Dot_Com0019
Smash Rookie
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2016
- Messages
- 8
Falcons knee will still f*ck your day upGanon is more like a clone to Captain Falcon, except he has strength over speed. Captain Falcon has speed over strength.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Falcons knee will still f*ck your day upGanon is more like a clone to Captain Falcon, except he has strength over speed. Captain Falcon has speed over strength.
You dont say?Ganon is more like a clone to Captain Falcon, except he has strength over speed. Captain Falcon has speed over strength.
Just cause more people play link doesn't mean he is better.I don't agree with DK being above Link, I see Link getting much more representation in tourneys and such than DK.
Otherwise, good list.
If fox had absolutely no representation, he would eventually fall in the rankings. The list is based off potential AND results, the line that separates the two is just drawn in several different places arbitrarily, lol.Just cause more people play link doesn't mean he is better.
Good point,my bad xDIf fox had absolutely no representation, he would eventually fall in the rankings. The list is based off potential AND results, the line that separates the two is just drawn in several different places arbitrarily, lol.
Bottom 5, not sure exactly. Probably worst or second worst lol.Where would sopo rank?
I don't think it would be worse than Bowser or Kirbu, I would say more closer to Zelda.Bottom 5, not sure exactly. Probably worst or second worst lol.
Zelda confirmed high tier KappaWait a second. If Shiek is Zelda and Shiek is higher than Zelda. Then Zelda beat Zelda?
mind blown.Zelda confirmed high tier Kappa
I have literally never left the melee boards, but I'm sure every game has a tier list.Are there more tier lists in Smashboards like N64, Brawl, and Project M? No Smash 4 tier list due to patches and DLC.
Google is your friendAre there more tier lists in Smashboards like N64, Brawl, and Project M? No Smash 4 tier list due to patches and DLC.
Tier lists aren't permanent lolCharacters change a lot throughout the series.
True.Tier lists aren't permanent lol
*RoyMewtwo is ****in legit, I just wish he wasn't so light. He's the best true low tier imo
Nah, honestly g&w is better than both, but mewtwo is definitely better than roy*Roy
I would disagree. Roy at least has top tier movement, D-Tilt to combo into another hit or quickly interrupt the opponent from a CC, a chaingrab and counter edgeguard on spacies, and two good kill moves.Nah, honestly g&w is better than both, but mewtwo is definitely better than roy
Smash 4 actually has a community tier list as well, but we are in break phase, waiting till bayo and corrin. Back to Melee, I think Fox should not be in his own tier. And bowser is worse than Kirby.Are there more tier lists in Smashboards like N64, Brawl, and Project M? No Smash 4 tier list due to patches and DLC.
Who is this directed towards? The voters or those discussing in this thread? Cuz we pretty much all disagree with the whole SS Fox things.90% of you are clueless, the 10% that aren't a tier list does not pertain to anyway. fox is not ss he's 50/50 marth, sheik is above marth, sheik has needles, and has slight higher favour across all the cast on average. they function very similarly, she also favoured against marth. a tier list ought to be based on character functions in relation to the cast and not based on what people think imo. seems like they tossed all that went into the 2013 list which imo was hardly off aside from perhaps pika and yoshi. an extra S does nothing but mislead. ignore me if you disagree.
They weren't actually calculated though. The metadata of the findings (like the 1.0 next to fox) means little imo. To those constructing the list, a unanimous vote for fox at #1 equates to him deserving his own tier, end of story. But I have a nagging suspicion that they wouldn't dream of giving Kirby or bowser their own tier had they been voted unanimously at #26, so this seems inconsistent. My stance is that the votes only tell us which character is #1, not by how much, and that the percentage of people voting for fox over falco means very little. The best characters are the most well known and most extensively optimized characters. This game is old. It's no secret that Fox is #1 guys. We know that. So how does a unanimous vote for fox mean anything at all? It's voting on something that is already accepted (by virtually everyone). The decision for tier gap placement should be different than determining the order of the list. What if all the voters answered the question "Do you think Fox is so much better than falco, marth, and sheik, in terms of results AND potential, that he deserves his own tier?" ?? I think that would tell you more than drawing conclusions off data that isn't really helpful.I don't think fox should be SS but people wanted a tier list with calculated tier divisions and the product was precisely that
Lol.Perhaps it was a conspiracy for the site to get more page views from gullibles with nothing better to do.
It's almost like this thread is dedicated to discussing the new tier list... hmmmmI think the funny part about fox being SS is how many doofs are still arguing about it therefore driving up traffic and ad clicks.
Perhaps it was a conspiracy for the site to get more page views from gullibles with nothing better to do.
If someone new comes in to beat the dead horse leave it alone...no matter how bored you are.
Half this thread seems to be the same discussion over and over.
I see you've contributed nothing. Maybe if you do, it won't contain spam or name-calling this time. I sincerely apologize that this thread didn't tantalize you with entertainment, but it would probably be worth keeping posts on-topic so that it doesn't get closed.Hey if you guys like saying the same exact thing over and over and have nothing better to do, have at it.
But it makes for a very boring lame thread. Not really a discussion since nothing new has been contributed for a while. Just keeps repeating.
Neither have you in your past 3 posts besides just responding in quite a predictable manner. Probably would have been wisest to not respond at all.I see you've contributed nothing. Maybe if you do, it won't contain spam or name-calling this time. I sincerely apologize that this thread didn't tantalize you with entertainment, but it would probably be worth keeping posts on-topic so that it doesn't get closed.
That's good.I'll stop posting here now.
Fox is not good enough to be in his own tier. That's absolutely ridiculous.
The cycle has repeated.Hey if you guys like saying the same exact thing over and over and have nothing better to do, have at it.
But it makes for a very boring lame thread. Not really a discussion since nothing new has been contributed for a while. Just keeps repeating.