Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Darth seems pretty intent on his argument being that Nintendo should literally withhold pre-planned content for DLC.But is this a manifestation of "let's only have newcomers in DLC so that nobody gets cut and we only get third parties"?
I always buy both versions myself, but it was honestly a great model.Not gonna lie, one of the earliest things I did in this website is exactly that; seek out someone who'd get the 3DS version but wouldn't get the Wii U one so we could both have a free Mewtwo.
Yep. That's pretty much the thing. ...Which they know Sakurai hates, and won't do it in Smash unless he's literally not among the project at all. And probably not even then. Nintendo can be ****ty about it too, no doubt, but as I said, they respect Sakurai.Darth seems pretty intent on his argument being that Nintendo should literally withhold pre-planned content for DLC.
Y'know, the very thing Capcom ****ing got blasted for in 2012 with SFxT.
The man has a master plan for exactly how things should go with the next Smash. I kinda admire the conviction.Darth seems pretty intent on his argument being that Nintendo should literally withhold pre-planned content for DLC.
Y'know, the very thing Capcom ****ing got blasted for in 2012 with SFxT.
I don't really recall the last time Nintendo decided to take some already finished or planned content and intentionally delayed it to sell as paid DLC.Yep. That's pretty much the thing. ...Which they know Sakurai hates, and won't do it in Smash unless he's literally not among the project at all. And probably not even then. Nintendo can be ****ty about it too, no doubt, but as I said, they respect Sakurai.
Should is irrelevant. It's what's going to happen. Because...that's how games work now. That's how Ultimate worked.Darth seems pretty intent on his argument being that Nintendo should literally withhold pre-planned content for DLC.
And the very thing they did for SF6, and nobody batted an eye. Because, unless it's on the disc, nobody gives a ****.Y'know, the very thing Capcom ****ing got blasted for in 2012 with SFxT.
I don't either. I just remember they weren't really against the concept in general. But either way, they're not heavily into that either. We've had some crappy launches like Mario Tennis Switch, but... that wasn't paid either.I don't really recall the last time Nintendo decided to take some already finished or planned content and intentionally delayed it to sell as paid DLC.
It's typically done in a live-service free thing if they do something like that.
I mean, you could phrase any prediction like that if you wanted.Should is irrelevant. It's what's going to happen. Because...that's how games work now. That's how Ultimate worked.
And not only did it not hurt Ultimate, Ultimate was more successful than ever. So they're going to do it again, whether you want them to or not.
Ultimate was not more successful than ever because of its DLC. It was successful due to the whole "Everyone is Here!" and how many of its newcomers were influenced by the Ballot. You're taking two unrelated things and claiming they're connected.Should is irrelevant. It's what's going to happen. Because...that's how games work now. That's how Ultimate worked.
And not only did it not hurt Ultimate, Ultimate was more successful than ever. So they're going to do it again, whether you want them to or not.
Look. If you guys really want to hold on to the hope that Smash 6 is going to have 15 newcomers at launch, then congratulations. You're as delusional as I am with my dreams of "EiH2".I mean, you could phrase any prediction like that if you wanted.
Well, so are you. Because factual data on the exact reasons for Ultimates success don't exist. You're just speculating, like me.Ultimate was not more successful than ever because of its DLC. It was successful due to the whole "Everyone is Here!" and how many of its newcomers were influenced by the Ballot. You're taking two unrelated things and claiming they're connected.
I never said 15!Look. If you guys really want to hold on to the hope that Smash 6 is going to have 15 newcomers at launch, then congratulations. You're as delusional as I am with my dreams of "EiH2" .
Yeah, I'm the one who said 15.I never said 15!
I said 10-12
If they don't EiH again, then 10 is within the realm of possibility.I never said 15!
I said 10-12
Negotiations were settled after, but some of them started well before. They said as much about Minecraft. So Nintendo knew from the planning stages that Minecraft would come to Smash. And had to have known it wasn't going to be base game pretty early on.Negotiations were settled well after Ultimate's initial project plan had been decided on
So you're genuinely going to make me believe that Min Min and Aegis, two characters Sakurai had explicitly said were too late to be considered for base game... were considered for base game but withheld for DLC because money?Negotiations were settled after, but some of them started well before. They said as much about Minecraft. So Nintendo knew from the planning stages that Minecraft would come to Smash. And had to have known it wasn't going to be base game pretty early on.
All this "DLC wasn't part of the original plan for Ultimate" is a fantasy.
Oh, yeah, I forgot about that. Besides, he didn't choose them, Nintendo did, full stop. The only notable thing is Min Min was asked to be in from the creator, which given how things are, would've gone to Nintendo who would ask Sakurai. It's the only explanation that doesn't directly contradict a constant amount of statements.So you're genuinely going to make me believe that Min Min and Aegis, two characters Sakurai had explicitly said were too late to be considered for base game... were considered for base game but withheld for DLC because money?
Do I have to repeat a previous history lesson on when characters were picked for Ultimate, now? >:VSo you're genuinely going to make me believe that Min Min and Aegis, two characters Sakurai had explicitly said were too late to be considered for base game... were considered for base game but withheld for DLC because money?
Probably for the same reasons the Smash Ballot will never be shown to the public.This is a good example of why game dev is so secretive.
It's not all or nothing. Some characters were planned ahead of time. Others weren't.So you're genuinely going to make me believe that Min Min and Aegis, two characters Sakurai had explicitly said were too late to be considered for base game... were considered for base game but withheld for DLC because money?
This is super late, but I wanted to post at least the special move ideas I had. Didn't end up having enough time to write down a full moveset like I wanted to. I'll probably complete and revise this one later on.Here's a new topic. Let's talk moveset design.
Ignoring any discussion regarding likelihood, priority or whether or not he should be in...
Seriously. DON'T do it.
How would you personally design Bandana Waddle Dee's moveset?
That's the least, though. Some characters received basically no changes from Smash 4. Look at Greninja or Duck Hunt.That doesn't make them newcomers though.
No veteran character has to truly be "made from scratch". Because even if they have to remake their model and animation, all the design work on their movset has already been done before.
Awfullyhow will the community react if they actually added a genshin rep as dlc.
Pretty good. It's an extremely popular series.how will the community react if they actually added a genshin rep as dlc.
Unless Smash 6, ya know...has the kind of engine upgrade that Brawl or Smash 4 had.There's no need to do all that work for any veteran next time.
I do think there's no harm in showing truncated results for the Smash ballot, as in only showing placements of characters that actually made it into Ultimate. Seeing Sora in 1st, Banjo in 2nd, and then a jump to K. Rool in like 5th or something would invite speculation on who the 3rd or 4th placers could have been.Probably for the same reasons the Smash Ballot will never be shown to the public.
True. And we know that Bayonetta was in 5th place in the EU regions, but not her placement beyond that. Though I might be remembering some numbers wrong, she did place relatively high. Of course, her situation is far more complicated as is, but that's our faults for datamining information we shouldn't know. XDI do think there's no harm in showing truncated results for the Smash ballot, as in only showing placements of characters that actually made it into Ultimate. Seeing Sora in 1st, Banjo in 2nd, and then a jump to K. Rool in like 5th or something would invite speculation on who the 3rd or 4th placers could have been.
She was actually 1st place in Europe and “among the top 5” in North America/US.True. And we know that Bayonetta was in 5th place in the EU regions, but not her placement beyond that. Though I might be remembering some numbers wrong, she did place relatively high. Of course, her situation is far more complicated as is, but that's our faults for datamining information we shouldn't know. XD
Isn’t it the standard nowadays to have Direct every February, June and September? Just wait until June.Man, we haven't had a direct in a long time.
When will the silence be broken?
It does feel like a long time. I suppose sometime close to the release of Luigi’s Mansion 2 HD is my best bet right now.Man, we haven't had a direct in a long time.
When will the silence be broken?
That is the usual pattern, but we technically skipped February.Isn’t it the standard nowadays to have Direct every February, June and September? Just wait until June.
It's a bit dependent on what Nintendo says in their investor's meeting, but realistically June. The company has been willing to forgo one major general direct but (outside the pandemic year) two in a row? Unlikely. Even with a fairly barren year in regard to major first party releases, there's probably enough for at least a Direct mini in late spring/early June.Man, we haven't had a direct in a long time.
When will the silence be broken?