• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

K. Rool's Kremling Kutthroats: PM BKupa666 for an Invite to the New K. Rool Thread

StormC

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Messages
8,299
I mean if we were going to have a completely brand new character, I'd rather it be someone who lots of people actually want, y'know? Why Ryu over someone like K. Rool or Isaac? It's just so random and nonsensical.
 

cephalopod17

Smash Ace
Joined
May 18, 2013
Messages
513
NNID
cephalopod17
Both were probably planned before the Ballot. We are still going to see at least one character from the Ballot. I think Ryu is an interesting choice and Roy was wanted and is quicker to make due to his clone statues. We still have many supporters and the King has not been affected much by this.
 

CJ Falcon

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
1,008
Location
Austin
They can put every Fire Emblem character ever created in Smash and I wouldn't care as long as I get my much-deserved K. Rool.
 

Oracle_Summon

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
5,059
I mean if we were going to have a completely brand new character, I'd rather it be someone who lots of people actually want, y'know? Why Ryu over someone like K. Rool or Isaac? It's just so random and nonsensical.
Only if the Wii U gets Street Fighter V and all of its extra editions does it make sense to add Ryu in SSB4. This would only make sense to me as a marketing ploy.
 

MrHomelessHobo

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 25, 2014
Messages
244
NNID
Orangeporrige
Warning Received
Suck it up, seriously you guys are acting so pathetic right now. These characters were most likely planned long before the ballot and have no effect on King K Rool.

I mean if we were going to have a completely brand new character, I'd rather it be someone who lots of people actually want, y'know? Why Ryu over someone like K. Rool or Isaac? It's just so random and nonsensical.
Because Ryu is from one of the biggest fighting game franchises in the world.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MandoBardanJusik

Smash Ace
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Messages
588
Only if the Wii U gets Street Fighter V and all of its extra editions does it make sense to add Ryu in SSB4. This would only make sense to me as a marketing ploy.
I still get the feeling that we might wind up with a Nintendo VS Capcom game on wii-u, wouldn't be the first VS exclusive game on Nintendo, great potential, and they could use a modified version of Street Fighter 4 engine
 

MasterWarlord

Smash Champion
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
2,911
Because Ryu is from one of the biggest fighting game franchises in the world.
So is Master Chief.

And Goku is from the biggest animu in the world.

The only reason Ryu would weasel his way in for is due to Capcom being corporate and wanting a character actually making them money, given they've been going out of their way to slander Megaman.
 

MrHomelessHobo

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 25, 2014
Messages
244
NNID
Orangeporrige
So is Master Chief.

And Goku is from the biggest animu in the world.

The only reason Ryu would weasel his way in for is due to Capcom being corporate and wanting a character actually making them money, given they've been going out of their way to slander Megaman.

If smash bros is suppose to celebrate gaming as a whole wouldn't it make sense to have the main face of the series that popularized the fighting game market? The same genre Smash Bros is?
 
Last edited:

Dustydog96

Smash Ace
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
568
Earlier I was a bit struck by the "leak news" but I'm okay with it now : ) These characters if going to be in, were definitely planned pre-preemptively to April 1st. All in all I'm totally fine if the characters get in and am super excited to play DK64 tomorrow! It's pretty easy to say K. Rool's chances are not slimmer and if they were, what can we do right? Not worrying about what we can't control is key.
 

Oracle_Summon

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
5,059
I still get the feeling that we might wind up with a Nintendo VS Capcom game on wii-u, wouldn't be the first VS exclusive game on Nintendo, great potential, and they could use a modified version of Street Fighter 4 engine
Hopefully we get something worthwhile out of this. It is happened too often that Nintendo and its fans get screwed over from third party game releases.

So is Master Chief.

And Goku is from the biggest animu in the world.

The only reason Ryu would weasel his way in for is due to Capcom being corporate and wanting a character actually making them money, given they've been going out of their way to slander Megaman.
This, this so much.

If smash bros is suppose to celebrate gaming as a whole wouldn't it make sense to have the main face of the series that popularized the fighting game market? The same genre Smash Bros is?
Smash Brothers is a celebration of Nintendo's family (characters) and history, it is not about gaming as a whole. Pacman, Snake, Sonic, and Megaman all have to do with Nintendo, that is why we have not seen Master Chief, Cole (Infamous series) or Kratos in Smash Brothers.
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
19,183
Location
An elevator
Are people seriously insulting ryu

Do you people not understand he is pretty much the face of fighting games other than maybe scorpion (rated m anyway). Its not like SF has a history with nintendo anyway.

This is about as all star as it gets. Plus he isnt a ballot characyer so he doesnt affect anyone else. Jesus christ
 
Last edited:

toadster101

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
855
Location
Skype
NNID
toadster101
3DS FC
1891-1323-0892
If smash bros is suppose to celebrate gaming as a whole wouldn't it make sense to have the main face of the series that popularized the fighting game market? The same genre Smash Bros is?
It's not supposed to celebrate gaming as a whole. It's supposed to celebrate Nintendo. Blah blah blah "but they added Snake" blah blah blah. Maybe that's why he's no longer in the game. I don't think Ryu is a horrible addition, but first party favorites like K. Rool and Isaac should take priority no matter what. It feels like they're cheapening what made Smash Bros. so special in the first place.
 

MrHomelessHobo

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 25, 2014
Messages
244
NNID
Orangeporrige
Hopefully we get something worthwhile out of this. It is happened too often that Nintendo and its fans get screwed over from third party game releases.



This, this so much.



Smash Brothers is a celebration of Nintendo's family (characters) and history, it is not about gaming as a whole. Pacman, Snake, Sonic, and Megaman all have to do with Nintendo, that is why we have not seen Master Chief, Cole (Infamous series) or Kratos in Smash Brothers.
Yes, everyone knows how all the main Metal Gear Solid games were on nintendo system, or how Pacman started on nintendo systems.
 

Oracle_Summon

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
5,059
Are people seriously insulting ryu

Do you people not understand he is pretty much the face of fighting games other than maybe scorpion (rated m anyway). Its not like SF has a history with nintendo anyway.

This is about as all star as it gets. Plus he isnt a ballot characyer so he doesnt affect anyone else. Jesus christ
You also need to take into account that adding Ryu opens the flood gates of Third Party characters that are allowed per company. This should only happen once 99% of the Nintendo characters are fleshed out and playable.

Yes, everyone knows how all the main Metal Gear Solid games were on nintendo system, or how Pacman started on nintendo systems.
Snake was a request by his creator for Sakurai. Pacman was requested by Shigeru Miyamoto and he was on the NES, SNES, and Gamecube.

As of now, we particularly have all the third party characters that were needed.

Add to the fact that Ryu, of all people has crossed over in everything that his presence serves no worth.
 
Last edited:

mynameisBlade

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,071
This news is rather shocking whichever way we look at it. The fact remains that we know very little about what is actually going on at Nintendo in regards to what is planned for Smash and when. As hard as it is to just be calm and simply wait, that is exactly what we need to do. Just be calm and WAIT. Keep supporting the King no matter what. If we let this little bit of information stagger us, in no way, shape or form, will we be prepared for the (hypothetically speaking) terrible news we COULD get. Just hang in there and don't lose your heads. Nothing is over. Things are only just beginning.
 

CannonStreak

Supersonic Warrior
Premium
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
18,395
Location
Running from the cops in Stardust Speedway.
This news is rather shocking whichever way we look at it. The fact remains that we know very little about what is actually going on at Nintendo in regards to what is planned for Smash and when. As hard as it is to just be calm and simply wait, that is exactly what we need to do. Just be calm and WAIT. Keep supporting the King no matter what. If we let this little bit of information stagger us, in no way, shape or form, will we be prepared for the (hypothetically speaking) terrible news we COULD get. Just hang in there and don't lose your heads. Nothing is over. Things are only just beginning.
Calm? I'll be calm, of course. I surely can. The waiting extends past E3, right?
 

Dustydog96

Smash Ace
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
568
This news is rather shocking whichever way we look at it. The fact remains that we know very little about what is actually going on at Nintendo in regards to what is planned for Smash and when. As hard as it is to just be calm and simply wait, that is exactly what we need to do. Just be calm and WAIT. Keep supporting the King no matter what. If we let this little bit of information stagger us, in no way, shape or form, will we be prepared for the (hypothetically speaking) terrible news we COULD get. Just hang in there and don't lose your heads. Nothing is over. Things are only just beginning.
Exactly everyone : ) ^ On the bright side this news could mean we are getting MANY more characters OVERALL than we originally thought. And I think that's awesome. But again, nothing is confirmed.
 

MrHomelessHobo

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 25, 2014
Messages
244
NNID
Orangeporrige
You also need to take into account that adding Ryu opens the flood gates of Third Party characters that are allowed per company. This should only happen once 99% of the Nintendo characters are fleshed out and playable.
This is DLC, this isn't taking anything away from the main game. If they want to add in
You also need to take into account that adding Ryu opens the flood gates of Third Party characters that are allowed per company. This should only happen once 99% of the Nintendo characters are fleshed out and playable.



Snake was a request by his creator for Sakurai. Pacman was requested by Shigeru Miyamoto and he was on the NES, SNES, and Gamecube.

As of now, we particularly have all the third party characters that were needed.

Just because someone high up requests a character to be in smash brothers doesn't mean they are part of nintendo's family, if that was the case then I guess MeatBoy should belong in smash then.
 

StormC

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Messages
8,299
What is most baffling to me is that Sakurai would put these files in the game, plain as day, months before they're even announced.
 

MrHomelessHobo

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 25, 2014
Messages
244
NNID
Orangeporrige
What is most baffling to me is that Sakurai would put these files in the game, plain as day, months before they're even announced.
Now that is baffling, its like nintendo doesn't even know about the internet or how it works.
 

Oracle_Summon

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
5,059
This is DLC, this isn't taking anything away from the main game. If they want to add in
It takes away the concept of what the Smash games actually stand for. Having a multitude and over abundance of third party characters takes away from what Smash truly means as a series.

Smash Brothers is about Nintendo's Family and History, first and foremost, where do you draw the line and say enough is enough?

Just because someone high up requests a character to be in smash brothers doesn't mean they are part of nintendo's family, if that was the case then I guess MeatBoy should belong in smash then.
Unlike Snake, Pacman, Megaman and Sonic, Meatboy has done nothing with Nintendo in their life and has not worked with Nintendo. That there nullifies your point.

Ryu being in would allow third party companies to have more than 1 character, something that devalues the importance of Third Party characters that get in.
 

MrHomelessHobo

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 25, 2014
Messages
244
NNID
Orangeporrige
It takes away the concept of what the Smash games actually stand for. Having a multitude and over abundance of third party characters takes away from what Smash truly means as a series.

Smash Brothers is about Nintendo's Family and History, first and foremost, where do you draw the line and say enough is enough?



Unlike Snake, Pacman, Megaman and Sonic, Meatboy has done nothing with Nintendo in their life and has not worked with Nintendo. That there nullifies your point.

Ryu being in would allow third party companies to have more than 1 character, something that devalues the importance of Third Party characters that get in.


Snake had 2 games on Nintendo systems up to the release of brawl. I guess that counts as a deep history then.
 

StormC

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Messages
8,299
Snake is a complete and total outlier and should not be seriously considered when talking about third parties' relevance to Nintendo.

He was put in because Kojima and Sakurai are friends. That's it.
 

SuperiorYoshi87

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 11, 2014
Messages
1,458
Location
New Jersey
NNID
AVENGERxTHOR
I say we save the lamenting until AFTER the ballot....


The voting is FAR from over and the King is still looking good don't give up hope until atleast the end of this year if there's no sign of K.Rool
 

Captain Fun

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
1,464
Personally it's a little disheartening that Sakurai is using precious time and resources to bring in... a third party nobody asked for?
Ryu is the most famous fighting game character ever created. If there is another 3rd party that's worthy of appearing alongside Mario and Link, it's him.

He has nothing to do with the ballot and people should get past this illusory sense of competition. If Ryu is in, it's because of reasons wholly irrelevant to K. Rool.
 
Last edited:

Oracle_Summon

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
5,059
Snake had 2 games on Nintendo systems up to the release of brawl. I guess that counts as a deep history then.
It is not a deep history as, say, Megaman and Sonic; however, Snake had more than 2 games:

Metal Gear - NES 1987

Metal Gear Solid - Though it is stated as a Virtual Console release.

Metal Gear Ghost Babel - Game Boy Color 2000

Metal Gear Solid The Twin Snakes - Gamecube 2004

Ryu is the most famous fighting game character ever created. If there is another 3rd party that's worthy of appearing alongside Mario and Link, it's him.

He has nothing to do with the ballot and people should get past this illusory sense of competition. If Ryu is in, it's because of reasons wholly irrelevant to K. Rool.
I believe the reason people are against Ryu is because adding him in opens the flood gates of how many characters 3rd party companies have in the game. If it is true, then where do you draw the line and say enough is enough?
 

mynameisBlade

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,071
Exactly everyone : ) ^ On the bright side this news could mean we are getting MANY more characters OVERALL than we originally thought. And I think that's awesome. But again, nothing is confirmed.
That's the spirit. Ya know...if Nintendo wants to throw Ryu "THE Street Fighter" into Smash Bros and he has nothing to do with our voting LET THEM. Give us an Xbox character while your at it ;). And I am damn serious. I mean Banjo is an Xbox character right??? So would we freak out if Banjo got in? NO! I know it seems rather abrupt, this adding famous characters from everywhere type of thing, BUT Sakurai did say the following in an interview shortly after the reveal of Pac-Man: “I’m aiming to make this the number one character game in the world.” Adding Ryu makes perfect sense in this aspect as well as financially.

Source - http://www.gamestm.co.uk/interviews...-smash-bros-best-character-game-in-the-world/
 

BKupa666

Barnacled Boss
Moderator
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
7,788
Location
Toxic Tower
Disappointment that it's Roy we're getting presumably before Wolf aside, the one worry to take away is that less development time may be allocated toward ballot newcomers than toward these...others. That might or might not happen, but in the case that it does, it's our job to make sure K. Rool's the one standing atop the heap when the final vote tally is conducted. So basically, go out and find more people to get votes in (or whatever other tactic, if you so choose).

If it's any consolation, perhaps Roy is the red(-haired) meat that's being thrown to the mythical "casual voters" always referenced in relation to why we're all "so wrong about K. Rool doing well because a kajillion bazillion other voters are casual." That way, when a less memetic, more "hardcore" character like K. Rool gets in off the ballot, there's no outcry about "where's muh boy?!?!?" or "I wanted t3h ph1r3!!!!"
 
Last edited:

FalKoopa

Rainbow Waifu
BRoomer
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
32,231
Location
India/भारत
3DS FC
1650-3685-3998
Switch FC
SW-5545-7990-4793
What is most baffling to me is that Sakurai would put these files in the game, plain as day, months before they're even announced.
Well, it's not like they intended it to be hacked (though given Sakurai's trolly nature, it's hard to count out that possibility either. :p)

I think Ryu was probably Capcom's request. They do have a tendency of adding him wherever possible.

:231:
 

StormC

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Messages
8,299
I'm against Ryu because I find him boring, both as a character and as a third party addition, and wish the time that went to develop him was used on a Nintendo character, a fan favorite, or both. I'm perfectly open to being proven wrong and perhaps Ryu will be a very interesting character in the game, but I'm not optimistic.

Well, it's not like they intended it to be hacked (though given Sakurai's trolly nature, it's hard to count out that possibility either. :p)
It's 2015, Nintendo should be well aware that their games are gonna get data mined.
 
Last edited:

cybersai

Smash Ace
Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
940
What I don't get is by keeping so many Fire Emblem reps it implies they don't want to cut characters anymore. So in Smash 5 ina few years there will likely be another new FE character from the new 3DS game...and we're going to have 6 Fire Emblem characters in the next game.

So when does it end? Fire Emblem continually gets new reps every single game while Zelda, Metroid and Donkey Kong have been starving for new characters for a decade?
 

Oracle_Summon

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
5,059
What I don't get is by keeping so many Fire Emblem reps it implies they don't want to cut characters anymore. So in Smash 5 ina few years there will likely be another new FE character from the new 3DS game...and we're going to have 6 Fire Emblem characters in the next game.

So when does it end? Fire Emblem continually gets new reps every single game while Zelda, Metroid and Donkey Kong have been starving for new characters for a decade?
Not to say I personally want Roy in the game, but at least he is a Nintendo character. Let all Nintendo's franchises have playable characters and then we can think about adding more Third Party characters, especially more than 1 per Third Party company.
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
19,183
Location
An elevator
It is not a deep history as, say, Megaman and Sonic; however, Snake had more than 2 games:

Metal Gear - NES 1987

Metal Gear Solid - Though it is stated as a Virtual Console release.

Metal Gear Ghost Babel - Game Boy Color 2000

Metal Gear Solid The Twin Snakes - Gamecube 2004



I believe the reason people are against Ryu is because adding him in opens the flood gates of how many characters 3rd party companies have in the game. If it is true, then where do you draw the line and say enough is enough?

that is a lot of ryu
 

CJ Falcon

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
1,008
Location
Austin
You know, a genius idea would be to get rid of Lucina and let Roy take her place as the Marth clone. If they do that, everyone will be happy since there'd be the same number of FE characters with the stupid one being long gone.
 
Last edited:

mynameisBlade

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,071
What I don't get is by keeping so many Fire Emblem reps it implies they don't want to cut characters anymore. So in Smash 5 ina few years there will likely be another new FE character from the new 3DS game...and we're going to have 6 Fire Emblem characters in the next game.

So when does it end? Fire Emblem continually gets new reps every single game while Zelda, Metroid and Donkey Kong have been starving for new characters for a decade?
They are saving the best for last. We are all in for many more surprises I think. How can we NOT get a new DK character is what I am assuming. We HAVE to at this point. DK is too important of a franchise for that to not happen. DLC is the reason we haven't "YET". I bet anything.
 
Top Bottom