The Noob Legend
Smash Ace
It's really funny to look back on what people have said.
I guess it goes to show that Sakurai IS the master of all mindgames.
I guess it goes to show that Sakurai IS the master of all mindgames.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Oh yeah.doesn't it feel good to smack people in the face?
btw, i'm not a ness fan, i'm getting intrested though.
Erm, firstly I was pointing out that the JAPANESE site didn't deconfirm Ness from almost the very beginning."Up until now" is only an indication that something has been going on up to a certain point.
In no way does it imply that a certain action stops after that point.
Seriously, you guys still can't accept this fact? How sad. :\
"up until now" means the same as "up to the present" or "as of yet", which doesn't say ANYTHING about the future.Erm, firstly I was pointing out that the JAPANESE site didn't deconfirm Ness from almost the very beginning.
Secondly, "until now", that's the English imperfect tense (technically an aspect, but I don't think we have any linguistics majors on the board), which means the action has ended. If the English site was cannon, it would be a deconfirmation, but myself and others pointed out the disrepency between the Japanese and the English site.
I know many linguistics majors, including my brother, he's confirmed this on several occasions."up until now" means the same as "up to the present" or "as of yet", which doesn't say ANYTHING about the future.
Seriously, go ask a linguistics major or look it up yourself. I'm 100% sure on this.
I'm sorry to say it, but you're wrong.
Is that a joke? lol.All I have to say is, I'll believe it when I see it...
They aren't confirmed just yet, just really likely.This should be stickied in the Ness subforum... and, btw, why don't we have these three subforums up yet?
That makes no sense in terms of syntax, you're saying your belief ended and at the same time saying your belief continues...Up until now, I've always believed Ness would would be in brawl. Now I believe it more than ever.
lololThat makes no sense in terms of syntax, you're saying your belief ended and at the same time saying your belief continues...
No, just no, English is already butchered enough with it's split infinitives and other similar linguistic junk.
The function of the past continuous in English is to state an action ended, not changed. So yes, it does make no sense, the two sentences contradict each other because one stated an action ended and the other stated that it's still going on, albeit in a changed form.No, I didn't say my belief ended, I simply stated that up until this point I had the belief. Now, it has changed to an even stronger belief.
I dealt with that, there must be a point of no belief for it to have ended.Actually, I misspoke when I said that my belief hadn't ended. You see, there are two separate things going on here. I originally had a belief. That belief ENDED. Now I continue with a different, stronger belief. And as for you saying it doesn't refer to a change of action, it actually can. In order for a CHANGE to occur, something must end, in this case the belief. The change happens when the new, stronger belief then comes along. They are two separate statements but they work together just fine.
Doesn't work like that, clarifying doesn't mean an end. The action, "belief" is still ongoing, you're only clarified the type of belief in the second sentence, but in the first sentence you had stated that belief had ended, not any specific type of belief, but simply belief.No, the fact that I specified a difference in my second belief differentiated it from the first. There doesn't have to be a point of no belief, just a point at which one belief ends so another can begin.
No, up until now is imperfect, meaning that the belief IS ended by the phrase "Up until now, I believed Ness would be in brawl". At this point, the belief has ended because of this imperfect tense. I then go on to specify that now I believe it EVEN MORE. This "even more" belief is a new and separate belief from the one which just ended.By specifying that this belief is larger it automatically implies that the initial belief was smaller. Like if I had two glasses with different amounts of water and I stated that one contained more, it would automatically indicate that the other had less.Doesn't work like that, clarifying doesn't mean an end. The action, "belief" is still ongoing, you're only clarified the type of belief in the second sentence, but in the first sentence you had stated that belief had ended, not any specific type of belief, but simply belief.
Specifying it as a stronger belief (or weaker belief) does not linguistically "end" the action, so it doesn't make sense.
Linguistically, it's not a separate action, I'm sorry, but you simply do not understand the English past continuous aspect, it's quite confusing but if you're interested you should take a linguistics course, because what you're describing is the English imperfect (not to be confused with every other language's imperfect which is what I was talking about), not the English past continuous (which is every other language's imperfect).No, up until now is imperfect, meaning that the belief IS ended by the phrase "Up until now, I believed Ness would be in brawl". At this point, the belief has ended because of this imperfect tense. I then go on to specify that now I believe it EVEN MORE. This "even more" belief is a new and separate belief from the one which just ended.By specifying that this belief is larger it automatically implies that the initial belief was smaller. Like if I had two glasses with different amounts of water and I stated that one contained more, it would automatically indicate that the other had less.
Only if the original degree was specified...I have taken a linguistics course. I've also studied ancient Greek which is the primary basis for our gramatical forms. And yes, linguistically it is a separate action because it changes in degree. It doesn't have to be a change into an entirely separate type of action. The fact that both types of action are beliefs doesn't mean they are the same action.
wow..... that was trivey...... that audio file confused the crap out of me. but i did understand it