Look, do I think anybody wanting this changed in any way wants to reference some hate group? Absolutely not. I mean, there's probably someone out there that does but there always is someone out there for something. Most people don't. It's just that we don't live in an abstract world. We live in a world of context. And 3 Ks, back-to-back, seem like a big no-no in our context, which is part of the game's context because Smash Bros is a global product.
This is bad because for many people, especially those unfamiliar with DK, the Ks could be seen as a reference to that group. That could put off people and hurt them. And in terms of the character, it is needless controversy when he barely is just resurfacing.
That's what I think.
That's a fair perspective. I get where you're coming from. I hope my previous messages don't come off as too confrontational. I'll admit I was more in a mind to speak my mind more bluntly when I wrote those, though I still stand by those posts. Basically, I see it as more or less the opposite. You're right, context does matter, and in context it's already been pointed out that that if we acronized K. Rool Kremling Kommander, it wouldn't even make out KKK unless you reached for that goal and purposefully left out the King and ignore the Rool in his name. I believe that in context, anybody who wouldn't feel bothered to understand the reference to commander being spelled with s "K", and chooses instead to be offended on their own behalf and demand people change the acronym so that they can sleep better at night, is being purposefully obtuse and is ignoring context themselves, and thus should probably not be given much credence or mind. I would personally say that taking "KKK" out of King K. Rool Kremling Kommander" would be incredibly abstract. In a way, you're right, it would hypothetically be a needless controversy because the best option I could see if they did it would be trusting that a small minority of people are seeing racism where there is none, keeping the reference in, and resting easy knowing most people don't care and will keep buying their product either unaware there was ever a small nontroversy or even enjoying the sly reference.
As I said, I'm open and adamant about this because I loathe the idea of holding back an artistic vision because it might offend somebody. Something will always offend somebody and if someone betrays their vision because somebody is offended, you right, maybe it isn't a big deal, but do it again and again and again as soon as more people become offended by everything else someone put their heart and soul into, and you will invariably get an at best blander, less engaging product, albeit one you can still enjoy, and at worse a watered down, milquetoast parody of what made the work interesting and engaging to begin with. Balking whenever someone
could be offended also stifles the potential to write an actually controversial story. Someone might have something bold and nuanced to say about the state of racism, or gun violence, or religion, or any number of hot button issues, but that creative potential dies as soon as they can't get their work off the ground because somebody didn't like that they unabashedly
dared to write about an issue without side stepping around the problem at hand and having the temerity to write about the scarier, more terrible, grimier sides of true hate and atrocity.
In a sense, I do agree, it's not the end of the world if Nintendo didn't change Commander, to "Kommander", and really what ever they did, be it put in Kommander or not, wouldn't effect this gaming Titan's bottom line in any meaningful ways, but I maintain anybody seeing "KKK" is being overly sensitive and they don't make up a meaningful enough size of the Smash community to dent Ultimate's sales if they were totally ignored without so much of a statement. But be that as it may, I'm not arguing for them to add Kommander to the game, I'm fighting in defense of a world where art can be made and shared free of censorship and redactions so that new stories and art that could change the world get to be made. They remove a feather from G&W that harkened back to an undeniably racist stereotype that painted Native Americans as savages, okay fair, I can get behind that. They remove an outfit form a game because some women found it demeaning, uh okay. They remove dialogue because it makes this ethnic group uncomfortable, even though it was literally designed to highlight bigotry against that group that happens even today. They remove a historic landmark because a bad thing happened there in real life. They remove an evil dictator from a game about opposing said dictator because said dictator was bad and merely mentioning that person could offend, so the dictator is better off unpersoned at the risk of destroying a stories cohesion and plot. I hope you see what I'm getting at. First they came for X and I didn't mind, but then they came for me. As a writer that last note is especially important to me.
Also, and I'm sorry I know I
really shouldn't do this after trying to be nuanced and reasonable in order to plea that you see my point of view, but I just can't resist: Jontron is Middle Eastern and one of his best friends is the Jewish Ethan Klein, and he apologized for saying those remarkably dumb things on that livestream and explained his point of view. What more do you want from the guy? Unless he is one of the most diverse nazis I've ever seen, and his middle name is Aryan, so maybe he is a nazi. I interpret his name like that and it's offending me.
(I just got done spell checking this but I apologize for any grammatical errors. I hope you don't think less of my arguments because of a spelling or grammar mistake that might have snuck past me.)
*EDIT* Invariably, as soon as I post I immediately spot a spelling error. D'oh.