#HBC | ѕoup
The world is not beautiful, therefore it is.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,865
I am playing it. Reads don't matter? I never said that. Read it again, because you clearly got the wrong idea.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This implies it soup.but this essentially does nothing because that's all they are. They're just reads.
Can you go into this a bit more? Has it gotten you anything?If anything, I am more interested in people's intention to give reads instead of the reads themselves.
Can you go into this a bit more? Has it gotten you anything?
Cool. I'll stop bugging you till I see it then.It has. I'm not gonna say I've been keeping an ace up my sleeve but every time you guys imply that I'm not playing this game makes me laugh. I'm trying to read back and I was going to give reads-list actually.
Still my idea here. If you can explain it a tad more then dietz did, that'd be nice. Do you think this is more applicable in the later day phases?I'll let people in on my thought process on this game.
I don't believe that all this arguing and trifling about other players is beneficial to the course of the game. Pressure is not as heavy without voting, which is an essential part of reading a player. Removing the key factor of votes makes it much harder to discern who is being genuine and who isn't. Scum essentially has nothing to worry about other than winning matches and keeping themselves in check. I'm going to tell you right now that this game has practically paved itself and I think town has a very large chance of winning at this point. WATT is very obvious town. So is PJB. So is Picture Perfect. So is Super Fab. I think we all agree on this. You know what's ironic about that? All those players are consistently posting. Why would scum bother themselves with caring about all of this? They wouldn't. It's why calling people scum doesn't really matter in this game because the only threat you can make against them is writing more crap that they're not going to read. However, will a Scum just not post at all? Not care at all? No. Read what I said about the removal factor again and put this into mind. Scum would jump at a opportunity to remove a townie in a heartbeart. No question. Why? Because that's the only removal. What else does Scum have to worry about after that? Nothing. Once we remove someone, we can properly start grouping players and playing a much more strategical game. We shouldn't just be stacking our Byes on people universally town-read, instead we should be taking more risks. I think it was Shoco who mentioned it, but I'm actually open to the idea of Bye'ing scum players against town ones. Why? Because 3 points is better than 2, and even if a townie loses against another then it's easy to just bye them. Does that make sense? Am I being clear here? Please stop me for elaboration if you need it.
Still my idea here. If you can explain it a tad more then dietz did, that'd be nice. Do you think this is more applicable in the later day phases?
I like this post.I know I was a firm believer of scum not having to cheat, but I'm starting to question myself as I believe that scum will, and can cheat. Winning is more important than getting a Bye. Surface game isn't important to scum here, it's all about planning.
I know someone is going to say: "But soup, if we bye the mafia then what will the tourney cop do!?!?!?" There's more than one mafia. Throw scum into the lion's den. Force their hand. Don't let them get off scot free.
actually, it only gives them information on matches of other players. They can't get their own information, which includes banned moves.Can't bye'ing mafia give them more information then we'd want to let on?
No, I'm not scumreading soup hard enough to want to remove him. He's on my suspect list, but he's not my biggest priority. The truth is, while I do suspect gheb, Gheb was also not really somebody I wanted to remove either. The two of them are kind of in the same boat for me.You are going to be involved whether you like it or not, Soup.
Also PJB does that mean you'd like to remove Soup instead? (I find his wishywashyness on Gheb null, especially because I still find Gheb suspicious, don't let that convince you out of scumreading Gheb if you found Gheb scummy from his own actions in the first place)
talk to me about 2129 and 2130.No, I'm not scumreading soup hard enough to want to remove him. He's on my suspect list, but he's not my biggest priority. The truth is, while I do suspect gheb, Gheb was also not really somebody I wanted to remove either. The two of them are kind of in the same boat for me.
Like, seriously, you just added a reason for me to not want to remove gheb. You wanting to remove gheb, makes me want to keep him. Welcome to the game, soup. Start playing it.
I think it's good to talk about who we suspect so we have an idea of who to remove with the one removal. (And so the cop can have a chance to cop whoever wasn't removed)
Soup look at the removal tallies. Who do you feel is the one likeliest scum from what you are positing?
you mean the whole "let's give scum the byes" plan? I think it's totally something we can do in the future, yes. I'd want to get the obvtownies as much inside info, and accumulate some points to fall back on first. One we've got ourselves some points to work with, then we'll actually know how we want to manipulate things.talk to me about 2129 and 2130.
We were on it before but decided to wait a day or two to use the removal. (Which I'm fine with doing day3 or day4)
Soup can you explain your pawn read? I don't remember what you said about him.
it didnt' make me reconsider it. I never wanted to remove gheb in the first place. Have you been reading anythign I said during the entire morning phase wrt this? I've said it I don't know how many times. I have never, at any point in the game, advocated for gheb's removal.Then I don't get why just because of something Soup said, made you re-consider removing Gheb. I thought it was connection related. (I would understand if it was because of something Gheb did himself)
not at the moment. I'm uneasy in my read though.I can't even remember it. I recall disliking how Potassium got 2-0'd by him. Speaking of, would anyone be up to removing Potassium?
post grabbed for alert.
I'm down with it too and feel we should also try to at least give suggestions to the cop for who to cop. (Because it's kinda up to the removal and him doing well to nab scum)
But shoco thoughPotassium would be a D2 lynch in a game with only one lynch. I still prioritize Gheb because he's the safest bet for us to nab scum in my eyes.
I can't even remember it. I recall disliking how Potassium got 2-0'd by him. Speaking of, would anyone be up to removing Potassium?