Glad to see Smash Fan back!
If anyone has seen my last post, just want people to know that I edited it to where it reflects more of my opinion today and less of the drama it caused.
I just want to say that I am deeply sorry for what I said. There was clearly other ways I could have portrayed it, but I did it out of irrationality and was overly emotional about it.
Back then, I was a depressed person. My mind was all about Smash 4 and getting Victini in Smash 4 to prevent Zoroark's inclusion and mentally, it swallowed me up. I felt like a failure and worried every day that my dream of being myself would never be accomplished.
Shut up with the apology. You don't need to apologize to us. We knew you had good, but perhaps wrongly expressed reasons to leave. I figured you were perhaps too caught up into this, possibly to mask something. I did the same thing pre-Brawl for a while.
I was masking how I had recently been betrayed by most of my best and closest friends, many of whom I had been friends with for almost a decade. They had been stealing money and things from me for several years when I invited them to my house. We used to be real close when I was really athletic and involved in sports before I contracted an illness that prevented me from being physically active. But when my health started to deteriorate, they stopped wanting to be around me at school. I went from being one of the "cool kids" because of my athletic ablility (although I didn't like the rest of the crowd we hung out with) to being just another nobody who was seen as nothing special. They also only visited me, as I said, to steal from me. But you know what=??? I got over it, and so will you.
Don't make me link a Ray Lewis speech. Plus now I truly get physical talents aren't what make the man. The mind makes the man, and this experience made me a grounded and intelligent person with a lot more passion for life.
I've also been getting very much into movies recently. One fan base I'm currently involved in is An American Tail and I love both An American Tail and An American Tail: Fievel Goes West. The fan base is small, but I love being around it. The people are respectful, polite, and don't constantly fight with each other. What I'm saying is this; we should be more like them and less like what we are now.
Here's the thing: We debate over Smash Wii U and 3DS because we want different things to happen in the sequel. I want wave landing back, someone else doesn't. I want Toon Link back, a few people want Young Link back, and Arc wants a Masked Link concept. We are debating-which ripens our ability to reason. Because without doubting our opinion with the opinions of other, we are using argumentative certainty instead of reasoning. In other words, we are sharping our ability to reason, in a sense, by debating.
We also are able to learn more ideas, opinions, and thoughts from others, thus giving us a wider and better pool of ideas, opinions, and thoughts to like, dislike, and be indifferent or neutral to. I wouldn't have "liked" Geno if the Geno fan base hadn't come around and convinced me to play Super Mario RPG. I also wouldn't have pushed for Ridley if I didn't know other people also thought he was a great character.
The "An American Tail" series hasn't had a sequel in years, and likely, the whole fan base wants the same thing in a sequel. Thus "debating" is pointless, unless it comes down to how you interpret things in said movie.
However, I do agree arguing and name calling has no place here. But you know what=??? So does just about everyone here. We shouldn't be debating to win, but debating to get our point across better, more effectively, and to understand where others are coming from. We also do it to try to figure out what the other person views in all this, what they perceive, when they began to perceive this, how they began to perceive this, why they continue to perceive this, where they began to perceive this from, and what is the root of their views on what should be perceived as "important."
For instance, if I view Donkey Kong characters as "top priority characters," that means I value the DK's franchises characters as the most important. My root must be from either growing up liking Donkey Kong characters (more than other smash bros character candidates), liking the games a lot, or just liking the concept of them being playable in smash. If it's say the latter, that means I view character concepts as the most important part of adding playable characters. Literally our debating, if done right, is as simple as that my friend.
I agree some of us cross the line with our comments on Diddy Kong involving Impa, but he knows we like him aside from how annoying he can be. Think of him as the obnoxious older brother who thinks he is trying to do the right thing... in a sense. Back in the pre-Brawl days, he used to do the same thing with the character Diddy Kong. The difference=??? Dang near everyone wanted to play as Diddy Kong, whereas (now) nobody wants to play as Impa, especially as a replacement for Sheik. Plus back then there were separate boards for each character. Once there is a Smash Wii U/3DS character board, Diddy will inevitably overflow the Impa character page with comments about her. Quite frankly, that will annoy basically no one but the few
dark lost souls who decide to visit such a page...
My most wanted character has steered back to Mega Man. I have always loved Mega Man and have always wanted him to be in Smash. If he were to be in, I would immediately main him. Luckily, I feel he is very likely to show up this game and I do expect him.
So I guess that means we're all in the same boat on Mega Man being the
Strongest!
Two more things. First off, I will not actively push for characters I want to see in SSB4. I've realized it was pointless and I shouldn't be changing people's opinion as I tried to do so hard when I came here. Secondly, I am going to upheld a high expectation for the roster. Now I understand people are going to say "You're setting yourself up for disappointment." and I acknowledge that, but why bother avoiding disappointment? Everyone is likely to find something that they find less than satisfying, regardless of how low they set their expectations and the roster will be no exception. I expect at least fifty-three characters (transformation included). Of course I can definitely work with less, but I don't think Sakurai is going to pull a bad roster on us.
Well that's why I say hope for say up to 55 characters, but don't expect anymore than say 47 (you need to bring that 53 characters expectation down a tad). Don't expect certain characters (except maybe the Ridleys, King K. Rools, and Mega Mans of the world), and don't expect the game to blow the universe out of the water.
As for other things that you see changed about my opinions on characters and Smash in general, you'll see. Hopefully, with my campaign for Victini behind me, I can finally not have to stress about something so unimportant.
I get that you were mainly pushing for Victini because he would prevent Zoroark from being playable, but you can still push for Victini because you like Victini. Now if you aren't that big on Victini, that's cool. I kinda like Bowser Jr. and I would kinda like to see him playable, but if he doesn't make it, I'm cool with it (and I don't actively support him). If that's what you wanna do man, do it. Be free to do whatever you feel is the most... "you."
Lastly, has Sakurai stated anything in regards to relevancy being a factor he considers in characters? I see it as a buzz word at worst and indirect in influence at best; in other words, I don't seriously consider it.
The only "real thing" we've gotten was a Kid Icarus: Uprising interview where the interviewer forgot Pit was in Brawl, and asked Sakurai if Pit could be in the next smash bros game!
Sakurai said "it is a possibility." That sly dog...