WeirdChillFever
Smash Hero
Yeah, there’s only so many characters you can really cut before the alternative becomes a change for change’s sake. Everybody can put a knife to the Fire Emblem selection, but not many people can build a FE roster that makes sense (Cutting Ike means you fail)That’s my problem with severely reduced rosters in general. We have so many of the most important characters already. Cutting a ton of them for a few newcomers that are less iconic is a hard sell (for me at least). More than that, a drastically smaller roster means less unconventional character choices since there’s such limited space. Its going to be hard for the roster to look drastically different from Brawl’s beyond swapping out the 10 or so least relevant characters for more modern ones.
True, but without some skewed trade-offs you’re gonna end up with a veteran-heavy roster.I agree with that, although to some extent you have to take it with a grain of salt and recognize the fact that we're giving new characters the capacity to become these valued veterans too. In some way, the "new" may very well take precedent over the old. But it definitely won't be through some pre-decided exchange of an eye for an eye. Especially when one of those eyes has 20/20 vision and the other needs glasses.
I want to harp a bit more on Alear and Byleth to demonstrate the point. This is a common point of interest for some fans to believe the newest FE protagonist is in some roster rotation. In actuality we have zero evidence for this ever happening - perhaps characters like Lucario or Ike outprioritized Mewtwo or Roy. This is susceptible to happen, and ultimately I think the right decision is to favor the new. But those characters were also planned to be on the roster. So when people pose the idea that oh, Raven Beak is here so we don't need Ridley anymore (a remarkably stupid point that I've unfortunately seen more than once) they simply have the wrong idea of how this all operates. The old guard doesn't get tossed to the curb so dismissively.
Anyway, back to Alear and Byleth, Alear has some moveset potential in their camp but the conversation is often driven by their fleeting newness. Byleth is still fairly contemporary, debuted on Switch, and Three Houses is by far the more popular and successful game pit up against Engage. So exchanging the protagonist of the highest selling game in the series, right after they got here, for a character from a game with middling performance and hype at best... that's a bad trade. There's no doubt that Byleth is the character that speaks to more people. And yes, you have an inherent staying power if you are already a veteran that has connected with people, which is another can of worms, but not all legacies are infalliable and to get into that I'd have to break apart the roster one by one lol.
I hope it's clear this isn't just about Alear. But I think it's the most glaring example of the way some people attempt to make what on paper feels like a reasonable trade-off, but in actuality is a decision motivated by an arbitrary sense of the new as the only justification.
Last edited: