Heck your post also has language indicating that you're assuming scum has a strongman available in addition to a roleblock.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
yeah, we were discussing a roleblocker. but when we're talking "night kills" and "protect", you can't say it's strange to think about the possibility of a strongman - which is a night kill designed to go through protects. I'm assuming scum has a strongman because it's a common role in a lot of the games I've played. Better to be safe than sorry, I feel.But we had previously discussed there being a roleblocker around, unless I'm misremembering?
It's just extremely weird that you immediately wondered about Strongman, a role that hadn't been brought up at all.
Just because we have a protector, does not mean a strongman is guaranteed. We have gone several games with a body guard and no strongman.yeah, we were discussing a roleblocker. but when we're talking "night kills" and "protect", you can't say it's strange to think about the possibility of a strongman - which is a night kill designed to go through protects. I'm assuming scum has a strongman because it's a common role in a lot of the games I've played. Better to be safe than sorry, I feel.
maybe when praline flips we'll see that she was the one with the strongman LOL
to be fair, a majority of day 2 was spent discussing a forge theory, with just as much evidence for it as a strongman. I'm not saying this to flame you obviously, I'm saying it because it's important to consider what we may or may not have to face in the game. Spending time discussing a forge yet immediately shutting down a strongman is a bit hypocritical imoStrongman scum feels really unlikely. And honestly we have no evidence to suggest it could be at play, so we really shouldn’t be going all in on discussing it. With no proof there’s no reason we should assume they have a strongman.
I can certainly say it's strange when this is the first time a Strongman has been brought up. Especially when you made a post more or less assuming a Scum Strongman is a thing.yeah, we were discussing a roleblocker. but when we're talking "night kills" and "protect", you can't say it's strange to think about the possibility of a strongman - which is a night kill designed to go through protects. I'm assuming scum has a strongman because it's a common role in a lot of the games I've played. Better to be safe than sorry, I feel.
maybe when praline flips we'll see that she was the one with the strongman LOL
It's not shutting down the strongman at all. Heck, you talking about it makes me more convinced that we have one this game. Scum players do know their team mates, after all.to be fair, a majority of day 2 was spent discussing a forge theory, with just as much evidence for it as a strongman. I'm not saying this to flame you obviously, I'm saying it because it's important to consider what we may or may not have to face in the game. Spending time discussing a forge yet immediately shutting down a strongman is a bit hypocritical imo
he is shutting it down.It's not shutting down the strongman at all. Heck, you talking about it makes me more convinced that we have one this game. Scum players do know their team mates, after all.
Strongman scum feels really unlikely. And honestly we have no evidence to suggest it could be at play, so we really shouldn’t be going all in on discussing it. With no proof there’s no reason we should assume they have a strongman.
he's saying that it's "really unlikely", there's "no evidence", and that there's been several games without it. But he was willing to open D2 and discuss his forge theory, which isn't any less farfetched than me assuming there's a strongman on the mafia team.Just because we have a protector, does not mean a strongman is guaranteed. We have gone several games with a body guard and no strongman.
Fair, I thought you were referring to me.he is shutting it down.
he's saying that it's "really unlikely", there's "no evidence", and that there's been several games without it. But he was willing to open D2 and discuss his forge theory, which isn't any less farfetched than me assuming there's a strongman on the mafia team.
because you weren't explicitly making a plan revolving around protecting someone and trying to kill yourself so they can live. when it's in a different context ("im a bodyguard!" vs "ill protect someone tonight, reveal please"), of course there's going to be different thoughts spurred. in the latter I was thinking of possible roles that can mess up a protect to kill a target - hence, strongman came to mind. there's no reason to expect it should have come to mind in the former just because it came to mind in the latter, because the situations are different.protect that person toNight and take the bullet?
When there is already discussion about a roleblocker, it's a bit weird not to have your first assumption be that I'll be role blocked.because you weren't explicitly making a plan revolving around protecting someone and trying to kill yourself so they can live. when it's in a different context ("im a bodyguard!" vs "ill protect someone tonight, reveal please"), of course there's going to be different thoughts spurred. in the latter I was thinking of possible roles that can mess up a protect to kill a target - hence, strongman came to mind. there's no reason to expect it should have come to mind in the former just because it came to mind in the latter, because the situations are different.
ok let’s lay down some points.to be fair, a majority of day 2 was spent discussing a forge theory, with just as much evidence for it as a strongman. I'm not saying this to flame you obviously, I'm saying it because it's important to consider what we may or may not have to face in the game. Spending time discussing a forge yet immediately shutting down a strongman is a bit hypocritical imo
I love how savage you can be lmao.It's not shutting down the strongman at all. Heck, you talking about it makes me more convinced that we have one this game. Scum players do know their team mates, after all.
It is, but I personally feel that the claim would confirm it. It would also, more or less, confirm another town member.Lore
Why exactly do you want to use your protect here? Isn't the most likely explanation here that pokechu is lying?
Forge:ok let’s lay down some points.
Forger:
1)shinys pm was a comic character not anime
2) said character wasn’t even from the main show manga
3)said character made more sense as third party but wasn’t.
That’s three points I had there. Now you:
Strongman:
1)protector exists so should he.
Now I don’t know about you but last time I checked 3 was higher then 1. There was more to back my forgery theory then your strongman one. Doesn’t mean either is real or fake just that one has more going for it then the other.
I love how savage you can be lmao.
And this. I’m not shutting it down. It’s possible, I just don’t think we should be pursuing anything without leads.
They're awful, you're not missing anything lol.omg..........................
my life is a literal lie
how come I've never heard of this!? :[[[[[
I've never played a multi-faction mafia though so that might be why
but wow!!! the more you know
Good question, does your role pm specify?4) does strongman ignore redirects? I don't think so but it might depend on the host, but strongman could counter this to
I mean, I'm comfortable saying that.Forge:
1) shiny's PM character was "batman", an incredibly famous hero character
2) said character was at least the main character of the manga
3) said character makes more sense as a Hero character because he is a superhero, literally - batman LOL
Strongman:
1) very common scum role
2)if there's a bodyguard it is possible strongman exists to counter it
3) if there is a creator-like role, bulletproofs may be an item handed out - strongman would circumvent this
4) does strongman ignore redirects? I don't think so but it might depend on the host, but strongman could counter this to
There's just as much to back my theory as there was for yours. Take your bias out and you'll see it - it doesn't mean that your forge wasn't a good theory or that oh my strongman is better, but there's no reason to act so confident in your theory but try to shut down other's when they're not any less likely.
For me it's mostly that potential roleblock was the big topic, yet it wasn't his first thought as a counter to my protect. In addition, his later post assuming scum has both roleblock and strongman was weird to me.They're awful, you're not missing anything lol.
For the record, I don't think Pokechu bringing up a strongman is a valid point against them. Whenever you discuss a plan that requires x to protect y, that's a valid fear. I also agree it's weird that you all indulged the absurd forger theory but have such a difference in reaction to this.
it does! thank you for askingGood question, does your role pm specify?
All jokes aside, I do still feel that the Forger was a rough theory. Sorry Z25.I mean, I'm comfortable saying that.
they have to have a roleblocker, unless me and Z both got blocked by townies (which, why would a townie block Z? he seems pretty clean. Toaster flipped blocker IIRC so I'm 99% sure they (toaster) blocked me)When there is already discussion about a roleblocker, it's a bit weird not to have your first assumption be that I'll be role blocked.
Not to mention how you made a later post saying the strategic layers as to why scum would use their (assumed) strongman shot instead of their (assumed) roleblock. If the strongman is hypothetical anyway, why would you automatically assume they have both?
I haven't decided on my protect yet and don't intend to declare it unless as part of another strategy, like the item-maker claim idea.it does! thank you for asking
unfortunately no I dont think it does :///
but i have a question!!1 okay so who are you protecting toNight? I'd really like putting my strongman to use, can you tell me your target?
I think my two biggest pauses of an inventor claim is that if you're protecting the inventor the mafia would know who not to target, which is a big advantage for them. Also, if the inventor claims that they exist and gave an item to pokechu, that doesn't actually confirm that pokechu's alignment either way.My best bet is that it was either an item that didn't alert the receiving player or it was given to scum accidentally. If the role exists at all.
I have an idea.
Pokechu's claim of receiving the tracker could have been easily faked, if he was scum. He, of course, would know the movements of Praline (still likely scum).
I still have my protect. What if the person who gave the item claims, then I protect that person toNight and take the bullet? I die, but we confirm Pokechu's claim. If no one claims the role, we can assume Pokechu is lying.
I'm liking this idea the more I think on it. What do you guys think?
You could, you know, be lying about your role being blocked. That's also a possibility.they have to have a roleblocker, unless me and Z both got blocked by townies (which, why would a townie block Z? he seems pretty clean. Toaster flipped blocker IIRC so I'm 99% sure they (toaster) blocked me)
that's why I assumed mafia had a roleblocker, I assumed they had a strongman too because it's a common scum role. it's just spitballing ideas, once praline flips who knows I might be wrong I might be right, but throwing the idea out there doesn't do any harm. it only helps because it puts into perspective your theory, because a strongman is a plausible risk to it.
awww okI haven't decided on my protect yet and don't intend to declare it unless as part of another strategy, like the item-maker claim idea.
Exactly why it's less useful to bring up a role blocker, no? If the thread's already dicussed that, but hasn't mentioned a strongman, what would you bring up?For me it's mostly that potential roleblock was the big topic, yet it wasn't his first thought as a counter to my protect. In addition, his later post assuming scum has both roleblock and strongman was weird to me.
And you could also be lying about being a bodyguard and being shot N1.You could, you know, be lying about your role being blocked. That's also a possibility.
Pokechu is scum unless someone wants to admit giving an item to Pokechu. Right?I think my two biggest pauses of an inventor claim is that if you're protecting the inventor the mafia would know who not to target, which is a big advantage for them. Also, if the inventor claims that they exist and gave an item to pokechu, that doesn't actually confirm that pokechu's alignment either way.
Wrong. Say I'm inventor and I have something strong like a 1-shot cop left - I'm not going to claim, especially given that we're lynching praline today.Pokechu is scum unless someone wants to admit giving an item to Pokechu. Right?
Pokechu can be scum whether or not someone gave them an item. I don't think we should push town PRs to claim if we wouldn't benefit from it.Pokechu is scum unless someone wants to admit giving an item to Pokechu. Right?
Apologies if I'm being unclear, but I mean this:Exactly why it's less useful to bring up a role blocker, no? If the thread's already dicussed that, but hasn't mentioned a strongman, what would you bring up?
Your point on the later post is valid.
If I'm currently reading you as scum, it's a possibility that I have to consider.And you could also be lying about being a bodyguard and being shot N1.
Are we going down that rabbit hole? So why go down this one?
That's the idea, but I now realize that it's a bit of a flawed plan.Pokechu is scum unless someone wants to admit giving an item to Pokechu. Right?
I was not suggesting that they have to claim today.Wrong. Say I'm inventor and I have something strong like a 1-shot cop left - I'm not going to claim, especially given that we're lynching praline today.
I like them slightly more than the penguin guy. Why do you ask?Kary what do you think of Utops?
Ah, my mistake then. In that event I would agree.I was not suggesting that they have to claim today.
Lol.Good question, does your role pm specify?
That’s fair. I never said it was perfect but was at least worth discussing day 2.All jokes aside, I do still feel that the Forger was a rough theory. Sorry Z25.
Honestly if it wasn't for the soft "confirm" on Z25's role, I'd still be pushing it. If this game ends up having no show villains as the scum, I'm going to be frustrated with this confirm, to say the least.
****, it'd fit the flavor too as a training exercise. We need a scum flip asap to confirm or deny.
They’ve been a hard slot for me to read this whole game so I wanted someone else’s input. Also tired of the role discussion.I like them slightly more than the penguin guy. Why do you ask?