King K. Rool is one of the gayest, goofiest, childish villains in history. Shame on you fools.
Right. Now lets look at that claim.
King K Rool is a walking, talking, bipedal crocodile that wears clothes and has a gold plated belly. He stole DK's banana hoard, most likely to eat them I would imagine, or to end a famine on Crocodile Isle. After being foiled, he kidnapped DK and held him ransom for the banana hoard while torturing him (beating and shooting him with his blunderbuss), then kidnapped Diddy and used some crazy invention to make Diddy's mind evil and control a robot, and then after all those attempts failed, he decided to just blow up DK Isle. King K Rool was revealed, I believe in DKC64, to suffer from dimentia, paranoia, and schizophrenia, among others mental disorders, which explains why he is evil (tries to kill and all), and why he went from being a king to a pirate to a mad scientist to a boxer.
Bowser, another villain, is a walking, talking, bipedal turtle with spikes and fire breath. He kidnaps princess peach over and over and over again, nobody knows why, but in Mario Sunshine, he apparently did a little something with Peach in order for her to be Bowser Jr.'s mother. Though most believe Bowser just lied to Bowser Jr. about it, and he had no relations with Peach. And that's bowser, he's also a bipedal reptile, and he kidnaps Princess Peach over and over again, sometime's in a potato sack, but is always failing, and never thinks to change his plan or do something with Peach while he has her.
When you compare K Rool to the most popular Nintendo villain, I have to say, in my opinion, Bowser seems a lot more childish. They're both just as goofy, but K Rool seems a lot more fleshed out, he's given a personality (which takes more than the knowledge of a child to understand), and appears to learn from his mistakes. Bowser just decides to capture the Princess, who knows why, and always tries the same method, over and over again.
I'm guessing if you knew what you were talking about before actually speaking, your arguements would hold more. But just the fact that you used "gayest" as an insult speaks a lot on your intelligence.