it, but thats only my opinion. I also love his original 3d form that was on his japanese arcade box art, but again, that is also my opinion. He has not lost any iconic status though, he is still PACMAN. With that logic, i guess megaman has too. Capcom has literally abandoned him and tossed him away to focus on their more important series. At least Namco cares enough to try to revive their mascot. I really do appreciate you trying to show us supporters an objective view on why people don't want the pac in smash, but that person seems a bit too subjective in his argument points.
I remember Morbid singing that constantly. The Pac is back...I went and watched some of the new Pac-Man cartoon recently in a MST3000 sort of way with some friends, that show is remarkably bad. To the point I get why you'd enjoy it, the creators just didn't care at all about criticism, they went full cheeseball 90's style with the ridiculous world-building. And that theme song... that theme song...