Laura got plenty of stuff wrong as well...
She got the Zelda release date wrong.
She got BG&E2 bit wrong (said it-d be Switch exclusive)
She got the Mario bit wrong twofold, saying the 4chan leak (which was on point) was false because of the Odyssey subtle, as well as saying that it'd be ready at launch (when it's clearly still well in development)
She said Splatoon was an enhanced port, and would be packed in with the console
She said MK8 would have 16 new tracks
She said Switch would be $199
She got the date for the Switch reveal wrong.
She was wrong about the so called Mario Rabbids RPG
She said XCX would be ported from WiiU, when that clearly didn't happen, and we actually got a brand new Xenoblade game.
She failed to predict the Fire Emblem Musou as well, and that would have been an easy one to call, in hindsight.
I think this is more than enough to discredit any leaks put forth by her, it has NOTHING to do with her being LGBT. Even a broken clock is twice a day, and she failed to predict ANY of the new games announced, like ARMS and 1 2 Switch. Or NMH3 and SMTV. Plus, a lot of her safer predictions are pretty predictable, in fact, many of her predictions missed their mark because they were too safe. Such as the Zelda release date, and MK8 having 16 new tracks rather than adding a battle mode. The Switch not being called a "Wii" was a pretty no brained considering the Wii branding hurt the WiiU. PS4 revision, and being called Slim also makes sense considering EVERY PS console has had a revision, and they've all been called "Slim". And none of her leaks came before the patents, they came after.
A lot of LKD's stuff missed its mark horribly, and a lot of it sounds like she was simply making stuff up. I'm just calling bull**** when I see it, idk why you had to bring up the LGBT stuff, as I pointed fingers to Emily, and the other dude, just as equally as I did to LKD. Anyone can make easy predictions to get right, and ride that wave for street cred, and had they gotten one or two things wrong, then it'd be understandable that maybe they had some red herrings amid good leaks, but when +80% of what you "leaked" is totally wrong, then you've lost all credibility.
I can say... in 2017, Summer will be hot, we'll have hurricanes, and Aliens will land in Australia. If I get the first two of those right but the last bit wrong, that doesn't make me a psychic who got one faulty vision. It means I can make inferences on rather obvious data, and throw some **** at the wall that may or may not stick, and if it doesn't due to my correct easy predictions, I can claim to have gotten some faulty bits, but still keep my cred. But if say I get ALL of it wrong, and we get a cold summer full of blizzards, and no aliens, then I've totally lost any credibility, wouldn't you say?
