Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Too lazy to go back and confirm this.
Terrible explanation tbh.
Because they haven't been shutting down your lynch all ****ing game on the basis.of "im the role every person should enslave their vote to"
Rake hasn't done any of this. He's answered all asked of him right when he got into thread and it hasn't taken any harassing tk get him to answer things.
Because they haven't been shutting down your lynch all ****ing game on the basis.of "im the role every person should enslave their vote to"
I just got here but I'm not really in any mood to read tbh...
He's playing with zen. We should lynch them first so we can lynch trg tomorrow without fear of being stopped
he has every reason to being that he knows you'll suck him off for it
I take that as a verbal contract and plan to uphold my end of the arrangement.
I went mano a mano against Swiss in my first newb scum game... and Zen white knighted me until I died. Just saying it's not hard.
Zen/Gorf, explain why
and
clear TRG of being lyncher and in your own words, maybe even mafia.
Your summary of my thoughts sounds like you understand my post correctly despite it not being very elegant."Agreeing" is relative. It's certainly not the way I would go about reading a player or push a lynch against him. I think I can see where he's coming from though and why he'd conclude that you are probably scum. It's a bit vague ... not to call it diffuse ... because the way he presented his point is difficult to put into words. But if I follow it bit by bit I think I understand what he means.
I think the clumsy wording of the whole explanation makes it seem weaker and harder to understand than it actually is. In my opinion, Dietz genuinely believes that you answered the question in a manner that a scumbag would have. He probably think that the way you worded your answer shows that you've had to keep a lot of details in mind that a townie straight-up wouldn't have to worry about.
At the same time, it could be a massive stretch and maybe I'm reading his posts completely wrong. Pretty sure I'm not though. And I'm not even sure if I can agree with his case and how he concludes you are scum from it but I'm 100% sure he's genuine. Whether that makes him necessarily town is a different question though - in my opinion, it doesn't.
It lines up with my reads though because I think Orbo's approach to the whole issue is the most rational ... or even "functional", Dietz is somewhere in the middle and Rake is just opportunistic imo.
