Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's the difference between being a creator and a fan. A creator has to spend maybe years of their life making something and will grow sick of it faster than fans show only take in a few hours, depending on what's being created.
Nintendo does.
I remember him tweeting about it, but I guess that had no actual relevance. Good to know.
You don't get to say that when most games these days are shooters/ Survival 'horror'
Nintendo's one of the few exceptions, yes, but most companies are very dull in this regard
what about five nights at freddy's
Ehhhh, Spyro's much better off than Crash.
So, when should we expect Crash to become a Skylander?
The fact that he's essentially considered dead in his own series says a lot.
One man isn't a company. Actually, those games are more 'point and click horrors' and a new genre. As long as no AAA company decides to do something similar and charge a whopping 40-60 currencywhat about five nights at freddy's
Poor Sod. I would love to have GX/ AX come back to life. Even a HD re-master of it on Wii U to test the waters.In all seriousness, I'm surprised that hasn't been done by now. If Activision can't figure out what else to do with him, then they might as well. I'd still prefer if he got a new game of his own, though.So, when should we expect Crash to become a Skylander?
I'm currently dealing with writers block for a scene in my web comic that no one will remember but is important for the narrative to continue. Time invested: about 2 weeks. Time taken to consume: minute tops.
Remember how the Burnout guys said no to working on F-Zero? It's kinda funny, most companies want others to touch their toys while it's the other way around for themNo matter what you say about Nintendo. Not even they can keep all their IP's Alive.
Except he's not.
YES! Thank you I'm not along :')
fitting avi I guess.
Because Activision is filled with morons
Okay, he's not dead, but it's quite clear that he's not going to be considered a real priority anytime soon. Him being playable doesn't change the fact that they pushed him aside for their original Skylanders.
There's no reason why he can't. Rayman launched the Rabbids series the same way Spyro did Skylanders. Rayman eventually split off from them and got his series back.
Right, that's what I said.
Yeah but Nintendo at least recognizes them and will give them that light on occasions. Compared to other companies where they would forget and sit on the IPs. Now Nintendo isn't perfect but they are better than most other companies and even Sega and Capcom at least acknowledge those franchises.No matter what you say about Nintendo. Not even they can keep all their IP's Alive.
Still one of my favourite versions of Mute City.
Companies like Activision are probably leary in releasing games like that as they probably don't see it as doing well (or they think they can't make a quick buck off the franchise.)
Honestly, considering his last few games, that's probably for the best...
That's implying Bubsy was good to begin with
Isn't Vega being fab his thing? Still inferior to Skullomania
How am I implying Bubsy was good in any way? Bubsy rotted early because it was a heap of garbage that somehow kept going for several years. Crash is rotting because of decaying quality and lack of games in recent years.
Well I could sleep without that,edgy
next pl0x.Wait, refresh my memory. Was that the leak that had R. Mika in it, or was that something else entirely?
You said rotted, which would imply it wasn't rotten. Crash rotted, yes, but Bubsy was already ****
