Null..but not scum? This is the problem I'm still having here. I mean it's alright to question people but I'm wondering why you haven't dropped it if you don't think it's of scum intent. I'm pretty sure that's what you said.
At this point, the only reason I haven't dropped it or him now is because 1) people are still asking me questions about it and it's still generating discussion, 2) I don't like his 146, and 3) there is no where else I want my vote to be right now.
I think there is potential for there to be scum intent behind that action, yes. It's not the fact that I think or don't think one way or the other, and if I had to go with gut, I would say that he would still sit on his reads here and do nothing until probed for more later (especially considering the amount of interactions he has had with other players in the game that aren't directly involved with debating his claim). It's the fact that I don't know one way or the other which makes it null. I don't have anything to base my read off of aside from the gut thought that I don't like how he claimed dayvig early because of what that can do for a scum player, I don't like how he's insisting that I read him and Vult equally as if they're equal slots and because information roles exist, and I don't like his 146 in general.
So why are you exactly voting Gorf right now? What do you hope to get out of voting him?
It seems by this post that you are more in trouble with the consequences of Gorf's actions rather than Gorf himself making the action. Like I'd get the point if you thought he was scum and the logical conclusion would be that you thought the consequences are what he hoped for, but if you have a null read on him that seems to me like you don't think he planned the consequences of his actions.
Let me make it clear that I did not like the slot initially. I started realizing it was null after Soup posted this:
It's justifiably null that works less in his favor as scum because it paints a huge target on him, which is something I don't think Gorf would take a risk to do.
and I thought about it a bit. I disagreed with the fact that scum Gorf wouldn't do this (because it's a very easy way to generate content early and to coast by on that content later), but this post was still when I realized Gorf could have been town just as likely as he could be scum considering how early it was and the fact that I haven't actually seen what he does with that action
Joey can you run about why confronting Gorf like you did helps you read him better or the situation?
It actually gets his thoughts out there on a slot instead of just having him sit on his dayvig claim. I wanted actual thoughts from him instead of people taking the Soup approach so that it would turn into a Ryker v Gorf debate that wouldn't take off considering Ryker's play style.
I was also trying to get his motivation behind why he was trying to gambit Ryker so early, but I didn't really get that as all he really focused on until I apparently contradicted myself was the fact that he should be read equal to Vult from my perspective. I'm still not sure what he's trying to get out of this.