Cutie Gwen
Lovely warrior
You can just say it once and that's honestly fineWell... it may sound dumb but it is that... I have to repeat it in order to clarify my point... and it's tiresome to some extent.
The criticisms on sidequests were never genuine... it based on differs from people to people. That's you seems to take all of my argument as "It's just an opinion" is also out of context as well... which is not a good move imo. I hold people's opinions greatly and since it is an opinion, I, of course can have my own opinion as well.
But here is the thing... you haven't even played the game, so how are you sure know if the XC2 sidequests are good or not? If I were you I may just be more conservative and say "From what I heard from other people's experience, I don't think the sidequest in XC2 is better than XC", this way I can totally understand it.
I may sound arrogant, but just think about it... if a random user saw someone spending time on XC2 over 170 hours and have a positive review on sidequest and saw another have a negative view on sidequests based on other people's opinion (That we aren't even sure if they have played the same hours of time as me on sidequests btw)... just which one do you think will this random user believe?
And I have finished XC, and a majority of the sidequests since like I said XC sidequest are a lot, and did I forget to mention that I have already spend over 120 hours into the game?
To not sound rude or anything, you do have fair share of good points, such as checking guides might saw spoilers etc... I think I need to recheck out discussion, or if you have more opinion on XC2, I am all ears. But I will have my own fair share of rebuttals... probably.
So yeah... I still stand by think that the sidequest is a huge improvement over XC at least, andI have said I can't say if it's better than XCX's sidequest system, because I haven't play the game.
Not really. When a major criticism of the previous game isn't fixed, it is no longer an opinion. The statement as follows is "They didn't get rid of the thing lots of people didn't like"
First of all you're mixing up games. The issue with XB2's sidequests with collectables is that they're like Xenoblade X, which was an infamous game for not explaining important ****. I can tell because people who played the game said it's just like how it was in XCX. I've played XCX and I did not like it was done there, meaning if they haven't changed it, I don't need to see for myself, as I don't see why people who like the game regardless would lie about something like that.
Problem with that hypothesis: The whole reason we initially argued was because multiple people who played the game said it was bad. Then YOU said it wasn't bad! meaning the random user would see more people saying it's bad, especially as the people who didn't like the game said it was like the previous installment in that regard, meaning if you've played XCX, you already know enough. Also there's the fact that a random user has no business checking posts on this forum as a means to decide whether or not to get the game, they'd either check reviews or make a post asking about it.
That is absolutely irrelevant, the first Xenoblade game has **** all to do with this discussion
That's kinda the reason why I called you a fanboy. You add rebuttals when someone says they don't like something about the game. If it's a bull**** claim such as for example, "Shovel Knight punishes death too harshly and doesn't have a diverse amount of locations for the stages" then you can absolutely rebuttal that.
This isn't the argument, the argument was that they're like XCX, which while you didn't play, you tried comparing the game to XB2 when someone asked about XB2, when really, you can't compare an 80 plus hour game you've played to an 80 plus hour game you HAVEN'T played