- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 10,479
They should take out recovering. That gives players unfair advantages, especially if they have practiced it.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It does make it unfair to the majority of the Smash community when others exploit these altruistic techniques and can't play unless they do it. No matter what crap you say, NO ONE should be FORCED to learn these techniques if they want to play with someone. Period. End of.Just because you choose not to learn and apply it doesn't mean it's unfair.
That's a legit technique in the manual.They should take out recovering. That gives players unfair advantages, especially if they have practiced it.
I already touched on that subject and noted that I don't care about that and that doesn't bother me.like playing each other using advanced tactics and like seeing how well they can play by using those advanced tactics?
de·bate /dɪˈbeɪt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[di-beyt] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, verb, -bat·ed, -bat·ing.This is one of the most ridiculous arguments on this forum. Guys, just take it to the debate hall. This place is for discussion, not *****in'.
Wow you totally missed that one. It wasn't an analogy and he's pointing out that if you guys think L-Canceling (programmed into the game) is unfair and cheap, then why isn't returning?? (also programmed into the game).Dogenzaka said:That's a legit technique in the manual.
You suck at analogies.
They are only altruistic in your mind (and your little community's). You are right. No matter what crap I say, no one should be forced to learn these techniques if they want to play with someone. And you know what? NO ONE IS FORCED TO LEARN THESE TECHNIQUES! Did I say that they had to learn them? I don't recall. You'll have to quote me on that one. Regardless, I am not making anyone do anything. However, if they intend on beating me then they might wanna look into it.It does make it unfair to the majority of the Smash community when others exploit these altruistic techniques and can't play unless they do it. No matter what crap you say, NO ONE should be FORCED to learn these techniques if they want to play with someone. Period. End of.
If player A knows advanced techs, and player B doesn't know advanced techs, obviously player A would be expected to win. If both players agree not to use advanced techs, what would happen? Player A would still win, because even without his advanced techs, practicing them and playing in tournaments has made player A transcend the level that casuals will never transcend until playing with experienced players instead of just their friends. So in the end, it doesn't change the outcome for player B, because he only plays the game casually, and therefore can't and rightfully shouldn't expect to stand a chance against player A, who plays the game on a more frequent basis. Removing the advanced techs only hurts people when player A runs into player C, and both know the advanced techs and like using the advanced techs.I already touched on that subject and noted that I don't care about that and that doesn't bother me.
It's when it involves people who don't know these tactics wherein lies the problem.
I never said they should be forced. Like you said earlier, we're the MINORITY. You're drasticly exaggerating how many casuals are going to randomly run into a pro player (whether it be melee or Brawl online) and lose because of L canceling and wavedashing.It does make it unfair to the majority of the Smash community when others exploit these altruistic techniques and can't play unless they do it. No matter what crap you say, NO ONE should be FORCED to learn these techniques if they want to play with someone. Period. End of.
That's kind of wrong. Neither are hurt, the game just potentially loses some depth, as long as the techniques are options.If player A knows advanced techs, and player B doesn't know advanced techs, obviously player A would be expected to win. If both players agree not to use advanced techs, what would happen? Player A would still win, because even without his advanced techs, practicing them and playing in tournaments has made player A transcend the level that casuals will never transcend until playing with experienced players instead of just their friends. So in the end, it doesn't change the outcome for player B, because he only plays the game casually, and therefore can't and rightfully shouldn't expect to stand a chance against player A, who plays the game on a more frequent basis. Removing the advanced techs only hurts people when player A runs into player C, and both know the advanced techs and like using the advanced techs.
Fix'd.(and your huge community's)
They have to if they want to play evenly with someone like you or me.NO ONE IS FORCED TO LEARN THESE TECHNIQUES! Did I say that they had to learn them? I don't recall.
Obviously. But this thread isn't about who would win, it's about why they should or shouldn't be out.If player A knows advanced techs, and player B doesn't know advanced techs, obviously player A would be expected to win. If both players agree not to use advanced techs, what would happen? Player A would still win, because even without his advanced techs
It's not when you consider how many times people run into snakers online in Mario Kart DS.You're drasticly exaggerating how many casuals are going to randomly run into a pro player
Teching when you hit the floor isn't in the manual, is that cheap and unintended? The thing is you really have no idea how the developers feel about how we play, but i'll bet that whatever makes us happy probably makes them happy as well. Why do you think smash bros is so customizable? Because they want us to play the way that makes us the most happy, they NEVER said the game is meant to be played in a certain way. But ppl still assume such non-sense. If the game was meant to be played a certain way, wouldn't they mention that in the manual? lolz.That's a legit technique in the manual.
You suck at analogies.
Isn't it when you press A or something when you hit the floor to recover from a fall?Teching when you hit the floor isn't in the manual
It's customizable but why do you think these techniques are out?The thing is you really have no idea how the developers feel about how we play, but i'll bet that whatever makes us happy probably makes them happy as well. Why do you think smash bros is so customizable?
Nobody.Fix'd.
Player A and B are twin brothers who play the game together and have the same amount of experience and are easily advanced. One day one of them learns to wavedash and L-cancel. Who has the advantage?
Not really. I don't speak in terms of their opinion for them, but I speak for their defense.You believe you speak for the rest of the smashers in the world
Or unable? Or have lives and can't spend time perfecting it with every character?As I mentioned in a previous post, you represent this weird borderline community of smashers who are competitive but unwilling to adapt.
Wrong answer. The person who can wavedash and L-cancel does, because he's faster, and cancels out natural lag.Nobody.
Never said that. However, he has the advantage. They both have the same skill level, only one is able to wavedash and L-cancel, so he's faster, and nimbler. That's called an advantage.You don't learn how to wavedash and suddenly become some superb player. So you can wavedash, so what? It doesn't help much if you wavedash right into your opponents attack.
Wow, that sounds like a really good gaming technique!!!!! Good thing I can already do it, use them well, and I'm on my way to a tourney this weekend.Wrong answer. The person who can wavedash and L-cancel does, because he's faster, and cancels out natural lag.
I'm sure if Player A learned how to edgehog and chaingrab while player b learned wavedash and L-cancel, we'd be hard pressed to know who has the advantage.Player A and B are twin brothers who play the game together and have the same amount of experience and are easily advanced. One day one of them learns to wavedash and L-cancel. Who has the advantage?
I'm not talking about who's FCKING BETTER. I'M TALKING ABOUT THE ADVANTAGE PEOPLE RECEIVE FROM THESE TECHNIQUES.Like I said before, tournaments make you better. Not wavedashing. If you haven't been to a real tournament, you really have no say in how the game should be played or not.
True, L-canceling is however.(1) -- jumping -- not a glitch
(2) -- air dodging -- not a glitch
(3) -- sliding upon contact with the ground -- not a glitch
You're the minority because you're part of the group that actually wants wavedashing and l-canceling taken out of the game. The majority of people don't know what a wavedash even is, so can't possibly want them to remove it from Brawl.To be honest, the people who CAN'T use these techniques, are the majority. So you're right, I'm the minority, because I can use them.
Please try to realize that learning how to wavedash and l-cancel doesn't take 8 hours a day of practice ...ok?Or unable? Or have lives and can't spend time perfecting it with every character?
That's very true. Wavedash is a lot more logically in the game as opposed to l-cancelling, which was them making something that seemed to be a glitch in the first game a controlled technique...Wavedashing consists of the following:
(1) -- jumping -- not a glitch
(2) -- air dodging -- not a glitch
(3) -- sliding upon contact with the ground -- not a glitch
#3 is what seems to rub you the wrong way. The programs put those physics into the game. It's not an accident that characters slide upon coming in contact with the ground. Why do you think the combining of all three constitutes a glitch? Under that logic, most combos are glitches since they were never intended. Did the creators intend Fox's up-throw to up-smash? If so, how do you know? If not, should it be illegal? One of my favorite Link combos is jab then down-smash. Is that a glitch? It is an unintended combination of non-glitches to form a glitch according to your mode of thinking.
Wavedashing is not a glitch. Get over yourself!
And those happen to be the best players. What's your point? Getting beat too much?Dogenzaka said:I'm not talking about who's FCKING BETTER. I'M TALKING ABOUT THE ADVANTAGE PEOPLE RECEIVE FROM THESE TECHNIQUES.
And yeah, its not in Brawl anymore. So yay for you, you got your way. Too bad for you its perfectly legal in Melee.Dogenzaka said:True, L-canceling is however.
Perhaps glitch is a strong word. I like cheapass techniques better.
The answer is they both have advantages, it's just impossible to tell who has the most advantage.I'm sure if Player A learned how to edgehog and chaingrab while player b learned wavedash and L-cancel, we'd be hard pressed to know who has the advantage.
It requires practice, however, and some people earn a living through jobs and not smash bros. tournaments, and for some, it IS hard to pull off. It took me a few weeks to perfect wavedashing. Most people lack that time.Please try to realize that learning how to wavedash and l-cancel doesn't take 8 hours a day of practice ...ok?
How does that make me the minority? You only THINK it's the minority because the majority of people at this ridiculous forum want it IN.You're the minority because you're part of the group that actually wants wavedashing and l-canceling taken out of the game.
If I went up to someone and they asked me what it was and I replied "It's when someone does a fast button combination and takes advantage of the games physics system to make them unnaturally fast and cancel out natural lag set into the game" they'd say "well that's cheap!!!"The majority of people don't know what a wavedash even is, so can't possibly want them to remove it from Brawl.
Oh come off the insults. I'm getting angry and frustrated with the unbased insults. How does that have anything to do with my skill?And those happen to be the best players. What's your point? Getting beat too much?
But it technically does, considering, it makes you faster and cancel out lag. Speed is a big factor in tournaments.And those happen to be the best players. What's your point? Getting beat too much?
How? Chances are Nintendo didn't even know this thing existed.It was clearly intended to be there.
Like I said earlier, just because you know how to wavedash doesn't mean you know how to use it. Somebody who just learned how to wavedash isn't going to automatically know the spacing in which he has to wavedash backwards or forward. Also, ,missed L-cancels will result in shield grabs.Wrong answer. The person who can wavedash and L-cancel does, because he's faster, and cancels out natural lag.
I like that Buzz, He'll argue that the other people are spending more money on the game though. Which is also true. He's not going with the same argument that you're going with =].L-canceling is not a glitch either. It was recognized from Smash 64 and thus modified into Melee. It being removed in Brawl has nothing to do with whether it is considered a glitch. It was clearly intended to be there. Sure, they are taking it out in Brawl, so that supports your "I hate it because it's cheap" theory, but it is not a glitch no matter what you say.
And why are you against players having an advantage? Why are you against people getting better at the game? We're sorry people have lives and don't have time to learn advanced techniques. Why should we be denied the depth of the game to make them happy? If you total the hours put in by the competitive community, suddenly they become the minority. One competitive smasher easily puts in the hours to cover 1000 casual smashers. I know I have. Why on earth should we sink to their level? It is their choice to ascend to ours.
O_O It goes both ways! That was a poor argument...Dogenzaka said:The best players are the best because of skill, not because of the techniques.
I am not flame baiting ANYWHERE. I am discussing. I haven't insulted anyone, or personally attacked, or flamed anyone. If people decide to start a flame war, it's from their lack of self-control. Your argument is moot.with dog boy here flame baiting in a more subtle way then the normal trolls who post on this board.
You can discuss with us or leave. We're having a fine discussion. There's no such thing as "flame baiting" or you can turn anything into "flame bait". This thread doesn't concern you.dog, the way you have structured your language just blatantly calling people's OPINIONS wrong IS flame baiting, and hopefully I can get this thread closed asap.
I never mentioned honor.but I'd rather win while being called cheap then play with so called "honor". In my opinion, playing honorably is not fun.
What do you mean?O_O It goes both ways! That was a poor argument...
My example was assuming he was able to pull them off. Ugh.Like I said earlier, just because you know how to wavedash doesn't mean you know how to use it.
The lag reduced is different from move to move. How is that an accident?How? Chances are Nintendo didn't even know this thing existed.
The game's more fun because there are a lot of techniques in tournaments. You can say the extra techniques make it less fun for casuals, but what's a casual player doing trying to win a tournament anyway o_O?The answer is they both have advantages, it's just impossible to tell who has the most advantage.
The best players are the best because of skill, not because of the techniques. People said it themselves. Therefore, there's no logical reason why these techniques should be in the game anyway. They're unnecessary.
If I described anything in a negative sense in the way you are to people that have no idea what's going on, they're naturally going to dislike it.If I went up to someone and they asked me what it was and I replied "It's when someone does a fast button combination and takes advantage of the games physics system to make them unnaturally fast and cancel out natural lag set into the game" they'd say "well that's cheap!!!"
I say this because I've done it before and people responded that way lol.
And that sir is why you fail and continue to fail. Like it or not L-canceling has been part of Smash since day one (on the 64). Honestly how is it cheap if everyone can take advantage of it? All you have to do is press L before you hit the ground after an aerial. Thats it. Its the timing that takes practice. You refuse to practice and because of that everything else is cheap to you because you want to suck.I'm not talking about who's FCKING BETTER. I'M TALKING ABOUT THE ADVANTAGE PEOPLE RECEIVE FROM THESE TECHNIQUES.
True, L-canceling is however.
Perhaps glitch is a strong word. I like cheapass techniques better.
Perhaps it was an accident in SSB64. But because L-canceling was near unheard of back then, they never realized the mistake they made, and therefore never bothered to fix something they never knew was broken?The lag reduced is different from move to move. How is that an accident?
But it is true :/If I described anything in a negative sense in the way you are to people that have no idea what's going on, they're naturally going to dislike it.
Of course with people who can pull them off, but if you throw someone who knows these techniques with others who don't, it becomes frustrating to the others.The game's more fun because there are a lot of techniques in tournaments.
You've been reported a third time. Enjoy your ban.And that sir is why you fail and continue to fail.
Because your logic is "EVERYONE HAS TO LEARN IT IF THEY WANT TO PLAY".Honestly how is it cheap if everyone can take advantage of it?
You assume I can't do it lol.You refuse to practice and because of that everything else is cheap to you because you want to suck.
If you explain it that way, then yes, you would get your desired answer from that person. If they were to hear the explanation from two different people, one who is pro-wavedashing and one who was anti-wavedashing, what makes you so sure that they would still call it cheap?If I went up to someone and they asked me what it was and I replied "It's when someone does a fast button combination and takes advantage of the games physics system to make them unnaturally fast and cancel out natural lag set into the game" they'd say "well that's cheap!!!"
Why? Have I flamed you at all like you flamed me?I'm doing my part to try and get this thread closed as well hehe.
Probably. The internet lacks justice nowadays.There's still some debate left in this thread, although I'm sure it will be closed sometime this morning.
I'm not sure. However, I don't know anyone that knows wavedashing in real life. That's how rare it is.If you explain it that way, then yes, you would get your desired answer from that person. If they were to hear the explanation from two different people, one who is pro-wavedashing and one who was anti-wavedashing, what makes you so sure that they would still call it cheap?
But you do it anyway.I don't need to flame to get my point across.
How?And yes Dog you are flame baiting.