Andy4Brawl_911
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2007
- Messages
- 416
sure, just aslong as you wear the sig with prode.I'd like to join Kremlin Power.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
sure, just aslong as you wear the sig with prode.I'd like to join Kremlin Power.
And here I was under the impression that only F-Zero and Kirby had decent cartoons.Hmm? Not really. The Super Show was sucessful enough, though kids enjoyed the animated part better it seems, so when it became based on SMB3 and SMW, it was all cartoons, I know that. It survived a lot longer than that DK cartoon.
You could say the exact same thing about every other villain ever made. It doesn't take deep personal history with the hero to be a good villain. You just have to be a bad mother****er and K.Rool has that by the ****load.K. Rool doesn't matter in comparison to their importance though. He's just the throw away villain created soley for that spot. There's no deeper connection between him and DK other than his standard stealing and threatning. Any villain can fill that roll and nothing would be lost.
Tom Nook says hi.The AC human though is the face of Animal Crossing,
More unique? They are personalityless avatars. Recognizable? I laugh at that idiotic comment. K.Rool is the villain of one of Nintendo's all star franchises. A better balance? WTF?which has been highly sucessful,as shown in how much representation it's getting. They are more unique, recognizable, and create a better balance.
Multiple Personality Disorder. It means K.Rool has several personalities. It's the same disease the hulk has.Sorry, you just threw in that accronym without explination. He has more M.P.D? I just assumed that it had to do with the context and that he was a more important villain. Please explain yourself.
You are totally biased against K.Rool. To YOU he may not be memorable or original but to his legions of fans he is in fact very memorable and original.Ridley actually has more of a connection to the main character than the simple "Blarg i stel j00r banas" or "mah blast-o-matic wil keel u all to teh deds." Also he's really the only acceptable character for the second Metroid spot. (Third if technical, but he deserves it more than ZSS anyways) And it is a good balance. Bowser, Ganondorf, Wario, Dedede, and Ridley are all the villains that are worth it. I guess you can count Mewtwo in there, but he's kinda on the fench like Metaknight. The point is that they are all big name memorable and original villains instead of trash like K. Rool.
The main villain of the franchise would totally be added just to bolster his series numbers.That comment was labeled at the hypocracy of thinking that K. Rool could ever get in other than to add numbers to his franchise. =/
Wow. You totally choose to ignore all the great movesets that have been shoved in your face. Why don't you go back a few pages to the moveset I made in my first response to you? That should shut you up, unless of course you choose to ignore it again.You have a musket, and that's it. He's not unique beyond that. Heck, Snake's rocket launcher basically emulates that. You can use the Cracker Laungher or the Super Scope too. All of his other moves are basically already used.
sure, just aslong as you wear the sig with pride.I'd like to join Kremlin Power.
Why bother arguing against me? I feel that I have the correct stance, and they keep opposing me. Thus, why should I give up? Though it's possible I should. No one's comming up with anything good anymore. Even if I havn't changed their minds, the point about his chances are so low, has been made clear. =/
K.Rool has intercourse with his own mother? Now that's just more of a reason not to let him in. In anycase, K. Rool is way to cartoony to be what you are really implying, along with his constant habit to play dress up like Super Show Bowser did. >_>And here I was under the impression that only F-Zero and Kirby had decent cartoons.
You could say the exact same thing about every other villain ever made. It doesn't take deep personal history with the hero to be a good villain. You just have to be a bad mother****er and K.Rool has that by the ****load.
Tom Nook says hi.
More unique? They are personalityless avatars. Recognizable? I laugh at that idiotic comment. K.Rool is the villain of one of Nintendo's all star franchises. A better balance? WTF?
Multiple Personality Disorder. It means K.Rool has several personalities. It's the same disease the hulk has.
You are totally biased against K.Rool. To YOU he may not be memorable or original but to his legions of fans he is in fact very memorable and original.
The main villain of the franchise would totally be added just to bolster his series numbers.
Wow. You totally choose to ignore all the great movesets that have been shoved in your face. Why don't you go back a few pages to the moveset I made in my first response to you? That should shut you up, unless of course you choose to ignore it again.
uhh Lucas got 2 votes and he's in so...2 people voting K. Rool doesn't really mean a thing. Heck, does that mean everyone else with two votes is going to be a character? If me and a friend suggested a random character, would that make them all the more likely?
And I hate him for the same reason as Waluigi. They are just bad characters.
(And wait, he says he doesn't want bananas, but he steals the banana horde in the first game, and then wants to trade DK for them later?)
K.Rool has intercourse with his own mother? Now that's just more of a reason not to let him in. In anycase, K. Rool is way to cartoony to be what you are really implying, along with his constant habit to play dress up like Super Show Bowser did. >_>
Tom Nook being excluded saddens me, but he really isn't the face of the series. He's the most memorable character, but not the face, since the face is supposed to be yourself, and you are the AC human. (Which is why the AC human isn't the most memorable character).
In comparison to K. Rool, all of them have more personality, with the exception of Ridley and his lack of diologue. (Who's actually more involved in Samus's story, and is unique from the other villains) They are also more recognizable, and by effect, much more popular. That much is obvious. And K. Rool may be a villain of a all-star franchise, but that doesn't make him deserve it. Andross is the main villain of Star Fox, and he doesn't deserve a spot. Neither does Wolf. Being the main villain doesn't cut in anymore if you don't deserve it.
I'd hardly say he has a legion of fans. Heck, are you guys fans of Dr. Claw from Inspector Gaget? Or were you a fan of the Super Show Bowser, who K. Rool's virtually the same as? How about thos Scooby Doo villains? They are basically all the same thing.
I'm actually confused as to what page we're on with this part. I guess you're trying to be sarcasitc here and say he wouldn't be added just to add numbers to the series. The thing is there's no excuse for him outside of that.
I've seen your movesets, and there's nothing particularly original about them. If you've got something you're really proud of though, just state it instead of trying to make me run around. >_>
Well said. There are no heavyweights with a projectile and that would work very well. What would also make the Musket orginal is if you can fire both cannons and that weird color $hit that slows you down.(Sorry if someone has suggested that before.)Here's just my two cents.
K. Rool has been around since I can remember playing Donkey Kong games, and he has been in many shapes and sizes. He has always been the antagonist as we all know, and has made trouble for all the kongs through different schemes. However, he's done this differently many times (Baron K. Roolenstein, Kaptain K. Rool etc.). These different "forms" of K. Rool make way for a great and unique moveset. And to those who say the musket can't do anything because they're other types of projectile characters, think again. This would be the only addition to the roster, who is a heavyweight using aimed projectiles. It wouldn't hurt also, adding to the "grand total" of only three DK characters. (Come on guys we need SOMETHING evil from DK's series ) If K. Rool isn't in SSBB I can definently see him making the cut in future sequels to this game.
With all that said, K. ROOL FOR BRAWL!
The intercourse part really made me laugh I'll give you that much. So being cartoony means you can't be an evil mofo? What are you stupid? Cartoon villains are evil just for the heck of it most of the time. What sets K.Rool apart is he really has no idea just how evil he is really being. He's sick in the head, plain and simple. Stop reffering to the super show because I doubt anyone even remebers that show (I myself didn't even know such a show existed until you mentioned it)K.Rool has intercourse with his own mother? Now that's just more of a reason not to let him in. In anycase, K. Rool is way to cartoony to be what you are really implying, along with his constant habit to play dress up like Super Show Bowser did. >_>
The AC symbol is Tom Nook's leaf. I think he can be considered the face of the franchise.Tom Nook being excluded saddens me, but he really isn't the face of the series. He's the most memorable character, but not the face, since the face is supposed to be yourself, and you are the AC human. (Which is why the AC human isn't the most memorable character).
Personality never has and never will mean anything in any smash game ever and anyone who thinks it does is a *******.In comparison to K. Rool, all of them have more personality,
I don't see where you are going with the recognizable crap because K.Rool is very much recognizable and popularity means squat.with the exception of Ridley and his lack of diologue. (Who's actually more involved in Samus's story, and is unique from the other villains) They are also more recognizable, and by effect, much more popular. That much is obvious.
There is a fine line between deserving it and having the physical appendages needed to fight.And K. Rool may be a villain of a all-star franchise, but that doesn't make him deserve it. Andross is the main villain of Star Fox, and he doesn't deserve a spot.
*****, say that over on the Wolf thread and I'll prove every n00B point you bring up wrong.Neither does Wolf.
And what exactly makes a character deserve it all knowing one?Being the main villain doesn't cut in anymore if you don't deserve it.
Yes, all those things are the main villain of a huge Nintendo franchise.I'd hardly say he has a legion of fans. Heck, are you guys fans of Dr. Claw from Inspector Gaget? Or were you a fan of the Super Show Bowser, who K. Rool's virtually the same as? How about thos Scooby Doo villains? They are basically all the same thing.
How about the fact that HE'S THE MAIN VILLAIN OF THE FRANCHISE!I'm actually confused as to what page we're on with this part. I guess you're trying to be sarcasitc here and say he wouldn't be added just to add numbers to the series. The thing is there's no excuse for him outside of that.
Nothing original? You where the one saying K.Rool can't be in if his moves are too similar to other characters and when I make a moveset with moves unlike any others you say it's unoriginal? You are just too **** biased.I've seen your movesets, and there's nothing particularly original about them. If you've got something you're really proud of though, just state it instead of trying to make me run around. >_>
Well maybe you should look it up. It's where K.Rool's character comes from, as he's essentially Bowser from there.Seperate the quotes please. It's easier to read that way.
The intercourse part really made me laugh I'll give you that much. So being cartoony means you can't be an evil mofo? What are you stupid? Cartoon villains are evil just for the heck of it most of the time. What sets K.Rool apart is he really has no idea just how evil he is really being. He's sick in the head, plain and simple. Stop reffering to the super show because I doubt anyone even remebers that show (I myself didn't even know such a show existed until you mentioned it).
And the mushroom is essentially the head of a Toad. They must b the faces of the franchise.The AC symbol is Tom Nook's leaf. I think he can be considered the face of the franchise.
Yet you're acting like K. Rool's makes him stand apart, and thus should be included?Personality never has and never will mean anything in any smash game ever and anyone who thinks it does is a *******.
You'v said personality doesn't matter. You've said uniqueness doesn't matter. You've here said popularity doesn't matter. I admit K. Rool never really had any of these, but what else do you even think could get anyone in?I don't see where you are going with the recognizable crap because K.Rool is very much recognizable and popularity means squat.
Sure would be unique, wouldn't it? No other smasher would be like him if they resized him. Oiginal moves aswell, eh? Plus he's got more storyline relivance than K. Rool. Heck, he seems to deserve it more than K. Rool when you think about it.There is a fine line between deserving it and having the physical appendages needed to fight.
Granted I won't stray too off topic here, but there's no way Wolf's in either. His chances are worse than K. Rool's to boot! At least K. Rool isn't just a pallete swap. (There, you got some positive comments from me)*****, say that over on the Wolf thread and I'll prove every n00B point you bring up wrong.
Being memorable enough. Being unique enough. Not being there just to be a villain counterpart to a good guy, and being there because their character is just that good. K. Rool does not apply. He's just DK's standard villain with nothing to show for it.And what exactly makes a character deserve it all knowing one?
That's what makes him popular? Because he's Nintendo? At the end of the day, you distinguish him by the fact he's Nintendo?Yes, all those things are the main villain of a huge Nintendo franchise.
When you're as crummy and generic as him, hat doesn't cut it.How about the fact that HE'S THE MAIN VILLAIN OF THE FRANCHISE!
You're still not proving me wrong here. Is it that musket? Is it him throwing his crown? Is it im just jumping? The only thing there which hasn't really been done is the crown, and that's just idiotic.Nothing original? You where the one saying K.Rool can't be in if his moves are too similar to other characters and when I make a moveset with moves unlike any others you say it's unoriginal? You are just too **** biased.
It's not just 2 people who voted for him, it were 2 suggestions by people who were approved by Sakurai. Sure you and your friend could both vote for a random obscure 3rd party character but that wouldn't make that character more likely cause obviously you have to add more into your suggestion mail than just the name of the character to be approved by Sakurai.2 people voting K. Rool doesn't really mean a thing. Heck, does that mean everyone else with two votes is going to be a character? If me and a friend suggested a random character, would that make them all the more likely?
That's your opinion, but at least K.Rool has loads more originality, personality and importance than Waluigi, who I think IS a bad character.And I hate him for the same reason as Waluigi. They are just bad characters.
I strongly disagree with you here. K.Rool has loads of peronality as explained loads of times to you. He's in short a totally unbalanced maniac, who has all crazy random ideas which all come out of frustation out of losing to the Kongs. Might explain the eye tick of his.In comparison to K. Rool, all of them have more personality, with the exception of Ridley and his lack of diologue. (Who's actually more involved in Samus's story, and is unique from the other villains) They are also more recognizable, and by effect, much more popular. That much is obvious. And K. Rool may be a villain of a all-star franchise, but that doesn't make him deserve it. Andross is the main villain of Star Fox, and he doesn't deserve a spot. Neither does Wolf. Being the main villain doesn't cut in anymore if you don't deserve it.
I don't see huge support for ANY unacounced character that isn't Ridley anymore now that the biggest fan favorites are already added. Krystal and Geno come to mind, but there aren't many other characters that are very hyped at the moment. K.Rool has a fair group of fans I say, but surely you can't judge a character's popularity like this...I'd hardly say he has a legion of fans. Heck, are you guys fans of Dr. Claw from Inspector Gaget? Or were you a fan of the Super Show Bowser, who K. Rool's virtually the same as? How about thos Scooby Doo villains? They are basically all the same thing.
A big fat crocodile who uses his belly flop, boxer, pirate and doctor-"alter egos" to create one wacky moveset isn't a good reason to add K.Rool? Dude, I'd love to play as a crown throwing, musket shooting, overweight crocodile who jumps and runs way too good for the size of his belly! But that's probably just me... or the rest of the people who grew up with Donkey Kong Country and don't feel 'betrayed' by Rare (while Rare wasn't the 'traitor' to begin with >_<) but that's another story...I'm actually confused as to what page we're on with this part. I guess you're trying to be sarcasitc here and say he wouldn't be added just to add numbers to the series. The thing is there's no excuse for him outside of that.
I won't promise you anything, but I might do something like that when I've got time. Maybe...I've seen your movesets, and there's nothing particularly original about them. If you've got something you're really proud of though, just state it instead of trying to make me run around. >_>
Now you're just making **** up. A cartoon can be evil just like a real person. You keep acting as if his origin as a bowser rip-off actually matters to Sakurai a man that has had no relation to either franchise, which is stupid. I say K.Rool is original, you say he is generic. We keep going back and forth with this and neither of our opinions really matter on this.Well maybe you should look it up. It's where K.Rool's character comes from, as he's essentially Bowser from there.
Oh my.
Anyways, yes the cartoony-ness normally is something you can't be at the same time, while retaining the characteristic you seem to see in him. Just doesn't happen I'm afraid. And heck, you're starting to contradict it with your explination as to why.
Except that the mushroom item really has no relation to the Toads other then they are fungi. The leaf is the sign of the Tanooki so it being the AC symbol says alot about Nook's importance.And the mushroom is essentially the head of a Toad. They must b the faces of the franchise.
I think we are getting off topic about this. I don't even remember how we got on the topic of the AC human. We should drop this and just keep on with K.Rool.The icon is just that, a icon. They don't dictate who is more important than who, it's just a cmmon symbol seen throughout. The leaf is like this, since you are constantly talking to Nook, and your furniture basically become leaves. Still it's the AC human who does the interacting, and is there all the time.
No. I am trying to make a point about K.Rool not being generic. Whether he is or not really has no affect on his chances at all.Yet you're acting like K. Rool's makes him stand apart, and thus should be included?
Because it ****ing doesn't.You'v said personality doesn't matter.
Where the **** did I say that? For your information I think that the more good moveset potential a character has the more likely they are (if they are important enough to get in anyway of course).You've said uniqueness doesn't matter.
Not only me, but Sakurai HIMSELF said popularity means squat.You've here said popularity doesn't matter.
The most important factor for a character's inclusion is plain and simple. Franchise importance. Withought K.Rool the D.K franchise would have no main villain and would therefore suck as no one wants to play a game like Donkey Kong withought a villain.I admit K. Rool never really had any of these, but what else do you even think could get anyone in?
Now you're just being an ***. Andross WOULD have been original had they included him (made up body or not) Andross DID deserve to be in brawl somehow (IMO playable but Sakurai obviously didn't share that opinion) but he was obviously skipped over for whatever reason. Personally I think he decided to add Wolf instead of going through the trouble of making a brand spanking new body for the A man.Sure would be unique, wouldn't it? No other smasher would be like him if they resized him. Oiginal moves aswell, eh? Plus he's got more storyline relivance than K. Rool. Heck, he seems to deserve it more than K. Rool when you think about it.
I don't think I can ever respect you now that I know you are one of those idiots who can't see past a characters looks.Granted I won't stray too off topic here, but there's no way Wolf's in either. His chances are worse than K. Rool's to boot! At least K. Rool isn't just a pallete swap. (There, you got some positive comments from me)
K.Rool is sure as hell memorable since they keep making games with him. He's sure as hell unique what with his mental illness and all. I also love how you basically ignore the fact that every villain ever made is the same as K.Rool (in your words being the villain counterpart to a good guy).Being memorable enough. Being unique enough. Not being there just to be a villain counterpart to a good guy, and being there because their character is just that good. K. Rool does not apply. He's just DK's standard villain with nothing to show for it.
Wow. You completley missed the fact my comment was sarcasm directed at your examples of generic bad guys.That's what makes him popular? Because he's Nintendo? At the end of the day, you distinguish him by the fact he's Nintendo?
That's why he shouldn't be in? You think he is a crummy villain? I think Ridley is a crummy villlain. RIDLEY DECONFIRMED!!!!!!111 n00B Sakurai could care less what you think of K.Rool or if K.Rool has no personality and is some generic Bowser rip-off. At the end of the day his job is to make Kids game characters beat each other to a pulp and that is what he will do, regardless of trivial things like personality.When you're as crummy and generic as him, hat doesn't cut it.
This proves you didn't even read my moveset as the only move you listed above I had was the musket which is original enough (maybe not the cannon ball explosion effect most people want but it doesn't have to be like that).You're still not proving me wrong here. Is it that musket? Is it him throwing his crown? Is it im just jumping? The only thing there which hasn't really been done is the crown, and that's just idiotic.
it's funny how you say she's a clone of Diddy, I wonder why you don't consider facts, they're in your face. Dixie and Diddy are not alike, they look alike, but they're not the same. If you don't consider Dixie's ponytail moves, then what is wrong with you? At least that is more possibilities she could give than Luigi could ever had in Melee. :embarrassUm, what does Dixie have over K. Rool? It's not like her personality got developed or anything. In fact, it's almost like she's a clone of Diddy, except with long hair. And what would her B moves be? Smack with Hair? Grab with Hair? Seriously, there's nothing good about her except for the fact that she's a female hero. Oh, and some people like her, but almost every character has some fans.
First off I see no reason why this argument is taking place in the K. Rool forums.You say there's nothing good about her, well you're just biased. What's so good about Diddy, most of his moves are based around DK 64, because that was the game that in fact gave him more detail, Dixie has had enough detail since the beginning. They didn't need to add no peanut guns to her, she has been enough original since the beginning and is only similar to Diddy by the looks, walking, and running, and that's it.
Krystal, I'm almost certain, and someone else.i'm pretty sure we'll get atleast 2 new female characters in Brawl(Dixie is not one of them).
Krystal and hopefully Mona.Krystal, I'm almost certain, and someone else.
For right now, put up my banner, it's fine for others to use, I'll clear space in my sig for the Kremling Power banner later today, I'll tell you when I want to join.Guys, just another reminder tommorow go on http://smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=125751 and vote for K. Rool. Also Geno fans, don't waste your vote straight away, since geno is likely to be way ahead of the others in votes, whilst K. Rool will need more votes.
We now have 2 new officiial Kremling Power member RegalBuster and Diddykong08..
Also Mach Speed would you like to join Kremling power + Is it okay if i add your support icon to the list on the first post.
I'm not sure. There's no space left in my signature... but I'd like to join.Yes well remember in last vote we beat Link, and i'm sure if we get, full support K. Rool will again. Oh and sorry Luigi Player i haven't asked you a place for Kremling Power, but would you like one?
GenoKrystal, I'm almost certain, and someone else.