Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's fairly easy to beat OoT without a guide. The water temple isn't even that bad lol.Well, it's possible to clear the dungeon on your own, unlike the water temple.
Hopefully Nintendo would make an HD remaster of Twilight Princess with mix-ups and enhancements here and there at some point. That would blow my mind. TP is my favorite Zelda to date as well. I wouldn't mind a Skyward Sword HD remaster either. You know, without silly motion controls and less linearity and other enhancements of the sort. SS is one of my favorites as well.
The first time, it's not entirely easy for everyone. I can breeze through OoT and the Water Temple without a guide now lol. Even on Master Quest.
That is why I should have said MM and WWHD haha.
HD took it out? I had no idea.
Lol I'm jelly. I haven't even done it once yet, although I've come close a few times.
Short hop, then the moment link leaves the ground, tap z. If it explodes, you're pressing z too late.
To be honest though it can be done consistently both ways. It's easier to do it upon landing, but doing it on the start of a short hop can still be useful if you're moving away from the landing zone. It doesn't have to be at the end all the time.
Just tried it and yeah you are right. It's super easy to drop at the start of your jump as well.
Glad it worked. You can try mixing up your movement with retreating wave lands or an attack follow up as well if you feel the need.
What makes Skyward Sword so bad?
That means you're pressing it during jumpsquat.
I personally liked Skyward but it was just not as solid as the best Zelda games. The swordplay was shaky and gimmicky, the world wasn't as open as in other games and thus was a fair bit more linear, it was too easy, and so on. I wouldn't put it in E-tier, but it's not up there with TP or MM or WW or OoT or MC or (etc...)What makes Skyward Sword so bad?
A remaster without motion controls would probably be a huge improvement over the original, then. But the story was one of the best in the series. That's why I like it so much. And I personally think Ghirahim is the better villain, but to each their own, right?
Ghirahim was iffy at some points.
Lol @ the effeminate Isai thing. XD
I feel like TP and MM were much much more fundamentally solid than SS though. Gameplay is a very valuable tool for enhancing the experience of the story and can separate the good from the phenomenal.
Ganondorf in TP really had an overly generic personality. He was nothing short of a genaric villain. If you really compare the two, you would see that Demise is much more developed just by the things they say.
Perhaps. I just felt like I better knew who Ganondorf was based on the story of the game (could perhaps be because of my past Zelda history as well, but I'm trying to disregard that as I contemplate this) than I did with Demise.
There's always the option of watching cutscenes lol. The story is what's most important after all.
Sorry man, but no. This is the SAME Ganondorf from OOT and WW and every other game, his personality and thoughts are revealed to us through many games, not just one. He may have been "generic" in TP, but it's okay, because this isn't his first appearance, and even if we do go solely by TP, he shows more of his personality and attitude through his actions then Demise.
To me this is exactly what I think of Skyward Sword with the exception being I can't replay this horrendously linear game, I got this game day one with the gold wii remote mind you and I was excited as all hell for this game, but upon playing and beating it 100% in less then 14 hours time-span, I can't go back into it, I've tried countless times on giving it a second chance thinking it can't be this bad I must be missing something but no It's just such a poor zelda game to me, the controls are bad, the story is meh at best, the only likable character that is new is Groose and that's from serious retrospect after hating on him for days until finally coming to like him, there's nothing I want to come back to in this game to me "IMO" this game is as bad as the cdi zelda games.
I bet an HD remaster would entice. :3
That's not how I see it. Even if Ganondorf was in more than just one game, that's no excuse to make him so bland. I'm talking about his appearance in TP anyhow, not OoT. All Ganondorf wants is to rule the world and to kill anyone in his way. What makes him so much better? And like I said earlier, if you compare the two, you would find that Demise is a more developed character simply by what they say.
I highly dissagree. There is no way in hell it could be compared the cdi games. The story is great. Better than OoT and TP in my honest opinion. The controls really aren't terrible, but just because a game is linear, it doesn't mean it's bad in any sense.