SuperRad
Smash Master
It's Sun, thank you very much.No, we need new seeds.
And no +(Kevin Sung's reasoning).
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's Sun, thank you very much.No, we need new seeds.
And no +(Kevin Sung's reasoning).
i wanna say i agree with you, but i'm not active enough to throw in my two cents.spots ~8 on down are really inaccurate
DP beat me, and HMW, and rey all in one tournament =Dwaiiiiit
i know i did horrible this period and all so i kinda agree with my ranking but
i think my wins/losses this period are
*beat dp in two sets at stockton tournament*
*lost to shroomed and sheridan*
right? so uhhh... idk can somebody explain my rank in comparison to DP?
Im assuming its because when you beat DP, he wasnt ranked. While he proceeded to beat a few ranked players, while you lost to people who were ranked beneath you.waiiiiit
i know i did horrible this period and all so i kinda agree with my ranking but
i think my wins/losses this period are
*beat dp in two sets at stockton tournament*
*lost to shroomed and sheridan*
right? so uhhh... idk can somebody explain my rank in comparison to DP?
they didn't take SCSA into account I believe.WOW WHAT THE ****, REPLICATE GOT MOVED DOWN?
THATS ****ING ******** I HOPE YOU GUYS REALIZE THIS
IM LIKE THE ANGRY MOM WHEN HER KID GETS A C IN 6TH GRADE
NORCAL UR DUMB AS ***
dang
they didn't take SCSA into account I believe.
if they did he definitely woulda moved up, but not counting that joe hasn't been doing great nor bad.
There you go.yes SCSA was the last tournament in the period. The first was stockton on the 15th of Feb.
dog, stop trying so hard. it's now super obvious the panel has no idea what they're doing. LOL DP does well at what, one tournament, and he's ranked 9th? how many tournaments had he been to in that period? two? that's not enough to get ranked. well, i guess it is in norcal.waiiiiit
i know i did horrible this period and all so i kinda agree with my ranking but
i think my wins/losses this period are
*beat dp in two sets at stockton tournament*
*lost to shroomed and sheridan*
right? so uhhh... idk can somebody explain my rank in comparison to DP?
Who are you and where are you from?dog, stop trying so hard. it's now super obvious the panel has no idea what they're doing. LOL DP does well at what, one tournament, and he's ranked 9th? how many tournaments had he been to in that period? two? that's not enough to get ranked. well, i guess it is in norcal.
whenever your list is having players go up or fall down a lot, the list probably sucks
and no offense to hyuga, but why is he on the list again? nevertheless ahead of you and phil
Some brawl noob.Who are you and where are you from?
It sounds like you guys are judging EVERYTHING off of each individual ranking period. So past performance doesn't matter, only who you beat in that individual ranking period? That's quite unfair because then most things are judged on opportunity, not skill.Jr: I beat DP in two sets but he's still higher than me
DP beat more ranked people than KFC.
DP Wins: Mexican, Dark Mike x 2, Shroomed, HomeMadeWaffles, Sheridan, Me
KFC Wins: DP x 2, Mr. Ganondorf
DP Losses: KFC x 2, Lunin, SS
KFC Losses: Sheridan, Shroomed
DP also beat people Shroomed & Sheridan. KFC didn't.
That's why you don't judge solely off of results from 2-3 tournaments.The ranking period is short enough to make large movements.
So NOW history comes into play? Why doesn't KFC get the benefit of history over DP? Over Shroomed? KFC's long been one of Norcal's best...Replicate did nothing to prove he was better than Phil or KFC, who both have a better history.
He beat No. 4, No. 5 and No. 7 (I think Connor's 7th) in SoCal, along with Kira (unranked). You can't really give him credit for the Kira win wrt moving him up the rankings, but it provides evidence that the former wins weren't flukes, because Kira beat No. 4 on this list just a week before and has only lost to highly ranked SoCalians in recent weeks.Although he did beat Lovage, it does not mean he gets to move past Phil.
So when the next PR has to have a bunch of move changes again, will you still be confident or will you admit your errors?We are confident in what we've done.
Ur right on the shrot months we had to make another PR, but it keeps consistency. Also there are 5 tournaments we based this on.Some brawl noob.
It sounds like you guys are judging EVERYTHING off of each individual ranking period. So past performance doesn't matter, only who you beat in that individual ranking period? That's quite unfair because then most things are judged on opportunity, not skill.
And how can you put an unranked win over an unranked win (DP over Dark Mike) as a ranked win just because you so happened to rank the latter in the next ranking period? That's silly. It should be, what did you do to get on the list? That means beating ranked people. So he beat Shroomed, HMW, you, and Sheridan. Beating HMW and you is legit; beating Sheridan and Shroomed is more of a sign that they should drop.
But wow KFC, you losing to Sheridan and Shroomed ***** your whole life. No johns. But that's still way too much emphasis placed on 2-3 tournaments. This is why you can't go just off of tourny results alone; everyone in the world knows KFC, at any given tournament, would be a significant favorite to do better than Sheridan or Shroomed, or half the list even. Common sense about skill has to come into play or your rankings end up looking like a joke.
That's why you don't judge solely off of results from 2-3 tournaments.
So NOW history comes into play? Why doesn't KFC get the benefit of history over DP? Over Shroomed? KFC's long been one of Norcal's best...
He beat No. 4, No. 5 and No. 7 (I think Connor's 7th) in SoCal, along with Kira (unranked). You can't really give him credit for the Kira win wrt moving him up the rankings, but it provides evidence that the former wins weren't flukes, because Kira beat No. 4 on this list just a week before and has only lost to highly ranked SoCalians in recent weeks.
I'm not sure about his results before that -- probably on the border -- but the most recent results should be weighed the most heavily, especially when many of the people ranked higher than him have done little to distinguish themselves.
Anyway, wins over two of SoCal's top 5 are very legit based on other SoCal v Norcal results (Fly v Falcomist at WCSL, Tofu beating Phil and Kira beating Germ at MJ, etc.). He should get much more credit than you are giving him, because normally a player ranked near the bottom beating multiple people near the top is an instant reason to go up. So he beat No. 4 just a week after Phil loses to SoCal's No. 6, but he shouldn't move ahead of Phil? Sounds like inconsistency.
So when the next PR has to have a bunch of move changes again, will you still be confident or will you admit your errors?