?
The post I quoted was a reply to the one where I specifically talked about "originality"
Also, yes, let's go down to personal attacks, that always end up well
Yes, I'm aware, but I still don't get what you are trying to say.
You quoted my post where I asked you to show me where I said it wasn't OK to like the new Pokémon.
Your response then takes another quote of mine where you literally just highlighted the word "dislike". As if that is to be the point where I said it's not OK to like the new Pokémon.
Except the part you highlighted said nothing about it not being OK to like the new Pokémon. I was pointing out how people moan and winge for more original Pokémon and less Pika-clones, then they **** on the original Pokémon they get, and praise the Pika-clone they get, and later wonder why they are getting Pika-clones and it's back to step one. That was literally my original post in it's entirety. Once again, saying NOTHING about it being not OK to LIKE the new Pokémon.
Again, show me where I said something about it being not OK to like this new Pokémon, which was what you interpreted me as saying earlier.
And no, I did not attack you, I made a (now even more valid) criticism of your posts right now. I legitimately think you didn't actually read everything I was saying or radically misinterpreted something, but still feel the need to just argue with me for the sake of it anyway. You also have a history of doing this.
Please stop trying to pity yourself, a criticism is not an attack. If I was doing personal attacks, I'd be locked out of the thread immediately.