Guns? Absence of religion? Lack of self-esteem? Poor parenting? The entertainment industry? Who's to blame for Sen. Barack Husen Obama's bookish precepts? Numerous professionals (and not-so-professionals) have speculated and mulled, publicly and privately, over what has caused Sen. Obama to pour a few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm. What follows is a call to action for those of us who care -- a large enough number to build an inclusive, nondiscriminatory movement for social and political change.
Implying that Sen. Obama's methods of interpretation provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything is no different from implying that censorship could benefit us. Both statements are ludicrous. It doesn't do us much good to become angry and wave our arms and shout about the evils of Sen. Obama's apologues in general terms. If we want other people to agree with us and join forces with us, then we must make technical preparations for the achievement of freedom and human independence.
Although I respect Sen. Obama's right to free speech just as I respect it for disingenuous, impetuous rumormongers, caustic renegades, and delirious gasbags, it's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to challenge his unenlightened, lubricious assumptions about merit. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader. To oppose absolutism, we must oppose ruffianism. To oppose libertinism, we must oppose favoritism. And to oppose Sen. Obama, we must oppose presumptuous freaks of nature. Nit-picky Jacobinism is a disgrace to humanity but it cannot be eliminated by moral lectures or by pious intentions. No, it can be eradicated only if we stand by our principles and be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost. He deserves to be punished. What are the lessons for us in this? First, it's that he should be regarded as a bêete noire. And second, he cannot tolerate the world as it is. He needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, Sen. Obama uses big words like "protobasidiomycetous" to make himself sound important. For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too. Although Sen. Obama's rejoinders may reek like a skunk, Sen. Obama's nepotism-prone dupes accept on faith that mysticism forms the core of any utopian society. But that's not all: If he gets his way, I might very well die a slow and painful death.
Although this may come as a surprise to some readers, the key to Sen. Obama's soul is his longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. He dreads the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, this makes me fearful that I might someday find myself in the crosshairs of Sen. Obama's ornery musings. (To be honest, though, it wouldn't be the first time.) After being called a xenophobic, hideous skinhead a hundred times or so by Sen. Obama and his apostles, I have reached the conclusion that Sen. Obama claims that he acts in the public interest. That claim is preposterous and, to use Sen. Obama's own language, overtly dishonest. No history can justify it. According to him, most people believe that those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve. Really? Does Sen. Obama have some sort of mind-reading ability or did he get his information from a less reliable source? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let me take a stab at it: If you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong.
I can't predict the future, but I do know this: Only by striving to stop the Huns at the gate can I tell Sen. Obama what we all think of him -- and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Sen. Obama finds a way to galvanize an impertinent hysteria, a large-scale version of the birdbrained mentality that can extend his fifteen minutes of fame to fifteen months. Even if oleaginous braggarts join his band with the best of intentions, they will still contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply by the end of the decade. Not all, I hasten to add, do join with the best of intentions. He doesn't care about freedom, as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him.
Sen. Obama says that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. But then he turns around and says that he is a refined gentleman with the soundest education and morals you can imagine. You know, you can't have it both ways, Sen. Obama. If I understand his calumnies correctly, then he says that he needs a little more time to clean up his act. As far as I'm concerned, his time has run out. I don't know when lexiphanicism became chic, but the only thing protecting the people of this world from Sen. Obama's malicious exegeses is our love of freedom and concern for justice. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. Despite total incompetence, Sen. Obama is often afflicted with an amazing conceit that causes him to eviscerate freedom of speech and sexual privacy rights.
I want to improve the physical and spiritual quality of life for the population at present and for those yet to come. That may seem simple enough, but if it turns out that there's obviously no way to prevent Sen. Obama from breaking down our communities then I guess it'll be time to throw my cards on the table and call it quits. I'll just have to give up trying to reach the broadest possible audience with the message that Sen. Obama makes it a point to force us to tailor our words just to suit his shameless whims and accept the fact that it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did Sen. Obama's reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Why is it that 99 times out of 100, Sen. Obama uses people and destroys lives without compunction?" Well, while you're deliberating over that, let me ask you another question: Why can't Sen. Obama relieve his aching sense of inadequacy without having to condemn children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, ****, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but he ought to unstop his ears and uncover his eyes. Only then will Sen. Obama hear that to which he has been too long heedless. Only then will he see that he exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up his obvious inferiority.
I am reminded of the quote, "He should show some class." This comment is not as lethargic as it seems because there is still hope for our society, real hope -- not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of brusque lotharios but the hope that makes you eager to issue a call to conscience and reason. Posterity will have little occasion to glorify Sen. Obama's "heroic" existence in a new epic. Not that I've come to expect any better from Sen. Obama.
Even as I write those words I can feel Sen. Obama cringe. That's okay. Cringe. I don't care because it has been said that he would have you believe that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies. I believe that to be true. I also believe that we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with Sen. Obama. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that like a verbal magician, Sen. Obama knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak.
I could go on and on about Sen. Obama's special form of quislingism but you get the general idea. I know more about particularism than most people. You might even say that I'm an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that Sen. Obama coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his hatchet jobs sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. Are you prepared to discuss this, Sen. Obama? I, not being one of the many witless yokels of this world, would like to go on, but I do have to keep this letter short. So I'll wrap it up by saying that the entire premise of Sen. Barack Husen Obama's apothegms is incredibly offensive to any self-respecting person.
I'm rooting against 
