Schnee117
Too Majestic for Gender
PSASBR has nothing to do with Smash picks.And Joker never appeared in Playstation All Stars so.....
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
PSASBR has nothing to do with Smash picks.And Joker never appeared in Playstation All Stars so.....
Rofl.Except for those characters are from the same series so that's a false equivalency. And Joker never appeared in Playstation All Stars so.....
They are still part of the same series.Rofl.
Atlus has made it clear at this point SMT and Persona are different entities.
And I guess we can’t have Dante either by that logic, lol.
You don't know that.PSASBR has nothing to do with Smash picks.
hmmm. I am not to sure. I predictHonestly my predictions are as such:
100% chance I'm wrong, but still.
- Geno
- Crash
- Dante
- Hayabusa
- Gen 8 Pokemon
- Lloyd Irving or Sol Badguy
"**** this character crossed over in another fighting game, guess we can't add 'em"You don't know that.
Yes, Dig Dug is owned by Namco.Heihachi is the poster child of Tekken. While I think he is the bland one of the bunch. I honestly cannot see it being any other tekken character.
The battle.
Kosmos
Dark Souls
Heihachi
A tales person
Yoshimitsu (come on. You know he would be cool.)
Man Namco is a gold mine. Is Dig Dug namco also?
Not another fighting game, a game that was literally created to try to be Sony's equivalent of Smash Bros (and failed miserably)."**** this character crossed over in another fighting game, guess we can't add 'em"
shame we can't have sonic in smashNot another fighting game, a game that was literally created to try to be Sony's equivalent of Smash Bros (and failed miserably).
Lets see."**** this character crossed over in another fighting game, guess we can't add 'em"
I vote DigDug. He is the new Namco headliner.I'd be pretty happy with Heihachi. Though Jin would still be my personal choice for a Tekken character. The guy's pretty much the actual protagonist, but I don't think that'd matter much. I'd be fine with Kazuya too, though of the 3, he's the one I'm the least attached to.
Yes, Dig Dug is owned by Namco.
Right, another fighting game then.Not another fighting game, a game that was literally created to try to be Sony's equivalent of Smash Bros (and failed miserably).
Sega's not making consoles anymore. Sony is.shame we can't have sonic in smash
You must’ve been in the camp that thought Shantal was confirmed because she wasn’t in any other fighting games. :DDDYou don't know that.
and for a second I thought we could get banjo, oh wellSega's not making consoles anymore. Sony is.
Except for I already stated it had nothing to do with Fighting Games themselves. Try reading the thread more.You must’ve been in the camp that thought Shantal was confirmed because she wasn’t in any other fighting games. :DDD
Microsoft is hell of a lot more friendly than Sony is.and for a second I thought we could get banjo, oh well
Dig Dug is Namco. Actually Dig Dig has more content in Smash 4, the Pooka enemies were enemies in Smash run.Heihachi is the poster child of Tekken. While I think he is the bland one of the bunch. I honestly cannot see it being any other tekken character.
The battle.
Kosmos
Dark Souls
Heihachi
A tales person
Yoshimitsu (come on. You know he would be cool.)
Man Namco is a gold mine. Is Dig Dug namco also?
It's still a bit foolish to believe that a character showing up in one crossover fighting game, then means they can't show up in another.You don't know that.
Kind of.Do you think that Steve should have gotten in over Banjo-Kazooie, since it obviously sold so much more?
Yeah after Cuphead's creators said it'd be cool to have him in Smash and us getting the costumes some time later, I legit wonder how long it takes for those kind of negotiations or for spirits.If we want to be technical Mii Costumes are not included in the Challenger Packs per se, and they can be separate negotiations from the CPs (Sans / Cuphead etc). It's also not a death sentence for the company since Ubisoft still has characters like Prince of Persia - AC's potential inspiration. Now that's a major dark horse.
I don't think we'll get five third parties people talk the most about. I'm 90% sure Nintendo will add three or four relatively nicher characters and Sakurai will be like:
View attachment 263081
Simon and Snake were in DreamMix TV World Fighters with Optimus Prime and Beyblades back in 2003Lets see.
Cloud was in Ehirgiz
Ryu and Ken are SF
Simon was in the Castlvania fighting gme.
Snake was in smash
Terry is from KOF.
Megaman was in MVC.
Pacman was in Namco Vs Capcom
not sure about Bayo.
I never heard of Anarchy Reigns. I need to look into it.Simon and Snake were in DreamMix TV World Fighters with Optimus Prime and Beyblades back in 2003
Bayo was in Anarchy Reigns
According to rumors, PSASBR was supposed to have Cloud, but he was too expansive. Once again accordnig to rumor, getting Cloud cost Nintendo more than the entirity of PSASBR.Microsoft is. But why are we talking about Sony? Heihachi is Namco.
Are we talking about PSASBR? I really did enjoy that game. It had potential. The developers should have chosen a better starting roster. And had more unlockables. But it was overall fun.
Well, I've said before it's not "another crossover game", it's the rival equivalent crossover game, like the Justice League to the Avengers.It's still a bit foolish to believe that a character showing up in one crossover fighting game, then means they can't show up in another.
If that were the case, Mega Man, Ryu, Ken, Terry, Pac-Man, Sonic(I think he was in Fighter's Mega Mix) Snake, and Simon wouldn't be in Smash. Bayo was in Anarchy Reigns, but that'd be more akin to Heihachi in SC2, as a singular guest within that game's context.
Snake and Simon in particular were in another Smash clone that happened to have Bomberman in it as well.
Raiden appeared in Brawl first.Guess we have to remove the raiden spirit because he was in psabr..shame
so you're saying sony got bamco to sign a contract that meant heihachi couldn't appear in any crossovers besides psasbrExcept for I already stated it had nothing to do with Fighting Games themselves. Try reading the thread more.
Microsoft is hell of a lot more friendly than Sony is.
I feel bad for the developers, they had like no budget and hardly any power to chose the characters They wanted.Microsoft is. But why are we talking about Sony? Heihachi is Namco.
Are we talking about PSASBR? I really did enjoy that game. It had potential. The developers should have chosen a better starting roster. And had more unlockables. But it was overall fun.
Wouldn't the fact that it failed miserably suggest that it doesn't matter? Not to mention you act as if this is an exclusivity deal when it clearly isn't, especially as Sony doesn't own Heihachi at allNot another fighting game, a game that was literally created to try to be Sony's equivalent of Smash Bros (and failed miserably).
Actually, Superbot (psasbr dev) was trying to get some third parties, but negotiation always fail. I've read that they wanted Crash, Spyro, Lara Croft and Lighning from FF. It didn't help the team that Sony gave them a super low budget to work with, so they had to go with promotional third party that was easier to get.Microsoft is. But why are we talking about Sony? Heihachi is Namco.
Are we talking about PSASBR? I really did enjoy that game. It had potential. The developers should have chosen a better starting roster. And had more unlockables. But it was overall fun.
I never heard of Anarchy Reigns. I need to look into it.
And I forgot about that Dream mix game. I wanted that to be ported back in the day. Looks so fun.
Thanking. Isn't Shovel knight also in a fighting game. He made it as an AT, but he was in a fighting game. Was also with Quote.
100% agree with you.Microsoft is. But why are we talking about Sony? Heihachi is Namco.
Are we talking about PSASBR? I really did enjoy that game. It had potential. The developers should have chosen a better starting roster. And had more unlockables. But it was overall fun.
Your sarcasm and strawmanning is hilarious. I think you made your point several jokes ago. Why don't you go rag on the people who insist sales are the be all end all determiner of who deserves to be in Smash?Oh right, Lloyd crossed over in a Soul Calibur spin-off.
Guess he's off the table too smh : pensive :
I don’t get the need to put them against each other either, but fanboys will do that.I don't have anything to add to the Tekken vs Tales argument.
I don't really care about either TBH, so I have no preference.
In the case of Monster Hunter, I’m assuming they thought the boss fight/AT was the best way to include the series and that a MH fighter isn’t on the cards.If sales are so important why do we have playable Megaman and Ryu while Resident Evil and Monster Hunter are stuck with a bunch of spirits and a boss fight
Snake was also in a Smash clone prior to Brawl, but that didn't mean jack towards his inclusion at all.Not another fighting game, a game that was literally created to try to be Sony's equivalent of Smash Bros (and failed miserably).