Irrelevant. Zelda is, if not close to, Nintendo's biggest franchise, yet there are only three Zelda characters in comparison to the two other big franchises like Mario and Pokemon which have a lot more representatives.
Well, in Melee there were three original characters (Link, Zelda and Sheik) but there were also two charcaters with movesets cloned from other characters (Young Link and Ganondorf) which makes five characters total. In comparision, the Mario series had five (not including Yoshi and DK) and Pokemon had four.
And his importance is clear as the protagonist of the very first Fire Emblem.
That is the argument for his return. My point was that, if he does return, it will be because he is important to the Fire Emblem series not because of his role in Melee.
You have no evidence to support your claim. Who says there are more Fire Emblem fans outside of Japan than in it? In fact, I would argue the opposite as there have only been three titles released outside of Japan in comparison to the Japan-only six that were released prior to those three.
I've been over this a couple times, but what the heck.
Read my point carefully: "there are currently more Fire Emblem fans outside of Japan than inside". I'm not talking about how many there were ten or more years ago in the days of the NES and SNES (when FE game were exclusive to Japan). I'm talking about how many people actually buy Fire Emblem games today.
Its a fact that the last three internationally released Fire Emblems (the only ones to be available outside of Japan)have sold more copies in all the non-Japanese counties combined (ie: North America and South America, Europe, Autralia, Asia, etc.) than inside Japan. Goddess of Dawn hasn't been released outside of Japan yet, but when it does, you can bet that most of the people who buy it will not be Japanese gamers. So, in that regard, I am correct.
Since the majority of Fire Emblem fans do not currently hail from Japan, in my view it would be unfair to have the series represented by Japanese-only charcaters like Marth and Roy. Likewise, it is unfair to have representatives from the GBA games since they were not well recieved inside Japan.
Instead, characters should be taken exclusively from PoR, which is popular everywhere: including Japan. On Sakurai's poll, the vast majority of FE nominations were from this game and Ike was ranked as the second most requested charcater out of all the charcaters. I also think characters from GoD have a fair chance, since it would enable Nintendo to sell as many copies as possible when it is released internationally.
By your logic, no one would ever play anyone but Fox.
No, by my logic the majority of people would play as high tier charcaters like Fox, Falco, Sheik and Marth in tournaments. Which, in my experience, they do.
Considered extremely similar by whom? Yourself, maybe?
Let's see, two male Fire Emblem lords with blue hair, capes and big one-handed swords. They are also relatively the same height, and build. Even their facial structure and expression are almost identical. You're right, its just me.
True, Ike has things that set him apart. His GoD appearance has him wearing a sleavless shirt, he attacks with horizontal slashes (as opposed to Marth who attacks vertically) and he has a ranged protjectile attack. But still, I don't think having two charcaters so similar represent Fire Emblem series. It simply doesn't do justice to the diversity of charcaters in Fire Emblem games. It would be preferable to have Ike replace Marth and include another, more unique charcater or one that could be Ike's clone.
Who would've thought that people would actually question Marth's return?
Well, personally I want as many new charcaters in Brawl as possible. That means cutting as many old charcaters as possible. You can check out my thread: "Prepare to be Astounded and Amazed: Wiseguy's Brawl Charcater Predictions" if you wan to hear my reasoning. Feel free to post your arguments and criticisms, I enjoy a good debate.
In response to all the Marth/Roy/Sheik are "cheap" comments:
How can you claim these characters are cheap but there is no mention of Fox being cheap?
But that is besides the point, I don't really see any character as "cheap" People just use that as an excuse when they are getting their *** handed to them because they are poor losers.
Uhh.. I'm not sure anyonw has ever accused Roy of being cheap. In my previous posts, I've called out Fox, Falco, Marth and (esspecially) Sheik as charcaters that give the players an unfair advantage due to their extrmely overpowered movesets.
If you want to use these charcaters, then that's your choice. Just don't be surprised if Brawl is more balanced and you have to face opponents on equal footing.
1. All you'd really need to add is Ike or Lyn anyways. Marth and Roy are important to the series, despite what you want to believe.
2. Weren't you the one saying that Marth had no significance to the series before?
3. Oh my god! The game might as well not exist then, according to you. It doesn't matter if they've never played it. Just because they don't have something doesn't mean it has no importance. Imagine if the first Fire Emblem game never came out. We might not even have the series!
Want to know an interesting little fact? Just because you've never heard of a law doesn't mean you don't have to follow it. If you break that law you can still be charged with it.
4. Here we go again with the "Marth is cheap and brainless" comments. You must really lose to Marth a lot to have this large of a vendetta against him. Pirate is correct in saying that everyone would play Fox by your logic.
5. I've only seen you and Chief consider them like that. In no way, other than appearance, are they similar. They have different sword fighting styles! It doesn't matter if they have the same weapon! I've also witnessed people mix up Eliwood and Roy and Hector and Marth. By your logic if Hector got in he would fight just like Marth!
Eliwood and Roy I can understand seeing as how they are genetically linked. But ignorance can't excuse mixing up Hector/Marth or Ike/Marth. They just have far too different features.
Also I love how you say to take out Marth for a more original FE character. Yeah. You can really get more original than the original FE character.
1) Yeah, Marth and Roy do have some inportance to the series. However, given FE's new international fanbase they are less important than Ike: who will have starred the two orignal, internationally released Fire Emblem games by year's end. Ike is the most important FE lord by far.
2) I was and I am. I was just explaining the other side of the argument for newcomers to the thread. I was also explaining that Marth's worthiness is contingent on his importance to the FE series, not the Smash Bros. series.
3) Since the majority of FE fans will never play the Jpaanese-only games (some of us don't understand Japanese) then yeah, they are irrelivant in comparison Path of Radiance and Goddess of Dawn.
4) This has nothing to do with me. I actually don't mind fighting Marth (my vendetta is against Sheik). My point is that the majority of Marth's fans outside of Japan are not Fire Emblem fans, but people who like his Marth's extremely powerful attacks. If Marth wasn't more powerful than the majority of charcaters in Melee, most of his "fanbase" would evaporate.
5) When I said original, I meant more "unique". For example, you must admitt that Miciaiah would have a far more original moveset than Marth.