Purple
Hi guys!
Pretty small post, pretty easy to converse and debate.
For the most part everyone knows that MK is a broken character, while matchups are supposedly even, M2K Has shown time and time again that there isn't really too much you can do to a good metaknight player, and that using metaknight is the best option on pratically ANY counterpick you can think of.
So...
Why is it Pro-Ban can win in the MK poll, however pro-ban is not the solution? The Back Room decided that in order for MK to be banned it had to be a 66 percent vote.
Let's think about this.
You're running for president against the former school president, you work hard to get the facts out there to the students and in the end, it's worth it, you just barely win in vote percentage. HOwever, since it wasn't a certain vote percentage, the former class president still won. It doesn't make sense.
It's practically saying "we're acknowledging that metaknight in fact should be banned and a majority of smash thinks so, however we're just not going to do it."
discuss..
____
Side arguement
Why are stages like jungles japes banned in places. it doesn't make sense either. Characters like falco, dedede, peach, etc. Have stages where they would be ideal. We have Mk who is turbo broke, so these ground breaking stages are very helpful for matchups that are too rough to deal with regularly.
Peach and Jiggs had mute city, it was a practical guaranteed win against space animals. Plank recently banned mute city because he didn't like it (from pound 4 mind you). But is that truly fair? It's something that helps a lower tier character get just a bit better, however it's taken away, just so an already top tier character, can have less competition. How fair is that?! O_O
For the most part everyone knows that MK is a broken character, while matchups are supposedly even, M2K Has shown time and time again that there isn't really too much you can do to a good metaknight player, and that using metaknight is the best option on pratically ANY counterpick you can think of.
So...
Why is it Pro-Ban can win in the MK poll, however pro-ban is not the solution? The Back Room decided that in order for MK to be banned it had to be a 66 percent vote.
Let's think about this.
You're running for president against the former school president, you work hard to get the facts out there to the students and in the end, it's worth it, you just barely win in vote percentage. HOwever, since it wasn't a certain vote percentage, the former class president still won. It doesn't make sense.
It's practically saying "we're acknowledging that metaknight in fact should be banned and a majority of smash thinks so, however we're just not going to do it."
discuss..
____
Side arguement
Why are stages like jungles japes banned in places. it doesn't make sense either. Characters like falco, dedede, peach, etc. Have stages where they would be ideal. We have Mk who is turbo broke, so these ground breaking stages are very helpful for matchups that are too rough to deal with regularly.
Peach and Jiggs had mute city, it was a practical guaranteed win against space animals. Plank recently banned mute city because he didn't like it (from pound 4 mind you). But is that truly fair? It's something that helps a lower tier character get just a bit better, however it's taken away, just so an already top tier character, can have less competition. How fair is that?! O_O