Link chucks bombs around too and he's already blown himself and others up many-a-times in past games. I think that bomb-related terrorism is allowed.Bomberman is a terrorist and should not be allowed.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Link chucks bombs around too and he's already blown himself and others up many-a-times in past games. I think that bomb-related terrorism is allowed.Bomberman is a terrorist and should not be allowed.
I forgot about him. I think I should change it. HE has better chances.Tails has no chance, i would like Crono, but if square lends a character i guess it would be someone else, so megaman sounds the most likely, but i still think he wouldnt fit that well cause he is already in other fighting games with a very different style... but yet again i didnt really think sonic would make it
Instead of Tails u shouldve put bomberman, he has more chances, but still, the one i would want is definetely Crono, i wouldve wanted to play as him again since Chrono Trigger, and that was a loooong time ago
Simon freaking Belmont FTW.
I needn't say more.
That's most likely what will happenGeno sneaks in as a MARIO CHARACTER, while Megaman steals the last spot. Everyone is happy. [end thread]
I'd be happy with either Bomberman or Megaman...Though I like Megaman, Bomberman was the character that I have wanted in Smash since just after 64...voted for him on the Melee poll, not knowing at the time that he was 3rd party...mainly because all his games up to that point were all on nintendo system.I want Megaman but from rumors and facts I have been hearing... bomberman is more likely then any other third party.
Still unsure on Pacman, don't count him out.
They worked together on Star Fox Assault, F-Zero GX, Pac-Man Vs, Mario Kart Arcade GP and the sequel, and Namco has a bunch of Namco Museum titles on Nintendo platforms.4. Pac-Man- Namco rep, I'll be honest, the only reason Pac-Man is here is for iconic purposes. Melee had G&W, why shouldnt Brawl have an equally revolutionary character? The only bad is that he probably is the least likely of the four, as Namco hasnt (in my vision) shown any real favortism towards Nintendo, they're just another third party.
Sorry dude, if Capcom gets a rep, it's gonna be Mega Man. Viewtiful Joe just hasn't earned a spot on Brawl's roster. It should be reserved for the ELITE. If you let VJ in, you have to (potentially) let in just about anybody.THREAD BUMP>
Why? Because i think everyone should sit back and take a good look at joe and see, at the very least his potential for brawl. I mean hes got all the qualifications. He's been on a nintendo platform, hes from a considerably big developer in capcom, whos known to be friendly with the big N, and hes has a fair sized fan based. Plus Joe is the definition of brawler.
*snip*
sora is definitely not going to make it. its not even a possibility. his two main games were on the ps2. his stupid little chain memories did not really help nintendo out.1. Sora(Kingdom Hearts)
2. Megaman
3. Ryu from Street fighter xD
Actually, Sega worked with Nintendo on GX. Just pointing that out.They worked together on Star Fox Assault, F-Zero GX, Pac-Man Vs, Mario Kart Arcade GP and the sequel, and Namco has a bunch of Namco Museum titles on Nintendo platforms.
Face it: Namco + Nintendo = BFF
Namco also helped out... but mostly with the arcade version.Actually, Sega worked with Nintendo on GX. Just pointing that out.
The next third party slot probably belongs to Megaman (hopefully X, even though his chances are low). Capcom and Nintendo have been through so much together, it wouldn't make sense not to put him in.
Either him or Geno, even though I don't care for Geno.
Nintendo, SEGA and Namco worked together on the Triforce arcade board.Wikipedia said:At the AOU Amusement Expo in mid-February 2002, Nintendo announced that an arcade board under the name of "Triforce" was being developed in conjunction between Nintendo, Namco, and Sega. In an a follow-up interview held in London, Miyamoto said announcements will be made revealing several software titles that will make use of the hardware. The first occurred in late March 2002 and was from Sega's Amusement Vision.[6] The announcement revealed Sega's subsidiary Amusement Vision and Nintendo will collaborate to release F-Zero video game titles for the Triforce arcade board and the Nintendo GameCube.[1] While Amusement Vision was responsible for most of the game's development, Nintendo EAD executives including Shigeru Miyamoto, Takaya Imamura, and Isshin Shimizu, took on leading roles.[6] Nintendo revealed the first footage of F-Zero GX at the Pre-E3 press conference on May 21, 2002 in video gaming|2002]]. While the game was known to exist several months prior, it had remained behind closed doors until that conference.