If Shovel Knight couldn't get a character with his ballot support and Japanese Nintendo distribution, what makes Undertale more likely? I'll give you it's going beyond having one game to its name (though so has Shantae PLUS some ballot support, right? And she was just a spirit)
My thinking on echo fighter criteria is this:
- The character must have a good amount of appeal. (I can't imagine most people would care about someone like Demise)
- The character must have the exact same proportions as the original fighter. (Characters like Young Link and Isabelle do not fit this criteria)
- The character must have a visibly different personality (Alph's manorisms are very similar to Olimar's, and the characters don't speak in Smash).
- Any new attacks for the character have to be ripped from other characters.
So why is Dr. Mario a clone and not an echo fighter? *shrugs*
Also, why do people consider Minecraft to be an indie game? It may have been made by one person but Microsoft has owned it for years. Personally I think that makes it a AAA title.
I don't think Ken's unique attacks were from other characters tho.
I'm guessing it's simply easy (in some cases, real easy) clones based off of other characters but don't fall under Isabelle levels of uniqueness (no different body proportions requiring entirely new animations) and came about in the Smash 4/Smash Ultimate development period.
Young Link, that said, did get updated as well as by proxy of regular Link having new moves, is as close as you can get to Classic Link. Bar the Gale Boomerang at best. I mean, Hookshot and Clawshot were more or less the same move, bar model changes. Giving him Triforce Slash does make you feel like he was intended as that. But I don't remember any article stating this as an intention, though. It would make sense. Young Link is a regular version of Link from various games after all. Who better to represent the original moveset? The Trophies were written with it in mind(that Young Link is believed to be the one from Zelda 1).
Wait, so Young Link can sorta canonically be considered NES Zelda Link as well??
Dixie Kong is far harder to say. It could be just the hair alone wasn't plausible and considered too much of a drastic change. Maybe he still is holding onto the idea of her being a Partner archtype. Maybe she wasn't high priority to begin with(at least that explains K. Rool in Ultimate over her. Or maybe he just was more voted?). If we do get her at some point, he might explain his reasonings more. That said, she'd still work as an Echo as is, even if the only real difference is a unique Up B. That's the bare minimum she needs. Diddy no longer uses his tail on attacks, so that makes her able to do all his moves quite easily. And possibly a new Neutral B based upon a similar idea. From what I was told earlier, to note, is that Dixie and DK share the same body structure, so they could rework his Up B into a variant for hers(not unlike how Chrom got a variant of Ike's Up B), though I can't say for sure if it'd actually work. If not clear, I'm using "maybe"-based phrasing for that reason alone. Anyway, I hope she gets in at some point.
Maybe they could do an "easy" fighter's pass with more echos or semiclones and/or characters from existing series so they needn't worry about developing a stage as well. Would cut developer's costs on additional DLC while still making a lot of fans happy with certain characters so it's a win-win.
They could do Tails, Dixie, Medusa, Ms. Pac-Man, Roll/Bass/Proto-Man that also uses some scrapped custom moves of Mega Man that were in 4, Octolings... And that's just the clone choices (*cough* Geno *cough* assuming fans wouldn't mind no stage *cough*)
You think if we do hypothetically get a first party, people will be mad because it wasn't x third party/someone bigger? Would it be another Corrin situation?