Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Dislike. Do you have a stance on Panta then? You say you don't like his last post - do you think it's townPanta being inherently scummy again, or is there something to suggest that it's different?Panta's last post was odd but I am learning from reading about Panta and pushing him as a ML as scum (sorry about that before duder. ^^") that his style is just inherently scummy but I don't like his last post off pure surface value.
Panta, can you explain what about Spell is scummy in your own words?
Your reasoning makes no sense. If Panta is town, then anyone who distracts town from other lynches in an attempt to go to the fallback lynch is scummy. If Panta is scum, then anyone who argues against lynching Panta is scummy. Cool. Inactives have always been pressured, and this system does nothing more to force them into action. Fake contributors not taking stances were heavily pressured even without a fallback lynch. So, how does this force scum to play? More specifically, what is it about an organized fallback lynch that forces scum to play, or leave trails, more than usual?If town does not agree on a lynch, Panta will be our "fallback lynch". If anyone disagrees, they need to come up with a better fallback lynch within 24 hours. There will be no distractions as such after 24 hours; now is your chance.
![]()
This is advantageous to scum in that if they know that the person we have as our fallback lynch is town, they can deliberately go for a no lynch situation. This will help them get the guaranteed lynch.
This is advantageous to town in that we can decidedly know that, because only scum would know the alignment of someone unless they were investigated or cleared, so anyone going deliberately towards a no lynch situation under the guise of "I don't really like this lynch, let's go after the other guy instead" will be put under heavy scrutiny. Meaning, coasting in this game will be incredibly scummy because not acting or participating is a direct actions towards the lynch of our fallback lynch. For today, that's Panta. For similar reasons, those that do the opposite and rally against killing the fallback lynch are just as scummy, especially if that fallback lynch eventually flips as mafia. This gives scum a game they have to play; because we have a fallback lynch that may or may not be scum, in certain situations they'll be forced to actually "play" or otherwise leave a visible trail. But playing also leaves a visible trail.
8 pages isn't that much... you can probably expect a lot of reading for this game.Whoa man that was a long 8 pages to read through. I've only played 5-10 forum mafias before but I've played a lot in real life. So far I'm thinking Panta and spellcasters are scum, so for now VOTE: Panta
So trusting? Nah, I was just looking to see where the wagon went. It turned out basically nowhere because Werekill didn't post and RR said he was fakeclaiming and kind of screwed that up. Besides, you're comparing apples and oranges. Believing a claim and not believing your counting skills are two different things. Main reason I didn't want to believe your count isn't because I believed you'd be 'tricking' me but rather because you could've flat out miscounted. Considering this wagon fizzled out before a Werekill rebuttal, not as much was gained as could have been. I don't understand why RR just backed off while being under no pressure aside from OS' post.Can I ask you why you are untrusting of me yet so trusting of RR? =P So what other info have you gained from this wagon
I'm a little put off by you asking if this was okay.Oh, also, Nabe did the question mark thing. Are we too far out of RVS for me to call him scum for that without being that guy in the thread?
No, 15-20 at least.For me it is I think 10 or so.
Shows that he does not believe Ryu is telling the truth because Werekill is not Spell's scumbuddy and therefore Spell knows Ryu isn't the truth.this claim seams like bs unvote vote:red ryu
Daytalk obviously influenced this because Spell is sticking out like a sore thumb not believing a daycop result.ok sure vote werekill
mhmm. No, you didn't believe it because Were isn't one of your scumbuddies and then your actual scumbuddies nagged you for being so obvious.beacuse everyone else seamed to believed it so I figured I just sucked and changed it
Only after the fact. People started to get suspicious and your scumbuddies quickly shuffled you into the backroom so you wouldn't make another scene that was as bad as your first one.no I am believing him
Ambivalent about Overswarm, especially with this post. He already stated that RVS was Over with his kingmaker situation, yet he goes and says he is the daycop with an innocent on Circus?He did the day claim wrong. Werekill was under no pressure; to claim that early and not actually be the day cop means that werekill can just say "nope, not mafia" and then we get a coin flip situation that RRyu backs down from. If RR wanted to fakeclaim daycop, he should have waited until the deadline was later to force a claim. I'm totally not against tricking a townie to claim, btw; just not this early when you can't choose who you want to hit with a realistic idea as to why.
In other news, I'm the actual day cop and got a town result on you, Circus. Glad we've cleared that up.
Is this the type of activity you are trying to promote, Overswarm? Your plan may prevent lurking, but it doesn't stop active lurking.Agreed with this.
+1 to postcount
I don't like this post at all. It seems like scum feeling pressure and trying to throw it onto the next most scummy looking player. Several of us that don't like Panta ALSO don't like spellcasters so he's jumping on spell to try to get things to flow in that direction instead.Shows that he does not believe Ryu is telling the truth because Werekill is not Spell's scumbuddy and therefore Spell knows Ryu isn't the truth.
Daytalk obviously influenced this because Spell is sticking out like a sore thumb not believing a daycop result.
mhmm. No, you didn't believe it because Were isn't one of your scumbuddies and then your actual scumbuddies nagged you for being so obvious.
Only after the fact. People started to get suspicious and your scumbuddies quickly shuffled you into the backroom so you wouldn't make another scene that was as bad as your first one.
Unvote:
vote: Spellcasters
Ambivalent about Overswarm, especially with this post. He already stated that RVS was Over with his kingmaker situation, yet he goes and says he is the daycop with an innocent on Circus?
He states, in his post addressing my vote on him, that he is unable to control the minds of 15 other people to make them follow him, but that actually does seem like a possibility at the moment. The whole post was condescending towards me because of simple RVS joke that apparently NONE of you got because I am now a scumread for all of you.
I am not going to comment on that actual kingmaker situation since I don't comprehend it completely, but I will say something about the "guranteed back up lynch".
That has been my fate in almost all of my games. Literally. Everyone has a "scum" read on me throughout the first day and then when push comes to shove the scum and town gum everything up and because they have no other "viable" options they lynch me. Anyone opposing my lynch is automatically suspicious and likely scum? Does that make me scum for not wanting my own lynch? You are just playing into the hands of the scum, Overswarm. They can create confusion and indecisiveness in the town and force town to go with their guranteed back up lynch with no risk to them because I am town.
I don't like you trying to direct the town and your daycop post was illthought out if you are the actual daycop. There is one scenario I can think of for you to say that and it gives you town points in my book, but I am having a hard time deciding whether or not that was your actual intent given your other posts.
Is this the type of activity you are trying to promote, Overswarm? Your plan may prevent lurking, but it doesn't stop active lurking.
T-Block's post commenting about the backup lynch is opportunistic in my opinion. (no this is not omgus)
He states that he does not like the whole premise of a backup lynch, but goes on to say that I am a good choice for a lynch anyway. Unless I misread Overswarm's post (entirely possible) I am not supposed to be the primary lynch unless we cannot decide on another person. Tblock looks like he is sitting in the middle of the road on the issue and parking his vote on me for later when he knows that the scumteam can create enough muck to prevent the town from forming a lynch and forcing them to revert to the backup lynch of a townie (me).
Please, enlighten me. How do you find scum?You people are too paranoid for your own good.
Where was it stated that people don't like me because I also suspect Spell? Who I have suspected since he failed miserably with regards to Ryu's gambit?
Of course I am going to be ****ing defensive when the entire ****ing town, literally not even 150 pages into the game, has voiced their opinions that I am scum with reasons such as "this feels fake, forced, defensive" with equates to nothing but gut. It is bull.
It's only a trick question if you have to articulate your answer in such a way that it doesn't backfire you later. But you wouldn't need to do that, would you?By looking at their actions and analyzing their tone or motivation for those actions? Trick question?
Wow, get off Overswarm's **** please.T-Block, while I appreciate what you're going for with your assessment of the "king" mechanic that OS is proposing, I'm sure you can agree that it will keep scum from coasting, right? It's not set in stone. Even OS wouldn't be opposed to switching the vote to a better candidate before falling back if one arose. The point isn't "it's current lynch candidate or fallback, with no other options". It's more of a "we won't be no lynching in this game" so we have a pre-established fall-back if ALL other lynch candidates fall through and it's getting late in the Day.
Thanks for a little meta on T-Block. Give me more, I literally had never heard of him until this game.I've forgotten how much I love having Dastrn and T-block in games. Seriously. I love you both. You both use inductive reasoning on a categorical terms rather than absolute terms, and use it to just "guide" you instead of determining your action.
I just discovered I died in my other game, so I guess I can stop being so goofy here. Lame.
No mention of the possibility that Overswarm is scum. Why is Overswarm "playing into the hands of scum" rather than being scum himself? Is there anything to suggest that?That has been my fate in almost all of my games. Literally. Everyone has a "scum" read on me throughout the first day and then when push comes to shove the scum and town gum everything up and because they have no other "viable" options they lynch me. Anyone opposing my lynch is automatically suspicious and likely scum? Does that make me scum for not wanting my own lynch? You are just playing into the hands of the scum, Overswarm. They can create confusion and indecisiveness in the town and force town to go with their guranteed back up lynch with no risk to them because I am town.
Panta, your past few posts have been very focused on simply discrediting those who find you scum, and this is no different.T-Block's post commenting about the backup lynch is opportunistic in my opinion. (no this is not omgus)
He states that he does not like the whole premise of a backup lynch, but goes on to say that I am a good choice for a lynch anyway. Unless I misread Overswarm's post (entirely possible) I am not supposed to be the primary lynch unless we cannot decide on another person. Tblock looks like he is sitting in the middle of the road on the issue and parking his vote on me for later when he knows that the scumteam can create enough muck to prevent the town from forming a lynch and forcing them to revert to the backup lynch of a townie (me).
There's nothing out of character about what RR did. Why so focused on meta, especially second-hand meta?@ everyone: is RR known for ballsy plays Day1? I don't remember ever playing with him before, and don't have a meta on him whatsoever. Someone feed me a little meta on RR.
Hell no - that's not all you're giving me.I've forgotten how much I love having Dastrn and T-block in games. Seriously. I love you both. You both use inductive reasoning on a categorical terms rather than absolute terms, and use it to just "guide" you instead of determining your action.
I just discovered I died in my other game, so I guess I can stop being so goofy here. Lame.
Yeah, Red Ryu does this fairly often. He loves claiming Daycop or Dayvig on Day 1 just for reactions.@ everyone: is RR known for ballsy plays Day1? I don't remember ever playing with him before, and don't have a meta on him whatsoever. Someone feed me a little meta on RR.
I remember. *grumble* And pick the two biggests new posts to compare and contrast? ;P But sure because I found something in T-B's that pretty *ahem*.@J: Compare and contrast 130 (T-block) and 132 (Xastrn). Get back to me.
Man, does anyone remember my cop gambit in Bingo on Gorf/Kuz? So badass.
I did have a stance on Panta within that post and it said I was confused by his slot due to my past experiences with him since I've been in every game he has been in on DGames in some way besides the newest newbie game where he was also lynched D1.unvote
vote: Panta
@J: Dislike. Do you have a stance on Panta then? You say you don't like his last post - do you think it's townPanta being inherently scummy again, or is there something to suggest that it's different?
Regardless, it just so happens I'm completely fine with Panta dying toDay at the moment, and not just as a fallback lynch. 105 makes me nauseous.
RR is actually not known for this type of play to be all honest. o_O It's something I'm not used to seeing but I am still curious about what he found but he said he'll get that later. So far it's null for me.@everyone: is RR known for ballsy plays Day1? I don't remember ever playing with him before, and don't have a meta on him whatsoever. Someone feed me a little meta on RR.
OS, hold hands, sir?
Okay I knew I wasn't crazy. Why do you keep asking OS to hold your hand so early?OS, hold hands?
I'm already at a disadvantage on information because of the whole uninformed majority aspect of being town.
So where's your head at now may I ask? You say the Panta lynch is fine so is that your strongest scum-read at this point?So trusting? Nah, I was just looking to see where the wagon went. It turned out basically nowhere because Werekill didn't post and RR said he was fakeclaiming and kind of screwed that up. Besides, you're comparing apples and oranges. Believing a claim and not believing your counting skills are two different things. Main reason I didn't want to believe your count isn't because I believed you'd be 'tricking' me but rather because you could've flat out miscounted. Considering this wagon fizzled out before a Werekill rebuttal, not as much was gained as could have been. I don't understand why RR just backed off while being under no pressure aside from OS' post.
I don't really have a stance on the fallback lynch yet and I've never played a game like that, but Panta lynch toDay is fine so I'll go with it and see how I feel as it plays out.