8-peacock-8
Smash Hero
My favorite is Pac-Man World 3.so.... What everybody's favorite pac-man game?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
My favorite is Pac-Man World 3.so.... What everybody's favorite pac-man game?
I was born in the 90's and still love him,Hmm... I guess I just don't really have much of an attachment for characters like Pac-Man since I wasn't even born during the eighties and he seems to be the most popular during that era according to a number of people here. Though the likes of Megaman do interest me.I would still like to see Layton more though.^^;
Which reminds me, I still need to download some of those Megaman games released for the 3DS virtual console...
That sounds beautiful. ;-)Despite Pac-Man's game getting released this month, with Sonic's reveal I think it's far too soon for another third-party to be released. However, May of next year will by Pac-Man's 34th anniversary.
Might be a nice time to reveal him then if he's in the game.
Are you Picasso this something i would frame if pac man is confirmedWell, this is just perfect. Having the 4 gaming icons fighting against each other will be a staple in history. There's absolutely NO WAY Namco can't acknowledge this. Look at this picture:
It looks so right...
(except it's wrong sizes. Too not canon size for Smash.)
Are you Picasso this something i would frame if pac man is confirmed
Pac-Man World 2.so.... What everybody's favorite pac-man game?
I think your missing the point of these characters. Let's look at the 4 criteria.If the above image doesn't excite you in any way, you probably weren't gaming in the 90's (and it's probably past your bedtime). The above 4 have literally defined not just a generation of gaming, but gaming itself. 15 years ago (close to the birth of the Smash series itself) if someone had told me that the Smash series would eventually lead to the above 4 duking it out I wouldn't have been able to even fathom it...
And it's so close to becoming reality. 4 of the biggest icons to ever grace a Nintendo console finally coming together... Nearly 15 years in the process.
It's pretty much the gaming equivalent of an ultimate throw-down between Chuck Norris, Abraham Lincoln, Samuel L. Jackson, and Jesus.
This NEEDS to happen.
UPDATE: WE'RE NEARLY THERE GUYS!
Oh no, he's back! well I might as well start the 4 pages of arguments that will proceed this one...About number 4, I hate when megaman fans say that he deserved to be in because of his history with Nintendo. so what! But, Pac-man on the other hand does have things going for him besides his legendary status, just ask anyone on this thread.I think your missing the point of these characters. Let's look at the 4 criteria.
# 1: The character's inclusion must make people want to play the game.
We can safely say this is true of Megaman and Sonic. Megaman was commonly asked by fans. Sonic, well, check the Miiverse thread for today. But Pac-Man......well. Not so much. We can look at polls to see this. Sonic was the most requested character from the Brawl poll. Megaman was on top of any poll. Pac-Man hasn't dpone as well. His best accomplishment to date is he is 17th in Shortie's comprehensive poll. He has no notable request in Japan, and when Shortie ran 4chan, we wasn't requested once.
# 2: The character must be unique
Sonic brings his super fast speed and rolls as well as the spin dash, his signature move. Megaman brings a whole host of weapons from his various games. Pac-Man doesn't have the same catalog. The most common moves that come up, the Rev Roll and Butt Bounce are already covered by other characters. Rev Roll is covered by Jigglypuff and, now, Sonic. Dillon from Dillon's Rolling Western can also do something similar (if he gets in). Butt Bounce is already done by Bowser and Yoshi. Beyond this, he has a very limited ability. His ability to eat is also covered by Wario, Dedede and Kirby. There are other moves he can do, such as becoming a super hero, eating dot trails (a recovery) or a power pellet. The problem with all of those is they are not cool abilities that bring more to Smash but abilities to just reference Pac-Man. See, Megaman and Sonic's moves are from their various games but bring something new to Smash. As such, they are fun to play. Pac-Man's other moves wouldn't be unique and would also be there to service Pac-Man. The only reason the character would be there is to service them self.
It makes sense when you think about it. Look at Pac-Man though the years. It has fallen off the wagon, really since the 90s. Namco has no idea what to do with it so it tries to make him a mascot. They make platformers and then try to make a kids show but they get no where in the process. Megaman and Sonic didn't have the same problem.
# 3: The character must fit into the style of Super Smash Bros.
Any character will pass this (save L Block). Next.
# 4: They must contribute to the series balance.
Not that series balance here also means balance of the series. Right now, we have two third party characters and three if Snake comes back. That is quite a few guest characters for a game about Nintendo. But Pac-Man would make 4, and then the number starts to get noticable. Each new third party character gets less and less interesting (diminishing marginal utility). Thus, Pac-Man doesn't fit the bill here.
Why bring this up? Because your is the age old misnomer. Characters are not added for heritage. You see this all the time with the most odd ball characters. X should be in because of their history, presence yadda yadda yadda. This is why I look at these criteria. They are going to separate OK characters from great. Would it be that bad if Pac-Man was added. probably not. Would it be good. No. This is why Sakurai is very choosy. He also doesn't want to flood the game with guest characters for similar reason.
This criteria point is moot considering characters like G&W and ROB got in due to their history alone. I strongly doubt people looked at ROB's inclusion in Brawl and thought "Wow I HAVE to get Smash now!" Wii Fit Trainer, G&W, and ROB should prove by now that fan demand means very little when it comes to a retro/niche character's chances, and Pac-Man is no different.I think your missing the point of these characters. Let's look at the 4 criteria.
# 1: The character's inclusion must make people want to play the game.
We can safely say this is true of Megaman and Sonic. Megaman was commonly asked by fans. Sonic, well, check the Miiverse thread for today. But Pac-Man......well. Not so much. We can look at polls to see this. Sonic was the most requested character from the Brawl poll. Megaman was on top of any poll. Pac-Man hasn't dpone as well. His best accomplishment to date is he is 17th in Shortie's comprehensive poll. He has no notable request in Japan, and when Shortie ran 4chan, we wasn't requested once.
People made this same argument against the Villager/Tom Nook; "he's not a fighter therefore he doesn't have enough move set potential."# 2: The character must be unique
Sonic brings his super fast speed and rolls as well as the spin dash, his signature move. Megaman brings a whole host of weapons from his various games. Pac-Man doesn't have the same catalog. The most common moves that come up, the Rev Roll and Butt Bounce are already covered by other characters. Rev Roll is covered by Jigglypuff and, now, Sonic. Dillon from Dillon's Rolling Western can also do something similar (if he gets in). Butt Bounce is already done by Bowser and Yoshi. Beyond this, he has a very limited ability. His ability to eat is also covered by Wario, Dedede and Kirby. There are other moves he can do, such as becoming a super hero, eating dot trails (a recovery) or a power pellet. The problem with all of those is they are not cool abilities that bring more to Smash but abilities to just reference Pac-Man. See, Megaman and Sonic's moves are from their various games but bring something new to Smash. As such, they are fun to play. Pac-Man's other moves wouldn't be unique and would also be there to service Pac-Man. The only reason the character would be there is to service them self.
It makes sense when you think about it. Look at Pac-Man though the years. It has fallen off the wagon, really since the 90s. Namco has no idea what to do with it so it tries to make him a mascot. They make platformers and then try to make a kids show but they get no where in the process. Megaman and Sonic didn't have the same problem.
This is only assuming Snake returns. If he doesn't then the 3rd party character count is down to 3, which is just one more than Brawl had. I don't see the issue here.# 4: They must contribute to the series balance.
Not that series balance here also means balance of the series. Right now, we have two third party characters and three if Snake comes back. That is quite a few guest characters for a game about Nintendo. But Pac-Man would make 4, and then the number starts to get noticable. Each new third party character gets less and less interesting (diminishing marginal utility). Thus, Pac-Man doesn't fit the bill here.
Why bring this up? Because your is the age old misnomer. Characters are not added for heritage. You see this all the time with the most odd ball characters. X should be in because of their history, presence yadda yadda yadda. This is why I look at these criteria. They are going to separate OK characters from great. Would it be that bad if Pac-Man was added. probably not. Would it be good. No. This is why Sakurai is very choosy. He also doesn't want to flood the game with guest characters for similar reason.
Yet you don't list a single one.But, Pac-man on the other hand does have things going for him besides his legendary status, just ask anyone on this thread.
I'm going to refer you to the roster analysis I did a while back. They fit the criteria well. Also, what you're saying is Sakurai should force Pac-Man on us despite he doesn't offer the same appeal of the third party characters and do have Nintendo history.This criteria point is moot considering characters like G&W and ROB got in due to their history alone. I strongly doubt people looked at ROB's inclusion in Brawl and thought "Wow I HAVE to get Smash now!" Wii Fit Trainer, G&W, and ROB should prove by now that fan demand means very little when it comes to a retro/niche character's chances, and Pac-Man is no different.[
Lets be real here: the only thing Pac-Man is universally known for is eating pellets.
That would still be 3 third party characters which is still a lot. So he doesn't give series balance and does the smae job of Sonic and Megaman worse.This is only assuming Snake returns. If he doesn't then the 3rd party character count is down to 3, which is just one more than Brawl had. I don't see the issue here.
How do you think Sonic and Megaman got it.But none of this even matters because Sakurai doesn't simply base his choices off of who's the most requested. If he did then the Smash 4 roster would just end up looking like the cookie cutter ones we're constantly seeing on this site. He does what HE thinks is best for the series, and with Namco helping him out this time around, Pac-Man's chances are just as good as any other remaining 3rd party.
1. He can use various elements from his arcade game such as pellets, the maze teleporter, various pills and magic wands from pacman arrangement, bombs and other abilities from DX championship edition, shall I go on...Yet you don't list a single one.
The problem is when you look at the criteria, Pac-Man doesn't stack up to Megaman and Sonic. He's not as demanded, he lacks unique, distinct moves, and we already have a ton of third party characters.
From what I'm seeing, I think Smash Board is really the Pac-Man fan base. I don't see the same love for him anywhere else, and here it's tepid.
That's where he gained it, but not where it only derives from. A lot of people like his 3d games, (after the ones that made him look like an idiot like pacman 2 and pac-in-time) In fact, I'm going to make a moveset based mostly on his appearances in the arcade version, but i'm also going to use world moves because there is nobody in the entire smash roster with more than one game, who got there moveset from ONLY there first game.pac man is only popular from arcade. I swear, if he came around the same time as klonoa or something, he'd be shrugged off.
This is a given. And I've already stated why Pac-Man is a special case... This isn't just some random 3rd party request. Pac-Man is a gaming icon.The first thing to remember is the bar is higher for third party characters. See my links and then this.
...So where's the link? Until you post it I'm going to assume this is a strong case of hindsight bias. Anyone who tried to argue that Wii Fit Trainer was a good fit for Smash prior to her release would probably get laughed off the internet.I'm going to refer you to the roster analysis I did a while back. They fit the criteria well. Also, what you're saying is Sakurai should force Pac-Man on us despite he doesn't offer the same appeal of the third party characters and do have Nintendo history.
"Pac-Man eats things... So does Wario and Kirby... So he shouldn't be included."That's basically my point. His defining characteristic is covered by other characters. So he fails number 2.
That would still be 3 third party characters which is still a lot. So he doesn't give series balance and does the smae job of Sonic and Megaman worse.
How do you think Sonic and Megaman got it.
Poor Snake. To be honest, i want him and Pac-Man to be the final third parties. But alas that is wishful thinking.I don't really like the idea of Pac-Man, but I can't help but feel that he's going to be in. Sakurai has to know just how epic this game would be with the possible matchup of Mario vs. Pac-Man vs. Mega Man vs. Sonic.
And then Snake. Just sitting and watching from his box in the corner. Eating ice cream out of a gallon sized tub. He could be fighting, and is selectable, but he can't be in that fight.
I'm sure the reasoning behind this can be said the same with SEGA.One thing that confuses me though, at the bottom of the main site Namco isn't listed in the copyrights. I guess developers that have no holding over the property don't need to be included but it seems weird to me.
Most of those aren't defining of Pac-Man. Again, Megaman and Sonic's abilities augment the game. Pac-Man move set only exist to service Pac-Man as a character. They are more just a homage to his character and don't add anything that other characters don't already have. Zelda uses magic so why do we need a magic wand? Palutena could do it too and is a more popular pick. Link has bombs. And what would the pellets do? Again, it only exist to give Pac-Man homages. Bold fails #3.1. He can use various elements from his arcade game such as pellets, the maze teleporter, various pills and magic wands from pacman arrangement, bombs and other abilities from DX championship edition, shall I go on...
"Appeal" doesn't determine what characters get in. Mario would appeal to young players. Even Lucas could appeal to young players. That's not an argument.2. He appeals to the casual gamers and younger players (children of this age don't know who megaman is)
Snake is not a valid argument because Snake was specifically asked by Kojima who is also a friend of Sakurai. Sakurai has confirmed that no one else has asked him for characters. The talk inside Namco is that they are not going to influence Sakurai and Sakurai will not add a Namco character "just because they are making the game."3. He doesn't have to be severely demanded due to his lovability and status (ask snake) from that experience, all we need is for Namco to push him in since like you said, they are trying to put him in everything (they wanted him in soulcalibur)
But pac-man represents the rivalry in the arcade age. I still wouldn't put megaman on par with the other gaming legends, but he and sonic represent the change in the 90s. Namco has contributed to success, it just want blatant. After all, he did have a crossover with mario.I'll admit, if there was ever a time to have those four in one game, now is the time to do it. However, I think Megaman and Sonic are enough right now. My belief is that, as it is, the game is a tribute to Nintendo and its history with two very special guests who've contributed to or revolutionized that history in some way. When you throw in Pacman, the focus quickly shifts to "That game with Mario, Sonic, Megaman, and Pacman." It goes from "Super Smash Bros." to "Super Gaming Legends Bros."
I mean, Pacman could happen, but I think he's too much. If we were to have a third 3rd Party I'd rather just have Snake return and call it a night.