Not worth it by this point I imagine. It's weird they never tried to remake the game on Switch either, cause there's many classic old RPG games from Square being remade this generation. Shame, cause Paper Mario is no longer much of a RPG, and Mario & Luigi is a thing of the past.
Was working on finishing a big post to explain to and encourage people that EiH isn't all that hard to pull off again, but I saw this and...well, this is simply shallow-minded.
First off, how do you know they aren't remaking it for Switch? Are you assuming this because it wasn't announced for Mario 35th? Did you forget that we have had multiple Mario announcements that had nothing to do with the anniversary, including a ****ing movie?
Are you assuming this because the Switch is nearing the end of it's lifecycle? Remember, it's the crazies like me who are saying a next-gen Switch can happen as soon as the next two years: everyone else is suggesting 2024 or later. Wouldn't that be plenty of time in the works for it to happen? I mean, even if the next-gent Switch comes out as early as some of us think, they won't drop support for the older model right away...so why would you think it won't happen? Also, just because lots of rumors swirl and a bunch of them we hear end up right doesn't mean Nintendo isn't working on things we haven't heard of...and even then, a remaster or remake of SMRPG has been rumored for a while now.
Do you think Nintendo thinks they have no market, or that Paper Mario covers that market? Well my friend, you would be wrong. The sheer amount of RPGs being dumped onto Switch is insane, so they know they have a market for people to play new and beloved RPGs on the go. They also know that people are sad about M&L getting nothing but remakes and then AlphaDream falling apart, and how people have been nothing but pissed with the direction Paper Mario has gone. Remember that Furukawa wasn't large and in-charge until the middle of 2018, which means Origami King was already in development by then, and this man believes Nintendo was at it's best from the SNES to the Gamecube...and guess what Mario RPGs were on those? That's right, the ones widely considered to be the best ones.
All the fan feedback for Origami King was 'This is kinda better than the last couple games, but this still ain't it Chief.' What has been happening rapidly since Furukawa has been in charge for a few years now? Massive fan appeal, in many way. Super Mario Party blows and Mario Party has sucked for years? Remake of the old Mario Party people love! Nintendo ****s on Ultimate and Melee tournaments? Works with Panda Global to make the first true Nintendo-sponsored tournament! He's all about giving games the delays they need as well, and it's rumored that he may have been a core part of getting Banjo negotiated for Ultimate, but that's not really confirmed.
What makes it not worth it at this point? There is no true Mario RPG on Nintendo's hottest home console since the Wii...you think they will just pass that up?
Not every game can be like Smash and be shoved out way faster than they honestly should be, cutting corners and generally making a rushed product, and still turn out decent. You have to have patience, Bayo fans can probably tell you that one...here's hoping Pikmin fans live long enough to tell a similar story.
EDIT: In the same wave of thought, this also applies to Smash. Ultimate was basically done by the time Furukawa sat on the N-shaped throne, so there was nothing he could really do about any of it: no delays, no suggestions, and to semi-debunk that rumor it's clear all the characters for the first Pass would have to be selected and negotiated for before Ultimate dropped for them to be able to start work on them and get them out to purchase that quickly. There could be some extension of this into Pass 2 since those character were chosen very early as well, but we may never know that.
Now, Sakurai has slaved on Smash for a hot minute now, and he's always pressured some how to deliver: N64 almost didn't happen, Melee was hell on earth, Brawl was essentially blackmailed into existence, Smash 4 was pushed to come out at on set dates for two wildly different consoles, and Ultimate was rushed to sell the Switch in it's second year. Now imagine you are Furukawa and you know you are releasing a next-gen console soon...how do you sell it best? Well there are a lot of choices, like a new Mario game, a new Zelda game, maybe Metroid Prime 4 launches on it? However, none of those have quite the same ring to them as 'Smash Bros on Next Gen Switch' now do they?
Here's the crazy part though: Sakurai would be more inclined to agree to it based off Furukawa being much more likely to give him the time he needs to make it happen, which would be a lot less if they just build onto Ultimate. He would also have more creative control, and I'm sure everyone would prefer it if Sakurai had more say on character choices than Nintendo, seeing as this Smash had a lot more shilling than I believe any previous Smash title.
Man, Nintendo's future just looks so bright, it's almost blinding.