Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
oh thats gonna be hard. Each of the pictures I found have him facing one durection. You would think with eternal diva that they would have one of those character charts that show him at different angles seeing how it was a stright up anime movie
Don't be so dee-srespectful.
Indeed, have a good dee
Yeah, its a bit ironic how Hershel of all people apparently doesn't have any front and side view concept art released by Level-5. A lot of other characters on the other hand have though, such as Luke and Inspector Grosky, even more obscure characters such as Lady Dahlia and Janice have them too. I used one of those concept drawings to make my first 3D model of Flora too. It's Hershel in particular that is being quite elusive to me though.... :T
Maybe they didnt do it because no matter where you look at him, he will always look the same lol
I mean, his design is quite simplistic looking yeah, but there are still some details here and there that need some further thought put into when working on him. It's why my attempts usually have him end up looking like his rushed sausage man design from Miracle Mask.... :T
Oh I'm sorry, you thought that was new to Awakening and Fates?Genealogy of the Holy War wiki page said:
Most older fans are aware of that system being in FE4.
Actually thing about FE4, the children aren't tact on, massive spoiler for the game incoming by the way
Professor Layton: A man so simple but is also so very complex
Fire Emblem 12(3) says hi. But I forgot, that game doesn't count cause it was never released in the West.
I wonder how a Layton game in general would look like in HD. Would the art style be something akin to the 3DS Layton games, or would they go for something more brighter looking?
But FE4 is likely next in line, and anyone who's played that game already knows about its child system. In fact unlike in the new games
If SoV is anything to go by, I think they might actually keep most of the unique mechanics/aspects intact.
So people aren't worried about "shipping" in general, but about self insertion and. . .I guess the lack of writing detail that comes with offering a greater variety?
So it's not the child system, it's that it's thrown onto the plot?
Atleast we will have the remakes.
The same as it has been since yesterday.
I think the main thing that caught my eye (and was kind of amusing) was how all the items in one spot were blown away because the wind was too realistic. I wonder where that was at in the game?
They might, it's possible. But SoV's deal is that it still has features that never really moved to the later games, like the free town & dungeon exploring, random battles, Shrines, Spell learning, etc. Most of Genealogy's features have returned in later games and have been either modernized or improved, with only the Holy Blood system never making a comeback. Shadow Dragon did add recurring features that weren't in the original, like the Weapon Triangle and recurring classes, but it's attempt of trying to keep close to the original made it feel like a lot of steps back(although the Gaiden Chapters and willingly letting units die to get new characters did not help it as well).
It depends on how they handle the characters. Except for the main and returning FE1 characters, most of the cast don't have defined personalities beyond reasons for joining the war. That said I'm more hopeful than I was regarding Fates for a couple reasons:
Basically, you switch between Alm and Celica's armies during the game. Eventually on the last chapter, both join together.
In the first chapter you control only Alm's army, and in the second only Celica's. After that, you control both at the same time, but they are separated into different areas of the world map. They don't unite until the final map of the game.
Oh that reminds me, I've been calling Arvis 'Alvis" this whole time because of the english patch of FE4.
Just out of curiosity, what is it that you dislike about Yusuke Kozaki? I remember you mentioning that you weren't a fan of him back when I started that Fire Emblem Awakening discussion in late August, but I forget to ask you at the time.
It's mostly the art style and the general feel they create.
I don't get itI might just keep calling him Deke to make HSR references.
So he wasnt the one that made Charlett look like a total who- I mean look like that?
Hearing this reminds of that one artist who made a character and when that artist showed that character to a developer, the developer said to make them sexier. Not to mention when people blamed Team Ninja for Other M's story.
There's no need to apologize. Stand by your opinions and your mistakes.
