He is definitely one of my suspicions, but not sure I want to lynch him just yet. I do believe EE said something about how Rockin needed to die near the end of D1, so I'm not sure I like the idea post Rockin flip.
Even if he said so it doesn't mean that he wanted to lynch him at all. In the end the only thing that matters is that he
did go for the NL instead and that he did
not vote Rockin at such an important stage of the day. He could've
easily make sure that Rockin was getting lynched but he went for the NL instead.
he said rockin was scummy in his bigass post but advocated lynching cacti, gheb, and jf all before him.
There you have it. EE himself said in that post that scum is always looking for the most convenient lynch and he is doing just that in the very same post by voting Cacti and nudging me, JF and BB. Of course he had to mention Rockin somewhere in between so he could draw the "I told you" card in case Rockin flips scum. In his posts he often mentions Rockin as one of his main suspicions but none of his actions substantiate this. He'd always avoid voting for Rockin even when he literally became our best lynch choice.
vyse needs to claim cuz i said so
I support this request. Once Vyse is back he should do a full claim.
EE's first post about the game still seems too townie to me. If he was scum, it would make sense to make a good argument against Bunbun and deem him as scummy. However, Rockin, was like 2nd on his list in terms of scumminess. So I'm feeling a bit hesitant at the moment.
I already responded to a similar point above. Just because he mentions Rockin as one of his suspicions doesn't make him more credible because for all we know that could exactly be his intention. None of his actions show that he was as suspicious of Rockin as he pretended to be.
However, people and things that I like while rereading so far:
Post #131 - I Like Cacti
http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=8754639&postcount=131
Yes, Cacti is probably a good guy.
I don't get Kevin as scum either but I wouldn't read too much into what he said. I wouldn't be surprised if he bussed his scumbuddy here.
Also, EE's town vibes were directed toward me, Gheb, Kevin, and Marshy. Considering Marshy flipped town and I like Kevin and I don't dislike Gheb it feels like he's making good reads overall. At least reads similar to mine.
Only the mafia could be able to tell who's mafia and who is not. Giving townies credit is a simple mafia strategy to gain credibility. It could be him making good reads but I have my doubts. If you are making good reads then you use them to find scum, not to point out whom you find particularily town. You're not supposed to spread around who think's town (that'd only paint a target for scum on their backs) unless you want to look trustworthy in those people's eyes.
I'm Starting to like EE/Vyse #492 -
http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=8880405&postcount=492
Here he continues to peg BB as newb scum. His first "quick hit" was that he doesn't like Rockin's claim (Rockin being scum). He also buys Jungle's claim (who flipped town). Basically, all of EE's points based on flips have been directed accordingly. This was the post where he NL'ed.
Posts can only show so much. The point in this case is that VysEE has never voted for a scumbag at the end of the day and in one particluar case it was up to him to make the final call. His actions simply don't make him any more credible. Buying Jungle's claim to look more townie isn't a big trick when you know that he isn't one of your scumbuddies.
Currently at the 600th post and neither Rockin nor Mentos make any comments towards each other in terms of scumhunting. Neither of the two point fingers at each other, either. They literally have no connection at this point which makes me feel uneasy about Mentos right now.
Indeed I have come to a similar conclusion. This is why after Rockin's flip I'm more suspicious than ever of him for sitting on BB for a while and just ignoring Rockin. Mentos played a very similar game in FFVII and MegaMafia where he pretty much ignored his scumbuddies over the course of the whole game and never interacted with them. In this game he never mentioned Rockin at all until about mid D2 and he also never had any interactions with VysEE, which leads me to believe (amont other reasons) that mentos and vyse are the remaining scumbags.
The verdict? I think Mentos is the play today. I think that Mentosman isn't lying about his character being Wolfgang Grimer. I'm going to ALSO assume that Mafia weren't given safe-claims SINCE Rockin decided to claim Wolfgang Grimer and he got "CC'ed". If it was a safe claim, then Mentos would not be CC'ing at the moment obviously.
I don't see why Mentos wouldn't CC the safeclaim of his doomed scumbuddy if it makes people reconsider his allignment. The whole CC scenario looks very staged to me. I don't think Mentos ever was at L/2 until toDay so why'd he know how his double vote would be "unlocked" and that he is in fact himself Wolfgang Grimmer? I feel like I'm missing something here.
And now that Rockin is gone I find it interesting that Mentos is pushing this "I am basically confirmed town," theory based on his ability to cast a 2nd hidden vote. In my opinion, having the ability to double vote (one of the votes being hidden) doesn't confirm a townie role.
Indeed. If you look at his power and the way it is unlocked there is no way to tell his allignment. It could very well be a mafia power to turn the table in a sticky situation like we have it now in case of mentos. However, this is a reason why we think we shouldn't lynch mentos toDay as we can force or manipulate him to use his double vote for the purposes of town (which at this point would be mainly to pressure Vyse).
Omni, you do realize you are making points on someone who counterclaimed scum and made sure they were lynched, and now has a proven role which would be overpowered in the hands of mafia, correct?
I also realize that you only counterclaimed the
name of an already doomed mafia player. You didn't make sure he'd be lynched because he was about to get lynched already. Your role is proven but your allignment is not.