agentli
Smash Apprentice
Considering that Uncle Meat is banned, who is going to replace him/or already replaced him?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Ok...Don't you see that Common seems to have no experience whatsoever defending him/herself? Look at it! I guess Common thinks that nameclaiming as Pooh will clear him/her of any guilt of all. It's not that I'm supporting Common because he/she is mafia.(If he/she is mafia, then I'm screwed) No, I'm supporting him/her because he/she is the only one who came up with a fuching plan! A course of action, rather than randomly bandwagoning on Common for doing extremely stupid things (like Eleftorious in Lost mafia, or whatever ZMan usually does).
Vote: Uncle Meat
For being extremely good at lurking
FoS: Frozenflame751
For being in reverse alphabetical order in lurking
How about common knowing this? He expected us to believe him saying that a mafia wouldn't try a name claim twice in a row. So he could try it again, thinking that we would see this action just as a mistake and not as a mafia action.I hope none of you forget that it was Ligolski, Lance87, and Kuji who are bandwagoning on Common for voting him/her away. Isn't it kind of obvious that they are controlling the town right now, that they, not us are passing around blame, that they are shifting attention, passing smoke, and constantly pointing fingers? Why won't they stop and look at the fact that a mafia member won't put out a stupid idea twice. If you ask me, they are the real mafia.
I already thought you were Pinnochio, but I think it's a bad thing that you name claimed. And where are your lies? Tell me, where the heck have your lies gone to?agentli said:I am Pinnochio, Town Aligned. I can't attack for squat and I have to lie every day. But look carefully at the responses that I'll get to this post. They'll be slanderous, they'll take it apart piece by piece "deconstructing" the ideas of it, calling it "scummy".
Again, you try to change the subject. And because of your scummy looking actions, I'm surprised to see that you keep defending common.agentli said:The right thing to do at the point is going after inactives. They don't participate in the game, and if we start doing that, the lurkers will come out and then we can actually have a real game in which activity is controlled by the town. I hope you never forget that when, not if, I am lynched, I will be town, and you will go and lynch the mafia that pushed for my death.
No. I'm accusing you for holding back and bandwagoning. If you really did suspect me, you'd have voted against me right away. That FOS shifted the attantion on me without putting yourself in a vulnerable possition. That's the difference between you and ligolski. He actually voted against me without waiting.Lol common, you vote on me just because I wouldn't have explained side of nameclaiming? Look back at where I FoS'd you, that's exactly where I said it. It's not long, but I thought you were smart enough to remember what I said the first time you wanted a name claim. At that time, I made a longer explanaition about why nameclaiming is bad. And I supposed that you would know what I meant with a short post like this one.
Weren't you the one who said this game was so booooring? I'm the first one to do anything of interest today and you vote against me. That's one of the reasons I'm voting agaisnt you.Let's vote common and get this thing rolling, it's been day 2 for way too long.
Wrong. You clearly dont understand the situation at all, and have argued in my favor. The two scenerios are COMPLETELY different. Like you said, the first time was noobiness, and this time it wasn't. This means that the reactions from you guys obviously wouldn't be the same as the first time. Look again. The reaction this time is overwhelmingly different. Sheesh.Ok...
a) his plan was discussed before and deemed not good, we let him go because it was his first offense/noobiness or something... BUT he does it a SECOND time, for "getting reactions" which were gotten from the first time...that being ITS A BAD IDEA!!!! and scummy at that...his plan doesn't make any sense, since we already were able to guage reactions from before...hence the reason I am suspicious of common and therefore my vote on him...
Again with the changing topics? And he never did anything suspiscous! Seriously man, you aren't doing well at all at defending yourself. and agent, Im starting to doubt you as well. A nameclaim would be horrible for the town, and yet you still support him.Jazzy: You're off the nuetral list. I cant tell if your logic is off or if you're mafia. Either way, I've got my eye on you.grrr
He accused me with rather bad logic. I have a right to defend myself. I wasn't changing topics.Again with the changing topics? And he never did anything suspiscous! Seriously man, you aren't doing well at all at defending yourself. and agent, Im starting to doubt you as well. A nameclaim would be horrible for the town, and yet you still support him.
Fos agentli
I was trying to catch more people in my plan. I already explained this.I am sorry about being inactive but i did mention in post a little while ago that i have been pretty busy lately.
Anyway, to me all of this starting with the name claim on your part seemed really sketchy and with all of the posts against you, it was just putting you in a deeper hole and you waited so long to try and dig yourself out.
To me it seemed like you waited a little to long for that.commonyoshi said:I dont want to die, afterall.
I dont like the fact lance jumped the gun to want to vote him out for just SAYING we should do a name claim, and wanting to end the day really fast... Yea, its been day two for some time, but there isn't much going on, and i think he was just trying to get something happening! Wanting to hurry up and end the day so you can survive another one seems really suspicious...
Vote Lance87
I dont have any other FOS's at the moment.. But just a side note:
i am quite convinced that common isn't mafia. He wants a name claim, so he is probably pretty certain he won't end up getting lynched if a name claim happens, so his character is most likely town alligned.
Kujirudo, you seem very adamant at attacking Agentli even after he's claimed Pinnochio. He has said time and time before that he doesn't post a lie every time because technically his restriction says one lie per 'day', not 'post'. I believe him and it seems suspicious that you are jumping on him like that.
FOS: Kujirudo
I also think the people that are quick to jump on common are suspicious too, but it's still a toss because they could just be town against the name claim idea. I am against it as well, but I didn't jump on common because I figured he was just trying to get some action going. And from the looks of it, he succeeded.
um...yes...thats how mafia works IMO...the town votes who it sees as suspicious for whatever reasons...meaningless paragraph...To those of you who have not yet made up their minds on what is happening right now in KH Mafia. It seems Ligolski, Kuji, and Lance87 have made up their minds that Common and I are mafia. I hope none of you forget, I hope you will diligently witness and observe the neverending attacks that will continue for just trying to defend somebody's mistake. It's not as if we all don't make mistakes. I've made a few myself. But is it reason to be suspicious, maybe, but it's no reason to just go out and place a vote on him/her.
well your first sentance is how mafia works, thats how it is done, we vote off the most suspicious players because we think they are mafia and hopefully they are...your next statements are poor attempts to try and make us feel bad for possibly lynching common who we believe to be mafia...oh and common hasn't done squat besides bringing up discussion about himself...It seems to be the trend of the town right now, or should I say, the game, to vote off players and lynch them because they seem "suspicious". Well maybe suspicion is a good thing. if your definition of suspicion means conjuring up some kind of activity, trying to see who bandwagons, and looking at voting patterns, then Common is guilty. If your definition of suspicious is being proactive and attempting to be helpful, then Common is guilty.
First of all I did not bandwagon, I placed the first vote adn those guys have backed up their vote too imo...controlling th e town eh? well you tried to do that too when you and common tried to organize the name claim before...and on top of that you accuse us of passing around blame...BS...we have been on on top of only you and common for this day...YOU on the other hand have tried to shift attention away from you and common towards the inactives... <cough>HYPOCRIT! and maybe your are counting on that idea of not putting out a "stupid" idea twice to defend your actions...not working for me obviously...I hope none of you forget that it was Ligolski, Lance87, and Kuji who are bandwagoning on Common for voting him/her away. Isn't it kind of obvious that they are controlling the town right now, that they, not us are passing around blame, that they are shifting attention, passing smoke, and constantly pointing fingers? Why won't they stop and look at the fact that a mafia member won't put out a stupid idea twice. If you ask me, they are the real mafia.
wow, I just registered the fact that even though NOT A SINGLE PERSON has voted for you yet, you seem very adament about defending yourself and common...over reaction maybe? idk...as for the above quote...its meaningless...just more hope attempts on making people think twice...its like taking a test...don't change your answer after you already put down one...b/c your first instinct is ussually right...and well my instinct is telling me these two are mafia...sure I could be mistaken and it happens (poor skylink lol) but this is how the game s played...when things don't add up we lynch those who are the most suspicious...I hope none of you forget that when we're dead, that it was them who consistently pushed for our deaths. I hope none of you forget their names. Of course, those of you who have already fallen under some kind of influence will probably lie and shove this under the rug and go as if nothing happened "Gee that was rather unfortunate, OOPS I GUESS WE MADE A MISTAKE THERE!"
Hey, guess what? Thats how the game is played pal...we, the town, deconstruct posts because it is our job and thats how we will win the game...so I'll continue to decontruct your post...I am Pinnochio, Town Aligned. I can't attack for squat and I have to lie every day. But look carefully at the responses that I'll get to this post. They'll be slanderous, they'll take it apart piece by piece "deconstructing" the ideas of it, calling it "scummy".
Shifting the attention again eh? and IF you are actually town and we happen to lynch you, doesn't mean we are mafia...as you are so adament about saying...people can make mistakes...you said it yourself...otherwise this is an attempt at revengefor those who caught him and he is trying to make us second guess ourselves but remember what I said before...The right thing to do at the point is going after inactives. They don't participate in the game, and if we start doing that, the lurkers will come out and then we can actually have a real game in which activity is controlled by the town. I hope you never forget that when, not if, I am lynched, I will be town, and you will go and lynch the mafia that pushed for my death.
FOS's are almost pointless unless used right like I did...mine showed that agentli was next on the list since I believe they are both mafia...and yes I am argueing strongly for the lynch...why?...because some of you don't see how scummy these guys really are...all I am trying to do is to presuade you guys on to what I think is the right thing to do...simple as that...plus I voted because this is a second offense and an FOS wasn't even close to enough pressure that I wanted to give...and then I developed my thoughts and bleive that he is mafia...so I don't consider me being a "bandwagoner" PLUS it just happens to be that I went on after that post and then decided to vote...I would have jumped on him even if kuj had not FOS'd him...Ligolski was the first person to vote, but only after someone FOSed Common. Then, he argued strongly for lynching him, and then for Agentli, even though Agentli was more of a mediator.
I see what your saying and your right, the reactions are different by a little but as you said this isn't "noobiness" like you claim to say was the reason for the first time...which mean it is planned and WHAT town member would plan to have a name claim in a game like this... not me at least...thats why your suspicous...plus I still am a little ify about the first name claim idea...Wrong. You clearly dont understand the situation at all, and have argued in my favor. The two scenerios are COMPLETELY different. Like you said, the first time was noobiness, and this time it wasn't. This means that the reactions from you guys obviously wouldn't be the same as the first time. Look again. The reaction this time is overwhelmingly different. Sheesh.
Or this is her first mafia game and is easily persuaded? idk...just throwing that one out thereI was trying to catch more people in my plan. I already explained this.
Eitehr he didn't ready my post, or he wants to lynch me for the heck of it.
I really don't see why you seem soooo sure that lance is town...explain a little more besides the whole " lets get this over with" b/c imo thats a weak argument for a vote/lynchIll review things as well tomorrow, but currently i think that common is town... i think lance is mafia and i think kuj is not really that suspicious that i can see.. maybe a little, but nothing compared to lance's hurry to get to day 3
I agree...IMO, common never meant it to be a plan. I think he reacted from agentli's posts soon after and took it up as an easy defense.
always a possibility...Maybe agent is mafia and is protecting common to make himself look innocent if common were town when he died...
thats another reason I don't believe entrirely agentli's claim...his lie story has changed on when he has to do it...it seems to me it is possible that he said that to be very ambigous (hope i spelled that right hehe) and so if he made a mistake he could fall back on something...and teh second paragraph I: QFTFirst of all, I didn't really know what it was with his role restriction. First he said that it had to be once a day in-game, but then he switched to once a day in real life. I know it doesn't have to be in every post, but it has been freaking 3 real life days(or more) since he posted his last lie. So what is it now, once a day in-game or once a day in real?
About the second part of your post: Didn't you notice yet why we suspected him immediately? He came up with the idea before and we all agreed that he shouldn't do so! And now, he does the same thing again but this time you guys all believe him that it was a plan to see who is the bad guy and who isn't.
From Day 1Commonyoshi said:But a name claim is exactly what clues like "simple minded" will devlop into. It IS a clue to my character. The only thing that's preventing me from telling you guys right now who I am is the possibility that our names may not have anything to our roles.
I'm sorry if that didn't make sense because I'm just musing to myself. I'm deciding what action we should take. If our characters do have something to do with our roles then I think a name claim is something that should be considered. Chill just gave you guys a hint as to who I am. If someone claims they are Chip and Dale, but Chill gives a hint that he was a large person then we'd know he was a liar.
Chill giving us these clues makes me believe that our characters are important and not just name holderz. We can decide on came claims after no more discussion can be made today.
Ok, here's what I think about this. If Pooh is singleminded, there's no way he can change his decision after going through with it. So therefore, once he proposes the nameclaim idea, he can't backtrack from it, correct? In that case, it isn't scummy at all.Kujirudo said:And yes, I also noticed that what Lance said: It seems like agentli and common really are teaming up. If agentli and common really are who they said they are, I agree with you that it could be a plan to lure the mafia. But I don't know it anymore. This seems all so confusing to me. I do suspect common and I do suspect agentli, but they both claimed to be townies which is very possible (Pooh = single minded and Pinnochio lies).
I believe it is once per in-game, but it was vague. Usually the role restrictions are once per in-game.Kujirudo said:First of all, I didn't really know what it was with his role restriction. First he said that it had to be once a day in-game, but then he switched to once a day in real life. I know it doesn't have to be in every post, but it has been freaking 3 real life days(or more) since he posted his last lie. So what is it now, once a day in-game or once a day in real?
I support him, not his idea. I think his idea is the most stupid thing in the world. I think he is the most stupid player in the world. I think he is town.Ronike said:Again with the changing topics? And he never did anything suspiscous! Seriously man, you aren't doing well at all at defending yourself. and agent, Im starting to doubt you as well. A nameclaim would be horrible for the town, and yet you still support him.
No, the town doesn't impulsively automatically place votes on someone who did something completely stupid twice. They go back and ask WHY someone might have done that. The answer might not always be because they're mafia.ligolski said:um...yes...thats how mafia works IMO...the town votes who it sees as suspicious for whatever reasons...meaningless paragraph...
Ok, you have convinced me for now that common is just being stupid and not mafia...but when did Chill say we should listen to him? I don't recall that...Chill, the mod, has said that we should perhaps be listening to him/her. And I am giving Common a chance before lynching. It seems like the fair and reasonable thing to do.
I never thought of it that way good catch...Ok, here's what I think about this. If Pooh is singleminded, there's no way he can change his decision after going through with it. So therefore, once he proposes the nameclaim idea, he can't backtrack from it, correct? In that case, it isn't scummy at all.
well I said I was sure he was mafia based on the point of view that he wasn't being stupid...he did say it was his "plan" and so I was thinking along those lines...and u put words into my mouth...I never said go around and impulsively put on the votes...never...No, the town doesn't impulsively automatically place votes on someone who did something completely stupid twice. They go back and ask WHY someone might have done that. The answer might not always be because they're mafia.
quote me where I said unboubtably and I'll eat my shorts...I left room open I think so that someone could switch my thoughts and you did by pointing out a few good points...To tell you the truth, the rest of ligolski's post is basically attacking mine and any other that might have offended his idea of Common and I being UNDOUBTABLY mafia, as if there was no other possibility
LOL...i meant mafia...typoNo, i said i think lance is mafiaNot Town. And i still think he is. ill post more about it tonight, hopefully
I don't see why you are voting me but I ignored the name claim of those two before thinking that it was part of their wanting a name claim...but as I said before I stand corrected and I now think that what agentli brought up linking simple minded into a role situation is a good one...I was about to say that we should go after Ligolski if common turned out to be town, but I really don't see how Pooh and Pinnochio would be mafia when you've got real characters like Maleficent, Ansem, Hades, Jafar, etc.
Vote: Ligolski
yea...thats meI doubt all three of them are mafia. That is almost impossible. People always make mistakes
Speaking of that, we shouldnt have to vote for him, he should be removed, dont u agree?Because he is inactive, so we should kick him out of the game. HE'S BANNED!!!
Wow, massive catch. Yes, that could explain why common said that it was just to see how we reacted. Nice thinking!Ok, here's what I think about this. If Pooh is singleminded, there's no way he can change his decision after going through with it. So therefore, once he proposes the nameclaim idea, he can't backtrack from it, correct? In that case, it isn't scummy at all.
Mmm, not a yes nor a no but at least we get somewhere.agentli said:I believe it is once per in-game, but it was vague. Usually the role restrictions are once per in-game.
So do I now.agentli said:I support him, not his idea. I think his idea is the most stupid thing in the world. I think he is the most stupid player in the world. I think he is town.
Remember Chill saying that common is single minded? That probally meant that he wanted us to know that, even though we didn't know he was Pooh, he can only think one way and can't change his mind so quickly.ligolski said:but when did Chill say we should listen to him? I don't recall that...
I still dont buy that whole simple minded thing, it seems too precise to be true. Its more likely if that is the case that common cant switch votes.This doesn't sit well with everyone. A few of you have become suspicous of commonyoshi and consider his ideas simple-minded.
I was thinking the same...hey ronike could you explain that a little more...that made no sense