I apologize to those who didn't see the satire behind my post for putting in my exaggeration of a statement of what a mafia player would say. I thought people would get that I was trying to be funny and lighten the mood a little, but I guess it was taken literally.
In my mind, common is just putting forth an opinion, and through this, he could possibly get some activity going. Do you really think that common would be foolish enough not to see that if he/she put out the plan, that he/she would be pounced on by opportunists in the game trying to get someone lynched the second they propose a plan? It is agreed, that the plan sucks, but let's try to be understanding that common is just trying to get something going, anything. After all, I don't see any opposing plans out there from you, ligolski. Before pointing fingers, let's put out another plan, one that's better in substance, rather than just shooting down those of others.
That is the way it is hypocritical, that if we were to discourage people from setting forth plans, this would harm the town more than help it. Discouraging plans forces us into another no-lynch situation by killing activity from the thread. Obviously this aids the mafia more than the town.
A mafia, not the mafia, wouldn't be casting suspicion on common necessarily, but they are doing it so people are afraid of submitting plans to public scrutiny, limiting activity.
I hope that answers all your questions for the moment, ligolski. I'm not necessarily defending just Common, but the idea of fostering the growth of ideas and sharing plans so we can actually get this game going. After all, we can't be depending on having an even every day...
